" * In 2004, 8 percent of the electorate earned $15k or less; that dropped to 6 percent in 2008, a 25 percent decline
* In 2004, 15 percent made between $15k-$30K; that dropped to 12 percent in 2008, a 20 percent decline
* In 2004, 23 percent made $30k or less; that dropped to 18 percent in 2008, a 22 percent decline
* In 2004, 11 percent made $100k-$150k; that rose to 14 percent in 2008, a 27 percent increase
* In 2004, 4 percent made $150k-$200k; that rose to 6 percent in 2008, a 50 percent increase
* In 2004, 3 percent made $200k or more; that rose to 6 percent in 2008, a 100 percent increase
* In 2004, 18 percent made $100k or more; that rose to 26 percent in 2008, a 44 percent increase."
Why should anyone let facts get in the way of a good anti-Bush story?
What do you think the comparatives will look like in 2012?
No comments:
Post a Comment