This piece http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5407245/STEPHEN-GLOVER-asks-BBC-ignoring-Corbyn-claims.html by Stephen Glover is worth a read, raising many points that deserve repetition including some What-iffery around how the BBC would report a news story about alleged links between Theresa May and the South Africa regime of the 1980s. The BBC's bias is clear and obvious to anyone with eyes and ears.
Here's an extract from Stephen Glover's piece:
'But it isn't the first time it has looked the other way where Corbyn is concerned. In the weeks before last June's election, it seemed deliberately to avoid reminding people of his discreditable past.
This includes asking two former IRA convicts to speak in the House of Commons a fortnight after the IRA had tried to blow up Margaret Thatcher, killing five people in the process; and, as recently as 2009, describing the Islamic terrorists of Hezbollah and Hamas as his 'friends'.
Now the BBC turns a blind eye to a truly shocking allegation – that Jeremy Corbyn consorted with this country's enemies while holding public office. It may be false. But if it is even partly true, the implications are appalling.Will we ever find out what really happened? Not if the mighty broadcaster which controls so many of our airwaves has anything to do with it.'
How can the BBC be made to report news in an impartial manner? I fear that there is no practical way of achieving this and so more serious action needs to be taken against the BBC.
No comments:
Post a Comment