Something you won't hear on the BBC

Maajid Nawaz on LBC expressing views on Muslim grooming gangs that means he won't ever get a job with the BBC.

'During this powerful take, Maajid Nawaz points out the uncomfortable truth about grooming gangs in the UK that others have been too afraid to discuss.

The LBC presenter was giving his epic reaction to the conviction of 17 men and one woman for abusing girls in Newcastle and Gateshead.

The 18-strong gang prosecuted were from the Bangladeshi, Pakistani, Indian, Iraqi, Iranian and Turkish communities and mainly British-born.

This wasn’t the first incident in the UK - since 2011 groups of men have been convicted for organised sex grooming cases in 16 towns and cities.

And, in all but two of those cases, most were Muslim men of south Asian origin.

“They were men like me from my community,” Maajid said during his scathing take.

“And in all but three the victims were white teenage girls. That is the truth, and what I’m saying is so uncomfortable that we’ve been ignoring it for years.

“As a result of ignoring it this problem has been growing and growing to a point where it now has led to racial tensions.”

He continued: “We haven’t been speaking about it, what did you expect?

“The alternative to speaking about problems is violence, the alternative to addressing things with facts and truth is post-truth and alternative facts.”

Maajid finished: “What’s more important? Protecting these young girls, children, from being plied with drugs and raped.

“That’s what is more important.”'

 Not the BBC approved line at all.

How the enslavement of people in countries conquered by Jihad is carried out

In June 2011 Egyptian cleric Abu Ishaq Al-Heweny made a fascinating speech about 'Enslavement of People Captured in Jihad: They All Become Booty'

You can watch the speech here at MEMRI


Thanks to MEMRI you can also read here  

'Egyptian Cleric Abu Ishaq Al-Heweny Explains Enslavement of People Captured in Jihad: They All Become Booty (Archival)

In a lecture, Egyptian cleric Abu Ishaq Al-Heweny explained how the enslavement of people in countries conquered by Jihad is carried out. "In every war there is a winner and a loser," he said. "According to the rules of Islam, all the people in the [conquered] country become booty," and are "divided between the mujahideen," he said. Al-Heweny also talked about the benefits of slave markets, saying that they were useful if you needed a little spare cash.

Following are excerpts from the lecture, which was posted on the Internet on June 8, 2011.

Abu Ishaq Al-Heweny: ... there that according to the rulings of Jihad, if we fight polytheists… The Prophet Muhammad told the military commander that he should do three things: This hadith appears in the Muslim compilation. If you fight polytheist enemies, offer them three options: First, call them to join Islam. If they join Islam, let them be, because they will become just like you, and you won't fight Muslims. If they refuse to join Islam, they should pay the jizya poll tax. If they are willing to pay the jizya, take it from them and let them be. Okay so far?

If they refuse to pay the jizya, seek the help of Allah and fight them. These are the three options, which the Prophet Muhammad related to the military commander. In every war, there is a winner and there is a loser. If we win and invade the land of our infidel enemy… Jihad is a pure Islamic term. It is not a synonym for fighting, combat, struggle, or any other word. The basic prerequisite of Jihad is that your enemy be non-Muslim.

[…]

If we are the winners, it is only natural for us to impose the rules of Islam on the country we invaded. According to the rules of Islam, all the people in that country become booty and prisoners of war: the women, the men, the children, the money, the homes, the fields… All these become the property of the Islamic state.

[…]

What is the fate of the prisoners of war according to the shari'a? Since they constitute booty, they should be divided between the mujahideen. According to the hadith, the law states that anyone who did not participate in the raid does not get a share of the booty. This is well known. If you didn't participate in the Jihad, you don't get to share the booty. Let's say that we invaded a country with a population of half a million. What are we supposed to do with them?

We check how many mujahideen there were. Let's say there were 100,000. That's it, then. Each mujahid gets five of them. Each one gets five, but there can be a variety. You can take two men, two women, and a child, or the other way around. You divide them up. Great. As soon as this system is in place, there has to be a slave market, where can sell slaves, slavegirls, and children.

Each of these "heads" comes with a price. Let's say I am entitled to five "heads." I don't need any of them, but could use a little cash. Am I supposed to hang them just to get rid of them? No, you can sell them in the market. Well, in order for me to be able to sell them there has to be a market. Then the haggling begins: How much would you pay for this one? And for that one? The buyer says: 300. I say: No, let's make it 314. Eventually, he buys them. He takes them and leaves. Okay?

The way to repent for some sins is be removing the shackles from a slave's neck, setting him free. Where can I get a slave's neck, so I can get rid of my sins? I have to go and buy one. So, obviously, there has to be a slave market, where I can buy a slave's neck, and tell the slave that he is free for the sake of Allah.'

I am glad that Islam has the rules laid out for what happens after a successful war, we in the West can't say that we weren't warned. Although if you rely upon the BBC and our political masters you would be forgiven for not knowing this sort of information.

“Who would do such a thing?”

'EVEN after all these years, all these attacks and all these dead, the West still keeps asking the same question: “Who would do such a thing?”

The answer is always the same.

Sometimes the culprits are home-grown. Sometimes they are recent arrivals.
Sometimes they have been in the West for generations, eat fish and chips and play cricket.
Sometimes the perpetrator is a lone wolf, unknown to the authorities.
More often it turns out to be a “known wolf”, in the peripheral vision of the security ­services.

Yet still our society wonders: What would make someone do such a thing?

The tone of bafflement is strange — like a society that keeps asking a question, but keeps its fingers lodged firmly in its ears whenever it is given the answer.

For their part, the Islamists are ­amazingly clear about what they want and the reasons why they act accordingly. You never have to read between the lines.

Listen to Jawad Akbar, recorded in the UK in 2004 as he discussed the soft ­targets he and his al Qaeda-linked cell were planning to hit.

The targets included the Ministry of Sound nightclub in ­London.

Akbar said to his colleague, Omar Khyam, that no one could “turn round and say, ‘Oh they are innocent’, those slags dancing around”.

It’s the same reason why ten years ago next month, Bilal Abdullah and Kafeel Ahmed (an NHS doctor and an engineering PhD student, respectively) planted a car bomb outside the glass front of the Tiger Tiger club on London’s Haymarket.

They then planted another just down the road in the hope that those “slags” fleeing from the first blast would run straight into the second.

Similarly, Irfan Naseer and his 11-member cell from Birmingham were ­convicted of plotting terror attacks in the nightclub area of the city where “slags and whores go drinking and clubbing” and “have sex like donkeys”.

Where does it come from, this hatred the Islamists hold — as well as everyone else they loathe — for half the human ­species?

Even moderate Muslims hate it when you ask this, but the question is begged before us all.

What do people think the burka is? Or the niqab? Or even the headscarf? Why do Muslim societies restrict the freedom of women?

Why are the Sharia courts, which legally operate in the UK, set up to prejudice the rights of women?

Why do Islamists hate women from their faith who raise their voices against the extremists?

It’s in Islam’s ­origins, and too few people are willing to admit it or reform it.

 

It is a constant of Islamic history, along with the Jews, the gays and the “wrong type of Muslim”: always and everywhere, the question of women.

Such disdain is what led to the abuse of hundreds of girls in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxfordshire and elsewhere.

Obviously, in the wake of Manchester, there are security questions to address.

But what we seem most likely to dodge yet again is the possibility of learning any proper lessons at all from this.'

I've seen this sort of article before but this one from Douglas Murray in The Sun is right on the money.

Stoke Central’s Muslim voters warned they will go to hell if they do not vote Labour in anti-Ukip text

The Sun reports that:

'Stoke Central’s Muslim voters warned they will go to hell if they do not vote Labour in anti-Ukip text

...

One message said failure to back Labour’s Gareth Snell would see “anti-Islam” Ukip win. It ranted: “Will you be able to answer for this in the Grave and on the Final Day??? ‘I helped the Enemies of Islam because…’”

You can see the actual messages in full  in the Sun article. Somehow I doubt that the BBC will report this news in any way.

Eid Mubarak - unless your an animal whose throat is cut and you bleed to death

'The streets of Dhaka in Bangladesh have been turned into literal rivers of blood and 79 sheep lay brutally butchered in Austria as Muslims celebrate Eid al-Adha by mass slaughtering animals.

The Islamic holiday of Eid al-Adha currently dominates the calendars of Muslims worldwide and a large feature of the festival is the ritual halal slaughter of animals.

Rain and floods meant that the official government designated "kill zones" were unable to be used by the public to carry out the slaughter, which involves the slitting of the throat of an animal, usually a goat, sheep, or cow, and letting it bleed to death.'

More here at Breitbart http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/09/15/muslims-brutally-mass-slaughter-animals-eid-al-adha-festival/ but not in the BBC and most of the rest of the mainstream media where protecting Islam from criticism is more important than animal welfare.

Islamic Scholar: Europe May Be Heading Toward Civil War

'The long-term goal of the Jihad Generation is to destroy Europe through civil war and then build an Islamic society from the ashes, Prof. Kepel said. The strategy is similar to the expansion of Islamic State in Syria, Iraq, and Libya where the terrorist organisation was able to use the chaos of civil war to slowly build its forces, grow in power, and rapidly seize territory.

While Prof. Kepel says that most Muslims do not actively participate in terrorism or with terrorist groups, he says that the growth of Salafism among young people, combined with a sense of entitlement and lack of job prospects, means that third-generation Muslims will be far more likely to join radical groups.'

More here at Breitbart http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/09/11/islam-scholar-europe-may-heading-toward-civil-war/ but obviously not on the BBC.

Baby names: Noah enters top 10 for boys, Amelia remains top for girls per BBC News

This BBC report http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-37254187 starts thus:

'The name Noah has entered the top 10 most popular boys' names for the first time, while Amelia has remained the most popular for girls, the Office for National Statistics said.

The list of most popular baby names in England and Wales in 2015 also showed Oliver has remained top for boys.

The ONS said the results were "based on the exact spelling of the name given on the birth certificate".Grouping similarly-pronounced names would change the rankings, it added.'

Can you guess what grouping of names would take the top spot but that the BBC would rather keep quiet? Might it be Muhammad/Mohammed etc.?

The London We've Lost

This Breitbart London article http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/08/31/london-is-gone/ by Milo Y is a must read. 

'If you are scared of being called a racist for speaking out against Islam, think about what people will call you in a generation if you don't take a stand now.

As we look across the English Channel to the terror attacks in Europe, the question is not "Will it continue?" or "Could it happen here?" The questions are: "How often will it happen, and what will we do about it?"'

Milo is leaving London for the last time. Others have already left, I'm thinking of doing the same. Oddly I don't want to die at the hands of someone that the BBC and police will describe as mentally disturbed but who I will hear scream triumphantly "Allahu Akbar" as he fires his gun, explodes his bomb or drives his car into a crowd.

Boy, 8, killed in grenade attack on apartment in Sweden per BBC News

This BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-37161752 ends rather interestingly:

'Sweden generally has low crime rates but police have had difficulty addressing violence in poorer neighbourhoods in Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmo.

Over the course of the summer, cars have been set alight on an almost nightly basis in some neighbourhoods.'

Odd how I don't recall any previous BBC reports mentioning these car burnings in Sweden. I wonder if the perpetrators are in any way linked to those who burn cars in some French cities.

Jewish man stabbed on street in French city of Strasbourg per BBC News

Read this BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-37132582 about a Rabbi being stabbed in Strasbourg.

It would seem that for the BBC and the European authorities if a Muslim shouting Allahu Akbar attacks a Jewish man (possibly a rabbi) who was wearing 'distinctive Jewish dress' 'no anti-Semitic motive had yet been established'.

The rise in antisemitism in Europe has been fuelled by both the media's hatred of, and propaganda against, Israel and the rise of Muslim immigration.

The one hundred and eighteenth weekly No Shit Sherlock award

This Telegraph report is possibly the least surprising that I have read for some time.

'Election fraud allowed to take place in Muslim communities because of 'political correctness'...'

No Shit Sherlock

Heightened Security Forces End Of Historic French Street Market

' "There comes a time, despite our passions and our convictions, when we have to say stop."'

That line refers not to stopping unchecked immigration or to being soft on Islamist terrorists and the supporters of Islamist terrorism, but rather to the continuance of European traditions. Welcome to Europe's dhimmified future.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/08/10/heightened-security-forces-end-to-historic-french-street-market/

The Islamic State's Dehumanisation Of Christians Is Nothing New

This Breitbart article contains a reminder that should scare every kufr in Britain and Europe:

'Unfortunately for Christians in Europe, the murder of a priest celebrating mass in France is just the peak of swelling anti-Western, and anti-Christian sentiment on the continent. 

Just yesterday major Belgian Dutch-language newspaper Het Laatste Nieuws reported that police are seeking a young boy after he was filmed walking down the main street of Waloonian city Verviers calling for Christians to be killed.In between prayers the young boy cries out: "Oh Allah, destroy the terrible Christians. Oh Allah, kill them all. Do not let a single one survive."

... 

These highly radicalised youngsters fit a growing pattern in Europe, where young Muslims are consistently more radical than their parents, even among second and third generation migrants who might otherwise be supposed to have enjoyed the benefits of Western life and integration.

Writing earlier this year, Breitbart London's Editor in Chief cited numerous studies which found the young generation of Muslims in Britain and Europe to have a high rate of acceptance of terror methods, endorsing or excusing attacks including the 7/7 bombings and the Charlie Hebdo attack.

Among young British Muslims polled, 78 per cent expressed support for punishment for those who published cartoons of Muhammed, and 68 per cent said people who "insult Islam" should be arrested.'

Scared? I am.

Belgian police hunting teenager who pledged to 'kill all Christians' in online video

The Telegraph reports yet another Islamist terrorist story:

'Belgian police have launched a manhunt for a teenager after footage emerged of him calling for "the murder of all Christians".

The video shows the 15-year-old, who has not been named, in Verviers and, in Arabic, declaring, "Oh Allah,destroy the odious Christians. Oh Allah kill them all."

The boy is filmed on a French website saying, "Don't spare any of them."

The film was shot in Verviers, the scene of a successful anti-terrorism operation last year.

Police said the boy has been identified and is on a list of radicalised persons, but did not disclose his name. A source said the teenager, the son of a local radical imam, posed a potentially "serious threat" to the public and they wanted to trace him "as soon as possible."'

Well isn't that just dandy? Welcome to the future of Europe thanks to the idiocy of too many European politicians. Is Lebanon really the best model for a future Europe?

France today, London when?

'France's politicians and community leaders have criticised the "intolerable" violence against Paris' Jewish community, after a pro-Palestinian rally led to the vandalizing and looting of Jewish businesses and the burning of cars.

It is the third time in a week where pro-Palestinian activists have clashed with the city's Jewish residents. On Sunday, locals reported chats of "Gas the Jews" and "Kill the Jews", as rioters attacked businesses in the Sarcelles district, known as "little Jerusalem".

Manuel Valls, France's prime minister said: "What happened in Sarcelles is intolerable. An attack on a synagogue and on a kosher shop is simply anti-Semitism. Nothing in France can justify this violence."'

More here http://m.huffpost.com/uk/entry/5608612

Ben Shapiro: The Myth of the Tiny Radical Muslim Minority

This should be compulsory viewing for all lefty PC media types especially those at the BBC

Did a French court really give an Islamist who wanted to join ISIS in Syria a four hour window every day when he could do what he wanted?

'... it was revealed that one of the killers, 19-year-old Adel K., was being monitored by electronic tag after twice attempting to join fanatics in Syria.

His bail terms, however, allowed him to be unsupervised between 8.30am and 12.30pm. The attack happened between 9am and 11am'

More here in The Mail

If this is true then the French legal system is as ridiculous as ours. Questions need to be asked and terrorist suspects need to be treated as potentially dangerous 24 hours a day.

Why did that Catholic priest die?

The BBC seem confused as to why Islamist terrorists would cut a French Catholic priest's throat.

Maybe the BBC should read this post of mine from two weeks ago, here's the most pertinent part (I've emphasised the really key parts in case the BBC are even more blind to reality than I thought):

'The so-called Islamic State urged its followers to attack French people with vehicles well before the deadly attack in Nice.

A speech two years ago from the jihadists' spokesman, Abu Mohammed al Adnani, encouraged devotees to turn to more basic methods of terrorism if they could not obtain guns or explosives.

"If you are not able to find a bomb or a bullet, then smash his head with a rock, or slaughter him with a knife, or crush him with your car, or throw him down from a high place, or choke him, or poison him," he said.

In his remarks, Adnani singled out "the spiteful French" amid a long list of enemies topped by "the disbelieving American" and their allies.'

In recent weeks in Europe as well as bombs and bullets we've had people crushed by a truck and killed by a knife, that leaves smashing heads with rocks, throwing people from a high place and poison. Would you care to wager how long before Western Europeans experience these types of atrocities as well?

Europe has lost the war?

Israpundit has an interesting and depressing point of view:

'The Wall Street Journal just published a shocking article revealing what Patrick Calvar, France’s director general of intelligence, has in mind.

“The confrontation is inevitable,” said Mr. Calvar. There are an estimated 15,000 Salafists among France’s seven million Muslims, “whose radical-fundamentalist creed dominates many of the predominantly Muslim housing projects at the edges of cities such as Paris, Nice or Lyon. Their preachers call for a civil war, with all Muslims tasked to wipe out the miscreants down the street”.

Yes, France is heading toward the “inevitable confrontation”.

...
 
On the ashes of the World Trade Center, George W. Bush rose to the fight. In those years, the United States and its European allies proved themselves “the stronger horse” and the forces of the “weaker horse” of Al Qaeda began to lose heart. When Islamists were thrown on the defensive, recruits dropped off. Attacks on Western cities diminished.

After eight years of Barack Hussein Obama and Europe’s retreat from the war on terror, the West appears to be the weaker horse and the Islamists the stronger one.

A few days ago, I asked Professor Bruce Thornton of California State University what Europe should do to reverse this horrible trend. His answer was revealing:

“There is no political will for waging total war against ISIS. It would require 100,000 troops and massive bombing to eliminate as many jihadists as possible. We would have to abandon rules of engagement that privilege the enemy’s people over our own. At home, we would have to increase deportations and publicly demand that Muslim communities in the West disavow Jihadism and Sharia law”.

Of course, Europe and the West are not adopting any of these important and clearly articulated measures.

-Radical Islamists have already infiltrated Europe’s universities, mosques and cities’ outskirts.

-Institutional Islam has been able to convince Europeans that terror “has nothing to do with Islam”.

-Mainstream media is refusing even to spell the name of the enemy and it is just preparing new articles about the next victims of Jihad.

-Pope Francis is busy in preaching clemency to everybody.

-The remnant of European Jewry is fleeing the old continent.

-Europe’s armies are getting smaller by the day.

Abandon any hope: Without a major cultural revolution and shock, Europe is lost, Islamists will win! And as it goes along, we will cede more and more of our freedom and civilization to the Grand Jihad.'

I'd like to say that this was pessimistic and that there was an alternative but I am afraid to say that Israpundit is probably correct. Depressing prospect for Europe isn't it? have you planned your exit?

German Government Admits They Have Lost 130,000 Migrants

With the frequency of attacks in Germany now making it hard to keep track, this report from  Breitbart is really concerning.

'German authorities do not know the whereabouts of 130,000 migrants, the government confessed today. It means that more than one in ten unvetted new arrivals from the Middle East have disappeared, somewhere in Europe.

Of the 1.1 million migrants who registered as asylum seekers in Germany in 2015, "about 13 per cent did not turn up at the reception centres to which they had been directed," the government said in a written reply to a question from a lawmaker from the Left Party.'

Need I really explain why?

How many of these individuals will carry out attacks like those that have happened in recent days in Nice and Germany?