StatCounter

Showing posts with label April Fool. Show all posts
Showing posts with label April Fool. Show all posts

Tuesday, 1 April 2014

Googles 2014 April Fools

A few spotted so far...

First the Google photobombs feature, starting with David Hasselhoff. All you have to do is upload a new 'selfie' or group photo and leave a little room for a photobomb...


Secondly Google's new Nest home-automation acquisition company have teamed up with Virgin Atlantic to allow you to individually control your environment on the plane. This would be a fantastic idea but a little tricky to implement in reality...




Thirdly Google's social mapping software company, Waze, have taken over the Israeli social enterprise software startup SingleSpotter. The first joint project is WazeDates...




I'm sure I'll find some more, so keep coming back here for updates.

A great April Fools Day prank



Monday, 31 March 2014

Tuesday, 2 April 2013

At last something for every lefty in Britain - Guardian Goggles'


I presume that this is an April Fools Day spoof, but I am sure that there are many at the BBC just crying out for such a device.

Monday, 1 April 2013

Secret Lib Dem-UKIP talks revealed

Very good April Fools Day article...
http://www.libdemvoice.org/secret-lib-demukip-pact-revealed-33916.html

But one joke idea actually makes sense...

'Individual desks with lids and storage for books will replace group tables in order to fit the children in.'

You Tube is ready

You Tube is finally ready to select a winner and will be closed until 2023 whilst a winner is chosen.



Ah, it's April 1st...

Friday, 1 April 2011

Some more April Fools Day goodies

As well as Google Gmail Gmotion there is also the tale of how Google's AutoComplete technology works, there's more human involvement than you might imagine; say thank you to Michael...

"Princes Leia Metal Bikini" - Now why woudl he be thinking of that?

Land Rover have developed a system to comply with upcoming tax disc display legislation, the explanation is here, but here is the rather lovely video...


BMW's attempt this year was rather lame; the BMW WIll -

Last year's Google launch

Gmotion is the future of email technology


Gmail have the full details on this page, it looks very exciting...

April Fools Day

Ah April Fools Day and the newspapers are printin their spoofs. It is the one day of the year when I turn to The Guardoian first as their spoofs are normally the best. I still treasure the San Serriffe  spoof of 1977, very very funny and from a time when most people had no idea about the font names used. This year The Guardian have a Royal wedding themed spoof, apparently there are only 29 days to go and The Guardian has started its live coverage. Being The Guardian the gags are somewhat slanted, for example this Melanie Phillips one:
'8.24am: The commentator Melanie Phillips has made a typically pungent intervention into the political debate surrounding the royal nuptials. On her Spectator blog, she writes:

It shows a spinelessness depressingly typical of David Cameron's craven shower of apologists that he has done so little to ensure that William and Kate's wedding vows contain no strident condemnation of the insidious Islamist extremism that has come to dominate the thinking of Britain's Royal Family. Truly, the West has been lost.
It's a thought-provoking piece.'
Yes, yes, very funny; Melanie Phillips has an understandable bee in her bonnet about Islamism, I wonder why.

However there are some funnier moments:
' Meanwhile, Esther Addley is heading up a team of reporters who are already based in special wifi-enabled tents on the Mall and outside Westminster Abbey. She tweets: Live blog: Twitter
@estheraddley On Mall. Mood palpable. no sign of crowd yet but slowly building thru day. Ice crm vn playing nat.Anth, no queue. so exciting!!! #gdnroywed'
...

Royal aides, keen to avoid the 'Flakegate' controversy that Anthea Turner attracted after posing with a Cadbury's Flake for OK! magazine on her wedding day, have ordered that all confectionery consumed during the service be unpackaged and wrapped in white napkins. A palace spokesman said a team of 10 equerries would be tasked with unwrapping Twix, Snickers and Drifters, with a further five dedicated to non-chocolate items such as Fruit Pastilles and Opal Fruits. "The chocolate bars will each be wrapped in one napkin," a spokesman said. He later conceded to the Guardian that some bars — such as a Curly Wurly — may require two napkins.'
What is of course even funnier are the reactions of some Guardian readers who in true left fashion couldn't spot the spoof and immediately complained. Here are my favourites so far:
'TheOneExeption
1 April 2011 7:42AM
No! Not you too Guardian, I thought I could trust you!

constantseeker
1 April 2011 7:47AM
Youve got to be fucking kidding me!!!

RubberDucky
1 April 2011 8:02AM
Two rich people, one from a family with a very dubious past, get married. Yawn.
This newspaper is becoming more and more like a tabloid everyday.
Any plans for page three yet?'

And then there are the angry Guardian readers:
'territorialisation
1 April 2011 7:54AM
funny, just that after that 'supporting the lib dems' thing this time last year, i wouldn't put it past you. just saying.

ct001
1 April 2011 8:11AM
I thought you'd celebrate today by telling us all to vote Lib Dem again. Nice one, bastards.'

No BMW spoof online yet, so here's last years...

Oddly The Telegraph also have a wedding based April Fool this one being from a different angle
'Labour memo: celebrate Ed Miliband's wedding with street party

Labour party members have been urged to celebrate the forthcoming wedding of Ed Miliband and Justine Thornton with street parties, trifles and bunting, according to a secret memo seen by The Daily Telegraph.'
There are some lovely touches in this piece but unlike The Guardian's it won't be updated durin the day...


Thursday, 1 April 2010

Yes I know The Guardian article was an April Fool, hence my last sentence...

To all the people who keep commenting "April Fool" on this post: Yes I know The Guardian article is an April Fool, hence my last line
'Maybe bloggers and journalists should also get involved in the inter-party fighting, I would offer to take on 'Olaf Priol' but I think he may only work at The Guardian one day a year...'


The Guardian article is the best April Fool I have seen this year and in the proud tradition of their 1977 Island of San Serriffe hoax, that kept me amused for ages, unfortunately I lost my original copy in a house move.

Is this the BBC's April Fool?

The BBC report that:
'Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg could be the surprise winner of the UK's general election, former US presidential candidate Howard Dean has said.

...

Mr Dean, who was briefly frontrunner for the 2004 Democratic Party nomination and whose infamous "Iowa scream" - a yelp of defiance at a campaign rally - became an internet hit, said Mr Clegg believes he can win outright.

...

"I know the Liberals, I know Nick Clegg very well, and he intends to win this and I think they could.

"So you may have a hung Parliament but I think you won't have a coalition. At least not that coalition going forward."

Asked if Mr Clegg could be the next British prime minister, Mr Dean said: "I think he could".'
Will the BBC stop at nothing in order to boost the 'hung Parliament' narrative and particularly the prospects of the Lib Dems?

The nasty party are back (that is the Labour party in case you were wondering)


The Guardian this morning has the fascinating story that Gordon Brown has tired of his cuddly, family man image:
'In an audacious new election strategy, Labour is set to embrace Gordon Brown's reputation for anger and physical aggression, presenting the prime minister as a hard man, unafraid of confrontation, who is willing to take on David Cameron in "a bare-knuckle fistfight for the future of Britain", the Guardian has learned.

Following months of allegations about Brown's explosive outbursts and bullying, Downing Street will seize the initiative this week with a national billboard campaign portraying him as "a sort of Dirty Harry figure", in the words of a senior aide. One poster shows a glowering Brown alongside the caption "Step outside, posh boy," while another asks "Do you want some of this?"'

Do the Labour party really think that calling someone 'posh boy' is in any way sensible, intelligent or acceptable? Sorry, what was I thinking, of course they do.

The Guardian article also includes this passage which shows the lengths that the Labour party are thinking of going to in order to ensure their re-election:
'Labour was "going all in", staking the election on the hope that voters will be drawn to an alpha-male personality who "is prepared to pummel, punch or even headbutt the British economy into a new era of jobs and prosperity".'
Unbelievable...

But the article continues with details of several putative plans to push Gordon Brown's new hard man image:
'Strategists are even understood to be considering engineering a high-profile incident of violence on the campaign trail, and are in urgent consultations on the matter with John Prescott, whose public image improved in 2001 after he punched an egg-throwing protester.

Possible confrontations under discussion include pushing Andrew Marr out of the way while passing him on a staircase, or thumping the back of Jeremy Paxman's chair so hard that he flinches in shock.

One tactic being discussed involves provoking a physical confrontation at one of the three ground-breaking TV debates between the candidates. In this scenario, Brown, instead of responding to a point made by Cameron, would walk over from his microphone with an exaggerated silent display of self-control, bring his face to within an inch of the Tory leader's, and in a subdued voice, ask "what did you just say?", before delivering a single well-aimed blow to his opponent's face, followed by a headlock if required.'
Staggering...

I am shocked that even the Labour party would be aiming so low and I congratulate The Guardian's 'Olaf Priol' for this scoop, I trust that David Cameron will respond to these plans, fighting fire with fire by setting loose William 'judo' Hague and David 'SAS' Davis on to the more effete members of the Labour cabinet and other 'greybeards'. Maybe as well as this week's Chancellor's debate and the upcoming leader's debates there should also be some proper manly bouts to settle the arguments. Cabinet ministers versus their shadows is an obvious one; who would not pay good money to see Ken Clarke beat the crap out of Peter Mandelson and William Hague show Harriet Harman and/or David Miliband how a real man operates. I would also like to see a battle of the ex-Ministers with Davis Davis showing John Prescott that one punch does not a fighter make.

As Harry Hill is often heard to say: "There's only one way to settle this... FIGHT".


Maybe bloggers and journalists should also get involved in the inter-party fighting, I would offer to take on 'Olaf Priol' but I think he may only work at The Guardian one day a year...