StatCounter

Showing posts with label Alex Salmond. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alex Salmond. Show all posts

Sunday, 18 October 2009

Sunday news catchup

So much news, so little time...

1. The Telegraph reports that:
"Jack Straw tried to prevent MPs' expenses claims from being published because he did not want the public to find out about renovations to his own home, documents seen by The Sunday Telegraph suggest. "
Jack Straw denies the story of course, but who would you rather believe Slippery Jack or The Telegraph? Easy one, no?


2. The BBC report that Gordon "decisive" Brown has finally made his mind over an important issue of national priority:
"Gordon Brown has revealed that he is partial to a chocolate biscuit, after he was accused of sidestepping a question during an online chat.

The prime minister said he had missed a question about his favourite biscuit during the live web chat with the parents' website Mumsnet.

He used the social networking site Twitter to reveal that he likes "anything with a bit of chocolate.""
24 hours to make his mind up over which biscuit he prefers; isn't great to have such a decisive man at the nation's helm?


3. The BBC report with a straight face that:
"Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond has compared his justice secretary's actions to the principles of Indian peace champion Mahatma Gandhi.

It comes in the wake of the decision to release the"
Words fail me, I just wish they would fail Alex Salmond as well.

Friday, 21 August 2009

al-Megrahi

Have a listen to the 07:31 Today programme interview with Alex Salmond and see if you can spot where John Humphrys asks the important question and Alex Salmond avoids answering the questions asked.

The key passage starts at 07:15:
"What conversations have you had with British Authorities?"
Listen to the tone of Alex Salmond's voice

"Did the British government suggest to you whether they thought he should be let out, or not?"
Spot the long pause and the evasive answer involving the word "recommendation" rather than "suggestion"...
"Not recommendation but dod they give you any indication as to what they thought?"
Another evasive answer.
"It was your understanding that the British government wanted him released?"
Another evasive answer using "recommendation" again


There is a truth to be discovered here and maybe John Humphrys will get a straight answer out of David "there are circumstances in which terrorism is justified" Miliband; but somehow I doubt it.

Tuesday, 3 July 2007

Something fishy in Scotland - Updated 10.07.07 @ 18:10

Thank you Mr Eugenides for alerting the world to this strange story about Alex Salmond. In March the SNP stated that "He will do exactly the same as Donald Dewar did, Jim Wallace did and Donald Gorrie did, which is to stand down at the next Westminster election... And he will only take one salary." you can read the whole story here. So that's clear Alex Salmond will have stopped taking his Westminster salary since the Scottish elections.

However, there is this question & answer in Hansard "Jo Swinson: To ask the Leader of the House which hon. Members elected at the 2005 election are not drawing their salaries as hon. Members.
Ms Harman: All current Members elected at the 2005 election are at present drawing their salary except for the five Sinn Fein MPs, none of whom have taken the Oath."

Hmm, so is Alex Salmond still drawing his Westminster salary contrary to his party's promise before the elections or did Harriet Harman lie to Parliament or is there some other reason?

If I find out the truth I will post an update.



UPDATE:
It appears that Alex Salmond is still intending to take just the one salary, that of a Westminster MP rather than a MSP. Presumably this is because of the better pension arrangements that would accrue. There seems to be some debate as to whether Alex Salmond promised to take just one salary and did he specify which one he would take. It also seems most peculiar that the Scottish First Minister who wants independence for Scotland will draw a salary from Westminster which he wants freedom from and not from the Scottish Parliament that he heads. Furthermore, "He said arrangements were being put in place for him to receive only one of the parliamentary salaries." Arrangements would, I have thought, involve his office calling or writing to the relevant accounting department to say "please stop paying me my salary", not too tricky really. How many "unwanted" payments has he received since the election? I assume the May and June salary payments. I would have hoped that he would have noticed the large "unwanted" deposits in his bank account within that time or is he as vague on his family's finances as Tessa Jowell. I hope that we find out the answers to the above and that the excess monies are returned forthwith.

UPDATE:
It appears that Alex Salmond has done the decent thing. He will be putting his MSP salary into a charitable trust, "The trust is expected to generate about £18,000 a year until the next General Election, and will fund youth and community projects in the north-east" of Scotland. However I note from the same report that "In addition to both salaries, Mr Salmond also collects £77,000 as first minister." I would have thought that as a proud Scot and a supporter/proposer of Scottish Independence, Mr Salmond would rather take a salary for his work in Scotland rather than from the Westminster Parliament. Maybe like Scotland as a whole Mr Salmond is just quite happy to take money from Westminster.