'Poor Andy Murray, being ranked third in the world he has to beat Nadal and Federer in order to win a Grand Slam tournament'; so goes one argument as to why Andy Murray is finding it so hard to win a Tennis Grand Slam. Well David Ferrer beat Rafael Nadal in one Australian Open's Quarter Final setting up a semi-final with Andy Murray and now Novak Djokovic has beaten defending champion Roger Federer in the first semi-final. So can Andy Murray win a Grand Slam when he doesn't have to face either Nadal or Federer? Or is this like Tim Henman who we were told couldn't win Wimbledon because of Pete Sampras and then when Sampras lost early (oddly to a 19 year old Roger Federer), Tim Henman lost to Goran Ivanišević in the semi-finals.
Is Andy Murray a choker, or is this his time?
Is Andy Murray a choker, or is this his time?
No comments:
Post a Comment
By clicking "Publish your comment" you indemnify NotaSheepMaybeAGoat and accept full legal responsibility for your comments