StatCounter

Showing posts with label Sexism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sexism. Show all posts

Friday, 11 September 2015

Female cartoonist could have 12 year prison term extended for shaking her lawyer's hand per The Independent

'An Iranian artist currently serving more than 12 years in prison for criticising the government now faces further charges of "indecency" for allegedly shaking her male lawyer's hand.

Amnesty International reports that Atena Farghadani, 29, who was jailed after she depicted Iranian government officials as monkeys and goats in a satirical cartoon, may face a longer sentence amid claims over the handshake.

Charges of an "illegitimate sexual relationship short of adultery" have been brought against Farghadani and her lawyer Mohammad Moghimi amid allegations he visited her in jail and shook her hand - which is illegal in Iran.'
What a delightful regime...

Monday, 19 May 2014

The Guardian's Comment Is Free section asks 'Should women get paid menstrual leave?'

The Guardian's Comment Is Free section asks if women should get paid menstrual leave - it's a fair question, after all there is a magic money tree to pay for all extensions to workers benefits.

However this is a highly discriminatory measure and I demand equality. I don't see why I, as a man, should be discriminated against by not receiving this extra benefit. Just because I can't menstruate, I should still have the right to be able to menstruate and so have these extra days leave...


The Monty Python team once had similar views... In Life Of Brian.

Friday, 7 March 2014

Male vs Female in sport - weightlifting

Further to this morning's post and the continued claims from @SexismInSports that 'Women are NOT the weaker sex' I thought I'd compare a sport where strength is of great importance, although technique does also play an important part, weightlifting.

The trouble with making direct comparisons is that the weight (of the competitor) categories are not always directly comparable so I have compared in all but one case only where the women are in a higher weight category, thus giving them a slight advantage. The exception to this is in the highest women's category when women of any weight above 75kg compete, in this case I have compared with the men's 77kg category as there is no 75kg category. However for the men this is a restricted category with four heavier categories whereas for women there is no weight restriction in this category, so theoretically the women competing in this class could be many kilos heavier than the men.




If you look at this comparison you will see that the men at any given weight lift more than women. Taken across all the classes there is an average male superiority of 19.1%. However that includes the last wight class that gives women an unfair advantage, excluding that weight class gives men a superiority of 21.52%

So are women the weaker sex in weightlifting? In which sport are they not?

Wednesday, 20 November 2013

Education doesn't mean women should have more freedoms: Kerala Muslim leader - Indian Express Mobile

Yet more Islamic oppression of women that the West will ignore...
' ..Islam has not changed its decrees regarding the life of women. Muslim women should not work in a place where only a woman and a man are present. They should work only in a place where there are enough number of women and trustworthy men. Ninety per cent of jobs do not require men and women to mingle. These rules cannot be changed," he said.'

Friday, 1 November 2013

Well airport security can be trying

The rigmarole at British airports of removing your laptop and/or tablet from your carry-on bag, but not your pda (why the distinction? when does a pda become a tablet? 4", 5", 7", 9"?), then removing your coat or jacket but not always a cardigan or windcheater, removing your belt and sometimes your shoes can be rather trying.

Putting everything back into place whilst not holding up the queue too much is also extremely irritating but we'll leave that for the moment.

Many is the time that I've joked to Mrs NotaSheep and other nearby passengers that before long they'll require us to all strip completely before going through the magic arch. Well according to the Daily Mail two passengers at Manchester Airport tried to just that. Apparently:
'Hadfield-Hyde told the court that security guard Abdullah Mayet had indicated that she should take off all her clothes before passing through the scanner. She said: ‘He was pointing at me saying, “Off”. I said to him, “Do you mean just my jacket?”, but he was saying, “Off, off, all off”.’




I think I see the problem, I've also experienced the occasional security guard whose grasp of English is somewhat shaky and whose attitude is rude and dismissive. Indeed Mrs NotaSheep almost got into a serious row with one such security guard at a London airport when they put her carry-on bag to one side for manual checking but then just left it there for almost half  an hour rather than check it. That security guard seemed to be of a similar racial background to the guard in this instance, as Mrs NotaSheep says, some of these people just don't know how to deal with modern women.


Friday, 6 September 2013

The feminist response to Robin Thicke's Blurred Lines



This parody nicely done but doesn't reversing the roles demonstrate that two wrongs don't make a right?

The performers are The Law Revue girls who 'want to define those supposedly "blurred lines"'. It's interesting that the credits for the video on YouTube don't include the names of the male models, presumably they're just pretty bodies on the video!

If you want to see the original Blurred Lines videos both usual and uncensored take a trip here.

Tuesday, 13 December 2011

Sexism and ageism in The Telegraph

Yesterday's Telegraph included an article about Duran Duran's video to promote their latest single 'Girl Panic', and more specifically the fact that it had been banned by two music channels for being too raunchy. The aforementioned video features some of the original supermodels portraying the members of the band. The line that caught my eye was this one:
'Though most of the women are mothers in their 40s, the video was still considered too raunchy'
Savour the casual ageism in that line, why can't women in their 40s be raunchy?

Purely for research purposes I have watched the video and yes it is rather raunchy and what's wrong with that? But then why shouldn't women in their 40s be raunchy? In any case Yasmin Le Bon, Eva Herzigova, Cindy Crawford, Naomi Campbell and Helena Christensen are hardly your average 40 something woman and mother are they?



I am no expert but I think that's  Eva Herzigova portraying Nick Rhodes, Helena Christensen as Roger Taylor, definitely Naomi Campbell playing the front man Simon Le Bon, Cindy Crawford as John Taylor and Yasmin Le Bon as the fill-in guitarist.

Too raunchy for TV I think not. Women in the prime of life being too raunchy for young music channel execs...

Friday, 18 February 2011

Do men look at girls' bottoms?

Of course they do and here's the backward facing video proof...


The above clip, called "Rear view girls", is a montage of craning necks and double-takes, showing men, women, and even the Hollywood Jesus slowing down to take a cheeky peek at the girls' behinds. The girls being two New Zealanders living in Los Angeles: Jessie and Reanin - aka Miss Popularity winner and former All Blacks WAG Jessie Gurunathan and former Juice TV and Shortland St "bad girl" Reanin Johannink.

Thanks to Theo Spark fpr the spot.

Sunday, 13 February 2011

Sunday evening catchup

Too many open tabs in Firefox awaiting proper attention but somehow I don't think i will have time so:

1) Giles Coren asks 'So why is it all right for women to be sexist about MEN?'. It's a long article resulting from the Andy Gray/Richard Keys Sky Sports story, here's one perinent extract:
'To be a man in this country is constantly to have to apologise for oneself and to be ever so very careful about every sentence we speak or write which contains any reference at all to members of the opposite sex.

While at the same time, and this is the shame of it, we ourselves are fair game for women. While sexism from men is the outstanding social crime of the modern world, women can say absolutely whatever they like about us.

For make no mistake: sexism is alive and well in this country and applauded in all quarters — as long as it is practised by women. And they are allowed to say the most terrible, terrible things.

Only last week, for example, Jo Brand, the newly crowned Best Female TV Comic at the British Comedy Awards, was on Have I Got News For You and replied to the question ‘What’s your favourite kind of man, Jo?’ by saying: ‘A dead one.’ Oh, how the audience fell about. And the other contestants, all male, chortled away too.

I’m not saying it wasn’t funny. I’m just saying we live in a world where the thorough-going awfulness, uselessness and superfluity of the male sex is such a given, that a frontline television comic can get big laughs by saying she’d prefer it if we were all dead.'


2) The Telegraph
'A Polish MP has been forced to apologise after he criticised the prospect of gay men getting married but said he would "gladly watch lesbians". '


3) Harry's Place reports the words of Tariq Ramadan:
"Allah we ask you because you are Allah, strengthen the faith of our brothers and sisters in Palestine, Allah strengthen their faith in Palestine and make them triumphant over the enemy, Your enemy, the enemy of the religion (Islam) with your mercy, oh, Generous one. Allah strengthen their faith in Palestine, in Chechnya, Afghanistan, in Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, in Egypt, Sudan, Kashmir and in every land and on every battlefield. Allah, strike our enemies, Your enemies, the enemies of the religion (Islam)."
Ah the religion of peace...


4) Corpus Libris has a fantastic theme 'Books and the Bodies that love them' - Great imagination.


5) MEMRI report on 'British Islamist Kamal Al-Hilbawi and Liberal Nabil Yassin Debate: Are Israeli Children Legitimate Military Targets?' - Thatthe question can even be asked sums up so much of what I find repulsive about Islamic extremists.


6) The National Post have a report by Kevin Libin: 'Consensus on global warming challenged'; here's an extract:
'a book critic in the Boston Globe mentioned in passing the “scientific consensus that the world may be heading toward a climate Armageddon if nothing is done to reverse the present course.” And in the National Post, the executive director for the Ontario advocacy group, People for Education, asserted: “There’s no longer a debate around how much conservation is needed about what we’ve done to our atmosphere.” None of these people were actual scientists, yet this language of “consensus” about dangerous global warming has become accepted wisdom.

“It’s laziness. An urban legend,” says Mr. Harris, director of the International Climate Science Coalition, a league of researchers who maintain that the science of climate is copiously unsettled and, therefore, caution against premature policy prescriptions to address it. “You can say thousands of scientists agree, and then you don’t have to get into the actual facts.”

Since there has, Mr. Harris points out, never been any global poll of scientists to assess the unanimity of views on the scale and threat of environmental impacts, such claims are dubious enough. But, he notes, even among scientific groups whose leaders publicly and broadly endorse the findings of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that human activities are driving ruinous climate shifts, there’s no evidence of consensus from their own membership. One news story in 2009, for instance, suggested that “3,000 scientists” had called on the federal government in an open letter to take immediate action in curtailing carbon emissions. But among the members of the Canadian Geophysical Union, one of the organizations represented by the letter, a low response rate had only 28% of members explicitly declaring themselves behind the statement.'


7) The Mail poses 'One question the BBC never asks' The article starts:
'Even by the sorry standards of the BBC – apologist-in-chief for the bloated public sector – the past few days have been vintage.

On reducing police numbers, selling off forests, the end of the Big Society, library closures – you name it – critic after critic has been wheeled out to prophesy that the Government’s cuts will mean the death of civilisation as we know it.

What the Corporation never points out is that over the past few years, the private sector has already had to go through considerable pain, with employees’ wages frozen or cut and their pensions decimated.'
Read the rest.


8) Right Truth provocatively says 'If you don't want your daughters Westernized ... ... Don't move to Western civilized nations!'

Here's an extract:
'Muslims move to Western nations and bring their extended families. Unlike other immigrants who came here looking to be a part of American culture and a better life for their families, many Muslim immigrants come here planning to maintain their native culture and change America. "Americans, like Europeans, are now experiencing a new kind of immigrant, one for whom tribal, cultural, or ethnic loyalty trumps his allegiance to American law and to western concepts of individual human rights." says Dr. Phyllis Chesler.'
There's plenty more...


9) Robind Shepherd reminds us that
'According to a major opinion poll survey conducted by Pew in 2006, 97 percent of Egyptians admitted to holding “somewhat unfavourable” or “very unfavourable” opinions about Jews while none (zero percent) said they had favourable opinions about Jews; in Jordan 98 percent said they had unfavourable opinions with one percent holding favourable opinions.'


10) Daphne Anson reports that
'“Always Good to See You,” gushed the BBC Presenter to the Anti-Israel Arab Extremist'
'London-based Dr Abdel Bari Atwan, who’s dedicated (for some audiences subtly) to Israel’s overthrow, is, thanks to a fawning media, a familiar face on British television. Born in Gaza in 1950, he attended school in Jordan and studied journalism at Cairo University. He moved to London in 1978, working for a Saudi publication, and is now a British citizen.

In certain Arabic media, pre-eminently the widely-distributed Pan-Arab newspaper Al-Quds Al-Arabi (circulation about 50,000 according to one estimate), which he’s edited since its foundation in London in 1989 (and which has been banned or censored for its extremism in some pro-Western Arab countries), he’s foams with fury and venom against Israel and the West, and exults at their tragedies and setbacks. In 1996 he got a scoop by donning Afghan robes, trekking into remote terrain, and securing an interview with Osama Bin Laden, who took the opportunity of issuing a fatwa.

Dr Atwan can be considered one of those Arab radicals who’s made Londonistan what it is, to the avowed satisfaction of Frances Guy, a principal dhimmi-driver of Foreign Office appeasement (see her quoted remarks in my post of 15 January, “Drivers of Dhimmitude ...”)

The splendid Canadian columnist Mark Steyn – whose departure as a regular columnist from Britain’s Daily Telegraph is much regretted by his numerous admirers – has described Atwan aptly as a “celebrity eliminationist”, for there seems to be no shortage of Western venues and Western broadcasters prepared to host the extremist editor. '


That's ten down, about thirty more to go!

Friday, 28 January 2011

Typical Guardian error

The Guardian seem to be missing the point with their piece entitled 'Can the man on the street explain the offside rule?'. Richard Keys and Andy Gray's 'crime' was not that they said women don't understand the offside rule whilst men do, but that this particular lady linesman couldn't understand the offside rule. In fact the offside rule is quite tricky to explain, although easier to understand, especially since the change in te law re 'active' and 'passive' players.

Whether the man in the street understands the offside rule is unimportant, what is important is whether professional match officials understand the rule.

Saturday, 13 November 2010

6,5,7,7,6,9,6,7,8,7,7,7,7

The Telegraph explains that
'PricewaterhouseCoopers, one of Britain's largest accountancy firms, has launched an investigation after male staff at one of its branches in Ireland were found circulating emails where they rated the attractiveness of their female colleagues.'
And has the pictures.

Sexist swine, accountants!

Friday, 1 October 2010

Climate Change extremism - "Care to join us, no pressure"



I still can't believe that this video is for real, I keep expecting someone from 10:10 to appear and explain how it is just a publicity stunt and not to be taken seriously. Now whilst 10:10 and Richard Curtis are, I am sure, not really suggesting people should be blown up for not agreeing to go along with the policies of 10:10, they are just trying to get our attention, I wonder how they will feel when some eco-nut is inspired by this film to blow-up something or someone that they feel are not supporting 10:10. I hope this doesn't happen but there are some very odd people out there and 4x4s have been damaged by ecomentalists in the past 'coz they are destroying the planet'.


Incidentally "Getting your father to insulate the loft"; sexist?



I note that IN The Guardian 10:10 founder and Age of Stupid film maker Franny Armstrong 'joked':
'Doing nothing about climate change is still a fairly common affliction, even in this day and age. What to do with those people, who are together threatening everybody's existence on this planet? Clearly we don't really think they should be blown up, that's just a joke for the mini-movie, but maybe a little amputating would be a good place to start?

...

But why take such a risk of upsetting or alienating people, I ask her: "Because we have got about four years to stabilise global emissions and we are not anywhere near doing that. All our lives are at threat and if that's not worth jumping up and down about, I don't know what is."

"We 'killed' five people to make No Pressure – a mere blip compared to the 300,000 real people who now die each year from climate change," she adds.

Jamie Glover, the child-actor who plays the part of Philip and gets blown up, has similarly few qualms: "I was very happy to get blown up to save the world."'

Ah the certainties of the true believers, they are right and any one who does not believe is a 'denier' and deserves to lose a limb or at least a digit, if not be blown up. What delightful people, in earlier times I assume they would have been in favour of burning heretics at the stake.

Wednesday, 16 June 2010

Ranking the World Cup fans - female only

Guyism have their "ultimate guide to the sexy fans of the World Cup nations". Apart from missing North Korea it is quite extensive. My vote would go to Spain, Brazil & Switzerland although Argentina has a couple of points in her favour. However England, more decorum please.

Wednesday, 19 May 2010

"Are they real?"



Translation:
guy: Are they real?
Anna: Yes, they are.
guy: WOW! but may I try?
Anna: ?!
Ekzo. Ice cream with real berries.
Ekzo. Do you want REAL berries?

Sunday, 7 March 2010

I know it's wrong but when I was 15...

The Telegraph reports that
"A ballet teacher has appeared in court accused of abducting one of her male pupils and having sex with him.

Sarah Pirie, 27, from Dundee, is charged with taking the 15 year-old boy to hotels in Manchester between March and June last year.

Miss Pirie, who is a trained dancer and choreographer, met the boy at the dance school where she worked in Lytham St Annes on the Fylde Coast in Lancashire. "


Now when I was 15...

Wednesday, 3 March 2010

Boob War (update)

I am afraid that I have to report that Boob War is spreading. The Other McCain reveals that Monica Bellucci has tried to make the peace: "This senseless waste of cleavage cannot be allowed to continue... In the name of humanity, I call on the combatants to end their breast belligerence."...
and there is much more...

Meanwhile The Daley Gator thinks that "The only way to end Boob Wars is, Operation Pheobe Cates is out of the Pool commences" He makes a compelling argument...
but I would remind him that whilst the stills are powerful, the the video is even more uplifting.



There is more Rodney Carrington "Show them to me", including a live performance here

Worryingly The Camp of the Saints has tried the nuclear route with some Janet Lupo... pictures that I just cannot show on this blog, there are limits; maybe I am a closet supporter of unilateral disarmament, after all.


I am concerned by how this Boob/Cleavage War (pronounced - Boob stroke Cleavage War) is proceeding and call upon all concerned to settle down and look once more at Salma Hayek...

Friday, 26 February 2010

Boob war (update)

Further to this piece from last week I have to report that the blogosphere's boob wars have grown in intensity as The Camp of the Saints announces that "It’s D-Day baby and I’m General Patton and William Tecumseh Sherman on serious steroids…." and brings out some serious double-barrelled weaponry. Cynthia Myers seems to have upped the stakes once more, I await reprisals from elsewhere...

Friday, 19 February 2010

It's war

I am afraid that I have to inform you that war has broken out in the blogosphere; 'boob war'. Initial hostilities seem to have been commenced by American Power albeit after much provocation by Theo Spark, The Daley Gator has joined in and Wy Blog has too.

This could be a long campaign, there may be bust-ups along the way but you owe it to yourself to follow the tit for tat exchanges...


So far I would say it was a battle between Gemma Atkinson and Salma Hayek; but I could be swayed another way...

Tuesday, 9 February 2010

How to upset Harriet Harman

Vote for Harriet Harman on The Rear of the Year website...

Oddly I couldn't find an image of Harriet Harman's rear so here's two photos that I think do more than hint at what you might find.






UPDATE: The Mail have a photo and here it is in all its 'glory'...



And if that's not enough to make you 'Vote Harriet' then how about this from last week...

Friday, 8 January 2010

Something from Harriet Harman's equality obsessed past

"In June 2009, Sir Michael Scholar, head of the UK Statistics Authority, wrote to Harman to warn her that different headline figures used by the ONS and Government Equalities Office with regards to pay differentiation between men and women might undermine public trust in official statistics. The GEO's headline figure was 23%, which was based on median hourly earnings of all employees, not the 12.8%, based on median hourly earnings of full-time employees only, used by the ONS. Scholar wrote: "It is the Statistics Authority’s view that use of the 23% on its own, without qualification, risks giving a misleading quantification of the gender pay gap". The Equalities Office rejected his criticism, saying: 'With women representing over three-quarters of the part-time workforce, we believe this figure gives the fullest picture of the country's gender pay gap.'"
Per Wikipedia.