ISIS supporters working as baggage handlers, cleaners and catering staff at Brussels airport per Daily Mail Online

This news http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3517493/At-FIFTY-ISIS-supporters-working-baggage-handlers-cleaners-catering-staff-Brussels-airport-claim-police.html is not a huge surprise:

'Police at Brussels airport have claimed at least 50 Islamic State supporters are working there as baggage handlers, cleaners and catering staff.

In an astonishing open letter, the officers said they have warned about the terrorist sympathisers whose security badges give them access to planes, but they remain employed.

The airport police, who are threatening to go on strike because of security deficiencies, also said they have raised the issue of terrorists scouting the airport to plan possible attacks.'

How many similar Islamic State supporters are working at Heathrow airport next to Hayes and Southall? How about City Airport next to Tower Hamlets? How about Luton Airport? Anyone else not feeling that safe flying?

Do you like tennis? Elizabeth Anne Holland loves tennis - Rule 5 - NSFW

I could be persuaded...

'Best selfie ever': Brit who took grinning snap with EgyptAir hijacker speaks out - except that's not a selfie

"He just shrugged OK so I stood by him and smiled for the camera while a stewardess did the snap. It has to be the best selfie ever."

A selfie is a photo taken by oneself or someone else in the photo. This was just a snapped photo.

More here http://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/best-selfie-ever-brit-who-took-grinning-snap-with-egyptair-hijacker-speaks-out-a3213806.html

Jimmy Carr's First Major TV performance

Jimmy Carr's First Major TV performance

JustinGatlin runs 9.45 for 100m. The following wind of 20.0m/s is a little (!) over the allowable limit so Usain Bolt's record stands.

Those wacky Japanese...

IS Planning 'Imminent' Attack On Jewish Schools - No surprise there but there's a little piece of information in this Sky report that I haven't seen reported on the BBC

This paragraph is something that I have not seen reported on the BBC and doubt that I will... For on the BBC all refugees are cuddly, innocent doctors, engineers etc. 

'Turkey has absorbed close to three million refugees and there is strong evidence that several members of the Paris and Brussels cell, who have European origins, had travelled to Syria for training and then been smuggled back, hidden in the waves of refugees seeking safety in Europe.'

The truth is something that the institutionally pro immigration BBC is just not interested in.

http://news.sky.com/story/1668482/is-planning-imminent-attack-on-jewish-schools

Elder Of Ziyon reports that an Egyptian news site reports that Jews are slaughtering children for blood for matzah

http://elderofziyon.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/egyptian-news-site-reports-that-jews.html 

 

I doubt that the institutionally anti Israel BBC would ever report this sort of blatant anti Semitic slur

Pakistan explosion leaves many dead at Lahore park - BBC News - Unclear who target was!

This BBC report on the latest Islamist terrorist attrocity, this time in Lahore, is still linked to from the BBC news home page via a link entitled 'Unclear who target was'. This is odd as this BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-35908291 clearly says:

'"We claim responsibility for the attack on Christians as they were celebrating Easter," spokesperson Ehansullah Ehsan told Pakistan's Express Tribune.'

Unclear? Only if you're trying to give cover to Islamists.

BBC Radio Drama Gave Tips For Illegal Migrants In Somalia

Breitbart reports http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/03/27/bbc-broadcast-radio-drama-in-somalia-giving-tips-for-illegal-migrants/ that:

'A BBC department that produced a radio drama giving practical tips to would-be migrants on how to cross from Somalia to Europe received nearly £90 million of British tax payers' money.

The drama, broadcast to Somalia and Kenya at the height of the migrant crisis, featured one character advising a woman to travel only with small luggage to make the illegal crossing easier.

Another character is later advised that "this current time is the best opportunity to reach Europe".The drama is produced by BBC Media Action, the broadcaster's charitable arm, which is funded by the British government's foreign aid budget.

Titled 'A Better Life than Today', it follows the fortunes of a group of Somali youths and has more than two million listeners on BBC Radio Somali.'

The thing is that I'm not really surprised, the BBC's obsession with promoting mass immigration from Islamic countries into the UK is very obvious.

Belgian official says he'd 'kill each and every Jew' per The Times of Israel

'A Belgian municipal security officer is facing dismissal after saying he would kill "each and every Jew" during a debate on Facebook this past Friday.

"The word Jew itself is dirty. If I were in Israel, frankly, I would do to the Jews what they do with the Palestinians — slaughter each and every one of them," wrote the officer... '

More here http://www.timesofisrael.com/belgian-officer-says-would-kill-each-and-every-jew but not a word on the institutionally anti Israel and pro Islamist BBC.

EU supporting settlements in Palestine

A British Conservative MP recently said this about settlement building in Palestine being funded by the EU:

'The EU should comply with the law. It should not be meddling in the Middle East, then hiding behind some dodgy use of diplomatic immunity,'. 

'This is a gross waste of taxpayers' money. It's another example of money given to the EU over which Parliament has no real oversight.  

'The British electorate is contributing to this but we are completely unaware of how it's being spent. We don't know who is spending this, and we can't vote them out.' 

He added: 'No wonder the EU think they're above the law. They are untouchable.' 

Mr Percy also expressed serious concerns that the EU is 'undermining the Oslo Accords' and 'damaging attempts at peace' in the Middle East. 'Not only is it a waste of taxpayers' money, it is morally questionable,'

Right up the institutionally anti Israel BBC's street you would have thought, they'll be right on this. 

Oddly the BBC haven't reported this though.

For the reason visit http://isthebbcbiased.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/eu-meddle-muddle.html Is The BBC Biased.

Glasgow mosque leader praises extremist killer per BBC News

This BBC report http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-35893123 is well worth reading as it reports something that the BBC would rather keep quiet. 

However the passage that caught my eye was this one:

'In January, The Herald reported that Glasgow Central Mosque had donated money to the orthodox group Tablighi Jamaat, which some argue promotes an extreme brand of Islam.'

'Some argue promotes an extreme brand of Islam'? No analysis, no listing of the possibly extreme views, just that bland statement. Why does the BBC continue to try to protect extremist Islamists from scrutiny? How many people employed by the BBC support such Islamist extremism?

Belgians Mr De Backer is honest about EU aims

Right at the end of this BBC report  http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35898255 is this:

'He (Mr De Backer) said member states must now move on from the "old concept of sovereignty" towards a "shared sovereignty where we understand that we are better off when we share information and pool resources".'

Honesty at last from an EU supporter. Odd that the BBC reported it...

Donald Trump 'is he so wrong?'

I feel a little dirty admitting this,  but I may be agreeing with Piers Morgan in The Mail http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3504893/PIERS-MORGAN-comes-terror-isn-t-time-started-listening-seriously-Trump.html

'I spoke to Trump for 40 minutes. He was, as you'd expect, bombastic, defiant and self-congratulatory. Why wouldn't he be? He's ripped up every political rulebook to take this presidential race by storm, a scenario that is hardly going to deflate the ego of New York's most cock-sure billionaire tycoon.

But he also spoke in more detail about his plans to combat ISIS and I found myself nodding more than I expected.

Trump told me countries must tighten their borders in light of these terror attacks, especially to anyone related to an ISIS fighter in Syria.

Is he so wrong?

He told me he wants law-abiding Muslims to root out the extremists in their midst, expressing his bafflement and anger that someone like Abdeslam was able to hide for so long in the very part of Brussels he had previously lived.

Is he so wrong?

He told me America must make it far harder for illegal immigrants to enter the U.S. and thinks European countries should follow suit.

Is he so wrong?

He told me he believes there are now areas of many major European cities which have become poisonous breeding grounds for radicalized Islamic terror.

Is he so wrong? 

I didn't feel I was talking to a lunatic, as many seem to view Trump.

I saw a guy, a non-politician unfettered by PC language restraints, who is genuinely furious at the devastation which ISIS is wreaking, and seriously concerned for the security of his fellow Americans and indeed, the citizens of Europe.:

Views that you won't hear repeated on the anti Trump, pro Islam BBC.

Labour Reinstates Suspended Corbynista Who Said “Jews” Behind ISIS and 9/11 per Guido Fawkes

Guido Fawkes http://order-order.com/2016/03/23/labour-reinstates-suspended-corbynista-who-said-jews-behind-isis-and-911/ has news of another worrying reinstatement to the Labour Party:

 

'A Labour councillor who was suspended for writing that "Jews" were behind 9/11 and ISIS has been reinstated to the party. In October, Beinazir Lasharie, a Corbynista Labour councillor in Kensington, was suspended pending investigation after Guido exposed her extreme conspiracy theories. Lasharie had posted a video on Facebook titled "ISIS: Israeli Secret Intelligence Service", and commented:
 

"Many people know about who was behind 9/11 and also who is behind ISIS. I've nothing against Jews… just sharing it!"'

The sheer number of such instances is indicative of a problem in the Labour Party, a problem that the pro Labour Party and institutionally anti Israel BBC seem to be deliberately ignoring.

The thread with no name

The French President, so the BBC reports http://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-europe-35869266 has given us the benefit of his wisdom that Europe is under threat, but of course that threat cannot be named by either him or the BBC. 

'Speaking at a press conference, French President Francois Hollande condemned what he called the "heinous" attacks in Brussels today.

He said attacks had been directed at Belgium, but it was Europe that had been targeted and the whole world that should be concerned about the attacks. He said there was a "global threat which necessitates a global response".'

Who poses the threat? Unless you name it, what can you do to respond to it? But to name it would cause embarrassment to the BBC and the EU who have thrown their hats firmly behind the creation of EUrabia.

Socialism and the EU

A very perceptive couple of quotations and a comment from demon at http://biasedbbc.org/blog/2016/03/22/poor-but-happy/ articulates something I've said before on here:

'Churchill:  The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.

I also found this on a website... Bukovsky:   Socialism is the gradual and less violent form of communism, and socialism is the project of the European Union, which was born in Maastricht in 1992. The intent was to save socialism in Europe after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the predictable bankruptcy of the welfare state in the West as well.

I had never previously considered that the creation of the EU was specifically to replace the USSR (despite its similarity). But it makes perfect sense.'

The EU's future seems to be that of a bastardised marriage of socialism and Islam, are you happy? Will your children and grandchildren be?

Brussels airport attack: BBC anxious to protect British muslims

This running BBC report http://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-europe-35869266 on the latest Islamist terrorist attack on European soil includes the following report of the analysts by the BBC's Security correspondent, Frank Gardner:

'BBC security correspondent Frank Gardner says it is "not a surprise" that this attack has taken place but says it is "shocking it was so successful". 

He said since the Since Charlie Hebo attacks in Paris in January last year, which killed 12 people, there had been a number of terror cells "on the loose" that had been inspired by so-called Islamic State and had access to weapons and explosives. 

He said Belgian intelligence services had been playing "catch-up" since then and did not have a "very good system" of sharing information across the various authorities.

He said attacks in Britain had been prevented by Muslim communities reporting suspicious behaviour to police but this was not yet happening in Belgium.'

All praise the British Muslim communities? Not the British Security and Intelligence Services and the police?

Have all the planned attacks on British soil really been prevented by the Muslim communities reporting suspicious behaviour? Is it really 100% as Frank Gardner seems to suggest here?

What parts of the British Muslim communities are actively involved in assisting Islamist terrorists? Is it really zero % as one seems to be lead to infer from Frank Gardner's article?

Why is the BBC seemingly always so desperate to protect the British Muslim communities from any negative feedback?

Women could boycott Indian Wells over comments per Martina Navratilova on BBC Sport

A whole report on this matter with nobody pointing out that women actually earn more than men for playing.  They play best of three sets, the men play best of five sets. So the women get more per set played. 

Also see how often the top women seeds win losing just one or two games across their two sets, compare that with the top mens seeds... The men's game is more competitive faster, more athletic and better to watch.

More feminist tripe here http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/tennis/35866641

Clintons Receive More Than $25 Million From Speeches in Past 16 Months per WSJ

A fact that you won't hear reported by the pro Hillary Clinton BBC. 

'Hillary and Bill Clinton earned more than $30 million in the past 16 months, with $25 million coming from the delivery of 104 paid speeches and more than $5 million coming from Mrs. Clinton's book, "Hard Choices."'

More here http://www.wsj.com/articles/clintons-received-more-than-25-million-from-speeches-since-january-2014-1431730968

The BBC would rather tell you that Donald Trump is very rich... Why?