'The progressive shrinking of Arctic sea ice is bringing colder, snowier winters to the UK and other areas of Europe, North America and China, a study shows.As global temperatures have risen, the area of Arctic Ocean covered by ice in summer and autumn has been falling. Writing in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a US/China-based team show this affects the jet stream and brings cold, snowy weather.'The BBC's warmist evangelist Richard Black is happy to spread the fear.
As I wrote just three weeks ago, in 2000 The Independent newspaper was reporting as fact that:
'Britain's winter ends tomorrow with further indications of a striking environmental change: snow is starting to disappear from our lives.The same certainty on display there as the climate 'experts' tell us what they know will happen, except they were wrong. Britain and elsewhere have had three snowy winters on the trot. Have we had an apology from Dr David Viner or David Parker? Somehow I doubt it.
Sledges, snowmen, snowballs and the excitement of waking to find that the stuff has settled outside are all a rapidly diminishing part of Britain's culture, as warmer winters - which scientists are attributing to global climate change - produce not only fewer white Christmases, but fewer white Januaries and Februaries.
The first two months of 2000 were virtually free of significant snowfall in much of lowland Britain, and December brought only moderate snowfall in the South-east. It is the continuation of a trend that has been increasingly visible in the past 15 years: in the south of England, for instance, from 1970 to 1995 snow and sleet fell for an average of 3.7 days, while from 1988 to 1995 the average was 0.7 days. London's last substantial snowfall was in February 1991.
...
However, the warming is so far manifesting itself more in winters which are less cold than in much hotter summers. According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting event".
"Children just aren't going to know what snow is," he said.
...
David Parker, at the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research in Berkshire, says ultimately, British children could have only virtual experience of snow. Via the internet, they might wonder at polar scenes - or eventually "feel" virtual cold.'
Why should we believe experts in 2012 who tell us one thing when we were told almost the opposite with just as much certainty in 2000. The only constants are that we should be afraid, do as the 'experts' tell us and above all pay more taxes.
5 comments:
Different opinions from different scientists analysing different datasets. So what?
So? In each case the left-wing media report the conclusions as fact, they report what thethey want to report, what they believe; there's no critical analysis reporting - That's what.
meh
The point is, Mr Anyonymous, that the BBC only chooses to present one point of view as truth, even though it's consistently wrong, and completely ignores the other.
There's a difference between reporting the findings of a study and stating something as 'the truth'. Scientific studies will contradict each other. Science changes with the evidence - that is the point of it. If all the evidence starts to suggest climate change is not happening, then happy days! But it isn't. Generally the BBC let viewers make up their own minds. If anything, they give too much time to fringe opinions in the attempt to be 'balanced'. You just don't like the fact the bulk of the evidence points to global warming, and I don't think you really understand rhe principles of science either, Matt
Post a Comment