StatCounter

Showing posts with label Travel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Travel. Show all posts

Tuesday, 31 December 2013

I'm switching to Malaysia Airlines



Malaysia Airlines have banned under12s from the upper deck of their Airbus 380s.

Please British Airways do the same for the upper deck of 747s and one cabin of each class.


Meanwhile WestJet almost got my vote to, but it was an April's Fool



Monday, 7 March 2011

A start?

My views on children on planes are well documented (most recently here but also here and indeed here ) so I was intrigued to read in The Mail about the airline steward who put a small child in an overhead locker. Unfortunately it seems that this was not a noise-cancelling measure but part of a game of hide-and-seek that got out of hand. Still food for thought?

Thursday, 23 December 2010

Why is five inches of snow shutting down London’s Heathrow airport? Because it’s more concerned with being a mall than plowing runways, writes aviation expert Clive Irving.

Read the whole tarticle here in The Daily Beast; food for thought especially if you have been stuck at Heatrow airport for the last few days.

What was happening at Heathrow during the recent snow?

Travel Mole reports some interesting news:
'Airlines offered Heathrow operator BAA help in clearing snow and ice from the runways but were turned down for health and safety reasons, it emerged today.

...

... according to the Daily Telegraph, it seems Lufthansa and another unnamed airline said they asked to help because BAA was not clearing snow fast enough but were told that it contravened health and safety rules.

...

The paper reports a Lufthansa spokesman as saying: "The whole process took too long and should have been started earlier. There was not enough manpower available, we were surprised how long it took to get things operational.

"We were not allowed to clean stands for health and safety reasons. BAA gets a lot of money to operate the airport and they refused to do that."

Another airline said BAA was being “jobsworth” about clearing the snow, refusing to allow frustrated airlines to help.'
What a surprise 'Health and Safety' was one of the factors, I would never have guessed.

Monday, 20 December 2010

'SNOW UPDATE: Flight delays to continue until Christmas Eve Lack of preparation is 'nothing short of a scandal', says AITO'

'SNOW UPDATE: Flight delays to continue until Christmas Eve

Lack of preparation is 'nothing short of a scandal', says AITO'
As reported by Travel Mole this morning...

Thursday, 29 July 2010

He who pays the piper gets ****ed over

I see that the new Zil lanes for the 2012 Olympics are to be enforced by £200 fines for transgressors. Yes Londoners who are, and will for years, paying the lions share of the 2012 London Olympics costs will be banned from using parts of London's already over-crowded roads. The Olympic lanes will cross some of the most congested areas of London and are aimed at facilitating the speedy movement of athletes, International Olympic Committee members, Olympic sponsors and the media. Included roads are the main arterial road from Central London to Docklands and the heavily used Embankment. The restrictions will apply from 6am to midnight every day of the Games and on a smaller scale during the Paralympics. 6am to midnight, so that'll be easy to work around! We are also told that there are also venue specific routes on which restrictions will ONLY during the days of competition relating to those venues and then ONLY between 7am and 4pm or 7am and 7pm.

The special lanes will total nearly 60 miles and the extra restrictions such as closing side roads, banning turns and altering traffic light sequences, will comprise more than 100 miles in London and around 170 miles outside London.

John Armitt, chairman of the Olympic Delivery Association, who I have a feeling has a misplaced sense of priorities, said:
"We have been working closely with our partners to take our operational planning to the next level and will continue to consult with Londoners on the plans.

Where Games Lanes are required there will inevitably be some temporary disruption to everyday life, but we must give athletes the best chance to train and compete effectively. That means ensuring they get to their events on time and minimising the time they spend travelling."
What about the people paying for the event and needing to get to work? Do we get three weeks paid holiday? No we don't so we have to work and we need to travel. There are going to be a lot of very angry Londoners in two years time.

Apparently
"These plans strike an appropriate balance between the demands of hosting this unique event and the day-to-day needs of residents and businesses."
I see no evidence for this 'balance'.


You can see the map of the affected roads here.

Saturday, 31 October 2009

Air Passenger Duty - the truth

This Labour government and its cheerleaders in the BBC and the environmental movement have claimed that Air Passenger Duty (APT) was an environmental necessary to fight climate change. It seems that Alistair Darling, possibly the least impressive Chancellor of the Exchequer for a generation, has admitted that
"the higher air passenger duty being introduced tomorrow was needed to plug gaps in the national finances.

He made no attempt to justify the move - which will add £340 to the ticket for a family of four flying long haul - on environmental grounds, the official reason for the tax.

...

Addressing journalists in Newcastle, home of the failed bank Northern Rock, Mr Darling said: 'I am quite blunt about it, we need to raise money to pay for some of the things we have done.

'If unemployment goes up there is a cost obviously to the family, there is cost in increased benefits, Northern Rock has cost a lot of money.

What we are doing is putting a pound on to your average ticket, which about three quarters of people travel on.

'And you consider the cost of an air ticket, I don't think a pound is that unreasonable.

'In the North East, we have spent billions on a bank for very good reasons."
If it was just a pound then maybe I and others would not be so pissed off with this imposition of yet another Labour Stealth Tax. However the truth is that whilst ticket prices for short-haul economy flights to Europe rise from £10 to £11, on longer journeys the economy ticket levy rises by as much as £30 and of course by far more for Premium Economy, Business Class or First Class travel. Next November the Stealth Tax will rise even higher as the short-haul economy-class tax will rise to £12 per ticket. However for premium-class passengers on the longest flights the Stealth Tax will rise from the newly increased figure to as much as £170 per ticket.

Will air-travellers now be told the real reason for the rise in Air Passenger Duty, as admitted by Alistair Darling, or will they still be officially told that it is an environmental charge? If the latter, as I suspect, will stay the case then they are being lied to; would that make the charge invalid and could people refuse to pay it?

Wednesday, 21 October 2009

News Flash - Gatwick Airport has been sold

BAA has agreed to sell Gatwick, the UK and London's second busiest airport, to Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) who already own London City Airport for a fee of £1.51bn.

Thursday, 13 August 2009

Launched too soon?

LuvTrip.com has been getting a bit of publicity today, it was mentioned in today's TravelMole email for a start. LuvTrip.comm bills itself thus
"Need a weekend away with your cutie? Planning a fantasy honeymoon? Celebrating an anniversary? Coordinating your destination wedding?

LuvTrip is your guide to romantic travel. Research destinations and read one of our many planning articles. Also, book hotel, air, car rentals, cruise trips, weddings, tickets and more for great rates! LuvTrip is bringing a little touch of romance back into relationships!

We'll be adding a lot of destination information and hotel top picks, so check back often. Have wonderful LuvTrip vacations!"
Now I need to book a romantic week away with Mrs NotaSheep so I thought I'd try their serice... I was not impressed.


"Romantic Hotels

Under Construction! Check back soon to get tips and ideas for the best places to stay for romantic travel.



Romantic Travel Destination Guides
United States Destinations

* Kauai

Our romantic travel guides are still in the process of constructio. Please check back for more great information on romantic destinations."

Meanwhile their "Weekend Getaways" only reference US cities.

Somehow I think LuvTrio.com are not quite ready to launch, maybe I'll check back in a month or so.

Tuesday, 9 June 2009

When is a 48 hour strike not a 48 hour strike?

When it's a strike on the London Underground. The official strike is planned to run from 18:59 this evening and run until 19:00 on Thursday evening. However all London tube users know that services start to run down an hour or more before the strike starts "to ensure trains are in the right places for when the service restarts" and only gets back to normal the day following the resumption of service. In addition because the Underground service start to run down before the end of today's working day, people's work and travel plans are disrupted for the whole of today

So a 48 hour strike really affects people for three whole days. If the RMT wanted to minimise disruption to a 48 hour period then the strike would run from the start of one day to the end of the next - 2 whole days, albeit not 48 hours - more like 45 hours. But then since when did the RMT care about inconveniencing the public? Odd that the start of this strike coincides with an England football match, I seem to remember that happening before...

Tuesday, 5 May 2009

What's the relevant fact not being discussed here?

The BBC report that:
"Airport operator BAA saw passenger numbers at its London airports fall 10% in the first three months of 2009, as it was hit by the recession."
But nowhere in the report, that includes analysis from Robert Peston, is there any mention of the BAA's desperate need for a third runway at Heathrow, a runway whose building is strongly supported by Gordon Brown... Why?

Sunday, 22 March 2009

Scary windy landings


Lufthansa flight LH44 from Munich experienced severe crosswinds while landing at Hamburg Germany on 1 March 2008 during Hurricane Emma storm. Nobody was injured; the plane landed using another runway.







And finally an aborted Concorde landing

Concorde aborts a landing at Leeds Bradford under a high crosswind - good view of the Bristol Olympus engines [originally designed for the TSR2] and the extraordinary power of the afterburners.

Wednesday, 18 March 2009

'Freeloading will not be tolerated.' unless you are Ken Livingstone

The Mail has the details of Ken Livingstone's escaping of a mandatory £20 fine. Apparently "He said he was late and had to run for the train." OK everyone that excuse is now officially acceptable, try it and let me know how you get on; somehow I doubt you will be treated as leniently as Leninspart.

Friday, 13 March 2009

Fear of Flying

The news that: "Experts have warned there is a "high probability" that a fault which caused a British Airways jet to crash-land at Heathrow could hit other Boeing 777s." does not reassure a nervous flyer like myself. The additional information that: "US air accident investigators called for a component to be redesigned after a Delta Air Lines plane reportedly encountered a similar problem. Manufacturers Rolls-Royce say the new part should be ready within the year." does not help; ready within the year does not help when I take four flights on 777s most years. I have never liked the idea of two engined planes flying the Atlantic, I would say three or four engines should be the minimum - a 747 would be my favourite or bring back the Tristar.

The BBC try to reassure us passengers with
"Aviation expert David Gleave said he would have no concerns about flying on a Boeing 777 as new "operating procedures", such as boosting the engine on approach to landing to keep the heat up, had been implemented.

"All the regulatory authorities are satisfied the new procedures which they will adopt or already have adopted will cure the problem as a temporary measure," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

"Then new components will be fitted in time which will remove the need for the new operation procedure."

A Boeing spokeswoman said it had issued a set of guidelines for pilots to prevent long-term build-up of ice and these procedures had been approved by the regulatory bodies."

But have to admit that:
"the NTSB report said: "While the procedures may reduce the risk of a rollback in one or both engines due to ice blockage, they add complexity to flight crew operations, and the level of risk reduction is not well established.""



Alex Masterley has a take on this story that has me ven more worried, but it is a nice risk/reward comparison:
"It is good to see that in these difficult times, there are still people willing to take a measured risk. I refer of course to the world's airlines who will continue to fly Boeing 777's despite a known fault that has led to one crash and one near incident.

Our aviation correspondent reports:

The cause of the crash at Heathrow of BA 038 in January 2008 has been identified as fuel starvation or what engineers call "no fuel getting to the engine". Investigators have identified the primary factor leading to this problem, which they has been described by leading technical experts as "a big lump of ice in the fuel tank", which arose from an adverse thermodynamic environment at high altitudes. The effect of the blockage was to limit the flow of fuel to both engines.

With over 750 planes put in service in the last 15 years, that works out at about 2 incidents in 2.8 million flights, or about 10 times the probability of winning the national lottery.

The Boeing 777 is widely used on transatlantic and intercontinental flights. Industry experts say that in the event of a similar mid-flight incident, where ice accumulating in the tanks might be dislodged by turbulence or other activity, then the pilot would be unlikely to be able to manoeuvre the plane in the same manner as Capt. Sully Sullenberger, who recently landed an aircraft in the Hudson River shortly after take off from LaGuardia Airport.

The most likely manoeuvre after a total loss of power, including failure avionics and controls, would be a 35,000 ft "plummet", putting down on the surface of the sea at a velocity above industry norms, causing likely damage to the aircraft fuselage, after which the aircraft would probably "sink like a stone", industry sources commented."


I don't normally drink on planes, far too dehydrating, but I can envisage my hitting the alcohol just a tad on my next few flights.

Friday, 1 August 2008

American border controls

I read in the Washington Post that
"Federal agents may take a traveler's laptop computer or other electronic device to an off-site location for an unspecified period of time without any suspicion of wrongdoing, as part of border search policies the Department of Homeland Security recently disclosed.

Also, officials may share copies of the laptop's contents with other agencies and private entities for language translation, data decryption or other reasons, according to the policies, dated July 16 and issued by two DHS agencies, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement."
Yes that is right, US federal agents can take your laptop from you on entry to the US, keep it for as long as they want, copy any data off of it and transcribe that data as a permanent record AND all of that without any suspicion of wrongdoing.

According to the Washington Post report
"the policies cover "any device capable of storing information in digital or analog form," including hard drives, flash drives, cellphones, iPods, pagers, beepers, and video and audio tapes. They also cover "all papers and other written documentation," including books, pamphlets and "written materials commonly referred to as 'pocket trash' or 'pocket litter.'"
So a business visitor carrying the usual laptop, Blackberry, cellphone, couple of USB memory sticks, camera plus memory cards and some CDs could lose all of that equipment and data storage on the whim of a Federal agent, and lose it for an unspecified length of time.

My self-imposed NotaSheep travel ban on visiting the USA seems not to be ending any time soon.