StatCounter

Wednesday, 26 June 2013

Is Israel an apartheid state like South Africa was?

People like @DD1958 aka Pleb Donovan would say Israel was an apartheid state but then they don't seem to be able to face facts. Here's something I read last month, it's a letter to the San Francisco Examiner from a South African MP, the Rev. Dr. Kenneth Meshoe:
'On my recent trip to San Francisco, I was deeply disturbed to learn about the posters in The City accusing Israel of apartheid. As a black South African who lived under apartheid, this system was implemented in South Africa to subjugate people of color and deny them a variety of their rights. In my view, Israel cannot be compared to apartheid in South Africa. Those who make the accusation expose their ignorance of what apartheid really is.

Apartheid was a legal system of segregation and oppression based on skin color, with a very small white minority dominating over the vast majority of people of color.

As a black South African under apartheid, I, among other things, could not vote, nor could I freely travel the landscape of South Africa. No person of color could hold high government office. The races were strictly segregated at sports arenas, public restrooms, schools and on public transportation. People of color had inferior hospitals, medical care and education. If a white doctor was willing to take a black patient, he had to examine him or her in a back room or some other hidden place.

In my numerous visits to Israel, I did not see any of the above. My understanding of the Israeli legal system is that equal rights are enshrined in law. Black, brown and white Jews and the Arab minority mingle freely in all public places, universities, restaurants, voting stations and public transportation.

All people have the right to vote. The Arab minority has political parties, serves in the Israeli parliament (Knesset) and holds positions in government ministries, the police force and the security services. In hospitals, Palestinian patients lie in beds next to Israeli Jews, and doctors and nurses are as likely to be Israeli Arabs as Jews. I also understand that an Israeli Arab judge presided over the trial of former Israeli President Moshe Katsav, who was convicted of misconduct. An Ethiopian Jew recently won the title of Miss Israel. None of the above was legally permissible in apartheid South Africa!

I believe that it is slanderous and deceptive for Israel’s self-defense measures against the terrorists’ campaign of suicide bombing, rocket attacks and other acts of terrorism that have occurred, and continue to occur, to be labeled as apartheid. I am shocked by the claim that the free, diverse, democratic state of Israel practices apartheid. This ridiculous accusation trivializes the word apartheid, minimizing and belittling the magnitude of the racism and suffering endured by South Africans of color.

I urge all people, young people in particular, to visit Israel and learn the facts for themselves so that they can confidently refute these false allegations against Israel. The misapplication of the term apartheid makes a mockery of a grievous injustice and threatens to undermine the true meaning of the term.

In my view, Israel is a model of democracy, inclusion and pluralism that can be emulated by many nations, particularly in the Middle East.'
Don't listen to the lies of the purveyors of anti-Israel hatred, listen to someone who actually knows about apartheid - a South African MP.

Tuesday, 25 June 2013

Kate Upton topless on a horse - no longer...

Unfortunately the video I posted here has been taken down. Why? TV Predictions report that:
'TMZ.com has not commented on what happened to the video, but Coed.com (that's a real site?Yeah, it is.) reports the video was taken while the supermodel was doing a photo shoot for Complex Magazine in 2012. Our guess is that Complex knocked on TMZ's door and said knock it off and take it down. We don't know that for sure, but hmmm....

Of course, the irony of all this is that many people on the Internet were unhappy with the video anyway because TMZ had the audacity to put little stars over Ms. Upton's breasts in the video, thereby covering up what they wanted to see in the first place. Maybe TMZ.com took the video down because it was getting too much criticism.

No, that doesn't sound like TMZ, does it?'
Whatever the reason, booo!

Here's a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit video to make up for your disappointment


Laura Robson vs Maria Kirilenko

Whilst Laura Robson battles Maria Kirilenko at Wimbledon, striving to be the only British woman to make it beyond the first round this year, I thought a comparison of the two players was called for.

Laura Robson first







Maria Kirilenko second

Advantage Laura Robson?

Maria Kirilenko has tried to play dirty though with a spread for Sports Illustrated in 2010




Hmm unfortunately Laura Robson has not retaliated but she's still the winner here and indeed on the court today 6:3  6:4  Her only problem today was with her ball-toss in the last few service games.

How to uninstall McAfee anti-viris software - according to John McAfee




Possibly the strangest video I've seen this year, as John McAfee has a go at his old company's product and incorporates sex and drugs.

A fascinating discussion as to whether Islam is a 'religion of peace'




A fascinating Intelligence Squared USA discussion from 2008 between proponents Zeba Khan & Maajid Nawaz and opponents Ayaan Hirsi Ali & Douglas Murray.

If you can't find an hour and 45 minutes to watch the whole video, do watch from 1:13:00 - pretty cut and dried? Douglas Murray's summation from 1:38:15 should be a much watch for western politicians who glibly state that 'Islam is a religion of peace' without any real knowledge of the facts.

The audience would seem to agree with me:
Before:
In favour - 41%  Against - 25%  Undecided - 34%
After:
In favour - 36%  Against - 55%  Undecided - 9%

John Lydon on not boycotting Israel



I did post about this back in 2011 but missed this bit of John Lydon speaking. As I posted then:
"Until I see an Arab country, a Muslim country, with a democracy, I won't understand how anyone can have a problem with how they're treated."
John Lydon aka Johnny Rotten explaining why he will be performing in Israel, in Tel Aviv in fact."

Monday, 24 June 2013

Maths GCSE revision getting you down? Maths A-Level revision too difficult? Do you need help?

Just learn the contents of this video and use it as your only answer on your exam paper. It may not answer the questions posed, BUT if mathematics doesn't really exist then does a maths exam?




A fascinating discussion on BBC's Asian Network radio station




Do listen to the whole interview where Nihal does a fair job of fairly interviewing Nick Lowles of the group Hope Not Hate, Robert Spencer and Iman Dudwallah (?)....

I found especially interesting the part from around 12 minutes in when Nihal asked Robert Spencer to give him some passages from the Koran and Hadith that he found objectionable and then asked the Imam to counter these claims. From around 17:20 listen to the Imam complain that the Qur'an was more Robert Spencer's field than his. I did enjoy Nihal responding incredulously "But you're an imam!" Also a joy to listen to are Cameron's questions and Robert Spencer's answers near the end of the piece.

Sunday, 23 June 2013

Blackadder aka The Black Adder - The pilot episode - unaired in the UK

Part 1...


"The Eunuchs have cancelled"

"What's sounds like Greek but isn't Greek"


Part2...



"Well it's quite cunning....."


Possibly the worst fight scene ever...


Part 3...


"Stupid bastard" 

"I wouldn't pass water over Scotland"

A rather good sword fight, Errol Flynn had nothing on Rowan Atkinson.


Overall I think Tony Robinson was a fine addition and Brian Blessed made for a noisier King.The whole piece was pretty much carried forward into series 1 which had much darker humour than the later series which had Ben Elton added to the writing team. The main change between this and the first series is that Edmund Blackadder becomes more of a snivelling fool in the first series, a change that was reversed most successfully for the subsequent three series.

Labour's 13 years in government




Gareth Baines (@GABaines) tweeted at 11:01 AM on Sun, Jun 23, 2013:
Labour's achievements in 13 years of Government... http://t.co/Reuq8YsFHC
(https://twitter.com/GABaines/status/348742696439013376)



Saturday, 22 June 2013

Now this will confuse your eyes...




What a clever and disturbing optical illusion....

Published on 28 Mar 2013
- www.TheRenegadeRoadhouse.co - You haven't seen (or heard) anything quite like this. Punked-out polka-people! Lyrics to Tanz by Hiss below, in German and English.

A group of young girls in black and white tights perform a trippy dance to the popular tune of German folk-rock polka band Hiss. (lyrics, German and English, below)

www.TheRenegadeRoadhouse.co - Southern rock, pop and country play 24/7 Come visit and relax with your favorite crappy beer!

Du bist jung oder alt, You are young or old,
reich oder pleite, rich or broke,
Moslem oder Christ, Muslim or Christian,
Hindu oder Heide. Hindu or pagan
Du bist grün oder blau, You're green or blue,
schwarz oder weiß. black or white
Was ist gut für den Körper, What's good for the body,
für die Seele, für den Geist: for the soul, for the spirit:

DER TANZ! THE DANCE!

Du hast'ne Menge Sorgen, You hast'ne lot of worry,
oder du hast keine. or you do not.
Bist verlobt, geschieden, 're Engaged, divorced
oder ganz alleine. or alone.
Du bist dick oder dünn, You're fat or thin,
Jungfrau oder Stier. Virgo or Taurus
Du wolltest gar nicht kommen, You did not come,
doch jetzt bist du hier: but now you're here:

ALSO TANZ! ALSO DANCE!

Wackel mit dem Hintern, Shake that ass,




hebe deine Beine! raise your legs!
Tanz mit irgend jemand, Dance with anyone,
odet tanz alleine. odet dancing alone.
Du hast hüpfen oder zucken You jump or twitch
oder schweben oder bängen, or float or bängen,
Bewege deine Arme, Move your arms,
oder lass sie hängen: or let it hang:

ALSO TANZ! ALSO DANCE!




Du heißt Jutta oder Dieter, Your name is Julia or Dieter
Klaus oder Olga. Klaus or Olga
Bist zu alt für Heavy Metal, You're too old for heavy metal.
zu jung für die Polka. too young for the polka.
Du fängst an zu schwitzen, You start to sweat to,
keine Lust in dem Dunst. no desire in the mist.
Das ist nicht gerecht, This is not fair,
denn jetzt geht es dir wie uns: for now you are like is:

ALSO TANZ! ALSO DANCE!

(English translation by Google Translate, accuracy not guaranteed....)

The ‘Great Renewables Scam’ Unravels | The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF)

'A new analysis of government and industry figures revealed that every UK wind industry job is effectively subsidized to the tune of £100,000 per year. In some cases it rises to £1.3 million per job. In Scotland, with its 230 onshore windfarms, the figure is £154,000 per job. Even if the highly optimistic maximum projection of 75,000 wind industry jobs by 2020 is realised the figure would only drop to £80,000.'
More here http://www.thegwpf.org/great-renewables-scam-unravels/

Richard Bacon in full biased ranting mode

Last year I posted this piece about the most biased and boorish piece of broadcasting that I had ever heard. The culprit was the BBC's Richard Bacon and thanks to 'noggin' on the Biased-BBC website I now have some embeddable audio...






As I wrote in the original post:
'Please listen to this interview... Richard Bacon shows off his stupidity. The 97% figure as demolished by James Delingpole is as I have blogged previously.
Richard Bacon didn't sound a) impartial or b) knowledgeable...In fact have you ever heard him sound so angry throughout an interview and so triumphant when he thought (usually incorrectly) that he'd made a good point? Are BBC interviewers meant to treat interviewees like this? Can anyone think of another interviewee that Richard Bacon has so taken against?

I wonder if Richard bacon will find the time in his busy schedule to check that 97% statistic that so upset him. In case he or @declanmurray78 need some help here's a link that might help and in case you two cannot follwo a link, here's the meat of the matter:

'How do we know there’s a scientific consensus on climate change? Pundits and the press tell us so. And how do the pundits and the press know? Until recently, they typically pointed to the number 2500 – that’s the number of scientists associated with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Those 2500, the pundits and the press believed, had endorsed the IPCC position. [1]
To their embarrassment, most of the pundits and press discovered that they were mistaken – those 2500 scientists hadn’t endorsed the IPCC’s conclusions, they had merely reviewed some part or other of the IPCC’s mammoth studies. To add to their embarrassment, many of those reviewers from within the IPCC establishment actually disagreed with the IPCC’s conclusions, sometimes vehemently.
The upshot? The punditry looked for and recently found an alternate number to tout — “97% of the world’s climate scientists” accept the consensus, articles in the Washington Post and elsewhere have begun to claim.
This number will prove a new embarrassment to the pundits and press who use it. The number stems from a 2009 online survey of 10,257 earth scientists, conducted by two researchers at the University of Illinois. The survey results must have deeply disappointed the researchers – in the end, they chose to highlight the views of a subgroup of just 77 scientists, 75 of whom thought humans contributed to climate change. The ratio 75/77 produces the 97% figure that pundits now tout.
The two researchers started by altogether excluding from their survey the thousands of scientists most likely to think that the Sun, or planetary movements, might have something to do with climate on Earth – out were the solar scientists, space scientists, cosmologists, physicists, meteorologists and astronomers. That left the 10,257 scientists in disciplines like geology, oceanography, paleontology, and geochemistry that were somehow deemed more worthy of being included in the consensus. The two researchers also decided that scientific accomplishment should not be a factor in who could answer – those surveyed were determined by their place of employment (an academic or a governmental institution). Neither was academic qualification a factor – about 1,000 of those surveyed did not have a PhD, some didn’t even have a master’s diploma.
To encourage a high participation among these remaining disciplines, the two researchers decided on a quickie survey that would take less than two minutes to complete, and would be done online, saving the respondents the hassle of mailing a reply. Nevertheless, most didn’t consider the quickie survey worthy of response –just 3146, or 30.7%, answered the two questions on the survey:
1. When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?
2. Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?
The questions were actually non-questions. From my discussions with literally hundreds of skeptical scientists over the past few years, I know of none who claims that the planet hasn’t warmed since the 1700s, and almost none who think that humans haven’t contributed in some way to the recent warming – quite apart from carbon dioxide emissions, few would doubt that the creation of cities and the clearing of forests for agricultural lands have affected the climate. When pressed for a figure, global warming skeptics might say that human are responsible for 10% or 15% of the warming; some skeptics place the upper bound of man’s contribution at 35%. The skeptics only deny that humans played a dominant role in Earth’s warming.
Surprisingly, just 90% of those who responded to the first question believed that temperatures had risen – I would have expected a figure closer to 100%, since Earth was in the Little Ice Age in the centuries immediately preceding 1800. But perhaps some of the responders interpreted the question to include the past 1000 years, when Earth was in the Medieval Warm Period, generally thought to be warmer than today.
As for the second question, 82% of the earth scientists replied that that human activity had significantly contributed to the warming. Here the vagueness of the question comes into play. Since skeptics believe that human activity been a contributing factor, their answer would have turned on whether they consider a 10% or 15% or 35% increase to be a significant contributing factor. Some would, some wouldn’t.
In any case, the two researchers must have feared that an 82% figure would fall short of a convincing consensus – almost one in five wasn’t blaming humans for global warming — so they looked for subsets that would yield a higher percentage. They found it – almost — in those whose recent published peer-reviewed research fell primarily in the climate change field. But the percentage still fell short of the researchers’ ideal. So they made another cut, allowing only the research conducted by those earth scientists who identified themselves as climate scientists.
Once all these cuts were made, 75 out of 77 scientists of unknown qualifications were left endorsing the global warming orthodoxy. The two researchers were then satisfied with their findings [2]. Are you?
LawrenceSolomon@nextcity.com
Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Energy Probe and the author of The Deniers.
—
[1] http://www.probeinternational.org/ipcc-flyer-low%5B1%5D.pdf
[2] http://probeinternational.org/library/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/012009_Doran_final1.pdf''

Thankfully I gave up listening to Richard Bacon soon after this so I no longer have to listen to one of the few broadcasters who appears to have  regressed sinec leaving children's tv.

The one hundred and fifty-fifth weekly "No shit Sherlock" award

From the Prism revelation, I hear that you can plug a phone into a roadside green box and listen to calls - "No shit Sherlock"

Friday, 21 June 2013

Miley Cyrus - "We can't stop" - Oddest video of the week and certainly the one with most gratuitous tight trousers - A rule 5 Friday post

Miley Cyrus - "We can't stop" - Oddest video of the week and certainly the one with most gratuitous tight trousers


Hmmm



Billy Piper acts like a dirty goat and sheep and quite a few other farmyard animals - Probably NSFW - Friday Night Rule 5


Billy Piper from Secret Diary of a Call Girl Series 3 Episode 3

Kate Upton topless on a horse - Unfortunately NSFW - A Rule 5 Friday post



TMZ of course ruined this moment with their gratuitous nipple stars.

George Galloway attacks SNP's hatred of other opinions - BBC Question Time



'Gorgeous George Galloway attacks the way the SNP have a hatred of views that are not the same as theirs, in particular backing up Nigel Farage's recent visit to Scotland, and how he was attacked by SNP activists, bringing shame to Scotland, especially as the SNP leader Alex Salmond backed the protesters.

Recorded from BBC Question Time, 13 June 2013.'
Oh my word, I agree with George Galloway on something, I feel dirty.


Of course our reasons are different...and there's nothong 'gorgeous' about George Galloway.SNP

When the deaths of Palestinians in a refugee camp is of no interest to the BBC

Imagine that an Israeli tank shell hit an UNRWA school accommodating 260 Palestine refugees. Imagine that at least five of these Palestine refugees, including two children and two women, were killed inside the school by that shell and that eleven more sustained serious injuries including an UNRWA staff member.

What would the BBC coverage be like?

How many Palestinian spokespersons would be put on the air to scream about Israeli aggression?

How many BBC reporters would walk with a doleful expression and tears in their eyes through that camp?

How many images of the wailing relatives of the dead would be shown?

How many images of bodies being carried to waiting ambulances would be shown?


Well such an incident has just taken place, in fact there were three mortar shells fired by one side or another in the Syrian conflict. But the camp was in Syria, near Damascus, so there's no way that Israel can be blamed. Thus there's not a scintilla of coverage on the BBC of the attack on the Khan Eshieh Palestine refugee camp.

Not a word because as should be obvious the BBC's obsession with the plight of the Palestinians has less to do with support for the Palestinians as a hatred of Israel and Jews who aren't silent victims.

"Don't give weapons to people who want to kill us" - Sensibe advice for Barack Hussein Obama from Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas)




It would seem that Ted Cruz has a better handle on what's really happening in Syria than Barack Hussein Obama, or does Obama really know just what he's doing...