Is there a motive here that the BBC are trying not to ascribe? (Update)

Further to my recent blog article about: Sahnoun Daifallah's squirting of a foul-smelling brown liquid. I asked then

"Does anyone else wonder if Sahnoun Daifallah was attacking items that were "haram"? "

Today I see that the BBC are reporting that

"An Algerian chemist has been found guilty at Bristol Crown Court of contaminating food and wine by using his own urine and faeces.

Sahnoun Daifallah, 42, of Bibury Road, Gloucester, was found guilty of four counts of contaminating goods at four businesses in May 2008.

Daifallah, who had defended himself, had pleaded not guilty to all charges.

Sentencing was adjourned to allow preparation of psychiatric reports. Daifallah is likely to be deported."

Once again no mention of any possible religious explanation. Are the BBC just not curious or do they deliberately hide any negative references to Islam whenever they can?