'A question the American Physical Society panel will address is one we ask repeatedly: Why wasn't the current global temperature stasis, with no discernible change in the past 15 years, not predicted by any of the climate models used by the IPCC, part of the United Nations?More at Investors.com but not on the warmist BBC.
The APS announcement lists among its questions to be answered: "How long must the stasis persist before there would be a firm declaration of a problem with the models?"
And at the APS, "Climate Change Statement Review." In a nod to the likelihood that nature, not man, calls the shots, another APS audit question asks the panel: "What do you see as the likelihood of solar influences beyond TSI (total solar irradiance)? Is it coincidence that the stasis has occurred during the weakest solar cycle (i.e., sunspot activity) in about a century?"'
Sopel Tweets Ten Times Since X Departure
4 hours ago
2 comments:
A question the American Physical Society panel will address is one we ask repeatedly: Why wasn't the current global temperature stasis, with no discernible change in the past 15 years, not predicted by any of the climate models used by the IPCC, part of the United Nations?
You have used a double negative, and effectively asked the question:
"Why didn't the IPCC ignore the warming pause?"
To which, of course, the answer is that they did...
I have just quoted from Investors.com. I agree that that sentence is poorly constructed but the meaning is clear.
Post a Comment