Even if you have no German language skills this video should still make perfect sense and amuse...
Guido Whispers: Back of the Queue…
11 hours ago
I am not a sheep, I have my own mind
I have had enough of being told what and how to think
Whilst we are still allowed the remnants of free speech,
I will speak out.
I also reserve the right to discuss less controversial matters should I feel the urge.
The trouble is that the missive that they are describing is not a round robin but a newsletter. A round robin is is a document signed by multiple parties in a circle to make it more difficult to determine the order in which it was signed, thus preventing a ringleader from being identified.2. Round robin revival?The round robin letter - usually sent out with the Christmas cards - has become something of a seasonal joke. "Darling Theo is doing frightfully well in his eurhythmy lessons at Charterhouse - and little Imogen has gone back to advising Ban Ki-moon at the UN." Simon Hoggart, Guardian columnist and author of The Cat That Could Open the Fridge, a collection of round robin letters, is not a fan. "Round robins are hopeless because either you know the people so well, you're already familiar with their year, or else you don't know them well enough to care," he says. "The latter group find boasting particularly galling. Who wants to know about the exam successes of a teenager whose father you met in Derby 24 years ago?" But in an age where receiving a letter is a rarity, could the round robin be due for a renaissance? "It might now be a case of take what you can get," says Garfield. "Perhaps people should be grateful that they are being written to at all. It's time to bear the annual show of smugness."
'‘”Today there are about 6,000 languages in the world, and half of the world’s population speaks only 10 of them. English is the single most dominant of these 10. British colonialism initiated the spread of English across the globe; it has been spoken nearly everywhere and has become even more prevalent since World War II, with the global reach of American power.”As I thought...
(Christine Kenneally, The First Word: The Search for the Origins of Language. Viking, 2007)’
‘How many people in the world today speak English?
First-language speakers: 375 million
Second-language speakers: 375 million
Foreign-language speakers: 750 million
(David Graddol, The Future of English? A Guide to Forecasting the Popularity of the English Language in the 21st Century. British Council, 1997)’
The bloody obvious point being missed is that there are more speakers of Mandarin Chinese and Hindi than there are of English BUT (and it's a bloody big but) Hindi is not even spoken by all Indians, nor Mandarin by all Chinese. Indeed the common language of India is English, as it is the second language of so many people. But how many Chinese speak Hindi? How many Indians speak Mandarin? The reason English is the international language is not that it is the first language of the majority of people but that it is the first or second language of more people than any other language and the only chance of a common language.
'There has certainly been language shift in Los Angeles, most notably a doubling of the number of Spanish speakers (those who speak the language at home) in the past 30 years from 1.5 million in 1980 to 3.6 million in 2010 (including Spanish Creole).
Internationally, Spanish is also significant and futuregazers have gone as far as predicting that one day Mandarin Chinese could become the default language of business worldwide.
Speaking to the New York Times in 2009, French linguist Claude Hagege, author of On the Death and Life of Languages, said that Hindi and Mandarin could replace English some day.'
'Perhaps you have heard of taqiyya, the Muslim doctrine that allows lying in certain circumstances, primarily when Muslim minorities live under infidel authority. Now meet tawriya, a doctrine that allows lying in virtually all circumstances—including to fellow Muslims and by swearing to Allah—provided the liar is creative enough to articulate his deceit in a way that is true to him. (Though tawriya is technically not "new"—as shall be seen, it has been part of Islamic law and tradition for centuries—it is certainly new to most non-Muslims, hence the need for this exposition and the word "new" in the title.)Fascinating...
The authoritative Hans Wehr Arabic-English Dictionary defines tawriya as, "hiding, concealment; dissemblance, dissimulation, hypocrisy; equivocation, ambiguity, double-entendre, allusion." Conjugates of the trilateral root of the word, w-r-y, appear in the Quran in the context of hiding or concealing something (e.g., 5:31, 7:26).
As a doctrine, "double-entendre" best describes tawriya's function. According to past and present Muslim scholars (several documented below), tawriya is when a speaker says something that means one thing to the listener, though the speaker means something else, and his words technically support this alternate meaning.
For example, if someone declares "I don't have a penny in my pocket," most listeners will assume the speaker has no money on him—though he might have dollar bills, just literally no pennies. Likewise, say a friend asks you, "Do you know where Mike is?" You do, but prefer not to divulge. So you say "No, I don't know"—but you keep in mind another Mike, whose whereabouts you really do not know.
All these are legitimate according to Sharia law and do not constitute "lying," which is otherwise forbidden in Islam, except in three cases: lying in war, lying to one's spouse, and lying in order to reconcile people. For these, Sharia permits Muslims to lie freely, without the strictures of tawriya, that is, without the need for creativity.
As for all other instances, in the words of Sheikh Muhammad Salih al-Munajid (based on scholarly consensus): "Tawriya is permissible under two conditions: 1) that the words used fit the hidden meaning; 2) that it does not lead to an injustice" ("injustice" as defined by Sharia, of course, not Western standards). Otherwise, it is permissible even for a Muslim to swear when lying through tawriya. Munajid, for example, cites a man who swears to Allah that he can only sleep under a roof (saqf); when the man is caught sleeping atop a roof, he exonerates himself by saying "by roof, I meant the open sky." This is legitimate. "After all," Munajid adds, "Quran 21:32 refers to the sky as a roof [saqf]."
Here is a recent example of tawriya in action: Because it is a "great sin" for Muslims to acknowledge Christmas, this sheikh counsels Muslims to tell Christians, "I wish you the best," whereby the latter might "understand it to mean you're wishing them best in terms of their [Christmas] celebration." But—here the wily sheikh giggles as he explains—"by saying I wish you the best, you mean in your heart I wish you become a Muslim."'
'Anonymous said...
Well that is what I woud expect of whiny little englanders of your ilk, rather a fare dogder than a tory, rightwing, wine-swilling coporate eye-kisser, or equally as bad, a swill-eating cocaine snorting pig banker. Instead of whining about not wanting to do anything and then expect the moon on a stick like a 3year old, grow up, get involved in the Human Community, and make things better so that people can earn enough money (yes a decent wage)so we can properly pay for our fares. The can't do/won't do atitude you display is the reason why the world is in the shape it is. So for the the sake of all Human kind stop your Liberterian/reganite/thatcherite bleeting.'Let's take another look at that well thought out comment:
'Well that is what I woud expect of whiny little englanders of your ilk, rather a fare dogder than a tory, rightwing, wine-swilling coporate eye-kisser, or equally as bad, a swill-eating cocaine snorting pig banker.'Lovely use of the word 'ilk' but I would prefer Englander to start with a capital letter, probably something to do with being a little Englander I suppose. I could also comment on the punctuation problems being exhibited but that might take a long time, so I'll just restrict myself to suggesting 'anonymous' acquaints himself/herself with the semicolon. Now what is an 'eye-kisser'? I have heard of arse-kissing and that makes sense in that clause but 'eye-kisser'; how would that even work? It is interesting that anonymous calls me both a 'tory' (I think that should probably be 'Tory' but I suppose using the shift key is beyond 'anonymous') and 'rightwing' (or should that be 'right-wing'); I wonder which is worse? Interesting that my commenter manages to hyphenate 'wine-swilling', it's just a shame that that dig is so far from the mark. As for 'swill-eating', I take that personally as both I and Mrs NotaSheep would never eat (let alone cook) 'swill'. As for 'cocaine snorting', I am afraid I have never indulged. Calling me a 'pig' is offensive, especially as I am Jewish. Finally on this paragraph I am not, nor have I ever been, a banker. Moving on to the second line:
'Instead of whining about not wanting to do anything and then expect the moon on a stick like a 3year old, grow up, get involved in the Human Community, and make things better so that people can earn enough money (yes a decent wage)so we can properly pay for our fares.'I don't know where I whine 'about not wanting to do anything'; odd ideas some people get. What is 'moon on a stick', why or how would I want that; maybe the problem is that I can't remember being three (one to ten should be spelt out, only numbers higher should be in numerals). I like the idea of getting involved in the 'Human Community', is that like the 'Big Society'? Is the line of argument here that people should be allowed to evade fares because the fares are too high in relation to their salaries? If so should everyone be given a car and a house from central funds because not everyone can afford these items. I drive a quite elderly car partly because I cannot afford a new one and partly because I choose not to spend the money, should I be given a new car because my neighbour has one? Nearing the end now:
'The can't do/won't do atitude you display is the reason why the world is in the shape it is.'I am not sure what 'anonymous' is getting at here; when do I sat I can't or won't do? Mostly I think I complain that not enough of the right thongs are being done whilst too many of the wrong things are being done. Finally we reach the end line:
'So for the the sake of all Human kind stop your Liberterian/reganite/thatcherite bleeting.'Some very odd usage of capital letters there, let's list them: 'So' - yes 'Human kind' - no - and humankind should be one word or hyphenated but not two words 'Libertarian' - I don't think so 'reganite' - now you could argue that 'Reaganite' should start with a capital letter being as Ronald Reagan was a person but 'anonymous' has written 'reganite'; maybe he/she is thinking of Donald Regan who was Ronald Reagan's Chief of Staff, maybe not 'thatcherite' - see 'reagnite' but at least 'anonymous' managed to spell Thatcher correctly Finally for error-spotting, my 'anonymous' commenter can't even spell bleating correctly. Hold on that's unfair as he/she also can't spell would, dodger, corporate or attitude. Well there's 15 minutes I won't ever see again but then again I feel it was worthwhile!
'Tired of the Blair/European President stuff. Can we pls analyse in terms of value to European democracy, rather than in terms of Blair's ego'Jon is rather more pro-EU than I but an interesting read nonetheless.
'@jonworth One oxymoron and one tautology there surely? 'European democracy' and 'Blair's ego'!'
'In March 2011, Robinson participated in the 'March for the Alternative' protests in Central London, which opposed the then Tory-led UK Government's spending cuts programme.''then Tory-led UK Government'? Somehow I think that entry may last have been edited by someone on the left of British politics. I have corrected the entry so it now reads:
'In March 2011, Robinson participated in the 'March for the Alternative' protests in Central London, which opposed the Conservative led Coalition UK Government's spending cuts programme'
'/* Politics and personal life */ replaced 'then Tory-led UK Government' with 'Conservative led Coalition UK Government' as government is current & so should not be reported in past tense, lead party in government is Conservative not Tory party'Language is important and the Tory/Conservative difference is well known and explicable as is the use of the word 'then' to slant the entry.
'The Athlon-powered M5030 from Dell... is being released with its keyboard and Windows 7 installation customized in Spanish, neither of which would be unusual were it not for the fact that it's going to be on sale in the US. It's not exactly a vast overhaul, as only a couple of physical keys are swapped out and switching Win 7 into and out of Spanish mode can be done in the time it takes to click a mouse, but still, it's significant in that it services the speakers of the States' second most commonly used language...'Interesting?
'All is right with the world, as genius (and Googler!) Thomas Steiner has made this beautiful Chrome extension that corrects Twitter’s subject/object discrepancy on its “Who to Follow” feature. Grammar snobs (I KNOW WHO YOU ARE AND WHERE YOU COMMENT), rejoice!
In case anyone’s still confused about ”Who” vs. “Whom” usage, here’s a quick tip to differentiate courtesy of Shit You Should Know:
“To determine proper usage of who/whom, separate the who/whom clause and pose it as a question. If that question can be answered with “he”, use “who”; if it can be answered with “him”, use ‘whom’.”'
'George Osborne welcoming of Balls to his new job: “Now he knows too what it feels like to be the peoples’ second choice”.'Is George Osborne correct? Well obviously he's correct in that Ed Balls was Ed Miliband's second choice as Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer - incidentally has anyone asked Ed Miliband why Ed Balls was his second choice, what qualities he lacked that Alan Johnson had? - but is that correct English or should it have read:
“Now he too knows what it feels like to be the peoples’ second choice”Just wondering; maybe Simon Heffer or Lynne Truss will let me know...

"I see some of them looking for returns of 20 or 25 per cent, at a time when fellatio is almost non-existent."