StatCounter

Showing posts with label Gerry Adams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gerry Adams. Show all posts

Sunday, 13 July 2014

Get him...

I hear that The Sunday Telegraph says Tony Blair faces being summoned before Parliament to explain "secret negotiations" he is said to have held with Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams over on-the-run IRA suspects. 

I can hardly wait but then Blair is so slippery he'll get away scot free

Thursday, 13 September 2012

Murders in Northern Ireland - A post for @OfficialMHick

@OfficialMHick has been tweeting away about the need for apologies and reconciliation in Northern Ireland but seems unable to see why apologies from former IRA leaders are needed as well as from the UK government and Loyalist paramilitary leaders.

'In relation to perpetration of killings, Republican paramilitaries account for almost 59 per cent of all deaths, Loyalist paramilitaries for almost 28 per cent, the British Army for 9 per cent, the RUC for almost 2 per cent and other groups each for less than 1 per cent. Republican paramilitaries have killed 74 per cent of all Protestants killed over 25 per cent of all Catholics, and almost 96 per cent of those who were classified as "Non Northern Ireland." Loyalist paramilitaries killed 19 per cent of all Protestants killed, almost 50 per cent of all Catholics and just 2 per cent of the "Non Northern Ireland" category.'

Source  is the very detailed 'Mapping Troubles-Related Deaths and Deprivation in Northern Ireland by Marie Therese Fay, Mike Morrissey and Marie Smyth - The Cost of the Troubles Study'

So whilst the British government setup an enquiry into Bloody Sunday and apologised for deaths caused by the  British Army, has Martin 'machinegun' McGuinness ever apologised for the killings that he authorised or maybe even took part in when second-in-command of the IRA in Derry? Has Martin 'machinegun' McGuinness ever apologised for the IRA murders that took place when he was allegedly the head of the IRA's Northern Command ? Has Martin McGuinness ever apologised for the IRA's 1987 Enniskillen bombing, which left 11 civilians dead?

Saturday, 17 September 2011

A piece of pertinent information that the BBC see fit to ignore

The BBC report that:
'Martin McGuinness would meet Queen as president

Martin McGuinness has said he will be prepared to meet all heads of state "without exception", if he is elected President of Ireland. 

Sinn Fein announced on Friday that it would be supporting Northern Ireland's Deputy First Minister for the role
Returning from a trip to the US on Saturday, Mr McGuinness said he hoped his candidacy would not be divisive.

When the Queen made her first visit to Ireland in May, Sinn Fein did not take part in any of the main ceremonies.

Speaking to the BBC on Saturday morning, Mr McGuinness said he had given careful consideration to his decision to stand.

He was asked how he would handle another Royal visit to Ireland, given his party's position on the Queen's historic trip.

He said: "If the people of Ireland decide that I should be their president, my responsibilities and duties would be to meet heads of state from all over the world and to do that without exception and that would be my position."'
 How magnanimous of Martin McGuinness to deign to meet the Queen in the future.

The BBC do admit that 'Martin McGuinness, ... has admitted being second in command of the IRA in Derry in the 1970s' but don't link that to the fact that the IRA murdered the Queen's cousin Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma, in 1979. Gerry Adams, Martin McGuinness's SinnFein/IRA colleague, said of Lord Mountbatten's murder:
'The IRA gave clear reasons for the execution. I think it is unfortunate that anyone has to be killed, but the furore created by Mountbatten's death showed up the hypocritical attitude of the media establishment. As a member of the House of Lords, Mountbatten was an emotional figure in both British and Irish politics. What the IRA did to him is what Mountbatten had been doing all his life to other people; and with his war record I don't think he could have objected to dying in what was clearly a war situation. He knew the danger involved in coming to this country. In my opinion, the IRA achieved its objective: people started paying attention to what was happening in Ireland.'
What has Martin McGuinness ever said about this cold-blooded murder? Did he have any part in it, the ordering or approving of it? Have the BBC ever asked these questions? Do the BBC even care?

Regardless of the answers to those questions, would the Queen want to meet one of the men who at the very least was high up in the organisation that killed her cousin, the man who was her eldest son's favourite uncle?


UPDATE:
I see that Biased-BBC have a related piece about the BBC's lack of interest in Martin McGuinness's IRA background:
'why not ask when did McGuinness leave the IRA, exactly? When he was occupying the position as Capo di tutti capo, just how many innocent lives did he arrange to have terminated.Perhaps even more pointedly, how many peope did he murder HIMSELF? What exactly did he "command"?'

Thursday, 30 June 2011

The BBC respond re my Gerry Adams complaint

Finally I have had a response to my compliant about Gerry Adams being the chosen expert voice to comment on the Queen's upcoming visit to Ireland. My original complaint was made on 5th March and followed up on 14th March. Here's the BBC's latest response:
'Dear 5 Live listener



CAS-686637



Thank you for your further e-mail regarding BBC Radio 5 Live broadcast on 4 March 2011.



Firstly I’d like to apologise for the delay in our reply. Please be assured your concerns were raised with the relevant editorial staff.



We must stress that the BBC makes no editorial comment or judgement on the views expressed by Mr Adams or any public figure whose opinions feature in our news coverage or programmes.



Although some people believe that a programme or news bulletin should not allow certain figures or groups to air their views, we feel that it’s better to include many viewpoints wherever possible. This may include hearing opinions which some people may personally disagree with and we recognise your views on Mr Adams and his role in the Northern Ireland conflict.



To provide some context, this very brief contribution (18 seconds long) was heard during a summary bulletin providing one aspect of reaction to the Queen’s visit. During very short bulletins such as this, we often only have time to use one clip. This was the only occasion on this date that in covering the story we used Gerry Adams in a news bulletin.



During the rest of our coverage in programmes – ‘5 Live Drive’ for example - and bulletins, many other Irish perspectives were heard, from journalists, academics and politicians alike. ‘5 Live Drive’ heard from our Royal Correspondent Peter Hunt who put Mr Adam’s views into context, detailing the majority of the Irish population’s opposition to his take on the visit.



As previously mentioned, we have a duty to reflect all relevant views when discussing a subject and Mr Adams represented opposition to the visit at that time. Some of his views are also shared by a section of the Irish population, albeit small.



We strive to cover subjects with due impartiality, across our coverage and over time. We therefore believe we reported on the Queen’s visit and the reaction in Ireland in a fair, accurate and impartial manner.



Should you now wish to proceed to the second stage of the complaints process, it's now open to you to write to the Director of BBC News:



HelenBoadenComplaints@bbc.co.uk



Helen Boaden

Director

BBC News

Room 5601

Television Centre

Wood Lane

London W12 7RJ



Should you choose to escalate your complaint our procedures stipulate you do so within 20 days of receiving this correspondence.



Thanks again for taking the time to contact us.



Regards,



Liam Boyle



Senior Complaints Advisor for News and Current Affairs

BBC Audience Services'


I was going to respond but I have had a response to another complaint that I feel deserves more of my time... More about that tomorrow!

Monday, 16 May 2011

Just a quick ponder

When the Queen's visit to Ireland was announced the BBC asked Gerry Adams for a comment. Now that Irish terrorists (obviously not from the IRA) have issued a bomb threat on the people of London will the BBC do the same now? If not, why not?

Saturday, 23 April 2011

Does this mean that the IRA didn't really completely decommission their arms?

Police Officer Ronan Kerr was killed by men who until recently were members of the Provisional IRA. Police Officer Ronan Kerr was killed by men using IRA weapons, weapons that should have been decommissioned. So two questions come to mind: first how did Ronan Kerr's killers get access to Provo weapons and second does this mean that the IRA did not really decommission all of their arms?

The second question is one that I suspect we all know the answer to... Can we expect a statement from Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness and if so should we believe a word that they say?

Monday, 14 March 2011

The Queen's visit to Ireland, the BBC's choice of guest to comment - Gerry Adams - and a complaint (update)

Further to this post I have had a reply, to which I have in turn replied.

As a reminder, here's my original complaint post:
'Further to this and this I have lodged a complaint with the BBC:
 
Complaint type: BBC News
Location: England
What is your complaint about: Radio News
Programme title: 5Live 10pm news bulletin Friday 5 March 2011
Transmission date: 05/03/2011
Complaint category: Offence
Complaint summary: Choosing to intreview Gerry Adams re the Queen's future visit to Ireland
Full complaint: BBC 5Live 10pm News carried a piece about the upcoming visit by the Queen to Ireland. The BBC chose one person to interview about this visit; not the BBC's royal correspondent but Sinn fein's Gerry Adams. So for an opinion on the first royal visit to Ireland for 100 years the BBC choose the man who lead an organisation (Sinn Fein), in the public's mind, intrinsically linked with the terrorist organisation (the IRA) that blew up and killed the Queen's uncle, Lord Mountbatten, in 1979. Did anybody at BBC 5Live News wonder if it might be a trifle tasteless to interview a leading figure in Sinn Fein about the visit of the Queen to Ireland bearing in mind that history?
Receive a reply: Yes
Contacted us before: Yes
Complaint related to previous contact: No
Title: Mr
First name: NotaSheep
Surname: MaybeaGoat
Email address: notasheepmaybeagoat@gmail.com
Under 13: No
 
I wonder how long I will have to wait for a reply and how the BBC will justify their choice of guest... Somehow I doubt that they will accept a breach of taste.'

Here's the reply that I have just received from the BBC:
'Dear Mr MAYBEAGOAT

Reference CAS-637702

Thanks for contacting us about BBC Radio 5 live.

I understand you felt it was inappropriate to interview Sinn Fein’s Gerry Adams on the subject of the Queen’s first official state visit to Ireland.

The visit of the Queen to Ireland has created a lot of debate due to the history between the country and Britain over a number of years. As such, we’ve heard from a number of figures across our broadcasts, including Gerry Adams.

While you may personally disagree with the views of Mr Adams, he is fully entitled to hold them in the context of legitimate debate. For other views on the visit, please see the BBC Online link below:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12652934

Nonetheless, your complaint will be added to our audience log, a daily report of audience feedback that's circulated to many BBC staff, including members of the BBC Executive Board, channel controllers and other senior managers.

The audience logs are seen as important documents that can help shape decisions about future programming and content.

Thanks again for taking the time to contact us.

Finally, I have attached an invitation from BBC Audience Services' Head of Communications & Complaints, asking you to participate in our customer survey. We would welcome your views on our service.

Kind Regards


BBC Complaints
www.bbc.co.uk/complaints

NB This is sent from an outgoing account only which is not monitored. You cannot reply to this email address but if necessary please contact us via our webform quoting any case number we provided.

__________________________________________

Dear Mr MAYBEAGOAT

Thank you for your recent email to the BBC. It is our aim to provide the highest standard of responses to emails we receive. To help us do this, I am writing to ask you to complete a customer satisfaction survey which is being conducted by the research company Ipsos MORI.

Your response will help us to judge how your most recent email was handled, so we'd be grateful if you could rate the service you received and the quality of our response. We aren't expecting you to rate the BBC, its output, or any previous contacts you may have had with us. The purpose of this survey is to help us understand the level of service we currently provide when responding to emails and to ensure we achieve the highest possible standards. We may use your individual responses to help in our staff training and performance management.

The questionnaire is very straightforward to complete and should take no longer than 5-10 minutes. You can log onto it in two ways, depending upon the email system you are using. You can either click onto the following website address, or paste it into your address bar (where you normally type in a website address). You will be guided through the questionnaire automatically once you have logged into it.

Website Address: http://survey2.infocorp.co.uk/webprod/resources/bbcinfo/start.asp?st=6&pass=CAS-637702-7DF6Z9

Thank you very much for taking the time to assist us.

Keith Jones
Head of Communications & Complaints, BBC Audience Services'

And here is my reply:
'Thank you for your reply.

Gerry Adams is indeed entitled to hold his views and if the BBC wish to promote them then that is a matter for you and your collective consciences. My point was that on that news broadcast you chose to broadcast just one interview: with the man who lead an organisation (Sinn Fein), in the public's mind, intrinsically linked with the terrorist organisation (the IRA) that blew up and killed the Queen's uncle, Lord Mountbatten, in 1979.

Interestingly of the seven people interviewed on the page to which you linked - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12652934 - six welcomed the visist whilst only one did not. That was the one person that you decided to give air space to on the news broadcast in question. Why not any of the others?

The BBC is often guilty of blatant bias, in this case you were clearly guilty of a complete lack of taste and decency as well.

By the way, the invitation from BBC Audience Services' Head of Communications & Complaints, asking me to participate in our customer survey has expired. So you clearly don't welcome my views that much.


Regards

NotaSheep MaybeaGoat'

Saturday, 5 March 2011

The Queen's visit to Ireland, the BBC's choice of guest to comment - Gerry Adams - and a complaint


Further to this and this I have lodged a complaint with the BBC:
 
Complaint type: BBC News
Location: England
What is your complaint about: Radio News
Programme title: 5Live 10pm news bulletin Friday 5 March 2011
Transmission date: 05/03/2011
Complaint category: Offence
Complaint summary: Choosing to intreview Gerry Adams re the Queen's future visit to Ireland
Full complaint: BBC 5Live 10pm News carried a piece about the upcoming visit by the Queen to Ireland. The BBC chose one person to interview about this visit; not the BBC's royal correspondent but Sinn fein's Gerry Adams. So for an opinion on the first royal visit to Ireland for 100 years the BBC choose the man who lead an organisation (Sinn Fein), in the public's mind, intrinsically linked with the terrorist organisation (the IRA) that blew up and killed the Queen's uncle, Lord Mountbatten, in 1979. Did anybody at BBC 5Live News wonder if it might be a trifle tasteless to interview a leading figure in Sinn Fein about the visit of the Queen to Ireland bearing in mind that history?
Receive a reply: Yes
Contacted us before: Yes
Complaint related to previous contact: No
Title: Mr
First name: NotaSheep
Surname: MaybeaGoat
Email address: notasheepmaybeagoat@gmail.com
Under 13: No
 
I wonder how long I will have to wait for a reply and how the BBC will justify their choice of guest... Somehow I doubt that they will accept a breach of taste.

The murder of Lord Mountbatten and the comments of Gerry Adams - Please read the whole of this piece

My post of last night has caused some upset, from people who say that I have forgotten the others that were killed by the IRA on that day in 1979. I would like to reassure you all that I have not forgotten them but was trying to point out the callousness with which the BBC invited Gerry Adams to comment on the Queen's upcoming visit to Ireland.

In case you are unaware of what happened on that day in 1979 this might help. The Provisional IRA blew up the boat on which Lord Mountbatten was sailing; killed on that day were Lord Mountbatten, Nicholas Knatchbull (his nephew) and 15-year old crew member Paul Maxwell. Baroness Brabourne">Baroness Brabourne, Lord Mountbatten's elder daughter's 83-year-old mother-in-law was seriously injured in the explosion and died from her injuries the following day. Also seriously injured in the explosion but who survived were Nicholas Knatchbull's mother and father and his twin brother Timothy.

On the same day that the IRA murdered Lord Mountbatten, the IRA also ambushed and killed eighteen British soldiers, sixteen of them from the Parachute Regiment at Warrenpoint in what became known as the Warrenpoint ambush.

So 21 people not just one died on the 27th August 1979, a bloody day that the BBC choose not to remember, unlike Bloody Sunday which they v=can barely leave alone.


The BBC's interviewing of Gerry Adams re the upcoming visit of the Queen to Ireland is thrown into even starker relief by this quote I found on Wikipedia; it's what Gerry Adams reportedly said of Lord Mountbatten's death:
'The IRA gave clear reasons for the execution. I think it is unfortunate that anyone has to be killed, but the furore created by Mountbatten's death showed up the hypocritical attitude of the media establishment. As a member of the House of Lords, Mountbatten was an emotional figure in both British and Irish politics. What the IRA did to him is what Mountbatten had been doing all his life to other people; and with his war record I don't think he could have objected to dying in what was clearly a war situation. He knew the danger involved in coming to this country. In my opinion, the IRA achieved its objective: people started paying attention to what was happening in Ireland.'

The BBC have managed to excel themselves over this choice of interviewee, not that I think they feel any shame. I would lodge a formal complaint but what is the point?

Friday, 4 March 2011

Only the BBC...

BBC 5Live 10pm News and a piece about the upcoming Queen's visit to Ireland. So who do the BBC call upon for their expert commentary? Not the BBC's royal correspondent but Gerry Adams. Yes for an opinion on the first royal visit to Ireland for 100 years the BBC choose the man who lead an organisation in the public's mind intrinsically linked with the terrorist organisation that blew up and killed the Queen's uncle, Lord Mountbatten, in 1979. Only the BBC, only the bloody BBC would think that was a good idea.

I cannot believe that it was a mistake, surely someone would have said 'hold on a minute' is that a good idea, is that in any way tasteful? Oh my mistake it was the BBC where Gerry Adams is something of a hero and the death of a member of the royal family is of no moment.


It has taken me 15 minutes to write this piece as I carefully considered how to describe the relationship between Sinn Fein's Gerry Adams and the Privisional IRA. So here is part of Wikipedia's entry on Sinn Fein's 'links with the IRA:
'Sinn Féin is the largest group in the Republican wing of Irish nationalism and is closely associated with the IRA, with the Irish Government alleging that senior members of Sinn Féin have held posts on the IRA Army Council.[48] However, the SF leadership has denied these claims.[49]
A republican document of the early 1980s states, "Both Sinn Féin and the IRA play different but converging roles in the war of national liberation. The Irish Republican Army wages an armed campaign... Sinn Féin maintains the propaganda war and is the public and political voice of the movement".[50]
Sinn Féin organiser Danny Morrison at the party's Ard Fheis (Annual Conference) in 1981, said:
"Who here really believes we can win the war through the ballot box? But will anyone here object if, with a ballot paper in this hand and an Armalite in the other, we take power in Ireland?"[32]
The British Government stated in 2005 that "we had always said all the way through we believed that Sinn Féin and the IRA were inextricably linked and that had obvious implications at leadership level".[51]
The robbery of £26.5 million from the Northern Bank in Belfast in December 2004 further scuppered chances of a deal. The IRA were blamed for the robbery[52] though Sinn Féin denied this and stated that party officials had not known of the robbery nor sanctioned it.[53] Because of the timing of the robbery, it is considered that the plans for the robbery must have been laid whilst Sinn Féin was engaged in talks about a possible peace settlement. This undermined confidence within the unionist community about the sincerity of republicans towards reaching agreement. In the aftermath of the row over the robbery, a further controversy erupted when, on RTÉ's Questions and Answers programme, the chairman of Sinn Féin, Mitchel McLaughlin, insisted that the IRA's controversial killing of a mother of ten young children, Jean McConville, in the early 1970s though "wrong", was not a crime, as it had taken place in the context of the political conflict. Politicians from the Republic, along with the Irish media strongly attacked McLaughlin's comments.[54][55]
...
Gerry Adams responded to the IMC report by challenging the Irish Government to have him arrested for IRA membership, a crime in both jurisdictions, and conspiracy.[59]
On 20 February 2005, Irish Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform Michael McDowell publicly accused three of the Sinn Féin leadership, Gerry Adams, Martin McGuinness and Martin Ferris (TD for Kerry North) of being on the seven-man IRA Army Council which they later denied.[60][61]
On 27 February 2005, a demonstration against the murder of Robert McCartney on 30 January 2005 was held in East Belfast. Alex Maskey, a former Sinn Féin Mayor of Belfast, was told by relatives of McCartney to demand that Maskey "hand over the 12" IRA members involved.[62][63][64] The McCartney family, though formerly Sinn Féin voters themselves, urged witnesses to the crime to contact the PSNI.Three IRA men were expelled from the organisation, and a man was charged with McCartney's murder.[65][66]
Irish Taoiseach Bertie Ahern subsequently called Sinn Féin and the IRA "both sides of the same coin".[67] The ostracism of Sinn Féin was shown in February 2005 when Dáil Éireann passed a motion condemning the party's alleged involvement in illegal activity. US President George W. Bush and Senator Edward Kennedy refused to meet Gerry Adams while meeting the family of Robert McCartney.[68]
...
In March 2005, Mitchell Reiss, the United States special envoy to Northern Ireland, condemned the party's links to the IRA, saying "it is hard to understand how a European country in the year 2005 can have a private army associated with a political party".[70]'


Monday, 24 January 2011

Is fear the reason why SinnFein/IRA MPs can do what they like?

Allow Sinn Fein MPs to receive money for being an MP without taking the oath, contrary to ... - No problem.

Actually I feel sick when I write about Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness so I am not going to produce a long list of such examples, I will just relate that Michael Crick is reporting that Gerry Adams has 'managed to resign as a Westminster MP... without going through the traditional procedures.' Rather than applying for an office of profit under the Crown as is traditional and indeed required, it seems that Gerry Adams simply notified the House that he was resigning.

I was always lead to believe that an MP wishing to resign their seat had to apply for one of two paid offices of the Crown: Crown Steward and Bailiff of the Chiltern Hundreds or of the Manor of Northstead. Failing that a sitting MP could only resign their Commons seat by death, disqualification or expulsion.

As Michael Crick writes:
'A Sinn Fein spokesman told Newsnight that Adams "wrote to the Speaker's office on Friday and informed him of his resignation. It's a non-issue from our perspective. He submitted his resignation and that's it. He's stepped down from that position. He certainly didn't apply for the Stewardship of the Manor of Northstead."'

Now rules and tradition serve a purpose and if Gerry Adams wants to resign his seat then he can damn well apply for a paid office of the British state (whether he supports that state or not) or choose one of the other options - disqualification, expulsion or death. Let's be honest that's more of a choice than the 1,800 or so people murdered by the IRA during 'The Troubles' were ever given.


UPDATE:
Michael Crick has posted an update so I suppose I have to too:
'I've just asked a senior Parliamentary official whether Gerry Adams is still an MP.

"At the last count, yes he is," he told me.

It's all governed by the Parliamentary bible Erskine May, it seems, and the following section:

"It is a settled principle of parliamentary law that a Member, after he is duly chosen, cannot relinquish his seat; and, in order to evade this restriction, a Member who wishes to retire accepts office under the Crown, which legally vacates his seat and obliges the House to order a new writ."

So in British law, Gerry Adams is still an MP, whether he wants to be or not. Until he applies for one of the two stewardships.

I was also advised that one way Adams might get round this without expressing allegiance to the British Crown in any form would be to turn up at the House of Commons and try to sit in the Chamber.

He would then be automatically disqualified from the House on the grounds that he hasn't sworn the oath, and a writ would then be moved for a by-election in West Belfast.

"The seat is vacated as if they were dead," I'm told.'
So that is still an option!

Thursday, 5 August 2010

Is The Guardian serious

I missed this on Monday but it seems that The Guardian's Comment Is Free had a piece by Gerry Adams pontificating about the Wikileaks Afghanistan story and why we shouldn't be surprised by the British army killing civilians in Afghanistan, after all they had done it for years in Northern Ireland.

Gerry Adams being given a platform to fulminate on the killing of civilians, I would say that The Guardian was being ironic but somehow I doubt that they were.

As CIF commenter 'kieranbear' said:
'By all means let's have the truth about the conduct of the British security forces during the NI Troubles, but it should be a two way street. Let those who always characterized themselves a national army fighting a war against British occupation of their country be subjected to the same level of scrutiny, and be similarly forthcoming about the atrocities for which they were responsible.'

Friday, 18 June 2010

The next on the list for the IRA

With the Saville Inquiry over, the IRA Sinn Féin President Gerry Adams has called for a formal inquiry into 'The Ballymurphy killings' of 1971. I am not surprised as the Sinn Féin tactic is to blame the British army for all killings and so continue to de-legitimise British rule over Northern Ireland. For the sake of completeness, here is a list (from Wikipedia) of all those killed by the IRA before 9 August 1971...
1970

* 26 June 1970: Three IRA volunteers and two young girls were killed when a bomb being assembled accidentally exploded in the Creggan, Derry.[1]
* 27 June 1970: IRA volunteers used firearms to defend Clonard monastery in west Belfast, the Short Strand in east Belfast (see Battle of St. Matthews) and other nationalist areas from attack by loyalist mobs. Six people (one Catholic IRA member and five loyalists Protestants) were killed in gun battles.[2]
* 3–5 July 1970: During the Falls Curfew the Official IRA and Provisional IRA fought a three day gun battle with 3,000 British troops who imposed a curfew on the Lower Falls area of Belfast, over 1,500 rounds were fired by British troops. Four civilians were killed.[3]
* 11 August 1970: Two RUC officers were killed by an IRA booby-trap bomb attached to an abandoned car in Crossmaglen, County Armagh. The bomb contained 20 lbs of gelignite and exploded when one of the officers attempted to open one of the car's doors.[4][5][6]
* 4 September 1970: IRA volunteer Michael Kane (35) was killed when a bomb he was placing at an electricity transformer in Belfast exploded accidentally.[4]
* 16 November 1970: The IRA shot and killed two alleged criminals in the Ballymurphy area of Belfast.[4] The men are alleged to have been involved in protection rackets, fencing stolen goods, minor racketeering, moneylending, burglary and robbery.[7]

[edit] 1971

* 6 February 1971: A British soldier on security duties, Gunner Robert Curtis, was killed by Billy Reid in a gun battle in North Belfast. Curtis was the first British soldier to die in Ireland since the 1920s. IRA volunteer James Saunders (21) was shot dead in a shoot out with the British Army in the Bone area of Belfast and one Catholic civilian was shot dead by three British soldiers. Eight British soldiers and five civilians were also injured in various gun battles around Belfast.[8][9]
* 9 February 1971: An IRA landmine killed five men near a BBC transmitter on Brougher Mountain in County Tyrone. Two of the dead were BBC engineers, the other three were construction workers. It was believed their vehicle was mistaken for a British Army landrover. British mobile patrols frequently inspected the transmitter.[10][11]
* 15 February 1971: A British soldier was shot and killed by an IRA sniper while taking part in a mobile-patrol in the Ardoyne area of Belfast. Two British Army scout cars came under sniper fire and had a bomb thrown at them. The soldier was shot in the head.[12][13]
* 26 February 1971: Two RUC officers who were attached to the forces Special Patrol Group (RUC) were killed in a gun battle with the IRA in the Ardoyne area of Belfast.[10][14]
* 8 March 1971: IRA volunteer Charles Hughes (26) was shot dead by the Official IRA in the Lower Falls area of Belfast. This was part of an ongoing dispute between the IRA and the OIRA.[12] In response the IRA shot and seriously injured a member of the OIRA.[15]
* 10 March 1971: The IRA abducted three off-duty British soldiers from Belfast and brought them to a mountain road outside the city, lined them up, and shot each of them in the head. They were the first off-duty soldiers to be killed in the conflict.[16][17]
* 15 May 1971: IRA volunteer Billy Reid (32) was killed during a gun battle between the IRA and the British Army on Academy Street, Belfast. Two British soldiers were wounded in the incident.[12][18]
* 25 May 1971: A bomb was thrown into Springfield Road British Army/RUC base in Belfast, killing army Sergeant Michael Willetts as he shielded civilians from the blast with his body. He was posthumously awarded the George Cross. Seven RUC officers, two British soldiers and eighteen civilians were injured.[12][19]
* 12 July 1971: A British soldier was shot dead by an IRA sniper at a British Observation post on Northumberland Street in Belfast. The IRA claimed his death was in retaliation for the killings of two civilians in Derry by the British Army the previous week.[12][20]
* 14 July 1971: A British soldier was shot and killed in an IRA ambush on a mobile-patrol in the Andersonstown area of Belfast. Three IRA gunmen using automatic weapons fired at least 35 shots at the patrol.[12][21]
* 8 August 1971: A British soldier was shot dead in an IRA sniper attack while on foot-patrol in the Ardoyne area of Belfast. The IRA said he was shot in retaliation for the shooting dead of a civilian by the British Army the day before on the Springfield Road.[12][22]'

Will there be an inquiry into any of these? How about those murdered by the IRA in Brighton, Omagh, Warrenpoint, Ennidkillen, Hyde Park or Aldershot, to name but six IRA terrorist attrocities?

Wednesday, 24 February 2010

Just for fun...

Following Gerry Adams's appearance on Channel 4 presenting the episode about Jesus Christ in an episode of their series "The Bible: A History", Shane Greer is running a competition to see "if Gerry were to turn his attentions to developing a TV career, what kind of shows could we expect to see him host?".

Shane Greer suggests: 1) The Crystal Maze: during which Gerry will force players into various rooms telling them that they’ve “got three minutes to get out!”, 2) What Not to Wear (when engaging in paramilitary activity), 3) Changing Rooms (with Semtex)


So far his commentators have come up with several further ideas, including: "Arms Cache in the Attic", "(Arndale)Supermarket Sweep (up)" and "A Place In The Country (To bury an arms dump)". Go and suggest your own...

Sunday, 21 February 2010

"I Helped Disappear People. My Orders Came From Gerry Adams."

Those are the words of Dolours Price, the first woman to become a member of the Provisional IRA, the leader of the unit that bombed London in March 1973 and the hunger-striker who endured months of force-feeding in British prisons before eventually being released on grounds of ill-health. The words are from an interview with The Irish News in which she makes several claims but the one that stands out for me is her claim that Gerry Adams was her Officer Commanding from whom she took orders in person.

Gerry Adams denies the allegations, but then he would.

Not a whisper of coverage on the BBC to whom allegiance to the sainted Gerry is of great importance.

Saturday, 20 February 2010

The Bible: A History

Channel 4 have chosen Gerry Adams to present an episode of their series "The Bible: A History", the program about Jesus Christ. Words failed me when I heard about this a week or so ago and I failed to post anything about it as I just couldn't put my disgust into words. Fortunately Stephen Glover in The Mail has managed this task, so please read his article, here's a few extracts:
"Who would be the most unsuitable person in the whole world to introduce a television programme about Jesus Christ? One would be hard pushed to come up with someone worse than Gerry Adams, president of Sinn Fein, and former member of the Provisional IRA.

Yet, believe it or not, on Sunday evening this man with blood trickling from his hands will present an hour-long Channel 4 programme about Jesus, part of a series called The Bible: A History.

A former terrorist personally implicated in at least one murder, and associated with many more, has been invited to make a documentary about a man described by his followers as the Prince of Peace, who lived a life that celebrated non-violence.


How on earth could this happen? You may suspect Gerry Adams was chosen to discourse on Jesus because he has freely admitted his sins, and apologised for his past. Christianity, after all, is a religion that extols forgiveness, and puts a high value on repentance. But Mr Adams is not sorry for what he did - not, of course, that he admits to having ever killed anyone. He says at least twice that violence was the only course open to people like himself.

I have seen a preview of the programme and it begins with a shot of the former terrorist at prayer. He informs us that he went to Mass while in prison. Then, with his vulpine features, and a sinister smile revealing shining, remodelled teeth, he tells us that 'along with others' he 'helped to bring peace to Ireland'. While stressing that he doesn't feel he has any blood on his hands, he says he wants 'to explore Jesus's message of forgiveness'.

...

I repeat: how could a respectable television channel dream of allowing an unrepentant terrorist to explain Christ's life, and give viewers the impression that he has tried to live by it? There is even a preposterous, not to say sacrilegious, subtext implying a parallel between Christ, who according to Adams was persecuted by the Roman authorities, and Adams himself, who presents himself as a victim of British power.

In the interests of balance and fairness, Channel 4 should tell viewers something about the life of this former terrorist, since Adams himself certainly does not. Though he has refused to admit it, he was a member of the Provisional IRA as far back as 1972, when he represented the organisation in secret talks with the British government. A former IRA prisoner, Dolours Price, has referred to Adams as 'my commanding officer' in 1973.

The most damning information about Adams and his life as a terrorist was published in a book called A Secret History Of The IRA by Ed Moloney, a Dublin-based investigative journalist. According to Moloney's account, which has never been contested in the courts, Adams was at various times commander of the Belfast Brigade of the IRA and the IRA's chief of staff, as well as a long-time member of the IRA Army Council.

Moloney says that Adams was chief of staff when the IRA committed one of its most appalling atrocities - the murder of 12 Protestant civilians in the La Mon hotel on the outskirts of Belfast in February 1978. Moloney also contends that in 1972 Adams may have personally ordered, or at the very least approved, the killing of Jean McConville, allegedly an informer to the security services.

The closest we come - and it is not very close - to an admission of any involvement in such atrocities is Adams's musing about war towards the end of the programme: 'You have to harden yourself because it is not a natural thing to go out and harm other human beings.' Knowing what I do about Adams's past, I felt the hairs on the back of my neck stand up as I imagined him stealing down some dank Belfast street with murder in his heart.

...

He cannot plausibly claim to have lived a virtuous Christian life, which is why he is the last person on earth who should have been asked by Channel 4 to present a programme about Christ. He does not seem to have been much more decent in his personal life. For many years Gerry Adams covered up for his paedophile brother, and even helped him to work with children.

This seems to have been done not so much out of brotherly affection as to protect Adams's own reputation. When the scandal was revealed last December, Adams tried to win sympathy by claiming that his family were victims of sexual and physical abuse by his father, also called Gerry, who was buried with full IRA military honours six years ago.

As a Christian I am appalled that a man who once said he would 'wade up to my knees in Protestant blood' to achieve a united Ireland should have been asked by Channel 4 to introduce a programme about Jesus. I can see that it is a stunt, designed to attract maximum publicity to what has been a pretty undistinguished series. If Channel 4 had really wanted to make an enlightening programme about the life of Christ, there are hundreds of people far better qualified to do so than Gerry Adams.

Adams now presents himself as a democratic politician, and he has a right to be heard on that basis. But it betrays an almost unbelievable moral imbecility on the part of Channel 4 bosses to enable this unrepentant former terrorist to yoke himself to Jesus Christ, not to throw light on the noblest life ever lived but as a crude piece of self-serving IRA propaganda."

Monday, 25 January 2010

Serious questions for Gerry Adams

Read this article and wonder why the mainstream UK media seems completely uninterested in this Gerry Adams story, preferring to concentrate on Peter and Iris Robinsone?

Tuesday, 19 January 2010

Gerry Adams the story that may bring him down

The BBC are giving almost no coverage to the story of how Gerry Adams protected his paedophile brother for 22 years until the girl his brother abused told her story. For some rather better coverage of this distasteful story about a very distasteful man I suggest you read The Mail. For details of more allegations about Gerry Adams I suggest you read The Irish Tribune.

The Mail also reports that:
"In a damning new book to be published about the secret life of Gerry Adams, there will be revelations about his role in the case of The Disappeared - an infamous case involving the IRA murder of a dozen civilians.

This will finally nail the lie of Adams's denial of his involvement with the IRA, not to mention revealing the existence of secret tapes about his involvement in the killing of Jean McConville, a mother of ten suspected of being an informer."



I was going to write a pithy ending to this piece but The Mail seems to have done it for me:
"With his brother facing arrest and his niece pouring scorn on him, the past is at last coming back to haunt Adams.

The question is now whether his lies and special pleading will be enough to save him from political destruction."
Let's hope they are not enough to save him.

Thursday, 27 August 2009

30 years ago today

30 years ago today Admiral of the Fleet Louis Francis Albert Victor Nicholas Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma, KG, GCB, OM, GCSI, GCIE, GCVO, DSO, PC along with The Dowager Baroness Brabourne, The Hon. Nicholas Knatchbull and local teenager Paul Maxwell, were killed in Ireland by a bomb planted by the Provisional IRA.

Some facts about this IRA bombing that are often forgotten:
1. Nicholas Knatchbull's mother and father, along with his twin brother Timothy, survived the explosion but were seriously injured. The injured are often the forgotten victims of bombings and that is as true today in Afghanistan or in London on 7/7 as it was then. Their suffering continues for long after the attack and may like Lady Tebbit's last a lifetime.

2. Sinn Féin's then vice-president Gerry Adams said of Mountbatten's death "The IRA gave clear reasons for the execution. I think it is unfortunate that anyone has to be killed, but the furore created by Mountbatten's death showed up the hypocritical attitude of the media establishment. As a member of the House of Lords, Mountbatten was an emotional figure in both British and Irish politics. What the IRA did to him is what Mountbatten had been doing all his life to other people; and with his war record I don't think he could have objected to dying in what was clearly a war situation. He knew the danger involved in coming to this country. In my opinion, the IRA achieved its objective: people started paying attention to what was happening in Ireland." No compassion, no remorse from Gerry Adams. I wonder what Martin McGuinness has to say about the attack?

3. On the same day that Earl Mountbatten and his companions were killed, the IRA also ambushed and killed eighteen British Army soldiers at Warrenpoint, County Down in what became known as the Warrenpoint ambush.

4. The only bomber arrested for this murderous attack, Thomas McMahon, was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder in the Republic of Ireland on 23 November 1979, but was released in 1998 under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement. He served less than 20 years for these murders and was released as part of the deal that gave power to the political wing of the organisation that he was part of and was responsible for the killing of so many innocent people.


Earl Mountbatten, Baroness Brabourne, Nicholas Knatchbull and Paul Maxwell - "At the going down of the sun and in the morning. We will remember them"

Saturday, 14 March 2009

BBC investigative journalism

The BBC report in a very dry manner that:
"Leading republican Colin Duffy is one of three men being questioned about the murder of two soldiers at Massereene Army base last weekend.

The 41-year-old was arrested during a police raid in Lurgan on Saturday.

...

Colin Duffy is a former IRA member who has been critical of Sinn Fein's support for the police service. "

Hmm I thought, I wonder if the sainted Martin McGuinness and Gerry Adams have ever been linked with Colin Duffy in the past and has Colin Duffy ever made an appearance in news articles? So I did a bit of Googling and what did I find?

1. A Sinn Fein press release from 1997:
"Statement from Sinn Féin's chief negotiator, Martin McGuinness, who sought an urgent meeting today with the British security Minister Adam Ingram at which he expressed grave concern at the dangerous situation developing in north Armagh with the campaign of harassment and violence being waged against Lurgan republican Colin Duffy and the nationalist people of north Armagh.

...

``I pointed out to the British Minister that he was responsible for the level of Crown forces on the streets of these towns and that their presence there was oppressive and heavy-handed. The violent and ongoing abuse of Colin Duffy is the tip of the iceberg of harassment of nationalists by the Crown forces. Over the last month solicitors in Lurgan and Armagh have been inundated with complaints about harassment by the RUC and RIR and have logged over one hundred complaints in each area. "



2. This 1997 case seems quite key because if one looks at the Belfast Telegraph for their report on the arrest of Colin Duffy they manage to give some more background :
"He (Duffy) came to prominence in the 1990s after he was acquitted of the murder of a soldier when it emerged a key witness against him was a loyalist paramilitary, but was later arrested over the subsequent murder of two police constables though the case collapsed.

...

Colin Duffy is a member of the republican protest group Eirigi, which has not supported the new police service, but which insists it is a peaceful pressure group.

He attracted criticism last year when serious rioting in the Lurgan area led to attacks on police, which he failed to condemn.

After police came under gun and petrol-bomb attack during two days of rioting, he said the episodes were a symptom of a section of the nationalist community refusing to accept the PSNI.

But in the wake of the murder of the soldiers in Antrim and of Constable Carroll in the Lurgan/Craigavon area, Duffy and the Eirigi group were challenged to condemn the killings.

Eirigi, which is Irish for 'rise up', released a statement in response to the pressure insisting it did not support violent groups.

Earlier this week it said: "Eirigi is an open, independent, democratic political party which is not aligned to, or supportive of, any armed organisation."

It added: "While supporting the right of any people to defend themselves from imperial aggression, Eirigi does not believe that the conditions exist at this time for a successful armed struggle against the British occupation.

"As can be seen from the recent attacks on Britain's armed forces it is clear that not all republicans agree on how the British occupation should be resisted at this time.

"Those who carried out those attacks are best placed to explain their own rationale." "



3. So I did some more Googling and found this page showing the members of the "Garvaghy Residents Coalition" including a Mr Duffy and Rosemary Nelson. This page is on a site dedicated to reporting on "Sinn Fein "Residents Groups" in Northern Ireland". A quick look around this site finds much of interest.


4. A little more Googling and I found a pen portrait of Colin Duffy on Slugger O'Toole:
"THE Beeb and PA are reporting that Colin Duffy is one of the three people being questioned about the shootings of two soldiers last weekend. The Lurgan Mail reports that his house is also being searched. Duffy, a hate figure within unionism, was jailed but later acquitted of the murder of a UDR member in 1995. Duffy had also been charged with the June 1997 IRA murders of community police officers John Graham and David Johnston in Lurgan - the last policemen killed by republicans before this week. The charges were dropped, and it transpired a witness was a loyalist gunrunner. Recently, he has been a spokesman for republican group eirigi (pictured here at a recent protest against the Belfast homecoming parade for UK troops). In December, it was claimed by an anonymous security source that he had had an affair with murdered solicitor Rosemary Nelson, which has also been strongly denied. "



Are the BBC not interested in providing any background on Colin Duffy? Or are they deliberately trying to keep his possibly relevant past from the UK population? It may be that Colin Duffy is as innocent of this murder as he was in 1997 and that he is the victim of a Unionist plot, or it could be that he is guilty - I Simply don't know. The trouble is that the BBC don't know either but they don't seem at all interested.

The BBC's love-in with Irish Republicanism was one of the first clues to me that the BBC was not the unbiased news organisation that it purported to be, I see that they have not changed.