StatCounter

Showing posts with label British Airways. Show all posts
Showing posts with label British Airways. Show all posts

Friday, 12 December 2014

Airline Boss Sorry Over Daughter's Nut Row but better than British Airways

'Korean Air's Chairman Cho Yang-ho told reporters the 40-year-old's behaviour was "foolish" and that he regrets he did not raise her better.

The row happened after Cho Hyun-ah, who was travelling in first class, was offered macadamia nuts in a bag and not on a plate.'

British Airways don't even serve Macadamia nuts any more.

Tuesday, 31 December 2013

I'm switching to Malaysia Airlines



Malaysia Airlines have banned under12s from the upper deck of their Airbus 380s.

Please British Airways do the same for the upper deck of 747s and one cabin of each class.


Meanwhile WestJet almost got my vote to, but it was an April's Fool



Thursday, 25 July 2013

Celebrating Ramadan with a little Jew-hatred

I have read several articles in the run up to and during the start of Ramadan telling of the ways that normal Muslim families relax in the evenings after a hard day fasting. The BBC have been big on family meals and even British Airways' HighLife magazine managed a puff piece on Egyptian Ramadan soap operas. What none of the mainstream media has yet mentioned is the TV series Khaybar.

This year many Arab TV satellite channels are airing a series called Khaybar, referring to the Muslim massacre of the Jews of the town of that name in northwestern Arabia in 628 CE. After the attack, some Muslims, including Muhammad, took surviving women as wives. The Muslim conquerors charged the Jews a 50 percent tax on their crops and in 637, after Muhammad’s death, the Caliph Omar expelled the remaining Jews from Khaybar.

Does the name Khaybar ring a bell?  It should, it's featured on this blog before. In Islamic tradition, the chant “Khaybar Khaybar, ya yahud, Jaish Muhammad, sa yahud,” which means, “Jews, remember Khaybar, the army of Muhammad is returning,” is used as a battle cry when attacking Jews or Israelis. It was chanted on the Mavi Marmara Gaza flotilla ship in May 2010.


This new Khaybar retelling deals with the relationship between the Jews and the Arab tribes of Medina as well as between the Jews of Medina and Khaybar. One Arab media outlet described the film as demonstrating the Jews’ “hostility toward others, their treacherous nature, and their repeated betrayals.”

The plot deals with Jews asking Miqdad, an Arab warrior, to fight for them; he refuses to kill women and children and is sent to prison. Another episode, based on Islamic tradition, involves a Jewish woman whose father and brother were killed by Muslims and who tries to get revenge by attempting to poison the prophet.

The film was produced by Echo Media, a Qatari company and has or will air on channels such as Dubai TV, Dream TV (Egypt), Al-Iraqiyya TV, Algerian Channel 3, Atlas TV (Algeria), Qatar TV and UAE TV.

The actors in this serial know what it is about. Sameh al-Sereity, one of the main actors in the show, plays Muhammad ibn Maslamah, the bodyguard of the prophet Muhammad and he told an Egyptian newspaper the show portrays the evolution of Jews’ hatred of others.
“The hostility between us and the Jews still exists. The hatred is ingrained. Neither Egyptians nor Arabs need this show to justify their hatred of Zionism. The existing struggles between us provide the simplest proof of this,”
Another actor, Ahmad Abd al-Halim, said:
“I play one of the Jewish characters, who demonstrates the behavior of the Jewish human being. All he thinks about is accumulating money.”
The show’s screenwriter, Yusri al-Gindi, said in an interview with Al Jazeera about the series:
“The Jews are the Jews. They still act according to their nature, despite the passing generations. They corrupt any society in which they live, and therefore no regime can protect them with any contract or agreement.

The crisis in the Arab world offers the best proof of this, and this is where the show gets its current relevance.”
Here's some video of the actors and others associated with the series discussing the Jews.




Ramadan specials like Khaibar are designed to remind large numbers of Arab viewers, every day for a month, that their Jewish neighbours are plotting their destruction. In 2005 a Lebanese TV series titled The Diaspora Arabs featured a scene in which Jews slaughtered a Christian child for their secret matzah ingredient, the blood of Christians - the blood libel that I have blogged about before as living on in many Muslim majority countries.

Ramadan is supposed to give observant Muslims a month of spiritual reflection, self-restraint, and an opportunity to give to charity. Yet too often Ramadan also offers another dose of unchallenged hatred of Jews. These planted seeds of Jewish hatred are bearing the fruit of anti-Semitism, anti-Semitism that is all too often the main expression of Muslim identity in the 21st century.


So why have the BBC not been outraged by this, or previous, vile pieces of Ramadan television? Does their Middle East team not know about it? In which case they are clearly incompetent. Does their Middle East team know about it but consider it uninteresting or irrelevant? Does their Middle East team maybe consider this programme to be fair comment?

Anti-Semitism is rife and accepted as normal, indeed correct, in most of the Middle East and indeed the wider Muslim world. However to point this out in the west is considered Islamophobic. It's a sick, sick, world.


Friday, 2 November 2012

Snakes on a Plane is nothing, now there's Hobbits, Elves, Dwarves, Orcs and more on a plane

Air New Zealand have added some fun to their onboard safety briefing...

Was that Peter Jackson at 1:40?

A question, if it's OK for Business Class passengers on Air New Zealand to choose their seat back position for takeoff and landing, why do British Airways insist that the seat back be in the upright position?

And whilst we are on matters Middle Earth, here's The Hobbit trailer

Sunday, 27 March 2011

Did the 'Distinguished global leader in residence' aka Gordon Brown get upgraded causing others to lose their paid for seats?

The Mail report a rather odd story:
'Gordon Brown sparked a mutiny on a British Airways flight after he was blamed for an attempt to downgrade a heavily pregnant woman and Red Cross doctor into more cramped seats.

The extraordinary scenes - dubbed Mutiny On The Brown-ty - unfolded on a flight from Abu Dhabi to London, when passengers lost their seats before the former Prime Minister's six-strong entourage got on board.

It prompted an angry war of words with an 'aggressive' Brown aide, and led to a formal complaint to BA and an offer of compensation described as 'derisory' by those involved.'
Read the story and the denials from Gordon Brown and British Airways and decide who you believe. For my part I doubt practically everything Britain's worst ever Prime Minister and main reason (along with Ed Balls) for the UK's dire economic position.

Friday, 21 January 2011

Not a good day for British Airways

1. British Airways passengers are facing the threat of a renewed cabin crew strike, with members of the Unite union expected to back another series of stoppages today

2. The British Airways name will disappear from Stock Exchange screens tonight after almost 24 years, from Monday the shares will trade under the name of International Airlines Group (this follows the merger with Iberia

Monday, 20 December 2010

'SNOW UPDATE: Flight delays to continue until Christmas Eve Lack of preparation is 'nothing short of a scandal', says AITO'

'SNOW UPDATE: Flight delays to continue until Christmas Eve

Lack of preparation is 'nothing short of a scandal', says AITO'
As reported by Travel Mole this morning...

Wednesday, 13 October 2010

Giving the customer what they want

April 2009 a survey was reported to have found that '79 per cent of Britons believe there should also be child-free areas on planes.'.

Those of you travelling without children know that feeling of dread as the parents with two small wriggling children heads towards the row in front or behind you and you know that you are in for a very unpleasant flight full of shouting, screaming and seat kicking. Those parents of small children that I know, report a feeling of embarrassment and resentment as they walk down the plane's aisle with most people casting them looks of pure hatred.

So why do airlines not put all families, and those people who don't care about flying with children, in one (preferably SOUND PROOFED) cabin; leaving everyone else free to enjoy the British Airways experience? The public want it, so what's stopping you?

Tuesday, 30 March 2010

Really, is that what it is about?

The BBC have a helpful 'Q&A: What's the BA dispute about?' piece but I didn't get far into it before I found an error. The BBC claim:
'What is at the heart of the dispute?

In November, BA reduced the number of cabin crew on long haul flights from 15 to 14 and introduced a two-year pay freeze from 2010.'
Near the end of the piece you do find this line 'The airline has said flights from London City Airport will not be affected, and long-haul flights to and from Gatwick will also operate..'


So why is Gatwick not affected but Heathrow is? The BBC don't seem interested in pursuing this question, might that be because long haul flights from Gatwick already operate with one less crew-member, something that I was discussing with BA cabin crew before the cancelled Christmas flights. Now why are the BBC so shy of reporting this information?

Tuesday, 15 December 2009

A thought on the BA staff strikes

I think I am right that BA already fly from Gatwick with the reduced crew numbers that they want to implement at Heathrow and have done for quite a while.

Friday, 25 September 2009

Have BA lost the plot?

£60 per seat per route to reserve a seat, are they mad. I fly BA a lot but this could tip me over to another carrier.

Story details here or here.