I challenged Richard Burden...
I was not deemed worthy of a reply but then I have been challenging Richard Burden about his 'pro-Palestinian' views. He hasn't replied to this either.
It is interesting that Richard Burden thinks that Eric Hobsbawm is worthy of praise, this being a man who:
' .. in 1994, in an interview with Canadian author and politician Michael Ignatieff
on British television, Hobsbawm responded in the affirmative to the
question of whether 20 million deaths may have been justified had the
proposed communist utopia been created.
The following year, when asked the same question on BBC Radio 4's
Desert Island Discs,
that is if "the sacrifice of millions of lives" would have been worth a
communist utopia, he replied: "That's what we felt when we fought the
Second World War".
Hobsbawm has similarly argued that, "In a period in which, as you might
imagine, mass murder and mass suffering are absolutely universal, the
chance of a new world being born in great suffering would still have
been worth backing".
I have
mused before about the weird double-standards of the left who use 'Nazi' as a term of abuse to close down debate and would never allow any praise of any aspect of Adolph Hitler, yet will defend aspects of Soviet Russia or Mao's China.