In the BBC coverage of this story and Harriet Harman's online statement I can see no mention of this point: In a letter
to the Home Office in April 1978, the NCCL argued that child pornography
should not be banned as “indecent” unless it could be shown that the child
depicted had been harmed. The NCCL official who wrote this letter was its
legal officer, Harriet
Harman.
Am I correct, did she sign that letter? Why?
Am I correct, did she sign that letter? Why?
No comments:
Post a Comment
By clicking "Publish your comment" you indemnify NotaSheepMaybeAGoat and accept full legal responsibility for your comments