StatCounter

Monday 22 March 2010

What about the seriously injured

The long term injured who to this day bear the scars of the 7/7 terrorist atrocity get little or no attention form the UK media, likewise those seriously injured in Iraq and Afghanistan. So I was pleased to read Trixy's thoughts and you should read them too. Here's a well written extract:
'The summer of 2009 will be etched in the memory of many as we heard of the loss of so many young men and, as these men were flown home and buried with their deserved full military honours, the wards at Selly Oak and Headley Court were packed to bursting with wounded and limbless men. In total there were 158 serious and very seriously injured soldiers in 2009; an average of 13 per month.

In the first two months of this year we have seen 24 serious casualties: 17 very seriously injured and 7 seriously injured. Thats an average of 12 without counting those who were injured from the rifles battlegroup recently. That's almost the same and yet nothing.

I wonder why these figures haven't hit the headlines? I wonder why Bob Ainsworth and Bill Rammell haven't been talking about assistance for these men and their families? Those whose lives are changed forever rather than those who are squabbling, policy-less, to grip onto second homes and lavish expenses at our expense.

But don't hold your breath to hear the stories of those who have suffered and turned their lives around. For the MoD control what they can and can't say to the national press. And that means Bob Ainsworth and Bill Rammell. And do you think they want you reminded of these injured soldiers when they're trying to win your vote?'
The injured should not be forgotten, especially when their injuries are as much the fault of Gordon Brown's under-resourcing of the UK's armed forces as are the more headlining deaths of servicemen.

No comments: