Most of the media, especially the BBC with articles like this one, seem to be concerned with Vince Cable's disquiet over being secretly recorded, they seem relatively unconcerned by what he said and the implications of what he said.
So here are some questions for Vince Cable that he might care to answer:
1) You were recorded saying that you had "declared war" on Rupert Murdoch, was that a true reflection of your position on this matter or were you lying to your 'constituents'?
2) If this was a true reflection of your position then were you planning on declaring this position before or after you decided on Rupert Murdoch's takeover of BSkyB, or were you going to make a quasi-legal decision from a position of prejudged bias?
3) How do you reconcile your then role as independent arbiter on a major financial takeover with your declared position of being at war with one of the parties? Do you consider that position reasonable or moral?
4) Are there any other businesses, UK based or otherwise, that you consider you have declared war on?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Good questions NaS.
As usual the media class focuses on tinsel town issues - namely in this case whether this incident will prejudice their further "access" to the political class.
Post a Comment