IPCC climate predictions vs reality

The above graph shows a comparison between alarmist CAGW models in green with the reality and solar based variation in blue. I think this makes it very clear that the CAGW computer models and IPCC based models are utterly wrong.

I have yet to see this graph on the generally true believers in warmism BBC although Paul Hudson 'weather presenter and climate correspondent for BBC Look North in Yorkshire and Lincolnshire' has reported some news that I doubt will be acknowledged by his seniors at the BBC climate change propaganda unit:

'it (2011) is the 11th year out of the last 12 when the Met Office global temperature forecast has been too warm.

In all these years, the discrepancy between observed temperatures and the forecast are within the stated margin of error.

But all the errors are on the warm side, with none of the forecasts that have been issued in the last 12 years ending up too cold.

And, in my opinion, that makes the error significant.

...

Whatever the reason for the ongoing 'warm bias' in Met Office global temperatures, their forecast for the first half of this decade, published in early 2010, that half the years between 2010 and 2015 would be hotter than the hottest year on record (with an anomaly of 0.52C set in 1998) is already looking in doubt.'

The BBC's general policy of pushing of global warming  as fact not theory is bias, pure and simple.