StatCounter

Monday, 27 April 2009

Gloabl Warming - Finally a British newspaper reports an inconvenient "fact"

The Independent normally obsessed with the "fact" of Global Warming has published a piece in its Science section about the lack of sunspots, something that has been common knowledge in the blogosphere for some years now. Here's the start of the article but do note the part I emphasise; often I think that belief in Climate Change has more in common with a religious cult than science:

"Could the Sun play a greater role in recent climate change than has been believed? Climatologists had dismissed the idea and some solar scientists have been reticent about it because of its connections with those who those who deny climate change. But now the speculation has grown louder because of what is happening to our Sun. No living scientist has seen it behave this way. There are no sunspots.

The disappearance of sunspots happens every few years, but this time it’s gone on far longer than anyone expected – and there is no sign of the Sun waking up. “This is the lowest we’ve ever seen. We thought we’d be out of it by now, but we’re not,” says Marc Hairston of the University of Texas. And it’s not just the sunspots that are causing concern. There is also the so-called solar wind – streams of particles the Sun pours out – that is at its weakest since records began. In addition, the Sun’s magnetic axis is tilted to an unusual degree. “This is the quietest Sun we’ve seen in almost a century,” says NASA solar scientist David Hathaway. But this is not just a scientific curiosity. It could affect everyone on Earth and force what for many is the unthinkable: a reappraisal of the science behind recent global warming.

Our Sun is the primary force of the Earth’s climate system, driving atmospheric and oceanic circulation patterns. It lies behind every aspect of the Earth’s climate and is, of course, a key component of the greenhouse effect. But there is another factor to be considered. When the Sun has gone quiet like this before, it coincided with the earth cooling slightly and there is speculation that a similar thing could happen now. If so, it could alter all our predictions of climate change, and show that our understanding of climate change might not be anywhere near as good as we thought."

I am still awaiting a BBC report along these lines but somehow I doubt that anything as inconvenient as facts will be allowed to sully their environmentalist agenda.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I agree that a global warming religion exists, but so does a anti-global warming religion exist.

Just saying.

Not a sheep said...

The anti-global warming side of the argument has verifiable facts on its side, increasingly the believers have just belief and righteous anger.