StatCounter

Thursday, 13 October 2011

Thursday afternoon catch-up

The usual story, too mnay open Firefox tabs and not enough time:

1. Christopher Booker in The Telegraph had a fascinating piece about how local councils may be holding their rates level but they are raising money from elsewhere:
'There was a time, 40 years ago, when the most obvious source of council revenue was the rates, topped up by grants from central government – in return for which we could expect all the services that councils provided. But, largely below the radar, councils have discovered all sorts of ways in which they can take money off us, by levying charges, fees and penalties – some of which are actually illegal – for countless things that used to be free, or at least very much cheaper.

We have become familiar, for instance, with the practice whereby we must now pay for planning applications, anything from £150 for a garden shed to £250,000 for a large housing estate. We all know about the cost of parking fees and penalties, which earn councils £2 billion a year. And businesses must now pay billions to have their waste collected.

What most of us are less familiar with is the proliferation of new licensing charges for everything from pet shops to car boot sales, from riding establishments to “sex establishments” (up to £9,935, plus a yearly renewal fee of £5,000). Pubs that used to pay a yearly £10 to the local magistrates for their licence must now pay up to £1,905 to the council (plus £23.50 to notify the town hall if the landlord dies). Big pop festivals must pay £64,000 for a licence, even before they pay hundreds of thousands more to hire the police to provide security.

In 2007, the Lyons report on local government found that more than a quarter of councils were already earning more from such charges than they were from council tax. This has now risen to the point where “sales, fees, charges” and “other income” now yield some £25 billion a year, much the same as council tax.'

2. Is it just me or is there a word seeming to be missing from this article about 'Many thousands of children across England ... being sexually exploited by gangs, the Office of the Children's Commissioner suggests.'


3. CNS News report that:
'There is not a single, public Christian church left in Afghanistan, according to the U.S. State Department.
This reflects the state of religious freedom in that country ten years after the United States first invaded it and overthrew its Islamist Taliban regime.

In the intervening decade, U.S. taxpayers have spent $440 billion to support Afghanistan's new government and more than 1,700 U.S. military personnel have died serving in that country.

The last public Christian church in Afghanistan was razed in March 2010, according to the State Department's latest International Religious Freedom Report. The report, which was released last month and covers the period of July 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010, also states that “there were no Christian schools in the country.”'
Anything on the BBC about this?


4.  The Telegraph reports that:
'At least 200 potential terrorists are actively planning suicide attacks while living freely in Britain, intelligence chiefs have warned ministers.

A senior intelligence source has revealed that the figure is a "conservative" estimate of the threat facing the country from UK-based Islamist suicide bombers.

The would-be killers are among 2,000 extremists who the security services have said are based in Britain and actively planning terrorist activity of some kind. '
Oh marvelous and these people are left free to plot the deats of hundreds of Britains because ... How mnay more innocent people have to die before the fanatics are locked up or...?


5. USA Today have an article that you should read only if you are sitting down with a stiff drink. Investing may never be the same again.


6. YNet explains that Barack Obama is advocating the ghettoisation of Jews in Israel. My only question is - why is anyone surprised by the actions in this regard of Barack Hussein Obama?


7. The Telegraph reports that:
'Facebook has admitted that it has been watching the web pages its members visit – even when they have logged out.

In its latest privacy blunder, the social networking site was forced to confirm that it has been constantly tracking its 750million users, even when they are using other sites.'
Facebook, like Google before them, are saying it was a mistake...

USA

Answering the critics

I seem to have attracted another critic. In case you have missed his comments and my responses:

To my article entitled "How many are children?"

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Clearly the killing or imprisonment of any child is wrong, regardless of their nationality. Was simply making the point that children on both sides of the conflict suffer - what exactly is wrong with that position? Oh, and I was thinking of doing lasagne...
12 October 2011 19:18
Delete
Blogger Not a sheep said...
I would say the killing of any child is wrong. Imprisonment would depnd on what the child in question had been found guilty of doing. If the child was guilty of murder, attempted murder, violent assault or other serious crimes then why should they not be imprisoned? Hamas and Hezbollah use children as weapons and as willing covers for their terrorist activities; should such children be exempt from punishment? The age of criminal responsibility is 10 in the UK. I know plenty of under 10s who know the difference between right and wrong, and more should know the difference. Sorry I already have sausages under the grill...
12 October 2011 19:54
Delete
Anonymous PaulH said...
Hmm. By thinking as you do you are perpetuating the separation, keeping apart by coming out on the 'other side' from the side you hate. Would it be so wrong to say that BOTH sides are killers and BOTH sides have, most likely EQUALLY, killed children and innocent people of all ages? Would it be impertinent to suggest that BOTH are living in the past and that, in todays world, to kill for religion is tantamount to treating people as animals. We really can know better. ANY child killed is an innocent victim. There is no such thing as collateral damage and Israel are certainly not innocent as Palestine are neither. I think posting such things are bringing down the fun side of the site in my opinion, a pity as I recently found (and started to enjoy reading) you. I don't eat sausages...or Lasagna
13 October 2011 17:47
Delete
Blogger Not a sheep said...
Paul H: Oh dear oh dear, you really don't get it do you? Time for a some light Fisking I feel: 'Hmm. By thinking as you do you are perpetuating the separation, keeping apart by coming out on the 'other side' from the side you hate.' I don't 'hate' the 'other side'. However even if I did, I would do nothing more than blog. The 'other side' blow up pizza parlors full of innocent teenagers, slit the throats of innocent children & their parents and are on record as wanting to kill all Jews in Israel & the rest of the world. Tell me, who is full of hate? 'Would it be so wrong to say that BOTH sides are killers and BOTH sides have, most likely EQUALLY, killed children and innocent people of all ages?' Yes, it would be quite wrong. Islamic terrorists deliberately set out to kill as many innocent Jewish adults & children as possible. By way of contrast the Israeli armed forces do all they can to not kill innocent Palestinian children, even when they are being used as human shields by their Hamas or Fatah terrorist elders. 'Would it be impertinent to suggest that BOTH are living in the past and that, in todays world, to kill for religion is tantamount to treating people as animals. We really can know better.' If you characterise believeing in religion as 'living in th epast' then maybe you have a point BUT there is an important distinction - Islamic terrorists, as products of centuries of brainwashing kill on behalf of their religion (or maybe a perverted idea of that religion - that is a bigger point), israel kills to protect itself from destruction. If you want to test that theory, ask yourself this - If the Palestinians laid down their weapons and recognised Israel's right to exist, what would happen? Would Israel let the Palestinians live in peace? If however Israel disbanded its armies and the Palestinians did not, what would happen? Would the Palestinians let Israel live in peace, alive? 'ANY child killed is an innocent victim.' Is that ALWAYS the case? What if a 15-year old Palestinan decides to try and blow themselves up in a crowded Jerusalem cafe thus killing dozens of teenage Jews. Would you call that 'child' an 'innocent victim'? 'There is no such thing as collateral damage' Really? As I have said before, the Islamic terrorists want to kill as many innocent people as possible, Israel tries not to kill the innocent people who the Islamic terrorists often hide amongst. 'and Israel are certainly not innocent as Palestine are neither.' Well you are half right, quite good for you. 'I think posting such things are bringing down the fun side of the site in my opinion, a pity as I recently found (and started to enjoy reading) you.' The fun things are an aside not the point of this blog, if you don't understand that then... 'I don't eat sausages...or Lasagna' That's OK I don't think I would want to partake of dinner with you.
13 October 2011 18:54

To my article about the Muslim Brotherhood:


Blogger Alex said...
You're using Glenn Beck to make a point? Really? Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.
10 October 2011 12:27
Delete
Blogger Not a sheep said...
So you think the Muslim Brotherhood are 'largely secular' and 'have eschewed violence'? Do you? Really? Just because you ridule Glenn Beck does that mean everything he says is untrue?
10 October 2011 18:48
Delete
Anonymous PaulH said...
He has a point about Glenn Beck. To say the truth is found on his own sensationalist tabloid fluff disguised as patriotic passion, is one of the worst examples of a pseudo news source. Sorry but I was with you until that. Of course not EVERYthing GB says is untrue but he ALWAYS has an agenda my friend...you must see that. It seems you do too though on this topic. I am not for one side or the other. I am not Jewish, have no reason to dislike EITHER 'side'. You, on the other hand are biased. You really should try to be objective. Especially when you are passionate about a subject, for that is when you can be swayed by others. Glenn Beck indeed.
13 October 2011 17:56
Delete
Blogger Not a sheep said...
PaulH: As previously - So you think the Muslim Brotherhood are 'largely secular' and 'have eschewed violence'? Do you? Really? Just because you think Glenn Beck has an agenda does that mean what he said in this case is incorrect? I ask you - is the Muslim Brotherhood 'largely secular'? Have the Muslim Brotherhood 'eschewed violence'? Please answer those questions before attacking me for using Glenn Beck to backup my argument.

Critics! And critics and who don't answer questions, just complain..

Is Israel 'an apartheid state'?

A fascinating opinion piece by Dennis Prager that brings up many of the points that I have made here over the years. This part of the conclusion is most telling:
"So why is Israel called an apartheid state? Becasue by comparing the freest, most equitable country in the Middle East to the former South Africa, those who hate Israel hope they can persuade uninformed people that Israel doesn't deserve to exist just as apartheid South Africa didn't deserve to exist."

Wednesday, 12 October 2011

The right choice of phrase?

At PMQs today BBC 5Live described Denis MacShane as being 'Independent Labour'. Wouldn't 'Suspended Labour' or 'Under Investigation Labour' be a better description for this particular suspect MP?

And the missing factor is?

English Al Jazeera  are running a season of reports on slavery 'A 21st century Evil'. The reporting is by Rageh Omaar, I wonder if he will find the time and space to put the slave trade into context by mentioning the Arab traders that ran much of the African end of the slave trade from the 16th to the 19th centuries. I wonder if he will also find the space to mention the white slave trade as practiced by Arab slave traders from before the 8th century.

Will Rageh Omaar also explain for context that whilst slavery was outlawed in the western world from the start of the 19th century and across much of the rest of the world over the next century, the Muslim world only officially abolished slavery much later, for example Saudi Arabia and Yemen in 1962 and the United Arab Emirates in 1963. This inconvenient truth seems to be something that western self-hating liberals often ignore as they castigate the west for its part in the slave trade and cal for reparations to be paid to the victims of the slave trade.

The one hundred and forty-eighth weekly "No shit, Sherlock" award

This week's award goes to Noel Gallgaher on last night's Newsnight for this comment. He called labour leadeer Ed Miliband "utterly uninspiring and dull"

"No shit, Sherlock"

I may present Noel with this award in person the next time I see him in Waitrose on the Marylebone High Road with his chauffeur driven Mercedes parked outside on the double yellow lines.

What's better the iPhone 4 or the Samsung Galaxy S2?

Well T3 magazine's phone of the year award has just been awarded to the Samsung Galaxy S2, rather than the Apple iPhone 4 or the HTC Incredible S et al.

I cannot disagree with T3, the Samsung Galaxy S2 is a great phone with much better battery life than the HTC & iPhone 4, a great browser (maybe not as good as the iPhone), way better email facilities than the iPhone and it usable as a phone unlike the iPhone 4.

"How many are children?"

Last night I posted a piece about the upcoming release of Gilad Shalit. I included this thought:
'The price for the release of this Israeli soldier? That would be the release of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners. How many of those being released have killed or assisted in the murder of Jews in Israel? How many will kill or assist in killing in the future?'
This seems to have upset an anonymous commenter who asked 'How many are children?'
My answer is this; I don't know how many are children but here are some pictures of some of the children murdered or maimed by Palestinain terrorists between 2000 & 2006


That's just those aged less than five years of age. If you want to see the faces of the older children murdered or maimed by Palestinian terrorists between 2000 & 2006 take a trip to Daled Amos. The murdering of Jewish children did not stop in 2006, do you remember the Fogel family brutally murdered in their beds earlier this year?

So no, I do not know how many Palestinian children are being released, nor do I know of what crimes they were convicted. I know that many Palestinian terrorist atrocities have been or have used children in their commission. I also know that the Palestinian establishment brainwash their children to hate Jews and to see martyrdom as a desirable objective, I have posted on that subject many times before.


Earlier yesterday Alex a regular commenter asked me this:
'I notice you have made a huge number of Israel-related posts. Is there any particular reason you're so interested?'
I replied:
'I do seem to have made a lot of Israel related posts recently and it does trouble me slightly. This blog was not set up to cover Israeli issues... I am not Israeli, indeed I have never been to Israel; however I am Jewish. ... I see the barrage of hate that is fired at Israel by western liberals, especially the BBC, as vile and unfair.

I see the Isael question as one of the great moral questions of our time. I don't agree with every supporter of Israel but I find that anyone who opposes Israel is probably someone that I would not want to have dinner with.'
I think that the anonymous commenter that I quoted in the title of this piece fits into the latter of those two categories.

Pun of the day?

'All we need now is for iPhones to start playing up and we'll have the dream headline: Apple and Blackberry crumble'
Thanks to @SamKennedyy on Twitter for that one...

Tuesday, 11 October 2011

Gilad Shalit to be freed

I hear rumours that Israel and Hamas have agreed a deal and finally Segeant Gilad Shalit, the Israeli soldier held hostage by Palestinian terrorists linked to Hamas for five years is to be released. The price for the release of this Israeli soldier? That would be the release of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners. How many of those being released have killed or assisted in the murder of Jews in Israel? How many will kill or assist in killing in the future?

I am happy at the release of Gilad Shalit but the price...

Where have all the lovely cars come from? (part 2)

Today I saw a McLaren MP4 12C, much more striking than the F1.

Tomorrow...?

Always the Jews, always the Jews


An interview with an Occupy Wall St. protester from 5 October 2011
"President Obama is a Jewish puppet" - Hmm, sure sounds delusional to me.
Thanks to Israelly Cool for this video spot.



Rev. Stephen Sizer, who has a habit of associating with Holocaust Deniers, notorious antisemites, and Islamists who support terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians, said that church leaders refuse to speak out about Israel’s crimes because of “guilt for the Holocaust and fear of anti-Semitism”. Sizer further added that churches which side with “the occupation” and Zionism have “repudiated Jesus, have repudiated the bible and are an abomination”
Thanks to Cif Watch for this video spot.


Pat Condell has his own take on this


Pat Condell claims that Muslim children are brainwashed to hate Jews; is he right?

Jews are "Apes and pigs"; hmm where have I heard that before?

Thankfully that is in the Middle East and not in the UK...

What is wrong with the world? Why do so many people hate the Jews so much? Why do so few people realise or care what hatred and untruths are being spread by the Saudis throughout Europe and America as well as by others in the Middle East?

I have changed my mind, maybe there is something in the idea of a 'one state solution' for the Middle East


Does Andrew Klavan persuade you? He does make some good points in this video.

Monday, 10 October 2011

Where have all the lovely cars come from?

Yesterday I saw two Jensen Interceptors, gorgeous cars and rather a rare sight these days...


I also saw a Bristol 411 s4, car that epitomises restrained elegance...

Less excitingly I also saw two new Nissan GTRs, lovely if rather brutal cars.

Today I saw a lovely Green Maserati Merak S...

I wonder what automobile loveliness I shall spot tomorrow?

Boris Johnson's a fool

'Boris Johnson's a fool' - so I hear many lefties say. Well I say, better a fool than a vile excuse for a human like Ken Livingstone...

On Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi

Fine words Ken but you know what taqqiya and doublespeak are, don't you?
In case you really don't, here's Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi in his own words


On Christmas


Contrast this with how Britain, Europe and the rest of the Western Christian world is told to accommodate the religion of Islam

On justifying suicide bombs (from 2:15)


On the Jews and Hitler and his hope for the future


What do you have to say about those comments by the man you have invited to London and described as representing 'a more progressive strand of Islam than the Wahhabi sect'? Actually Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi may well be more moderate than the Wahhabi Islamists but that is a question of degree of extermism.

Here's Peter Tatchell on Ken Livingstone and his views of Islamists


So when leftists attack Boris Johnson for being a fool, remember who Ken Livingstone has allied himself with and vote accordingly next year. Ken Livingstone has made his choices and hopes to benefit from the large Muslim vote in London as a result. Let's hope that decent people of London of whatever religion, or none, stand up for the rights of the followers of religions other than Islam as well as homosexuals, etc. In fact for all those people the man Ken Livingstone called moderate wishes harm to.

Ken Livingstone is an unredeemed socialist, a former associate of some of the murderers in the IRA, as well as a recent inviter and defender of an Islamist extremist to speak in London. Let's make sure Ken Livingstone never gets his hands on any of the levers of power by being re-elected to bring more shame on this great city.


As an aside it was the same Al-Qaradawi who led the prayer in Egypt's Tahrir Square following the revolution. The same Al Qaradawi who the BBC represent as being a moderate Muslim leader and who will figure somehow in the future leadership of Egypt; a man who supports suicide bombing of Israel.

Sunday, 9 October 2011

The Fiat 500 Air advert



If you like the song in that advert then you might like the full version of the song

Amy Macdonald - "This Is The Life"

You can find more Amy Macdonald here.


By the way Fiat I think you'll find that should be "fewer emissions" not "less emissions".

The Muslim Brotherhood exposed, and they are not "largely secular" and nor have they "eschewed violence"



For more of the truth about the Muslim Brotherhood take a trip to Israelly Cool and GBTV. If you want more reassuring lies
about the Muslim Brotehrhood then I suggest the BBC and MSNBC.

"We'll Fogel you"

'Settlers in Itamar were outraged Sunday morning after Palestinians from Awarta arrived in Itamar for their annual olive harvest in the settlement. According to the settlers, among the Palestinians who arrived in Itamar were the family members of Amjad and Hakim Awad who brutally stabbed and murdered five members of the Fogel family six months ago.

The settlers claimed that the Palestinians shouted "We'll Fogel you" and drew their fingers across their necks indicating slaughter. Dozens of women and children from Itamar protested against the move, including Tamar Fogel who lost her parents and three siblings in the heinous terror attack.
Israel's 'partners in peace'?

Nothing about this story on the BBC. But then the BBC minimised coverage of the cold-blooded murder of the Fogel family so why would they cover this story? The BBC seem happy to support the Islamist murderers of Jews in Israel, so long as the BBC can call them 'settlers'.


Thanks to YNet News for the spot.

Is 9-9-9 the answer?

In the USA Herman Cain is trying to get the Republican nomination for Presidential candidate and then become the USA's first black President (Trolls, think before you write). Herman Cain is a fiscal conservative and one of his main proposals is the catchily-phrased 9-9-9 tax policy. Herman Cain wants to take the revolutionary step of ditching the current American taxation system and replacing it with a flat income tax rate of nine per cent, corporate tax rate of nine per cent and a national sales tax of nine per cent. Before you say 'that won't work', do bear in mind that the USA does not have a national sales tax (along the lines of VAT) although individual states do have state sales taxes. Herman Cain also plans on ending all tax deductions & exemptions and abolishing estate taxes & capital gains tax.

It's an interesting solution and one that might be of interest to the 'flat rate of tax' proponents in the UK. Is the US ready for such radical tax policies? Somehow I think that the American leftists and their media allies will attack, attack, attack as nothing must be allowed to stop the fiscally inept Obamamessiah from getting re-elected. Is the US ready for a black US President? Somehow I think that the the American leftists and their media allies will attack, attack, attack as nothing must be allowed to stop the half-black Obamamessiah from getting re-elected.

The BBC's disinterest in the story of Yousef Nadarkhani in Iran but as a result (?) unwittingly (?) linking to an article that they must not agree with

The BBC's coverage of the case of the Iranian Yousef Nadarkhani sentenced to death fr apostacy has been close to criminal. Iran's Supreme Court sentenced Yousef Nadarkhani thus:
'...is convicted of turning his back on Islam, the greatest religion the prophesy of Mohammad at the age of 19. He has often participated in Christian worship and organized home church services, evangelizing and has been baptized and baptized others, converting Muslims to Christianity. He has been accused of breaking Islamic Law that from puberty (15 years according to Islamic law) until the age of 19 the year 1996, he was raised a Muslim in a Muslim home. During court trials, he denied the prophecy of Mohammad and the authority of Islam. He has stated that he is a Christian and no longer Muslim.'
The Iranian authorities have tried to backtrack, claiming that Yousef Nadarkhani was actually sentenced to death for being one or more of these more Western 'liberal' friendly crimes: a "Zionist traitor", a "rapist", an "extortionist" and a "brothel owner". The truth is in Iran's Supreme Court ruling.
Meanwhile on planet BBC, the story attracts little coverage. Indeed searching for Nadarkhani on the BBC news website I found just this...

Why so shy BBC?

However that external link is an interesting one, it takes you to a Ted Nugent article for The Washington Times that really does not fit well with the BBC's view of Islam.
'In yet further proof that Iran is a country of insecure and intolerant voodoo extremists, as I wrote this, this there was a possibility a Christian pastor would be executed because he would not recant his Christian faith and embrace Islam in the land of Allah freaks.

Convert to Islam or die is the mantra of many of the world’s Muslims. It’s anti-human.

That’s right. In 2011, you can be executed in Iran for professing a faith other than Islam, the so-called “religion of peace.” It may be a religion of peace, but the religious voodoo whack jobs who embrace the faith are an oppressive, cruel and violent lot. Their faith is so weak that they execute and persecute others who are not Muslims.

Having a law that allows for the execution of people of other faiths is but one of the reasons why the unstable extremists in charge in Iran or other voodoo countries should not be allowed to get their hands on nuclear weapons. I stand with Israel.

The United Nations probably won’t even issue a proclamation condemning Iran for having a death penalty for practicing a different faith. Should Iran execute Christian pastor Youcef Nadarkhani, the United Nations will barely issue a whimper. The U.N. is infested with evil, soulless, brain-dead voodoo freaks. The fact that we have anything to do with the U.N. is disgusting and anti-American.

...

The persecution of Christians in Muslim-dominated countries is a story not given enough ink by our left-wing lapdog media. Even Christian churches and Christian leaders have failed miserably at identifying and condemning the persecution of their fellow Christians in Muslim countries. Political correctness has muzzled too many Christians.

A quick search of the Internet reveals hundreds of instances of Muslims terrorizing and killing Christians and destroying their churches. And we are supposed to believe that Islam is the religion of peace. I think not. Go to jihadwatch.com and read about Islam, the religion of persecution, death and destruction.

The world should be outraged over what is transpiring in Iran and, for that matter, in other Middle Eastern countries where it is impossible to tell the difference between their religion and their politics, where people of a different faith are terrorized, where kangaroo court systems will not stand for real justice. These subhuman countries deserve the world’s ridicule and scorn.

Whether or not Iran executes, locks up or throws pastor Nadarkhani out of Iran is not the point. The point is that Iran and other Middle Eastern countries legally sanction executing and terrorizing others of different faiths. It just goes to show you how little mankind really has evolved in some parts of the world.'
There's more in the article, do go and read it; but shh don't tell the BBC what they have linked to!

More lefty hypocrisy as they scream down with big corporations


Ah the swett sound, sight and smell of lefty hypocrisy!


Thanks to Theo Spark for the spot.

A better example for Theresa May to use in the future, should she have a future

'So a person accused of committing genocide in an ‘unsafe country’ (which country that has genocide is safe!) simply has to get into an ECHR country and they will get away with it. The ECHR is providing cover for people who commit genocide. Madness.'
The words of Phil Woolas in his diary, when he was the previous Labour government's  Immigration Minister, as reported in The Mail. Here's the context:
'June 28
Back to Rwanda. We have four people wanted for genocide in Rwanda (there are 100 but the four are the test case). The magistrates had agreed to extradite them but the High Court had disagreed on the grounds that they would not get a fair trial in Rwanda.

I am advised that I should grant six months leave to remain in the UK ‘in the hope that the legal system in Rwanda improves’.

I had asked why we couldn’t try them in The Hague and was told as they were not British, I couldn’t send them there!

So a person accused of committing genocide in an ‘unsafe country’ (which country that has genocide is safe!) simply has to get into an ECHR country and they will get away with it. The ECHR is providing cover for people who commit genocide. Madness.'
Madness? I would say that just about covers it.


Saturday, 8 October 2011

John Redwood is not impressed with the latest piece of Quantative Easing

John Redwood is not impressed with the latest piece of Quantative Easing
'How silly of me not to realise we could simply create £75 billion to sort out our problems.  Now we are told we can, maybe we should ask what we should do with the new money?

It seems such a pity just to go on buying government bonds with it. After all, taxpayers have £199 billion of them in the Bank already. They are not a lot of fun, and do not seem to do a lot of good. Once you have  got some, having more does not add a lot.

We could, for example, give every man, woman and child  in the country £1250 each to spend as they like. They could use it to pay off the credit card debt, or meet the tax bills on their petrol. It would help with the Council  Tax and the VAT. As the main problem over the last year has been the drop in  consumer spending, this would offer a way of boosting it. Funny how the authorities never want the punters to have any of the new money.

Or we could use the £75 billion to recapitalise the state owned banks. They could write off  their losses for that, and have a load of new capital to lend. That too could do a lot to promote recovery.

We could decide to spend it on a big capital programme. It would buy plenty of roads, railway capacity, energy supply and broadband access. We could all be given free shares in the projects and companies established with the money.

Or the government could just use the money to pay its bills direct, instead of going through the mechanics of buying in old government loans, and then issuing new ones to pay for the excess of spending over income.

Come to think of it, why don’t we always pay for public expenditure like that? Why do we go through the painful process of demanding tax revenue from people, when you could just print some more tenners? Is there a snag the MPC haven’t spotted yet? Why pause at £275 billion?

The Bank will have a nice tidy income from the gilts it buys in. The government could simply cancel all the bonds the Bank owns, to get its interest bill down. Come to think of it, why stop at just £275 billion for doing that? The more you   buy in and cancel , the less interest you have to pay.That would monetise the lot, and should prevent the deflation the Bank must fear.

Why do so many spoil sports and jeremiahs write in to this site to say this is a bad idea?  Does the Bank think there are any   limits to electronic money?

We are owed a proper explanation from the Bank of why they think printing money when inflation is already 5.2% is a good idea.  Just telling us yet again that inflation will fall and that we are in the midst of the worst crisis ever is not a sufficient argument for actions that savers will fear.

Maybe the Bank does  worry that the banking problems remain acute. If so, the right approach is to seek actions to create strong banks out of the weak banks that currently spook the system. We need honest money.

In the UK there is no substitute for sorting out RBS.'
I could not put it better myself, so I haven't.

This country's economy is heading for disaster and the 'Conservative led government' seems to be accelerating the process.

The great smell of eco-hypocrisy

From 2009 we read that:
'Lord Turner suggested that Britons might have to cut back on their overseas breaks.

He said the Government should urgently consider imposing individual restrictions to help reduce pollution caused by planes.

Lord Turner, chairman of Parliament's climate change committee, said: 'We will have to constrain demand in an absolute sense, with people not allowed to make as many journeys as they could in an unconstrained manner.''
In 2011 we read in The Telegraph (although oddly not online) that Lord Turner has spent an average of more than £4,500 a month on international air travel.
'The FSA usually bans its executives from flying in anything but economy class, but Lord Turner has secured an exemption.

...

... embarrassing as he is charged with both cutting carbon emissions and reining in the excessive behaviour in the City. Flying in first class creates double the carbon emissions of cheaper seats.'
Hmmmm

The BBC's coverage of the Labour and Conservative party conferences has been analysed

I knew Beeb Bias Craig would not let us down and he hasn't. On Biased BBC Craig has some very detailed analysis of the way the BBC Radio 4 Today programme covered the Labour and Conservative party conferences. It's a long but very rewarding read, here's the conclusion but do go and read the whole piece:
'A comparison of the 'Today' programme's coverage of the Labour Party and Conservative Party conferences reveals a significant degree of pro-Labour bias. Though only a few items, such as the Danny Shaw report, screamed 'bias!', the cumulative effect of the different moods established by the two respective presenters, the severe skewing of the commentariat towards the Labour Party, the unhelpfulness of the reports towards one party in particular, the presence of other unhelpful items towards that party (in contrast to a helpful one towards the other party), the framing of interviews, and the programme's initial agenda-setting (always followed through), all adds up to coverage that is much more favourable to one party than to another. I have tried to be as fair as fair can be towards the programme here but there is always the possibility that my own biases are blinding me to flaws in my own study. So, though I think I'm correct in all my judgements, please check the links (to whatever is still accessible on the 'Today' website) and see if you think I really am!

Of course, the question 'Does any of this really matter?' arises, especially when the Conservative Party itself shows little or no concern about biased BBC reporting. The related question 'Who cares?' may also cross your mind. (It crossed mine several times while writing this!) Still, the BBC has an obligation to impartiality and boasts that it is impartial. It it fails on that score, it must be called out. '

Since the BBC won't remember Yom Kippur 1973...

From the letters section of a Private Eyefrom October 2010
'Sir,

While discussing the coroner’s inquest into the death of Ashraf Marwan [page 7, Eye 1267], you write “In October 1973, for example, he warned Israel of the imminent Egyptian and Syrian invasions that started the Yom Kippur War’. As I am sure you note now, this is totally inaccurate. Syria and Egypt cannot invade their own lands. They attacked to regain their lands occupied by Israel.

Can you please make the necessary correction.

Thank you.

Hisham al-Qassab'
I think Hisham al-Qassab should learn some history, specifically about the conquest of Jewish land by Muslims pre 20th Century, the creation of Jordan on land promised to a future Jewish state, the expulsion of Jews from Muslim countries post 1948, and the story of the wars of 1948 and 1967.

In the meantime 'well over the fast' to my Jewish readers; being as Yom Kippur commenced at sunset last night. I await the BBC commemorations of the Muslim countries attack on Israel on the holiest day in the Jewish calendar in 1973, but somehow I think that I will wait in vain.

You see there are many who subscribe to the revisionist view that Israel was not attacked on the holiest day in the Jewish calendar but instead chose that day to attack its neighbours. It's a laughable suggestion and even the BBC agree with me on its on this day for 6 October (my emphasis):
'1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces
Heavy fighting has erupted between Arab and Israeli forces along two fronts.

To the south, Egyptian armoured forces have broken the Israeli line on the eastern bank of the Suez Canal.

In the north, Syrian troops and tanks are battling with Israeli defences along the Golan Heights seized by Israel from Syria in 1967.

Both sides have accused each other of firing the first shots, but UN observers have reported seeing Egyptian and Syrian troops crossing into Israeli-held territory.
Israeli defence minister, General Moshe Dayan has told the nation in a televised address: "We must realise this is war. We are engaged in heavy battles on both fronts against numerically superior forces."

The attacks have come on the Day of Atonement, Yom Kippur, and the holiest day in the Jewish calendar.

Most Jews had been observing strict religious rules of fasting and prayer, but with the outbreak of fighting, Israel's civilian reserve force is now rushing to mobilise.
The heaviest fighting has been reported along the Suez Canal and the adjoining Sinai peninsula, seized by the Israelis from Egypt in 1967.

Israel's Prime Minister, Mrs. Golda Meir, claimed in a radio address that heavy losses have been inflicted on both Egypt and Syria.

But an Egyptian military communiqué has stated the Canal is now almost entirely under their control.

Damascus radio said Syrian forces on the northern frontier have captured Israeli positions on the Golan Heights, notably Mount Hermon.

But the claims are being countered by the Israelis, who say the situation in the border region remains "adequate".

Israel is outnumbered three to two in immediately available man-power, three to two in tanks and two to one in combat aircraft against the combined forces of Egypt and Syria.

British Foreign Office officials say there is a risk neighbouring countries may become involved.

Algeria, Libya, Kuwait, Jordan and the Lebanon have all pledged their support for the Arab offensive. '

So why have the BBC seem to have all but ignored Yom Kippur and the anniversary of the Yom Kippur war on 6 October? Must nothing be allowed to counter their narrative of it's always Israel's fault?

Friday, 7 October 2011

Pat Condell and the Palestinian Lie


One of Pat Condell's best videos. I especially liked this line:
"The Arabs don't hate Jews because of Israel, they hate Israel because of Jews."

On Yom Kippur

May you be inscribed in the Book of Life for a good year.

Have the BBC  mentioned Yom Kippur yet or Rosh Hashona last week? They are always ready to explain what and why Ramadan, or whatever, is important but jewish festivals less so.

Just a war?

Oh the BBC, this report on Egypt's state of affairs includes this section:
'Egypt's military leader has said the country is undergoing a "sensitive stage" in its history, and called for people to "rally round national goals".

Speaking on the anniversary of the 1973 war with Israel, Field Marshal Mohamed Tantawi said he was confident Egyptians could build a "strong modern state".'
'the 1973 war with Israel' - that's it, no context? Nothing about how Egypt and other Islamic countries invaded  Israel on Judaism's holiest day. You can bet your bottom dollar that any story about Jerusalem or the West Bank will have context placed upon it.

A missing angle in this BBC report

The BBC report that:
'Thirty-two bodies have been found in several locations in Mexico's eastern port city of Veracruz, the navy says.

The discovery comes two weeks after 35 bodies were dumped on a busy road in Veracruz state in broad daylight.

The Mexican government has announced the deployment of extra security forces in the state, as gangs wage an escalating war over drug trafficking.'
The BBC mention the role of the Mexican authorities but not the role of the Obama administration in getting guns into Mexico. The  story of how and why the Obama administration put guns into Mexican criminals hands is a scandal but not one that the Obama supporting BBC will cover in any detail, if at all.

Federal agent John Dodson says what he was asked to do was beyond belief.
He was intentionally letting guns go to Mexico?
“Yes ma’am,” Dodson told CBS News. “The agency was.”

ATF managers allegedly made a controversial decision: allow most of the weapons on the streets. The idea, they said, was to gather intelligence and see where the guns ended up. Insiders say it’s a dangerous tactic called letting the guns, “walk.”
One agent called the strategy “insane.” Another said: “We were fully aware the guns would probably be moved across the border to drug cartels where they could be used to kill.”
. . . .
For months, ATF agents followed 50-caliber Barrett rifles and other guns believed headed for the Mexican border, but were ordered to let them go. One distraught agent was often overheard on ATF radios begging and pleading to be allowed to intercept transports. The answer: “Negative. Stand down.”
If the George W. Bush administration had made such a blunder the BBC would have covered the story but as this is an Obama foul-up... not a word.

I have heard the theory that Obama wants the Mexican gun situation to get out of hand so he can institute gun control in the US; I am inclined to believe that to be possible.

Yvonne Ridley Taliban apologist, Islamic terrorist supporter, liar about the situation in the Palestinian territories and generally nasty piece of work is taken to task by The Times' Oliver Kamm


From Nicky Campbell's BBC 5Live programme.

For more on Yvonne Ridley:
'http://markhumphrys.com/islam.uk.html#ridley

Yvonne Ridley on an "admirable struggle"
http://hurryupharry.org/2006/07/20/yvonne-ridley-on-an-admirable-struggle/

Yvonne Ridley: "Victory to Hamas"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruF3h_hZSE8

Yvonne Ridley: "The Zionists have tentacles everywhere"
http://hurryupharry.org/2010/04/08/%E2%80%9Cracist-and-inflammatory%E2%80%9D/

Yvonne Ridley: 9/11 Truther:
http://hurryupharry.org/2010/09/13/et-tu-yvonne/

Yvonne Ridley: Supporting Iraqi Jihadists
http://www.wrmea.com/archives/Sept_Oct_2005/0509058b.html


Or you could read my previous pieces about this individual - http://notasheepmaybeagoat.blogspot.com/search/label/Yvonne%20Ridley


Boris Johnson vs Jeremy Paxman

2009

Boris takes on Paxman quite beautifully.

2011

Jeremy Paxman - "What's the difference between you and David Cameron"
Boris Johnson - Just listen to the answer, Boris is a human being.


I am not a massive Boris fan, some of his mannerisms annoy me. However I do think that he is a natural performer, a witty chap and more capable of independent thought & speech than most politicians. I also like the way that Boris controls the space around him. I do not think that Boris is the right man to lead the Conservative party but as London Mayor he is ideal for the Conservatives as he appeals across the spectrum of London politics.

Thursday, 6 October 2011

Yes I think I see

The Telegraph recently reported that 'The boss of lap dancing company Spearmint Rhino has suggested hard-up students should consider stripping as a way to pay for university tuition fees.' The Telegraph's article included this attack on the idea:
'Estelle Hart, NUS women's officer, said:"I think the government has got some questions to answer about why students are turning to what is quite a dangerous job .

...

"The sort of idea that in order for women to work they have got to look and act a certain way and be sexually available and attractive to men is actually quite upsetting." '

Why would that thought upset you so much Estelle?

Sorry... I am in a bad mood today!

The taxonomy of Big Bird


Zoologist Mike Dickison talks about where a certain large, yellow, flightless bird fits into the tree of life.

Geeky but funny!


Thanks to Boing Boing for the spot.

Airport security - there is another way

I posted this last November  and think it's time for a re-post...


'The Star reports on why security is so much better and less intrusive at Israel's airports than in the USA (and indeed Europe). Here's an extract, do read the whole piece:

'"The first thing you do is to look at who is coming into your airport," said Sela. 
The first layer of actual security that greets travellers at Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion International Airport is a roadside check. All drivers are stopped and asked two questions: How are you? Where are you coming from? 
"Two benign questions. The questions aren't important. The way people act when they answer them is," Sela said. 
Officers are looking for nervousness or other signs of "distress" — behavioural profiling. Sela rejects the argument that profiling is discriminatory. 
"The word 'profiling' is a political invention by people who don't want to do security," he said. "To us, it doesn't matter if he's black, white, young or old. It's just his behaviour. So what kind of privacy am I really stepping on when I'm doing this?" 
Once you've parked your car or gotten off your bus, you pass through the second and third security perimeters. 
Armed guards outside the terminal are trained to observe passengers as they move toward the doors, again looking for odd behaviour. At Ben Gurion's half-dozen entrances, another layer of security are watching. At this point, some travellers will be randomly taken aside, and their person and their luggage run through a magnometer. 
"This is to see that you don't have heavy metals on you or something that looks suspicious," said Sela.
You are now in the terminal. As you approach your airline check-in desk, a trained interviewer takes your passport and ticket. They ask a series of questions: Who packed your luggage? Has it left your side? 
"The whole time, they are looking into your eyes — which is very embarrassing. But this is one of the ways they figure out if you are suspicious or not. It takes 20, 25 seconds," said Sela. 
Lines are staggered. People are not allowed to bunch up into inviting targets for a bomber who has gotten this far. 
At the check-in desk, your luggage is scanned immediately in a purpose-built area. Sela plays devil's advocate — what if you have escaped the attention of the first four layers of security, and now try to pass a bag with a bomb in it? 
"I once put this question to Jacques Duchesneau (the former head of the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority): say there is a bag with play-doh in it and two pens stuck in the play-doh. That is 'Bombs 101' to a screener. I asked Ducheneau, 'What would you do?' And he said, 'Evacuate the terminal.' And I said, 'Oh. My. God.' 
"Take Pearson. Do you know how many people are in the terminal at all times? Many thousands. Let's say I'm (doing an evacuation) without panic — which will never happen. But let's say this is the case. How long will it take? Nobody thought about it. I said, 'Two days.'" 
A screener at Ben-Gurion has a pair of better options.
First, the screening area is surrounded by contoured, blast-proof glass that can contain the detonation of up to 100 kilos of plastic explosive. Only the few dozen people within the screening area need be removed, and only to a point a few metres away. 
Second, all the screening areas contain 'bomb boxes'. If a screener spots a suspect bag, he/she is trained to pick it up and place it in the box, which is blast proof. A bomb squad arrives shortly and wheels the box away for further investigation.
"This is a very small simple example of how we can simply stop a problem that would cripple one of your airports," Sela said. 
Five security layers down: you now finally arrive at the only one which Ben-Gurion Airport shares with Pearson — the body and hand-luggage check. 
"But here it is done completely, absolutely 180 degrees differently than it is done in North America," Sela said. 
"First, it's fast — there's almost no line. That's because they're not looking for liquids, they're not looking at your shoes. They're not looking for everything they look for in North America. They just look at you," said Sela. "Even today with the heightened security in North America, they will check your items to death. But they will never look at you, at how you behave. They will never look into your eyes ... and that's how you figure out the bad guys from the good guys." 
That's the process — six layers, four hard, two soft. The goal at Ben-Gurion is to move fliers from the parking lot to the airport lounge in a maximum of 25 minutes.'

Why are we so fixated on looking for liquids and bombs rather than doing some intelligent profiling?' Why do we inconvenience the majority?

Steve Jobs, R.I.P.

Steve Jobs has passed away within less than 24 hours of Apple's launch of not the much heralded iPhone5 but a seemingly far less exciting iPhone 4S. I have never owned a piece of Apple technology, although I have worked on many Apple PCs over the years and Mrs NotaSheep owns an iPad and an iPod although neither of these get as much use as they should.

I have long admired Apple's design philosophy but find the way that one is coerced further and further into Apple-land irritating. Even worse though is the way that Apple charge top dollar for their hardware and take a ridiculously large cut from people who wish to sell via the App Store. It is strange how Microsoft are derided by such as the BBC for their monopolistic position in the PC world, yet Apple whose practices make Microsoft sometimes look like angels are lauded by the same organisations; presumably because they are still seen as trendy insurgents, despite them now being nothing of the sort.

Regardless of the above, Steve Jobs' death is a great loss to the world of technology and he will be missed.

Wednesday, 5 October 2011

Graham Dilley R.I.P.

I tweeted earlier about the sad death of Graham Dilley today but I want to say more. Graham Dilley was one of the England 1981 test team that first got me interested in cricket when at school. Graham Dilley was a fine fast bowler but in that Headingly Test Match he also showed how good a batsman he was. In that famous partnership with Ian Botham that put on 117 runs, I believe Graham Dilley scored 56 of the runs;  he all but matched Ian Botham!

Graham Dilley was more than just a one match player, he also performed magnificently against the West Indies in 1988, taking 9 wickets for just over a hundred in 50 overs.

Graham Dilley, a great test cricketer, by all accounts a great coach and man. More personally when I first met Mrs NotaSheep it transpired that she too was a fan of Graham Dilley, although Mrs NotaSheep's interests in Graham Dilley were not purely cricket related.

Inequalities in the NHS

The BBC were pushing the attack on this government's NHS reforms yesterday. Here's what they didn't tell you about one of the signatories:
'"Signatories include Sir Michael Marmot, one of the world's leading experts on health inequalities..."

Might it not have been informative to also tell their readers this:

"On 6 November 2008, Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced that the Secretary of State for Health Alan Johnson had asked Sir Michael Marmot to chair a Review of Health Inequalities in England..."

Now, that doesn't in itself make Mr Marmot wrong, but is surely relevant context to give.'
To the BBC, the background of former Labour associates is of no relevance; I wonder why?


Thanks to Roland Deschain at Biased-BBC for the spot.

Theresa May and the Human Rights Act

I was preparing a barnstorming piece on Theresa May's missed opportunity to attack this iniquitous piece of legislation but then I read Gildas the Monk's article on Anna Raccoon and I thought why bother; this article says it all and far more eloquently than I could have managed. So go read it all, here are a few excerpts to whet your appetite:
'I quite like Theresa May. It may be because I am an inveterate flirt and quite like posh women with fancy tastes in shoes. I don’t know. And when she makes a serious point that the legal system is being abused by a motley collection – nay, army – of thieves, murderers, drug dealers and malefactors who make hay in the United Kingdom by virtue of the “Yuman Rights” Act, she should be on solid ground with me.

The “Yuman Rights” Act, by the way, is an Act of Parliament which says that if you are a law abiding citizen of this country you are not allowed to complain if some Somali pirate with a penchant for knife crime stabs someone in the neck and we cannot throw him out of the country, back into the nasty pit whence he crawled. Provided, that is, he has managed to sire some offspring with one of his crack whores first, in which case he has a “right to family life” and is entitled to remain here. Usually at public expense.

...

Why can’t politicians get their speeches to back up what they are saying with hard fact? As I leafed through the Sunday Times a couple of days ago, for example, I noticed an article on page 20 which detailed the systematic abuse of Human Rights law to avoid extradition by Albanian criminals found guilty in their absence of crimes, including murder using a sub machine gun (at a cost of millions to the tax payer).

And the case of a Mr Siraj Yassin Abdullah Ali. Mr Ali was sentenced to nine years for helping the 21/7 bombers who killed more than fifty innocent people and maimed and seriously injured many more, but he can’t be deported because he might face “inhuman treatment” in his native Eritrea. Which begs some questions. Why was he here in first place? How was he allowed in? How did he get here? What will happen when, not if, he is released? Presumably he will vote Tory and join a golf club? Maybe not…

I am a great believer in the maxim that if you are going to do something, you had better do it well. If you are going to put the boot into the lunatic Human Rights industry, take a good long run up, and put that boot in properly and hard, right where it hurts. Get your facts rigorously right. If you wish to complain about the bloody cat, quote the judgement, quote the words, set the context…

Be relentless, merciless, dry, and to the point. Find the best examples. Spell them out in soulless, cold, unremitting and accurate detail. Tell us the costs of the fiasco in lawyers fees. The case is crying out to be made.'

Tuesday, 4 October 2011

Are you prepared for the complete meltdown of the world financial system and the subsequent chaos?

If you have laid in food and water, purchased a generator and hold stocks of gold coins, do you have any way of defending you, your family and your possessions?




Do the BBC accept advertising or product placement?

The Telegraph write that:
'The BBC has been accused of allowing some of its most high-profile presenters to effectively advertise outdoor clothing after receiving discounts for them of 45%.

George Alagiah, the news reader, Neil Oliver, the presenter of the documentary series Coast, and Professor Brian Cox, who presented BBC2’s Wonders of the Solar System, have all been shown on television with the Berghaus logo prominent.

Regional reporters have also appeared in the firm’s clothing, as has the BBC’s diplomatic and royal correspondent, Peter Hunt.

Viewers noticed the Berghaus label so regularly that many began to voice their concerns online.

One said: “Why do I keep seeing TV presenters wearing Berghaus coats? Just seen one with the Berghaus logo on one side and BBC on the other.

“What’s the shameless advertising on the Beeb?”'
Interesting and I am sure you can guess the BBC's defence without me even providing it here.

The BBC believe that they are never wrong and if they are wrong it was all a mistake.

Monday, 3 October 2011

A "No shit, sherlock" special with some additional questions that need answering

I read on the BBC  that:
'Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness has acknowledged that accidental killings by the IRA of civilians could be described as "murders".

In an interview with the Independent, he said the IRA "was involved in incidents which resulted in the accidental killing of innocent people".

Mr McGuinness added "the term used by the relatives of those people who were killed was that they were murdered".'
I will leave out the word 'accidental' from that first sentence because I am not sure of its validity and that leaves us with 'killings by the IRA of civilians could be described as "murders"' - "No shit, Sherlock"

However there are some additional questions that Martin McGuinness needs to answer in relation to this statement. First 'accidental' - Does Martin McGuinness really want us to believe that those killed by IRA bombs and bulletswere killed accidentally? Let's leave aside the fact that the IRA killed dozens and dozens of British Armed forces and Police; has Martin MacGuinness ever apologised for their murder? He seems happy to claim that they were killed as part of a war of liberation but equally keen on having the British government and Army censured for retaliating and killing IRA members; how odd.

Martin McGuinness and the IRA's use of the phrase "legitimate targets" to describe the people they murdered  reminds me of the Islamist terrorists justification of killing infidels as infidels cannot be 'innocent'.

The ame BBC article includes this line 'Mr McGuinness has accused the media of becoming obsessed with his IRA past, claiming that ordinary voters are not interested in the issue.'. I wonder if that's true, do ordinary voters really not care if their future President is a former murderer, really?

However the questions I really want answered though are these: how many British soldiers, policemen and civilians were killed personally by Martin McGuinness, how many on his orders and how mnay could he have prevented by saying 'No' to their IRA killers? Is the answer to all three of those questions really 'no'?

Do speed cameras reduce accident numbers?

The Association of British Drivers (ABD) have their doubts and the figures to prove it. This is the first article from July:
'Lancashire has been one of the first counties to publish its speed camera statistics under new government rules and locals are horrified.
The Lancashire Evening Post has found three speed cameras in Preston alone where the number of accidents and casualties has increased since the cameras were installed (countywide analysis may reveal more).

According to the Evening Post those same three cameras raked in £18,000 in fines from motorists in 2010. 1

ABD chairman Brian Gregory commented.
“Not only is it scandalous that cameras where casualties have increased have been kept in operation for many years, it is even more disturbing that the authorities have hidden this data and authorised continued operation whilst being in possession of this knowledge. The government should get a grip and insist that those responsible for such malpractice in all regions are removed from public service with immediate effect.”'
 You might be even more interested in this pdf of a report entitled 'A Review of the Effectiveness of Speed Cameras'. Here's the Preface:
'A careful examination of the RAC Foundation report entitled “The Effectiveness of Speed Cameras”, authored by Professor Richard Allsop, by the Association of British Drivers has identified some questionable methodological procedures, defective analyses and significant omissions. In our view these severely
compromise the validity of its conclusions and recommendations.

The excessive reliance on speed cameras in the UK over the last two decades has affected road safety adversely. A massive diversion of resources towards speed enforcement and away from more cost-effective alternatives has regrettably resulted. This process has primarily been driven - and supported - by
the financial interests of the equipment manufacturers and of the safety camera partnerships, rather than by concerns for improvement in UK road safety.

Speed cameras are far less effective than Prof. Allsop’s paper claims. They are also far less cost effective than other available devices. Resources misdirected on speed camera enforcement would, in our view, have resulted in far greater road casualty reductions - and particularly in the KSI (Killed and Seriously
Injured) figures - had they been employed on alternative road safety measures.

Independent evidence shows that Vehicle Activated Signs are 50 times more cost effective than speed cameras; yet the proponents of speed cameras continue to argue for their use. It is in the public interest to correct any misapprehensions which may have been created by the widely distributed, but
potentially misleading, Allsop paper.

We therefore commissioned the attached report which has been produced by a suitably-qualified ABD member. It has been peer-reviewed by a number of other senior ABD members; and by other, wholly independent researchers with an interest in this topic. We believe that it addresses all the key points.
Despite their complexities, we hope that you will read both studies and so identify for yourself the shortcomings in the Allsop paper. These are sufficient in number to seriously compromise many of its conclusions regarding the effectiveness of speed cameras as a road safety tool.'

The one hundred and forty seventy weekly "No shit, Sherlock" award

This week's prize is awarded to the Low Pay Commission as reported in The Telegraph for this piece of stating the bleedin' obvious:
'The minimum wage may be pricing young people out of work because employers are finding it too expensive to give them their first job, Government pay advisers have said.

Firms may be reluctant to create jobs by recruiting inexperienced staff because they are put off by the increased wage bill, the Low Pay Commission has suggested.'
You mean to say that if you increase the price of something then the demand for that thing falls?

"No shit, Sherlock"

Sunday, 2 October 2011

The way Israel treats its Arab population

This Elder of Ziyon article may be of interest:
'From Ha'aretz:

A new opinion poll shows that despite hardships, Palestinian residents of East Jerusalem are relatively satisfied with their lives under Israeli rule. The survey, implemented by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy in cooperation with Princeton University and the Beit Sahur-based Palestinian Center for Public Opinion, found that almost half of East Jerusalem Palestinian respondents said they prefered to remain under Israeli sovereignty.

Only 23 percent of respondents said they would definitely prefer Palestinian citizenship to Israeli citizenship.

Among the reasons respondents cited for wanting to remain under Israeli sovereignty were relative freedom of movement, relatively higher income, employment opportunities and social rights.
...


UPDATE: More details here:


A comparison of results from last November shows a significant improvement in perceptions of other issues.
For example, a majority (57 percent) are now satisfied with their standard of living, up from 44 percent in November. And just 43 percent now say they are dissatisfied on the issue of obtaining building permits -- down greatly from around 70 percent in the previous survey. Similarly, only 16 percent now report dissatisfaction with Jerusalem municipal officials, a significant improvement compared to 35 percent in November.'
I presume the BBC report on this  opinion poll is only moments away!

Another victory for Islamic terrorism?

Lori Dorn relates a harrowing experience she had at JFK recently. I have not edited her story but will comment at the end:
'At what point does the need for security eclipse human dignity and compassion?

Yesterday I went through the imaging scanner at JFK Terminal 4 for my Virgin America flight to San Francisco.  Evidently they found something, because after the scan, I was asked to step aside to have my breast area examined.  I explained to the agent that I was a breast cancer patient and had a bilateral mastectomy in April and had tissue expanders put in to make way for reconstruction at a later date.  

I told her that I was not comfortable with having my breasts touched and that I had a card in my wallet that explains the type of expanders, serial numbers and my doctor’s information (pictured) and asked to retrieve it. 

This request was denied.  Instead, she called over a female supervisor who told me the exam had to take place.  I was again told that I could not retrieve the card and needed to submit to a physical exam in order to be cleared.  She then said, “And if we don’t clear you, you don’t fly” loud enough for other passengers to hear.  And they did.  And they stared at the bald woman being yelled at by a TSA Supervisor. 

To my further dismay, my belongings, including my computer, were completely out of sight. I had no choice but to allow an agent to touch my breasts in front of other passengers.  

I just didn’t understand why these agents were so insensitive to the situation. I would have been happy to show her which bag was mine and have her retrieve the card, but she did not allow even that. I have been through emotional and physical hell this past year due to breast cancer.  The way I was treated by these TSA agents added a shitload of insult to injury and caused me a great deal of humiliation.

I understand the need for safety when flying, but there is also a need for those responsible to be compassionate and sensitive to each situation.  These agents were neither.

I can only comfort myself with the fact that Karma is always circular.'
Lori Dorn is right to complain at the treatment she received but the blame should be laid firmly at the door of Islamic terrorists. The security personel at airports around the world are (over)reacting to the efforts of Islamic terrorists to hide explosives in more and more devious ways. We have had explosives hidden in shoes and in underwear and also rumours of explosives hidden by surgery.

Are our children being brainwashed?

'RB junior is not alone.  He, along with his fellow students are considered the bright ones at science and may well pass into science related roles, yet this is what they are being taught as the fight for their minds continues.  If they receive no challenge to this orthodoxy, this frame of reference will drift into their subconscious.  They will start to use this notion in what they perceive to be their own original thought.  They won't recall how such an idea took hold in their heads nor will they even be able to recognise that it may have come in via an external source.  Their work and ideas will flow from it.  The concept of Inception will have been achieved.

So if you have children or grandchildren, take an interest in what they are thinking.'
Restoring Britain  has spotted some subtle (and not so subtle) attempts at brainwashing children in a Science exam; yes its Climate Change related of course. Do read the whole article.

Jihad comes to European football

For more details take a read of this Creeping Sharia article about Polish club Legia Warsaw.

Saturday, 1 October 2011

Doctor Who named!

The Doctor is never called Doctor Who... Until tonight! What has happened??? More thoughts later... Apart from the obvious that "Doctor Who" is the great unanswered question that was always in plain sight; nicely done.

Doctor Who - "Wedding of River Song" - 5 minutes to go

Steven Moffat has written this series finale when The Doctor dies at Lake Silencio; somehow I doubt that he will. Will we learn what 'the Silence' is? Previews have shown that that bloody River Song reappears as well as Winston Churchill and Dorium.

I predict a cliffhanger ending ready for the Christmas Day special.

Fort Hood update

As recently as July of this year I blogged that:
' The BBC reported
that

'The US Army psychiatrist accused in a deadly shooting rampage at a Texas base will face a court martial and possible death penalty, a general has ruled.

Maj Nidal Malik Hasan is accused of killing 13 people and wounding 32 more in November 2009 at Fort Hood.'
You will not be surprised to learn that the BBC manage not to report Major Hasan's blood-curdling cries as he attacked the soldiers but prefers to say this:
'He has been described as a devout Muslim and a poor-performing military officer who alarmed his superiors with his eccentric behaviour.''
So I was interested to read this on the BBC that:
'It also emerged after the Fort Hood incident that Awlaki had given the US Army psychiatrist charged with killing 13 people, Maj Nidal Malik Hasan, religious advice by email. He had also seen Awlaki preach in Virginia in 2001.

In July 2009, the cleric posted a blog saying a Muslim soldier who fought other Muslims was a "heartless beast, bent on evil, who sells his religion for a few dollars". Following the shootings, Awlaki called Maj Hasan a hero.

"My support to the operation was because the operation brother Nidal carried out was a courageous one," he told al-Jazeera.

"And I endeavoured to explain my position regarding what happened because many Islamic organisations and preachers in the West condemned the operation."'
 So Major Nidal Hasan was 'a devout Muslim' and went to see Anwar al-Awlaki preach. You wouldn't have thought so from the BBC's previous coverage of the murdering major's activities.

For more about Major Hasan you could do much worse than read this as well as what I wrote here, here, here, here, here and here.

I also read at Investigative Project that:
'Fort Hood attack: The Nov. 5, 2009, shootings in Fort Hood, Texas, killed 13 people and wounded at least 30 others. Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the accused killer, communicated with Awlaki by email about 18 times in 2008, records show. After the shootings, Awlaki posted a message on his website calling Hasan a hero.'
 

Doctor Who - "Closing Time" - a belated review

Not my favourite episode by a long way, the Cybermen defeated by a man's love for his baby son - oh do me a favour! However there was some rather good acting from Matt Smith in this episode; he really did manage the trick of looking 900+ years old, and to think I thought when he was announced as the new Doctor, I thought he was too young for the role.

So less of the sentimental crap please in the next episode. The Doctor dies, somehow I doubt it!

England v Scotland at the Rugby World Cup - Here we go

England should win but if Scotland can show enough passion and disrupt England's forward platform then they might steal it. England often manage to lose matches that they should win, is this the one?