StatCounter

Showing posts with label Labour incompetence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Labour incompetence. Show all posts

Wednesday, 18 April 2018

PMQs: Theresa May v Jeremy Corbyn

'Jeremy Corbyn asks about the destruction of the landing cards of "a generation of Commonwealth citizens". This was carried out by the Home Office in 2010, when Theresa May was home secretary.
The prime minister says "the decision was taken in 2009 under a Labour government".'

Oh dear, if true that does destroy the Labour/BBC attack line. 

Tuesday, 17 April 2018

Another Diane Abbott car crash interview



Watching especially from around 3:40 to hear Ms Abbott thrashing around trying to appear in control of her brief whilst clearly not. Do you think that she'd read Toby Harris's report? If she had, do you think she'd understood it? Is Diane Abbott as stupid as she seems? Is that possible? 

When the maths just doesn't add up for Diane Abbott



Diane Abbott explains! 

The whole country should be shown this video once a week so they realise quite how a) stupid and b) still condescending Ms Abbott is. 

Monday, 7 September 2015

Can you reaarange these words into the appropriate order: brewey, pissup, organise, in, couldn't, a, a?

Can you rearrange these words into the order appropriate to this story: brewery, piss-up, a, organise, in, couldn't, a?

Missing ballot papers in Labour leadership contest trigger call from one contender to delay the result by THREE days

EXCLUSIVE: Leadership campaign team furious at delays to ballot papers
Senior former Cabinet ministers among those still unable to vote
Ballot is due to close at noon on Thursday with the result out on Saturday
Call for voting to continue for 72 hours with leader named next Tuesday
The Labour Party as incompetent as always.

Thursday, 6 August 2015

Labour lost because voters believed it was anti-austerity per LabourList

A fascinating article on Labour List http://labourlist.org/2015/08/labour-lost-because-voters-believed-it-was-anti-austerity/ that should put the record straight as to why Labour lost the last general election. Here's an extract but do read the whole piece as I doubt that the BBC will report it as it contradicts the agreed Labour BBC anti austerity narrative :
'Voters rejected Labour because they perceived the Party as anti-austerity lite. 58% agree that, 'we must live within our means so cutting the deficit is the top priority'. Just 16% disagree. Almost all Tories and a majority of Lib Dems and Ukip voters agree.

Amongst working class C2DE voters 54% agree and 15% disagree. Labour voters are evenly divided; 32% agree compared to 34% who disagree.'

The bomb: 76 years later - UK Indymedia

This article from 2011 by Jeremy Corbyn https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2011/08/483050.html is fascinating, not least because in 2011 he says that Hiroshima happened 76 years previously. 2011 - 1945 = 66 not 76.

It looks as though Jeremy Corbyn is as mathematically challenged as Andy 'seven eights' Burnham.

Friday, 12 December 2014

“I don’t need to consult a folder to tell you what I believe in”

Thurrock's Tim Aker MEP takes Labour's Westminster Candidate and former Ed Miliband aide, Polly Billington, to task on the NHS during a debate at a local college in Thurrock.



“I don’t need to consult a folder to tell you what I believe in” and an attack on Labour's PFI record, I like the cut of Tim Aker's jib. Whilst Polly Billington seems to be just another Labour machine politician who would rather make a fool of herself looking up what the current party line is rather than risk saying something off-message.

Wednesday, 3 December 2014

Tweet from The Labour Party (@UKLabour) showing the degree of incompetence within the Labour Party

The Labour Party (@UKLabour) tweeted at 0:43 PM on Wed, Dec 03, 2014:
According to George Osborne, this is what it looks like when the plan is working. #onlyforafew http://t.co/36XFtMmigS
(https://twitter.com/UKLabour/status/540124185289170944)

Have the Labour Party not heard of a spell checker? How long did the Labour Party have to prepare this image and check it? Who signed off on it? 

If the Conservative party had made such a mistake the BBC would be all over the story but as it's theit Labout allies, not a word.

Monday, 18 August 2014

Another labour fail - it's Ed Miliband again - #LabourNo

Sometimes I wonder if the Labour Party is just full to the brim with idiots, here's a tweet from Ed Miliband (@ed_miliband) from this morning...


Yes, the Labour leader, a man who says that he has more intellectual self confidence than David Cameron has tweeted with the hashtag #LabourNo

I'd say it was unbelievable but it;'s really just par for the course for Ed Miliband and his band of undergraduate level debaters. Maybe they should have thought about it for just a little longer before tweeting #LabourNo at 01:48, maybe  a little over-tired?

Well on the plus side, @ed_miliband will be trending soon, albeit as people ridicule him. Mind you, I suppose he must be used to that by now.

Friday, 9 May 2014

The ignorance of the Labour Party is shocking

The Labour Party have issued a new poster, here it is...

Can you spot the mistake?

Obviously beyond the knowledge of the Labour Party is the fact that most of the items in that shopping basket re charged VAT at the rate of 0% so I'm not sure how VAT increases have affected the cost of that basket.

Labour Party ignorant as well as incompetent?

Wednesday, 2 April 2014

More weasel words from the BBC, this time about Gordon Brown

'Gordon Brown - who employed Ed Miliband and Ed Balls as advisers during his years as chancellor - is often accused by opponents of selling off Britain's gold reserves far too cheaply.

He decided to dispose of almost 400 tonnes of gold between 1999 and 2002 - the majority of Britain's reserves - for between $256 and $296 an ounce, only to watch it soar up to $1,615 per ounce.'
The article about today's PMQs is here. The whole truth is rarely to be found on the BBC anywhere.

Wednesday, 9 October 2013

More about those upcoming power cuts, I did warn you back in September 2009

'I have been "banging on" for some years now about the upcoming shortage in power generation in the UK and the resulting power cuts. My warnings, like those re houses being over valued, were met with the usual "oh it's NotaSheep being his usual pessimistic self". This morning The Telegraph reports that:
"Britain is facing the prospect of widespread power cuts for the first time since the 1970s, government projections show.

Demand for power from homes and businesses will exceed supply from the national grid within eight years, according to official figures.

...

The gap between Britain’s energy needs and demand throws fresh doubt on the Government’s assertion that renewable energy can make up for dwindling nuclear and coal capabilities.

Over the next 10 years, one third of Britain’s power-generating capacity needs to be replaced with cleaner fuels. But last night the Conservatives said that Labour had refused to face up to the problem.

The admission that Britain will face power-cuts is contained in a document that accompanied the Government’s Low Carbon Transition Plan, which was launched in July.

Ed Miliband, the Energy and Climate Change Secretary, outlined the plan amid much fanfare.

Under the plan, 40 per cent of the UK’s electricity will need to come from low-carbon energy sources including clean coal, nuclear and renewables.

Accompanying the report is an appendix, only published online, which warns of power shortages. It details supplies and expected demand between now and 2030.

It highlights the first short-fall in 2017. The “energy unserved” level reaches 3000 megawatt hours per year.

That is the equivalent of the whole of the Nottingham area being without electricity for a day.

By 2025 the situation worsens with the shortfall hitting 7000 megawatt hours per year. That is the equivalent to an hour-long power cut for half of Britain. "
The way that this Labour government delayed making any decisions on power generation and have still failed to replace old generating capacity with new reliable generating capacity - wind power is not a reliable source of power - is frankly not just disgraceful but criminal. One of the many investigations that an incoming Conservative government will have to hold, will be into this neglect of the nation's power generating capacity; charges may have to be laid against "responsible" ministers.

In the meantime, as I advised you last October:
"BUY A GENERATOR...

To paraphrase Sir Edward Grey "The lamps will be going out all over Britain; we shall not see them lit again in our lifetime."

This government's eco-stupidity seems to know no bounds, unless this is just another piece of scorched earth politics."'




The Sir Edward Grey remark I paraphrased above was said to have been made at the start of the First World War and was "The lamps are going out all over Europe; we shall not see them lit again in our lifetime."

For some starnge reason I can find no mention of the impending power cuts on the BBC news website, I wonder why?


From this article written and posted in September 2009 I think I first started warning of this upcoming power shortage in around 2005. If it was obvious to me and others then, why did the Labour government do nothing to help and indeed actively prevent new power generation sources being built?


Tuesday, 27 August 2013

Ed Balls - economic genius?

Only a few months ago, Ed Balls was attacking the Conservative lead Coalition government's economic record.
'Your experiment with austerity economics has failed on living standards, jobs and growth and on deficit reduction too – and the British people are paying the price for this failure.'
Today I note that that left wing economic commentator Paul Mason in The Guardian writes:
'The argument that fiscal austerity would lead to deep recession or permanent stagnation has proved false. In part, this is because the austerity is back-loaded, with the heaviest cuts starting now. But the economy has also refused to behave as the doomiest predicted. People have clung to jobs, even at the cost of tolerating zero-hours contracts, wage cuts, pension raids and unpaid overtime.

It is true that GDP per head is stagnating. It is also true that if you measure GDP against the retail price index, instead of the government-preferred CPI, it is flat. It's also true that growth is patchy regionally – not just between regions but even within small towns, as Rochdale shows. However, the headline GDP figure is important. If, in the next few quarters, its growth is sustained, the narrative of the government's critics on the left will have to change.

But sustaining the recovery is where the second political problem begins. Our last mini-recovery was choked off by inflation: real spending power shrank and growth went into reverse. This time there is more government money flowing through the credit system, through Help To Buy, and the funding for lending scheme – where the government underwrites bank lending risks. So this time the recovery may be able survive renewed inflation.'
 Maybe the headline is the best summary:
The economic recovery may be patchy, but the left is wrong to ignore it
It's not the same across the country, but there are signs of growth. The challenge for Labour is how to make the most of the new reality
Ed Balls and reality, now those are strange bedfellows.

Sunday, 18 August 2013

The one hundred and sixtieth weekly No shit Sherlock award

The BBC news website headline at the moment is this:
'Labour has "massively failed" to get its case across to the public this summer, the party's former deputy leader Lord Prescott says.'
No shit Sherlock

Actually it would be fair to say that 'massively failed' would be a pretty good summary of the last Labour government, one in which John Prescott was one of the largest (pun intended) failures.

Saturday, 29 September 2012

Labour isn't learning

The Conservatives have gone negative with their latest poster campaign. I approve as the public need to be constantly reminded that the current Labour leadership were at the heart of the last Labour government, the government that destroyed the UK's economy.

Thursday, 29 September 2011

How many Labour shadow cabinet ministers have business experience?


That's direct business experience not Trade Union activism, poltical researcher, etc. I feel a spot of research is called for...

Thursday, 11 August 2011

How prescient!

Thanks to a recent anonymous commenter I have been reminded of this post from January 2008. Here's the relevant extract, but do read the whole piece:
'I am a relatively streetwise Mr NotaSheep, but I try not to walk alone or with Mrs NotaSheep at night on London's streets. To be honest a lot of London's streets are probably unsafe in broad daylight. The gangs of feral youths that "own" the streets now know that the chances of a policeman catching them in the act of mugging a passerby are almost zero, the chances of any CCTV actually working or producing a decent image or not being used to take photos of cars parked six inches onto a yellow line or one minute into a proscribed period are also nil and even if caught the chances of being charged let alone convicted are somewhat slim and as for having to go to prison for more than six months, the odds are infinitesimal.
...
This Labour government tell us the country is safer than 10 years ago and Ken Livingstone tells us that crime is down in London. The trouble is, we know the truth and the truth is that the streets are more dangerous than 10 years ago and law-abiding people feel unsafe to walk 400 yards across the West End on a Saturday night after a meal out or a visit to the theatre, let alone pop out to buy a kebab in Peckham.

This Labour government have all but destroyed that which holds the fabric of society together and as the economy collapses this year the results on the street will not be pretty.'
  Well it looks as though I was right, just a bit previous!

Saturday, 6 August 2011

Gordon Brown and Ed Balls' legacy



As the price of gold rises and rises, remember who sold half the UK's gold reserves at the bottom of the market and wonder why anyone should listen to a word that they say on economics.

Tuesday, 14 June 2011

The one hundred and thirty fourth weekly "No shit, Sherlock" award

After last week's hiatus, the award that counts is back.

This week's winners are the 'third of middle–income parents' who according to a survey reported in The Telegraph 'believe university is no longer worth the investment after the rise in tuition fees'.

The last Labour government's expansion of the university sector and insistence that more and more people should get a degree, devalued university education and the economic value of many degrees awarded.

So 'university is no longer worth the investment after the rise in tuition fees' - "No shit, Sherlock!"