This BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38152765 contains these two paragraphs:
'Mr Trump has vowed as president to institute an "extreme vetting" programme to limit immigration to the US from countries that are believed to be at a heightened risk of terrorism.
He had previously called for a "total and complete shutdown" on Muslim immigration to the US.'
Is that last sentence 100% accurate or deliberately misleading?
This BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38151669 includes analysis from Gordon Corera that omits the news that the perpetrator of the Ohio attack said this:
"By Allah, we will not let you sleep unless you give peace to the Muslims. You will not celebrate or enjoy any holiday," he wrote before the attack. "Btw, every single Muslim who disapproves of my actions is a sleeper cell, waiting for a signal. I am warning you Oh America."
Presumably this attack is still 'nothing to do with Islam' so far as the BBC are concerned.
That rather bland headline to the BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-38152316 could mean that the employee made some anti Islamist comment but if that was the case then this story would be bigger news on the BBC. No, this is a story of Islamist penetration of a major intelligence agency.
Some questions arise from the BBC report, questions that the institutionally Pro Islam BBC won't ask.
'A BfV spokesman did not confirm a report in Die Welt newspaper that the man was suspected of planning a bomb attack on the BfV's Cologne office... '
Did the spokesman deny the report or just not confirm it?
' The man is reported to be of Spanish origin and a convert to Islam.'
No question missing here, just here we go again.
'The BfV said the suspect, who now has German citizenship, had previously "behaved inconspicuously".'
Which makes this all the more worrying surely. How many more Muslims are currently behaving inconspicuously but could start planning terrorist attacks in the future?
'BfV did not confirm which part of the intelligence agency the accused worked in, though German news magazine Der Spiegel said the man was recently hired to observe the Islamist situation in Germany.'
I wonder how many more experts on Islamists are in fact islamists themselves.
'It also reported that the man's family had no knowledge of his conversion, which the publication said took place in 2014.'
Two questions here, what conversion took place, is there an Islamist religion that requires conversion from being a Muslim?
'There are an estimated 40,000 Islamists in Germany, including 9,200 ultra-conservative Islamists known as Salafists, the head of the BfV told Reuters news agency earlier in November.'
How many were there of these islamists pre Angela Merkel's opening of the borders to 'refugees' from Islamic countries?
Do you agree that these are questions that an independent news reporting organisation would raise?
'Trump won't commit to accepting election results
Chris Wallace asked Donald Trump if he will accept the election results and he said "I will tell you at the time." Hillary Clinton responded to Trump's rigged elections claims by calling his remark "horrifying.'
Bill Still on what Stein, Clinton and Soros might be up to.
Which is why Donald Trump will not be allowed to become President of the United States of America, they will do their best to stop him.
As this BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38126899 explores, the Remoaners are at it again. Are there any lengths that they won't go to to stop the democratic result of the EU referendum?
'Conservative MP and Brexiteer Dominic Raab said: "Rather than coming up with new legal wheezes to try and frustrate the will of the people, these lawyers should be working with us to make a success of Brexit."
The public have spoken; we should respect the result and get on with it, not try to find new hurdles that undermine the democratic process."'
Did you really think that the New World Order would allow Donald Trump to beat Hillary Clinton?
The fix is on its way...
BBC approving article here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38118852
Surely the word 'correctly' is missing from that BBC headline.
The report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-38118739 that follows that headline only hints at the truth of the vicious dictatorship of Fidel Castro right at the end of the report when the BBC admit through clenched teeth that:
'He established a one-party state, with hundreds of supporters of the Batista government executed. Political opponents have been imprisoned, the independent media suppressed. Thousands of Cubans have fled into exile.'
Otherwise the BBC reporting of the death of the former brutal Cuban dictator is the hagiography that one would expect from a pro socialist media outlet.
'Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has warned that he will let hundreds of thousands of migrants travel on to Europe if pushed by the EU.
He was reacting to a non-binding vote by the European Parliament to freeze talks on EU membership for Turkey.'
More here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-38103375
But remember that there's no chance of Turkey joining the EU this century, do they think we're idiots?
I wonder how many of the 'experts' shown in this video are now telling us why Donald Trump can't succeed as US President? Why are you listening to them?
I know that I've posted this video before but with every day that passes it seems more relevant.
Could this really be the future of education if the Social Justice Warriors win?
Oh for a British politician willing to take on biased reporters in the same way that Donald Trump does here
"Sorry but don't you think it's time to stop all this propaganda"
If only more politicians had the guts to call out the BBC on its propagandising.
Of course 50 million Americans aren't racists but the BBC still cling to that narrative
Whenever you feel at all depressed, watch this video and your spirits will be lifted.
I especially enjoy the way The Young Turks turn on Hillary Clinton as the worst candidate. If she was so bad why were you supporting her?
Sarah Palin was viciously destroyed by the mainstream media. Watch this video to see the real Sarah Palin, not the idiot she was portrayed as, is she?
Thanks Angela Merkel and others, your idiotic policy of importing young disaffected mostly men from Somalia is really helping destroy Western Europe.
Having watched that I'm slightly less disgusted than I was yesterday.
Oddly the BBC haven't given this news any prominence, after all they've the doom and gloom post Donald Trump Presidential Election victory narrative to push.
This news sucks, I and many others supported Donald Trump because we wanted Hillary Clinton investigated and tried for her role in Pay To Play, her email server, deleting emails and every other allegedly illegal act she committed.
This news had better not be true...
Milo Yiannopoulos vs Will Young on Newsnight from November 2013. It would seem that Milo Yiannopoulos isn't a natural blonde, he dyes his hair!
The way Milo Yiannopoulos spanks the BBC journalist James Cook when he asks Milo if he's a white nationalist should be studied by every right of centre person who's about to be interviewed by the hideously left wing biased BBC.
Will Tim Allen be joining Kanye West in hospital? The Hollywood elite don't like pro Donald Trump views from one of their own.
Kanye West makes some pro Trump comments and the next thing we know he's in hospital for "assessment".
Meanwhile the BBC report on this http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38060498 manages to avoid mentioning Kanye West's pro Donald Trump remarks, we can't have people going against the BBC Donald Trump is a racist narrative, can we?
Is something being hidden?
This BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38060432 on plans to try to stop foreign nationals using the NHS without paying for the service to which they are not entitled.
Of course the BBC frame the debate on the grounds that help their case that the BBC should be for everyone. Thus pushing the idea that some British people may have trouble proving that they're British. More troublingly the BBC end the report with this:
'But the committee heard that according to official figures released earlier this year, in 2014-15 £674 million was charged to the UK government for the care of British citizens abroad, but the amount charged for the care of EEA nationals in British hospitals was only £49m.'
Oddly the BBC find no space to inform the British taxpayer who pay for the NHS, as well as the biased BBC, how much money is spent treating non EEA individuals. For a start I'd like to know how much is spent on maternity care for Nigerians and Ghanaians who arrive at Heathrow Airport well past the six months pregnancy they're certified as being and then have a premature birth paid for by the British NHS.
Here's http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3214709/African-mum-quintuplets-let-145-000-NHS-bill-Health-tourist-came-UK-birth-says-no-one-s-asked-pay.html just one example:
'Bimbo Ayelabola, 37, had to have complex caesarean section while in UK
The operation and neo-natal care for five babies cost in excess of £145,000
She returned to her native Lagos where she is successful a make-up artist
It's emerged that Homerton Hospital, east London, won't chase her for bill '
Remember that a Government commissioned report in 2013 put the cost of treating non entitled foreigners on the NHS as high as £2billion. Also remember that experts said that even this was an underestimate because the vast majority of overseas patients are never identified by hospitals.
It's odd that the BBC omit such salient facts. I say odd but I mean entirely predicable.
"Trump kept saying, 'We're in a room of liars, the deceitful dishonest media who got it all wrong.' He addressed everyone in the room calling the media dishonest, deceitful liars. He called out Jeff Zucker by name and said everyone at CNN was a liar, and CNN was [a] network of liars," the source said."
Trump didn't say [NBC reporter] Katy Tur by name, but talked about an NBC female correspondent who got it wrong, then he referred to a horrible network correspondent who cried when Hillary lost who hosted a debate – which was Martha Raddatz who was also in the room."
More here http://nypost.com/2016/11/21/donald-trumps-media-summit-was-a-f-ing-firing-squad/
Of course Donald Trump is quite correct, the vast bulk of the US mainstream media was hideously pro Hillary Clinton.
Oh for a British Prime Minister willing to take on the bias of the BBC the BBC is not an impartial reporter of news but rather a left wing campaigning organisation.
Facts you won't hear on the vile BBC.
An Englishman, a Scotsman and an Irish man went into a bar but the Engliahman wanted to leave so they all had to.
England comprises approximately 83.9% of the total UK populationSo one could argue that the population of 88.7% of the UK voted for Brexit and 11.3% voted to Remain. One could argue that but then one would be as wrong as the originator of the joke.
Scotland comprises approximately 8.4% of the total UK population
Wales comprises approximately 4.8% of the total UK population
Nothern Ireland comprises approximately 2.9% of the total UK population
Bill Still was right on the money re the US Presidential Election opinion polling realities. Is he correct about this too?
Democracy?
My attention wandered when one of them used the word 'deplorable', that was a sign of where he was coming from.
' Labour deputy leader Tom Watson has led a delegation of the party's MPs to visit Israel's Yad Vashem memorial to the victims of the Holocaust after Jeremy Corbyn turned down an invitation to go himself.
Mr Corbyn was originally invited by the leader of the Israeli Labour Party Isaac Herzog in the wake of the row which erupted earlier this year over anti-Semitic comments by former London mayor Ken Livingstone.'
I have absolutely no comment about this.
The BBC have a new crusade, word chosen deliberately, this time it's against 'fake news'.
The PM show included a long piece explaining how 'fake news' could have affected the result of the US Presidential Election.
The mainstream media have realised that they have lost their control of the agenda and thus the minds of the electorate. The incessant pro left of centre propagandising by the BBC and others has been effectively countered by the new Alt Right media and the mainstream media have decided to fight back. Their chosen ground is 'fake news' but a cursory look at sights such as mine, biasedbbc.org and isthebbcbiased would show you how factual the BBC really is.
The Conservative election victory, Brexit and now Donald Trump's victory have left the mainstream media bruised and angry, this sort of result cannot be allowed to happen again. The mainstream media have chosen the weapon that they have chosen to ensure that their views will prevail in the future. We must fight them tooth and nail. Our democracy requires a plurality of views, the mainstream media does not provide that.
What are the differences between what Bill Clinton said in his 1995 State of the Union Address and what Donald Trump says now?
I see very little difference.
Was Bill Clinton called a racist in 1995? Did the BBC react with outrage in 1995? Why the hate for Donald Trump in 2016?
That BBC headline is missing the key word 'illegal'. There's plenty of room for it and its addition would explain the policy rather better. But the BBC isn't interested in dispassionately explaining policy, it's more interested in increasing opposition to Donald Trump.
More from the biased BBC here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-37969112
Pretty much on the money, albeit from a left wing mea culpa point of view.
The BBC is cheerfully propagating the myth that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote and thus should be the next US President.
This is wrong for at least three reasons:
First because the electoral college method is well understood and the method used in the USA for Presidential Elections.
Second because the number of votes counted is not the same as the number of votes cast. This is because some states stop counting votes once the result would no longer be affected by the remaining uncounted votes.
Third because there are still a lot of uncounted absentee ballots. Two thirds of these are usually Republican votes.
However since when did inconvenient facts have a place on the BBC? The BBC is not an unbiased news reporting organisation, it is instead a campaigning body. The UK government MUST take action against the instructional bias of the BBC.
Senator Trey Gowdy as Attorney General would really put the wind up Hillary Clinton. I've been pushing this for quite a while now as Trey Gowdy is a great speaker, has a forensic mind and really understands what the Hillary Clinton affair is all about.
MSNBC convincing themselves...
Someone at MSNBC has got close to realising what the mainstream media got wrong. Of course the problem has being going on for much longer than this Presidential Election campaign. The problem runs much deeper than just opposing Donald Trump. Much of the mainstream media in the USA and elsewhere including the BBC, have ceased to be journalists and instead have become propagandists.
With proud thanksgiving, a mother for her children,
England mourns for her dead across the sea.
Flesh of her flesh they were, spirit of her spirit,
Fallen in the cause of the free.Solemn the drums thrill: Death august and royal
Sings sorrow up into immortal spheres.
There is music in the midst of desolation
And a glory that shines upon our tears.They went with songs to the battle, they were young,
Straight of limb, true of eye, steady and aglow.
They were staunch to the end against odds uncounted,
They fell with their faces to the foe.They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them.They mingle not with their laughing comrades again;
They sit no more at familiar tables of home;
They have no lot in our labour of the day-time;
They sleep beyond England's foam.But where our desires are and our hopes profound,
Felt as a well-spring that is hidden from sight,
To the innermost heart of their own land they are known
As the stars are known to the Night;As the stars that shall be bright when we are dust,
Moving in marches upon the heavenly plain,
As the stars that are starry in the time of our darkness,
To the end, to the end, they remain.
How did Donald Trump get elected? This video shows Donald Trump was quite impressive in the 1980s and 1990s, even the 2000s, but less so now.
Still he's a better option than Hillary Clinton. The Democrats could have won with almost anyone other than Hillary Clinton but the party machine wanted her.
This Breitbart piece http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/10/huffington-post-dnc-staffer-screams-donna-brazile-helping-elect-donald-trump/ is not that interesting except for what it reveals about the brainwashed left.
'"You are part of the problem," he continued, blaming Brazile for clearing the path for Trump's victory by siding with Clinton early on. "You and your friends will die of old age and I'm going to die from climate change. You and your friends let this happen, which is going to cut 40 years off my life expectancy."'
Does this DNC Staffer really believe that his life expectancy will be cut by 40 years as a result of climate change and if so why? Years of brainwashing by the left in education, the media and the majority of politicians have resulted in a large number of mainly young people who are scared of something that just isn't going to happen.
Milo Yiannopoulos is a fabulously 'dangerous faggot' and talks such sense. The problem is that's he's too good a debater for the BBC to risk interviewing.
Hillary Clinton cried 'inconsolably' : oh dear, how sad, never mind!
Watch this video, especially from 2:47 to 4:01 and you might begin to understand what the US public saw in Donald Trump. That and why the US mainstream media is so hated.
Now, where is the British politician with the balls to tell the truth about the equally biased BBC? Where is the British politician to cut the campaigning, biased and dangerous BBC down to size?
The almost always excellent Craig at isthebbcbiased has carried out some analysis of the BBC's post Donald Trump victory coverage. Here's an excerpt:
'That discussion followed a joint interview between Jennifer Lim of Republican Women for Hillary and Hillary supporting Democrat Lisa Osborne Ross of APCO Worldwide Public Affairs - i.e. two anti-Trump guests, one from each of the main parties.
Later came an interview with Frank Luntz, the anti-Trump Republican pollster (who today said that he no longer feels part of Trump's Republican Party) and, later still, an interview with the anti-Trump Jonathan Freedland of the Guardian who pushed the 'racist/sexist' angle on Trump and made the link to the made backward-looking/racist' comments about the Brexit vote.
Finally, with two minutes left, Fiona Bruce introduced us to the "right-wing" Raheem Kassam of Breitbart. That was the programme's 'balance'. He got 36 seconds. (Jonathan Freedland's had previously got 79 seconds).This - sandwiched between The One Showand Watchdog - was the only news special (outside of the main bulletins) that most BBC One viewers would have seen. That it was so utterly skewed against the winner of the US presidential election ought not to do the BBC's reputation much good.'
You can read more here http://isthebbcbiased.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/snapshot-i.html and experience anti Trump bias all over the BBC.
This tweet from Huffington Post is guaranteed to bring a smile to my face.
Maybe the mainstream media would have done well to read this article from Zero Hedge http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-23/new-podesta-email-exposes-dem-playbook-rigging-polls-through-oversamples before taking the polls at face value.
'Now, for all of you out there who still aren't convinced that the polls are "adjusted", we present to you the following Podesta email, leaked earlier today, that conveniently spells out, in detail, exactly how to "manufacture" the desired data. The email starts out with a request for recommendations on "oversamples for polling" in order to "maximize what we get out of our media polling."
I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling.
The email even includes a handy, 37-page guide with the following poll-rigging recommendations. In Arizona, over sampling of Hispanics and Native Americans is highly recommended:Research, microtargeting & polling projects- Over-sample Hispanics- Use Spanish language interviewing. (Monolingual Spanish-speaking voters are among the lowest turnout Democratic targets)- Over-sample the Native American populationFor Florida, the report recommends "consistently monitoring" samples to makes sure they're "not too old" and "has enough African American and Hispanic voters." Meanwhile, "independent" voters in Tampa and Orlando are apparently more dem friendly so the report suggests filling up independent quotas in those cities first.'
'Donald Trump has selected one of the best-known climate skeptics to lead his U.S. EPA transition team, according to two sources close to the campaign.
Myron Ebell, director of the Center for Energy and Environment at the conservative Competitive Enterprise Institute, is spearheading Trump's transition plans for EPA, the sources said.'
More here https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trump-picks-top-climate-skeptic-to-lead-epa-transition
Quite warms the cockles of my heart especially as the BBC will be so upset by this reality check.
'The election of the Hard-Right racist neoliberal Fascist Trump is literally the biggest disaster for the world – and indeed elsewhere – since that literally dark day in June when a literally tiny handful of 17,410,742 Far-Right bigots – who, let it never be forgotten, represent absolutely nobody but themselves – viciously voted against Our EU!The totally sickening and disgraceful behaviour of these vicious voters – whether in the US or in the UK – is literally appalling! HOW DARE THEY, friends!I for one, friends, do not remotely accept this so-called result, any more than I accept the vicious vote against Our EU. So-called "democracy" is all very well and good in theory, but not when it degenerates in to Mob Rule, which is clearly the case here.'
More here https://supportourjeremy.wordpress.com/2016/11/09/the-election-of-that-far-right-neoliberal-racist-fascist-the-widely-hated-trump-is-literally-the-biggest-disaster-to-hit-the-world-and-indeed-elsewhere-since-the-hate-vote-for-hard-right-brexit/ I think it's satire but it's hard to tell these days. It does seem to be what I imagine the thoughts of various Jeremy Corbyn supporters and BBC journalists think.
If this was a boxing match, either the referee would have stopped the fight or Jennifer Rubin's corner would have thrown in the towel.
Of course on the BBC a reporter would have just accepted Jennifer Rubin's claims, agreed with them and summarised for the host in the studio that Trump is a racist, Bill O'Reilly is biased and that all American voters should VOTE HILLARY.
Watch this video and ask yourself how many BBC reporters, journalists, editors etc know any Trump supporters, Brexit voters or even Conservatives.
The disconnect between the people and the media and opinion formers is huge in the UK and the USA. The disconnect means that the mainstream media including the BBC can't see what's happening in the country. If all your friends, family and colleagues support Hillary Clinton, want to stay in the EU and vote Labour, Lib Dem, SNP or Green then why would you believe that other views have much support.
Thankfully this disconnect has happened at a time when people don't have to consume the news that the mainstream media including the BBC pump out. The Internet has made alternative views easier to find and people are finding out what the mainstream media including the BBC are hiding from them. The BBC barely reported on the latest Wikileaks revelations but people found them on YouTube etc and educated themselves.
The BBC's upset is so much fun to hear today. Maybe if they'd listened to real Americans rather than the Washington elite, Hollywood celebrities and New York rich folk then they wouldn't be so surprised.
Some decent analysis of the US Presidential Election result, far better than the weeping and wailing on the BBC.
Care to retract that over-confident comment Mr Barack Hussein Obama?
You'd need a heart of stone not to appreciate that piece of video. MSNBC have been almost as pro Hillary Clinton as the BBC.
It looks as though the late counts in Michigan MAY be turning the result there. Donald Trump's lead is smaller than the uncounted votes and those votes are in Democrat strongholds. It looks like too big a lead but if just a few extra Democrat votes can be found then it might be close enough for a recount and then who knows what chicanery might be tried.
You can keep an eye on this at many sites but the New York Times stats are quite fun to watch change
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/forecast/president/michigan
So was Julian Assange wrong?
Will the election result not be allowed to stand?
How will the US Democrats and their fellow travellers in the mainstream media manage to overturn the result?
Maybe a traumatised SJW will launch a legal challenge based upon some spurious grounds.
Maybe a traumatised lefty will take it upon themselves to assassinate Donald Trump, for the good of America?
I get the strangest feeling that there are a few more twists to come before inauguration day in January.
Could Hillary Clinton still win this Presidential Election? It's possible, look out for large late Democrat votes in battleground states that have Democrat majorities and control in the big cities. There the dead can still vote, often more than once each!
It looks like Donald Trump will win the US Presidential Election, so the next big question is what aspect of his victory will the Democrats and their fellow travellers in the mainstream media, including the BBC find 'questionable' in order to complain about the result?
If Trump wins in the Electoral College but not the popular vote then expect "it's unfair" to be the cry.
If Donald Trump wins a usually Democrat state by a tiny margin expect tears about him getting all that state's votes, even though that's the rule (in 48 states) and it's worked in favour of Democrat presidents in the past.
Above all expect James Comey to get blamed for derailing Hillary Clinton's campaign by reopening the investigation two weeks before polling and only closing it again two days before polling.
CNN at least reported the facts, depressing for them though they may be. The BBC is still in full VOTE HILLARY mode.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/elections/map?poll=sm-lv-cps
Fascinating...
Our final snapshot of the national popular vote gives Hillary Clinton a six percentage point lead over Donald Trump, 47 to 41 percent, with 6 percent for Libertarian Gary Johnson and 3 percent for Green Party candidate Jill Stein.Clinton's lead has been remarkably steady during the Fall campaign. As reported by our partners at NBC News, "Clinton has not only maintained a lead over the Republican nominee since the end of July, but the margin of her lead has been between 4 to 6 percentage points since the second week of September."That six point lead in the popular vote translates into a lopsided Clinton advantage in the all-important Electoral College. Our final snapshot of voter preferences in all 50 states plus DC, based on more than 74,186 interviews conducted during the final week of the campaign, gives Clinton a lead of three percentage points or better in 21 states. That's a total of 257 electoral votes, which is thirteen shy of the 270 needed to win. Although Trump leads by three percentage points or better in 23 states, they earn him just 188 electoral votes.While the race is closer in seven states – classified as "toss-ups" colored in grey on our map – SurveyMonkey's tracking has given Clinton modest but consistent numerical leads in five states, two of which alone (Florida and Michigan) would assure an Electoral College victory. Clinton would pick up a total of 45 more electoral votes if she were to win both.Three more states – Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada, representing another 33 electoral votes–have been genuine toss-ups in our tracking, with very narrow margins that have not consistently favored either candidate.
http://hurryupharry.org/ has been inaccessible for at least 12 hours, does anybody know why?
'At least 20 Islamists have joined the Germany's armed forces in order to gain detailed knowledge of explosives and weapons, the country's intelligence service has found.
The military counterintelligence service (MAD) says a further 60 recruits are being investigated over suspicious links to Islamic State sympathisers, with fears "sleeper" agents could even turn their guns on comrades.'
More here http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/11/07/intelligence-islamists-joining-army-get-weapons-explosives-training/ but not a mention on the BBC.
I'd have challenged her false assertions about Israel but then I might not have kept my cool as well as this US shop owner.
I've only watched the first 30 seconds or so of this video so I've no idea what comes thereafter but that initial part contains a great conspiracy theory!
Some facts and questions arising from Rudy Giuliani that the likes of the BBC just aren't interested in pursuing.
I went to bed last night just as the news broke that the FBI would not be pursuing any further the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails. The BBC were ecstatic...
One fact not being reported by the VOTE HILLARY BBC or indeed much of the equally pro Hillary Clinton mainstream media is this:
'RNC chairman Reince Priebus is making it known that the FBI's public corruption investigation of the Clinton Foundation is ongoing.
"The FBI's findings from its criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton's secret email server were a damning and unprecedented indictment of her judgment. The FBI found evidence Clinton broke the law, that she placed highly classified national security information at risk and repeatedly lied to the American people about her reckless conduct," Priebus said in a statement provided to Breitbart News.'
'Radical revenue raising proposals by Befordshire Police and Crime Commissioner means all drivers breaking the speed limit will be finedAll drivers who travel at more than 70 miles per hour on the motorway face being fined under radical new proposals being considered.Speed cameras would be switched on permanently across stretches of the motorway network catching everyone who exceeded the limit.Motorists would then be forced to pay a £100 fine as well as having points added to their licence, or could opt instead to attend a speed awareness course, costing £90.But rather than being used to improve road safety, the controversial plan is intended to raise millions of pounds in revenue for the police.'
'The introduction of smart motorways has seen a big rise in speeding fines, figures obtained by the BBC suggest.Between 2010 and 2015, fixed penalties issued on smart sections increased from 2,000 to 52,000, according to data collated by the BBC's The One Show.There are more than 236 miles of smart motorways in England, which use the hard shoulder and variable speed limits to control traffic flow.The government says they are used to improve capacity, not generate revenue.'
'A Jewish man has said that a passerby "deliberately tripped" him, called him a "Jew" and a "four by two" (Cockney rhyming slang for a Jew) and told him that he knew where he lived. The incident took place yesterday afternoon at around 15:00 in Stanmore in London.'
Earlier this morning we wrote about the obvious sampling bias in the latest ABC / Washington Post poll that showed a 12-point national advantage for Hillary. Like many of the recent polls from Reuters, ABC and The Washington Post, this latest poll included a 9-point sampling bias toward registered democrats.
"METHODOLOGY – This ABC News poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone Oct. 20-22, 2016, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 874 likely voters. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points, including the design effect. Partisan divisions are 36-27-31 percent, Democrats - Republicans - Independents."
...
Now, for all of you out there who still aren't convinced that the polls are "adjusted", we present to you the following Podesta email, leaked earlier today, that conveniently spells out, in detail, exactly how to "manufacture" the desired data. The email starts out with a request for recommendations on "oversamples for polling" in order to "maximize what we get out of our media polling."
The email even includes a handy, 37-page guide with the following poll-rigging recommendations. In Arizona, over sampling of Hispanics and Native Americans is highly recommended:I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling.
For Florida, the report recommends "consistently monitoring" samples to makes sure they're "not too old" and "has enough African American and Hispanic voters." Meanwhile, "independent" voters in Tampa and Orlando are apparently more dem friendly so the report suggests filling up independent quotas in those cities first.Research, microtargeting & polling projects
- Over-sample Hispanics
- Use Spanish language interviewing. (Monolingual Spanish-speaking voters are among the lowest turnout Democratic targets)
- Over-sample the Native American population
Meanwhile, it's suggested that national polls over sample "key districts / regions" and "ethnic" groups "as needed."- Consistently monitor the sample to ensure it is not too old, and that it has enough African American and Hispanic voters to reflect the state.
- On Independents: Tampa and Orlando are better persuasion targets than north or south Florida (check your polls before concluding this). If there are budget questions or oversamples, make sure that Tampa and Orlando are included first.
...- General election benchmark, 800 sample, with potential over samples in key districts/regions
- Benchmark polling in targeted races, with ethnic over samples as needed
- Targeting tracking polls in key races, with ethnic over samples as needed
And that's how you manufacture a 12-point lead for your chosen candidate and effectively chill the vote of your opposition. '
'Four people were injured when a car mounted a pavement and ploughed into a group of pedestrians.A woman was seriously injured in the hit and run in Humberstone Gate, Leicester, shortly before 17:00 GMT, police said.Eyewitnesses told the BBC they saw a car with a smashed windscreen being driven "erratically" after the crash.Others said the car appeared to have been deliberately driven at the group of pedestrians.'
'When Israel resident Jack de Lowe wanted to buy a wing mirror for his Ford Focus earlier this month, he finally tracked down the part to a garage in Oldham, northern England.Although thousands of miles from where he lives, he was interested in buying a used mirror, not a new one, and Ford Parts Oldham seemed the most cost-effective option.He was expecting to pay about £40 for the mirror but he was instead quoted the vastly inflated figure of £1,025.When he emailed the firm again to query the amount, he received the following response (all spelling errors contained in it are deliberately reproduced below):"As we do not recognise the state of israel we do not ship to such non exitent ountries hwoever delivery to palestin can be arranged at a sensible price."The message wasn't signed.News website Heat Street rang Ford Parts Oldham for confirmation that it had really sent the message:The manager and owner of the business, Mursal Israr, admitted he had sent it personally.He said he was justified in doing so because it is his right not to do business with an individual if he doesn't want to.
He said: "I sent the email myself…We don't recognise the illegal occupation of Israel. We don't believe in the illegal occupation of what is going on there and there's innocent Muslims and people are getting killed there on a daily basis so we don't wish to do any business with the state of Israel whatsoever because we don't recognise the state of Israel."'