"Lord Hutton made a request for the records provided to the inquiry, not produced in evidence, to be closed for 30 years, and that medical (including post-mortem) reports and photographs be closed for 70 years."This refers to the decision take by Lord Hutton at the time of his 'inquiry' to keep secret documents relating to the death of Dr David Kelly.
So what would be the innocent explanation for the making of this decision?
For more realistic explanations, I suggest keeping an eye on Norman Baker's website and on Caig Murray's blog.
Meanwhile I note that whilst this story has been covered by The Mail, The Mirror, The Press Association, The Morning Star and others there is of course not a mention of this story on the BBC.
1 comment:
Because they want to stay alive?
There are loads of holes in this story, but it's unlikely that any of it will ever emerge - too many people with too much to lose. Not to mention whole governments around the world and the military industrial complex.
Kelly was one of a number of microbiologists who met an untimely death and his assassins might well have been 'horizontalised' since. Some interesting footage and audio files here.
Little wonder then that Cameron's keeping quiet about this. You would think he would be shouting to the rooftops that he would reverse the order of secrecy. Yes? Not a word from him.
Post a Comment