The "HARRY_READ_ME.txt" file and its bearing on Man Made Climate Change 'science'

This is a real scandal and the Main Stream Media are all but ignoring this issue. For details please take a trip to An Englishman's Castle, Steve McIntyre and especially Devils Kitchen for a tale of scientists "not knowing what the hell is going on" and glossing over anomalies. However read this a couple of times to see what was really going on at the CRU:

"These are very promising. The vast majority in both cases are within 0.5 degrees of the published data. However, there are still plenty of values more than a degree out."

and how about:

"However, it's not such good news for precip (PRE):
...
Percentages: 13.93 25.65 11.23 49.20

21. A little experimentation goes a short way..

I tried using the 'stn' option of anomdtb.for. Not completely sure what it's supposed to do, but no matter as it didn't work:"

What about

"It also means that we cannot say exactly how the gridded data is arrived at from a statistical perspective - since we're using an off-the-shelf product that isn't documented sufficiently to say that."

And how about this killer line:

"There is no uniform data integrity, it's just a catalogue of issues that continues to grow as they're found."

So we are going to fuck the world's economy based on data that has no integrity...

Any chance of the BBC covering this story? Come on Andrew Neil you seem to be the only BBC journalist with enough cojones to not toe the BBC line.