StatCounter

Friday 14 August 2009

The NHS - "the envy of the world"

It is a truism, much loved by the Labour party and the BBC, that the NHS is "the envy of the world" and so anyone that is less than passionate about the NHS must have their credibility destroyed. So it is with much glee that the BBC report the attacks on Daniel Hannan for speaking out in America. The BBC and the Labour party, and there is a definite alliance between the two on this matter as with many others, have been itching to "get back" Daniel Hannan ever since he made that speech and elicited such a revealing response from Gordon Brown. This is their first opportunity and they have taken it with both hands. Andy Burnham has accused Dan Hannan of being almost "unpatriotic" and tried to raise fears about the NHS in Tory hands with this
"What has happened within the last 48 hours is what Cameron has feared most because it lays bare the Tories' deep ambivalence towards the NHS."
The Labour party love to call Conservatives unpatriotic when they disagree with Labour policy, remember the similar Labour slurs when George Osborne said that Labour Government policies could trigger a run on the pound?

The "envy of the world" is of course nothing of the sort. If it was then other countries would have copied the NHS, but which have?

If you have had the misfortune to spend any time in a NHS hospital then you would know all about the dirt, the uncaring nurses and the overwhelming sense that the hospital would run so much better if it wasn't for the pesky patients. The "deep clean" was Labour spin. A October 2007 EU wide survey ranked Britain 17th out of 29 countries for patient satisfaction.

As I wrote in 2007: A second Lancet article, which looked at 2.7 million patients diagnosed between 1995 and 1999, found that countries which spent the most on health per capita a year had better survival rates. Britain was the exception. Despite spending up to £1,500 on health per person per year, it recorded similar survival rates for Hodgkin's disease and lung cancer as Poland, which spends a third of that amount." This Government has wasted more money than you would believe, one day it will be totted up and the public will not believe it possible.

Patients who have major operations on the National Health Service are four times more likely to die than Americans undergoing such surgery, according to a new study. The difference in mortality rates was blamed on long NHS waiting lists, a shortage of specialists and competition for intensive care beds. The joint study, carried out by University College London and a team from Columbia University in New York, found that patients in Britain who were most at risk of complications after major surgery were not being seen by specialists and were not reaching intensive care units in time to save them. The study followed 1,100 patients at the Queen Alexandra Hospital in Portsmouth and compared them with 1,000 patients who had undergone similar major surgery at the Mount Sinai Hospital in Manhattan. The results showed that just under 10 per cent of the British patients died in hospital after major surgery, compared with 2.5 per cent of the American patients. Each year, more than three million operations are carried out on the NHS and about 350,000 of these are emergencies which carry a higher risk of complications. Professor Monty Mythen, head of anaesthesia at UCL who led the British side of the research, said: "The main difference seems to be in the quality of post-operative care and who cares."" Read the rest of the article and plan to be in the US if you want to survive treatment.


But what about the cost of US treatment, at least the NHS is free? True it is free (mostly) at the point of use - if you ignore taxation, but you can't so - a 2005 estimate put the British workforce at 30m people and an unemployment rate of 4.7%. That means that just over 28.5 million people legally work in this country and pay tax. The “free” NHS was costing each worker £2,105 per year or £40 per week on average. How much would a decent private medical plan cost? Less than £175 a month I would have thought and I don't believe anyone has died from MRSA or Clostridium difficile in a BUPA or PPP or WPA hospital.


If the NHS was indeed "the envy of the world" then not only would much of the rest of the world have copied it but there would be little demand for expensive private medical insurance. That few (if any countries) have copied it and that there is great demand for private medical insurance speaks volumes.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Less than £175 a month I would have thought and I don't believe anyone has died from MRSA or Clostridium difficile in a BUPA or PPP or WPA hospital."

You are a numpty... use a little thing called google and then come back to this.

Not a sheep said...

Samuel, will you be returning here or are you standing by your comment on another thread that it's "good bye forever"?

I stand by my less than £175 a month figure but I must admit that I was wrong on the MRSA and C Diff infection levels in private hospitals. There have been infections, the MRSA infection figures for private hospitals are less than 10% of that for NHS hospitals. Maybe you could look up the C Diff figures and see how they compare.