Mr Miliband if the deed of variation applied to your father's will wasn't used to (legally) avoid tax, what was the reason?
Showing posts with label Inheritance Tax. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Inheritance Tax. Show all posts
Saturday, 14 February 2015
Friday, 13 February 2015
A question for Ed Miliband, one that the pro Labour BBC won't ask
Mr Miliband - if the deed of variation applied to your father's will wasn't used to (legally) avoid tax, what was the reason?
Tuesday, 28 September 2010
It would seem that inflation is not an accident it's a deliberate policy
Further to this morning's piece about the Bank of England's Deputy Governor, Charlie Bean, telling us to "go out and spend to help invigorate the UK's economic recovery" because "I think it needs to be said that savers shouldn't necessarily expect to be able to live just off their income in times when interest rates are low. It may make sense for them to eat into their capital a bit."
The more I think about this advice the more angry I get. There are many anger making points arising from Mr Bean's advice, here's a few:
1) If people have put money aside for a rainy day, something the last Labour government singly failed to do, why should they be punished whilst the feckless find the amount of their debts reduced?
2) If the current economic recession was caused largely by excessive spending, why does Mr Bean want us to repeat the mistakes?
3) Inflation is just another stealth tax, maybe the most effective one. It is a tax imposed by governments on those holding its debt and anyone whose savings are not index-linked (and by the correct index) is paying towards that tax.
4) In Feb 2009, just before the Labour Government & Bank of England turned on the banknote printing presses, the Bank of England predicted that inflation in late 2010 would be between 0% and 1%. A year later in Feb 2010 they predicted it would be between 1% and 2%. Now in September 2010 it's 3.1%. So why hould anyone believe a Bank of England who still claim that inflation is not a real worry, deflation is?
5) OK so we are not alone, the US Federal has said it is willing 'to provide additional accommodation if needed to … return inflation, over time, to levels consistent with its mandate' - More deliberate inflation...
6) Back to the value in property point. Yes my house has gone up in value and yes that is nice (on paper) but it gives me no income and I can only release that increase in value when I sell it. But at that point I will need to buy another house so how does that help. As I see it the only time the 'profit' in my house will be realised is when I die and the beneficiaries of my will pay inheritance tax. Hold on is that the real plan? Force old age pensioners and other savers with no real income to starve so that they die and then the government gets a percentage of the rise in house prices in the form of inheritance tax? Surely no government could be that cruel...
The more I think about this advice the more angry I get. There are many anger making points arising from Mr Bean's advice, here's a few:
1) If people have put money aside for a rainy day, something the last Labour government singly failed to do, why should they be punished whilst the feckless find the amount of their debts reduced?
2) If the current economic recession was caused largely by excessive spending, why does Mr Bean want us to repeat the mistakes?
3) Inflation is just another stealth tax, maybe the most effective one. It is a tax imposed by governments on those holding its debt and anyone whose savings are not index-linked (and by the correct index) is paying towards that tax.
4) In Feb 2009, just before the Labour Government & Bank of England turned on the banknote printing presses, the Bank of England predicted that inflation in late 2010 would be between 0% and 1%. A year later in Feb 2010 they predicted it would be between 1% and 2%. Now in September 2010 it's 3.1%. So why hould anyone believe a Bank of England who still claim that inflation is not a real worry, deflation is?
5) OK so we are not alone, the US Federal has said it is willing 'to provide additional accommodation if needed to … return inflation, over time, to levels consistent with its mandate' - More deliberate inflation...
6) Back to the value in property point. Yes my house has gone up in value and yes that is nice (on paper) but it gives me no income and I can only release that increase in value when I sell it. But at that point I will need to buy another house so how does that help. As I see it the only time the 'profit' in my house will be realised is when I die and the beneficiaries of my will pay inheritance tax. Hold on is that the real plan? Force old age pensioners and other savers with no real income to starve so that they die and then the government gets a percentage of the rise in house prices in the form of inheritance tax? Surely no government could be that cruel...
Sunday, 14 February 2010
'In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes."
Under this Labour government it seems that death will mean an extra incurring of taxation as The Telegraph reports that:
"The Tories have accused ministers of secretly planning a 10 per cent “death tax” to help pay for long-term care for the elderly and infirm.Tax, tax, tax; that's what Labour do best and now it looks as though they will be implementing at least one new tax on the dead's estate, in addition to inheritance tax.
They said the tax would be levied on estates in addition to inheritance tax, penalising families with large homes or other substantial assets.
The Conservatives ratcheted up the pressure after it emerged that Ipsos-Mori, the polling company, was testing public opinion on the option. "
Wednesday, 9 December 2009
Inheritance Tax threshold freeze
From when I heard that little dig last week that if Labour were so anti-rises in inheritance tax then why were they raising it themselves I knew this rise would have to go, and lo it came to pass today. But do bear in mind that it is not as clear cut as Alistair Darling pretends; the inheritance tax threshold may well be frozen at at £325,000 rather than rising to £350,000, but it will allow couples to pool their total IHT allowance to make £650,000. That looks like an IHT tax cut to me. So is the Labour party as opposed to cutting IHT as it likes to claim?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
