Hillary Clinton - The case for the prosecution

Powerful and logical stuff from Bill Whittle. 

Is there at least a case for Hillary Clinton to be prosecuted?

What was "really troubling" then doesn't seem to be even worrying Hillary Clinton now

During the Third Presidential Debate there was much horror from Hillary Clinton and her supporters in the mainstream media when Chris Wallace asked Donald Trump if he would accept the election results.

'Trump won't commit to accepting election results

Chris Wallace asked Donald Trump if he will accept the election results and he said "I will tell you at the time." Hillary Clinton responded to Trump's rigged elections claims by calling his remark "horrifying.'

Source: CNN'

You can see the video here

Now that Hillary Clinton's team see a chance, however small, of stealing the election, Hillary Clinton's fine words are shown as being as meaningless as so much of her bleatings.

Here's a reminder of what Hillary Clinton tweeted

Is Hillary Clinton's refusal to denounce Jill Stein's recount campaign "a direct threat to our democracy"?

It's odd how Hillary Clinton's words have disappeared down the memory hole so far as the mainstream media are concerned.



 a

Congressman Mike Pompeo raises a question to Hillary Clinton at the Benghazi hearing that I missed at the time

Congressman Mike Pompeo raises a question to Hillary Clinton at the Benghazi hearing that I missed at the time. 

It's footage like this that makes so many people so happy that Hillary Clinton didn't win the US Presidential Election.

To all of the Trump haters, all of the Hilary Clinton supporters...

I've seen so many crying Hillary Clinton supporting snowflakes on YouTube over the last few days that I thought this chap would make a fine antidote to their upset.

Watch "Clinton ordered maid to print out top secret information" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/Die9wr-soI4

How is this not negligence? How is this not mishandling of confidential government information? How is Hillary Clinton not under arrest?

Why did the FBI not interview the Clinton's maid? Why do the mainstream media, including the BBC, not report this story?

This story stinks to high heaven but at most of the mainstream media VOTE HILLARY is more important than the truth.

The Clinton's Circle of Enrichment - because 'charity' begins at home

https://youtu.be/KO5Robos1qY

The Clinton's Circle of Enrichment - because 'charity' begins at home.

As always, 'follow the money'.

This stinks but the BBC won't report anything like this.

Watch "Clinton Foundation accepts $1M gift from Qatar" on YouTube

Remember that Qataris have been implicated in funding ISIS.

This stinks so high but don't expect the BBC to cover this after all there's a US Presidential Election to be won.

Watch "Security clearance attorney reacts to Clinton investigation" on YouTube

One rule for the little people, quite another for Hillary Clinton.

The Chairman of the US House Homeland Security Committee accused Hillary Clinton of "treason" - how is this not headline news?

It does seem to be true that House Homeland Security Chairman Mike McCaul has accused Hillary Clinton of committing treason.

You can read more if you go to sites such as talkingpointsmemo, rickwells.us and indeed the Washington Times.

Good luck finding anything about this on MSNBC, CNN or the BBC - at these news organisations is VOTE HILLARY all the way.

This Julian Assange interview with John Pilger makes the substantiated claim that the same people are funding both ISIS and the Clinton Foundation

This Julian Assange interview with John Pilger makes the substantiated claim that the same people are funding both ISIS and the Clinton Foundation. 

This should be headline news but the mainstream media is so obsessed with getting Hillary Clinton elected President of the United States of America that inconvenient facts are ignored.

Rudy Giuliani on Hillary Clinton's "corruption"

More views that you won't hear on the VOTE HILLARY mainstream media.

Mishandling information - there's different rules for ordinary people like Kristian Saucier as opposed to Hillary Clinton

Now do you see why so many people believe that Hillary Clinton and her ilk truly think that they are above the law?

The one hundred and twenty first weekly No Shit, Sherlock award - The US media is biased against Donald Trump

The one hundred and twenty first weekly No Shit, Sherlock award - The US media is biased against Donald Trump

Hillary Clinton Supporters Like Trump's Tax Plan

At least the chap in the pink t-shirt had the decency to do the honourable thing. 

I've seen this sort of video before, it's always interesting though.

This is what happens if you dare to point out that Hillary Clinton lied about what happened in Benghazi

This is what happens if you dare to point out that Hillary Clinton lied about what happened in Benghazi

Free speech? Not in Clinton world.

This can't be true because if it was then CNN and the BBC would have to report these links, wouldn't they?

This can't be true because if it was then CNN and the BBC would have to report these links, wouldn't they? Only joking...

Remember for most of the mainstream media it's all about ignoring any facts that show any dodgy links between Hillary Clinton and radiacl Islam and spreading the message "VOTE HILLARY".

Hillary Clinton - is this the smoking gun?

Hillary Clinton - is this the smoking gun?

What's really happening with public opinion in the USA? Are the opinion polls reflecting reality?

 This Zero Hedge  post from last week was fascinating and I apologise for not posting it until now.

Earlier this morning we wrote about the obvious sampling bias in the latest ABC / Washington Post poll that showed a 12-point national advantage for Hillary.  Like many of the recent polls from Reuters, ABC and The Washington Post, this latest poll included a 9-point sampling bias toward registered democrats. 

"METHODOLOGY – This ABC News poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone Oct. 20-22, 2016, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 874 likely voters. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points, including the design effect. Partisan divisions are 36-27-31 percent, Democrats - Republicans - Independents."

...

Now, for all of you out there who still aren't convinced that the polls are "adjusted", we present to you the following Podesta email, leaked earlier today, that conveniently spells out, in detail, exactly how to "manufacture" the desired data. The email starts out with a request for recommendations on "oversamples for polling" in order to "maximize what we get out of our media polling."

I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling.

The email even includes a handy, 37-page guide with the following poll-rigging recommendations.  In Arizona, over sampling of Hispanics and Native Americans is highly recommended:

Research, microtargeting & polling projects
-  Over-sample Hispanics
-  Use Spanish language interviewing. (Monolingual Spanish-speaking voters are among the lowest turnout Democratic targets)
-  Over-sample the Native American population

For Florida, the report recommends "consistently monitoring" samples to makes sure they're "not too old" and "has enough African American and Hispanic voters."  Meanwhile, "independent" voters in Tampa and Orlando are apparently more dem friendly so the report suggests filling up independent quotas in those cities first.

-  Consistently monitor the sample to ensure it is not too old, and that it has enough African American and Hispanic voters to reflect the state.
-  On Independents: Tampa and Orlando are better persuasion targets than north or south Florida (check your polls before concluding this). If there are budget questions or oversamples, make sure that Tampa and Orlando are included first.

Meanwhile, it's suggested that national polls over sample "key districts / regions" and "ethnic" groups "as needed."

-  General election benchmark, 800 sample, with potential over samples in key districts/regions
-  Benchmark polling in targeted races, with ethnic over samples as needed
-  Targeting tracking polls in key races, with ethnic over samples as needed

 ...

And that's how you manufacture a 12-point lead for your chosen candidate and effectively chill the vote of your opposition.   '

Do read the whole of that Zero Hedge piece.

This morning Paul Joseph Watson interviewed Bill Mitchell about the US Presidential Election opinion polls and he comes to some interesting conclusions about polling sampling bias.

You can watch that video here

I wonder how many other Hillary Clinton supporters are equally well-informed as this one

A Hillary Clinton voter.

Hillary Clinton - Guilty or Not Guilty?

Hillary Clinton - Guilty or Not Guilty?