StatCounter

Showing posts with label Alcohol. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alcohol. Show all posts

Friday, 22 July 2011

Oh those Russians!

I have just learnt that Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has signed a bill that officially classifies beer as alcoholic. It seems that until now anything containing less than 10% alcohol in Russia has been considered a foodstuff.

Wow!

Saturday, 5 June 2010

Could I see their workings please

News that an official review instigated by the last Labour government but reporting to the new Conservative/LibDem government is expected to recommend bringing Britain into line with most of Europe by reducing the legal limit from 80mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood to 50mg, makes me wonder something. We are told that the report is likely to conclude that the reduction would prevent up to 65 deaths and 230 serious injuries a year. Can someone please release the workings that lead to that conclusion, I'd be interested to investigate the statistics...

Wednesday, 26 May 2010

Guiness really is good for you! Well maybe


I hear that a team from the University of Wisconsin have tested the health-giving properties of stout against lager and found that those dogs given Guinness had reduced clotting activity in their blood but not those given lager.

Mine's a pint of the dark stuff...

Thursday, 19 November 2009

BBC bias alert

The BBC report that
"Drinking alcohol every day cuts the risk of heart disease in men by more than a third, a major study suggests.

The Spanish research involving more than 15,500 men and 26,000 women found large quantities of alcohol could be even more beneficial for men.

Female drinkers did not benefit to the same extent, the study in Heart found. "
But as this does not fit their world view that alcohol is evil, how sharia law compliant of them, they have to immediately state that:
"Experts are critical, warning heavy drinking can increase the risk of other diseases, with alcohol responsible for 1.8 million deaths globally per year.

The study was conducted in Spain, a country with relatively high rates of alcohol consumption and low rates of coronary heart disease. "

Oddly the BBC never issue "health warnings" about reports that state how dangerous alcohol drinking is even when they are later proved to have conclusions that are almost entirely fictional.

Friday, 13 March 2009

Fear of Flying

The news that: "Experts have warned there is a "high probability" that a fault which caused a British Airways jet to crash-land at Heathrow could hit other Boeing 777s." does not reassure a nervous flyer like myself. The additional information that: "US air accident investigators called for a component to be redesigned after a Delta Air Lines plane reportedly encountered a similar problem. Manufacturers Rolls-Royce say the new part should be ready within the year." does not help; ready within the year does not help when I take four flights on 777s most years. I have never liked the idea of two engined planes flying the Atlantic, I would say three or four engines should be the minimum - a 747 would be my favourite or bring back the Tristar.

The BBC try to reassure us passengers with
"Aviation expert David Gleave said he would have no concerns about flying on a Boeing 777 as new "operating procedures", such as boosting the engine on approach to landing to keep the heat up, had been implemented.

"All the regulatory authorities are satisfied the new procedures which they will adopt or already have adopted will cure the problem as a temporary measure," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

"Then new components will be fitted in time which will remove the need for the new operation procedure."

A Boeing spokeswoman said it had issued a set of guidelines for pilots to prevent long-term build-up of ice and these procedures had been approved by the regulatory bodies."

But have to admit that:
"the NTSB report said: "While the procedures may reduce the risk of a rollback in one or both engines due to ice blockage, they add complexity to flight crew operations, and the level of risk reduction is not well established.""



Alex Masterley has a take on this story that has me ven more worried, but it is a nice risk/reward comparison:
"It is good to see that in these difficult times, there are still people willing to take a measured risk. I refer of course to the world's airlines who will continue to fly Boeing 777's despite a known fault that has led to one crash and one near incident.

Our aviation correspondent reports:

The cause of the crash at Heathrow of BA 038 in January 2008 has been identified as fuel starvation or what engineers call "no fuel getting to the engine". Investigators have identified the primary factor leading to this problem, which they has been described by leading technical experts as "a big lump of ice in the fuel tank", which arose from an adverse thermodynamic environment at high altitudes. The effect of the blockage was to limit the flow of fuel to both engines.

With over 750 planes put in service in the last 15 years, that works out at about 2 incidents in 2.8 million flights, or about 10 times the probability of winning the national lottery.

The Boeing 777 is widely used on transatlantic and intercontinental flights. Industry experts say that in the event of a similar mid-flight incident, where ice accumulating in the tanks might be dislodged by turbulence or other activity, then the pilot would be unlikely to be able to manoeuvre the plane in the same manner as Capt. Sully Sullenberger, who recently landed an aircraft in the Hudson River shortly after take off from LaGuardia Airport.

The most likely manoeuvre after a total loss of power, including failure avionics and controls, would be a 35,000 ft "plummet", putting down on the surface of the sea at a velocity above industry norms, causing likely damage to the aircraft fuselage, after which the aircraft would probably "sink like a stone", industry sources commented."


I don't normally drink on planes, far too dehydrating, but I can envisage my hitting the alcohol just a tad on my next few flights.

Tuesday, 12 August 2008

Cause and effect time

I know you will find this hard to believe but it appears that if you allow 24 hour drinking then alcohol-fuelled anti-social behaviour increases. A real surprise I know, who could have predicted that when this Labour government decided that introducing 24 hour drinking would create a European style cafe culture. The latest crime statistics show a 136% increase in public order offences over the last four years. Again, who would have believed that allowing pubs and clubs to stay open longer and serve drinks longer would lead to drink-related disorder problems happening in the early hours of the morning rather than at the old closing times.

The result of our Labour masters deciding to de-restrict drinking hours is more alcohol fuelled violence, happening later in the evening which means more police having to be deployed at these very unsocial hours which means less police around during the more normal hours that people might need them.

The Government response, a spokesman for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport said "The recent evaluation of The Licensing Act showed that it has not led to an increase in crime and disorder". You have to admire these people, many of them have "believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast" on a regular basis.