- Complaint type: Radio
- Location: England
- Radio station: Radio 4
- Programme title: Today
- Transmission date: 10/06/2011
- Complaint category: Bias
- Complaint summary: Deliberate omission of relevant information form a report
- Full complaint: The piece just after the 8:30 news explained that Israel trebled in size after the 1967 war. It then went on to say thus the idea of exchanging land for peace was born and that that was the way forward. The piece did not explain that Israel exchanged the Sinai peninsular with Egypt in return for peace in 1982. Thus any listener who did not know the history might think that Israel was still that much larger than it was pre-1967 and was still over treble the size it was in 1967, when it is not. Was this a deliberate omission? If not why was this extremely relevant fact omitted?
- Receive a reply: Yes
- Contacted us before: Yes
- Complaint related to previous contact: No
- Title: Mr
- First name: NotaSheep
- Surname: MaybeaGoat
- Email address: notasheepmaybeagoat@gmail.com
- Under 13: No
I am not a sheep, I have my own mind
I have had enough of being told what and how to think
Whilst we are still allowed the remnants of free speech,
I will speak out.
I also reserve the right to discuss less controversial matters should I feel the urge.
Pages
▼
Well, good luck Mr. Goat.
ReplyDeleteThis is a tricky one for the BBC.
The facts are the facts. Either they know them and are being dishonest or they don't and are incompetent.
Teams of Beeboids will be working on a form of words for their response which you may receive within the next 6 months.
Why the question "are you under 13 ?" I wonder ? No obvious significance , unless the BBC believe it to be the age of consent.
Isn't the point that Kevin Connolly's report is about the question of whether or not Israel will return to 1967 borders, therefore rendering any mention of exchanges with Egypt in 1982 an utterly irrelevant misleading, even unimportant aside? The size isn't important, it's the significance of 1967 that matters.
ReplyDeleteNo Goldie, that is not the point. The clear impression given was that Israel was over three times larger than now than it 'should' be on 1967 borders. This is not the case and that is the very important point.
ReplyDeleteAnother point is that the BBC is either ignorant of the history of Israel or lying about it.
ReplyDelete