StatCounter

Showing posts with label Global Cooling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Global Cooling. Show all posts

Tuesday, 9 August 2016

Global warming?

'Climbers have encountered deep snow on Britain's highest mountain while assisting in a scientific project on the peak.

It is not unusual for Ben Nevis to have coverings of snow all year.
 
However, snow expert Iain Cameron has described the depth of the white stuff on the mountain's North Face as "astonishing".'
Inconvenient?

Monday, 7 April 2014

Some questions that the American Physical Society is asking but that the BBC will not be reporting

'A question the American Physical Society panel will address is one we ask repeatedly: Why wasn't the current global temperature stasis, with no discernible change in the past 15 years, not predicted by any of the climate models used by the IPCC, part of the United Nations?

The APS announcement lists among its questions to be answered: "How long must the stasis persist before there would be a firm declaration of a problem with the models?"

And at the APS, "Climate Change Statement Review." In a nod to the likelihood that nature, not man, calls the shots, another APS audit question asks the panel: "What do you see as the likelihood of solar influences beyond TSI (total solar irradiance)? Is it coincidence that the stasis has occurred during the weakest solar cycle (i.e., sunspot activity) in about a century?"'
More at Investors.com but not on the warmist BBC.

Sunday, 27 October 2013

Svensmark: “global warming stopped and a cooling is beginning” – “enjoy global warming while it lasts” | Watts Up With That?

'It's important to realise that the Little Ice Age was a global event. It ended in the late 19th Century and was followed by increasing solar activity. Over the past 50 years solar activity has been at its highest since the medieval warmth of 1000 years ago. But now it appears that the Sun has changed again, and is returning towards what solar scientists call a "grand minimum" such as we saw in the Little Ice Age.'
Much more here http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/10/svensmark-global-warming-stopped-and-a-cooling-is-beginning-enjoy-global-warming-while-it-lasts/ but not on the warmist BBC.

Saturday, 28 September 2013

Arctic Ice Cap Growing at Tremendous Rate

Putting the truth of climate change into the public arena.
'Six years ago, the BBC reported that the Arctic, due to global warming, would be ice-free by this summer. That, clearly, has not happened. What has happened, instead, is that the Arctic ice cap has grown at a tremendous rate, by almost a million square miles. In other words, it has grown by a whopping 60%, due to constantly repeating periodic ocean cycles.

What explains the rapid growth of the Arctic ice cap?

The Arctic summer has been a chillier than usual one, which has helped the ice cap rebound from its record low just a year ago in 2012.

This is the time of the year when the fall refreeze of the ice occurs, but already, an ice sheet that is over half the size of Europe extends between the Canadian Islands to the northern shores of Russia.
Pack-ice has blocked the Northwest Passage the entire year. Over 20 yachts that had planned to traverse it haven't been able to, as they've been left ice-bound. Some of the yachts are stuck at the passage's eastern end located in Prince Regent Inlet. The other yachts are stuck at Cape Bathurst, further to the west.'

More here http://guardianlv.com/2013/09/arctic-ice-cap-growing-at-tremendous-rate/ but not on the warmist believing BBC.

Friday, 22 March 2013

Svensmark: “global warming stopped and a cooling is beginning” – “enjoy global warming while it lasts” | Watts Up With That?

The warmists ignore any history that might show the problem with their position,Watts Up With That has some extracts from a recent paper that addresses that shortage:
'Solar activity has always varied. Around the year 1000, we had a period of very high solar activity, which coincided with the Medieval Warm Period. It was a time when frosts in May were almost unknown – a matter of great importance for a good harvest. Vikings settled in Greenland and explored the coast of North America. On the whole it was a good time. For example, China’s population doubled in this period.
But after about 1300 solar activity declined and the world began to get colder. It was the beginning of the episode we now call the Little Ice Age. In this cold time, all the Viking settlements in Greenland disappeared. Sweden surprised Denmark by marching across the ice, and in London the Thames froze repeatedly. But more serious were the long periods of crop failures, which resulted in poorly nourished populations, reduced in Europe by about 30 per cent because of disease and hunger.
It’s important to realise that the Little Ice Age was a global event. It ended in the late 19th Century and was followed by increasing solar activity. Over the past 50 years solar activity has been at its highest since the medieval warmth of 1000 years ago. But now it appears that the Sun has changed again, and is returning towards what solar scientists call a “grand minimum” such as we saw in the Little Ice Age.
The match between solar activity and climate through the ages is sometimes explained away as coincidence. Yet it turns out that, almost no matter when you look and not just in the last 1000 years, there is a link. Solar activity has repeatedly fluctuated between high and low during the past 10,000 years. In fact the Sun spent about 17 per cent of those 10,000 years in a sleeping mode, with a cooling Earth the result.'
There's science as well:
'You may wonder why the international climate panel IPCC does not believe that the Sun’s changing activity affects the climate. The reason is that it considers only changes in solar radiation. That would be the simplest way for the Sun to change the climate – a bit like turning up and down the brightness of a light bulb.
Satellite measurements have shown that the variations of solar radiation are too small to explain climate change. But the panel has closed its eyes to another, much more powerful way for the Sun to affect Earth’s climate. In 1996 we discovered a surprising influence of the Sun – its impact on Earth’s cloud cover. High-energy accelerated particles coming from exploded stars, the cosmic rays, help to form clouds.
When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. High solar activity means fewer clouds and and a warmer world. Low solar activity and poorer shielding against cosmic rays result in increased cloud cover and hence a cooling. As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then.
That also explains why most climate scientists try to ignore this possibility. It does not favour their idea that the 20th century temperature rise was mainly due to human emissions of CO2. If the Sun provoked a significant part of warming in the 20th Century, then the contribution by CO2 must necessarily be smaller.'
Read the whole article and rest assured that the BBC won't be reporting this scientific paper any time soon.

Sunday, 17 March 2013

Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again) | Mail Online

From January 2012:

'The supposed ‘consensus’ on man-made global warming is facing an inconvenient challenge after the release of new temperature data showing the planet has not warmed for the past 15 years.

The figures suggest that we could even be heading for a mini ice age to rival the 70-year temperature drop that saw frost fairs held on the Thames in the 17th Century.

Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997.'
More at The Mail but definitely not on the warmist BBC.

Tuesday, 28 February 2012

The only constant are that we should be afraid, do as we are told and pay more taxes

Yesterday the BBC informed us that:
'The progressive shrinking of Arctic sea ice is bringing colder, snowier winters to the UK and other areas of Europe, North America and China, a study shows.As global temperatures have risen, the area of Arctic Ocean covered by ice in summer and autumn has been falling. Writing in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a US/China-based team show this affects the jet stream and brings cold, snowy weather.'
The BBC's warmist evangelist Richard Black is happy to spread the fear.

As I wrote just three weeks ago, in 2000 The Independent newspaper was reporting as fact that:
'Britain's winter ends tomorrow with further indications of a striking environmental change: snow is starting to disappear from our lives.

Sledges, snowmen, snowballs and the excitement of waking to find that the stuff has settled outside are all a rapidly diminishing part of Britain's culture, as warmer winters - which scientists are attributing to global climate change - produce not only fewer white Christmases, but fewer white Januaries and Februaries.

The first two months of 2000 were virtually free of significant snowfall in much of lowland Britain, and December brought only moderate snowfall in the South-east. It is the continuation of a trend that has been increasingly visible in the past 15 years: in the south of England, for instance, from 1970 to 1995 snow and sleet fell for an average of 3.7 days, while from 1988 to 1995 the average was 0.7 days. London's last substantial snowfall was in February 1991.

...

However, the warming is so far manifesting itself more in winters which are less cold than in much hotter summers. According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting event".

"Children just aren't going to know what snow is," he said.

...

David Parker, at the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research in Berkshire, says ultimately, British children could have only virtual experience of snow. Via the internet, they might wonder at polar scenes - or eventually "feel" virtual cold.'
The same certainty on display there as the climate 'experts' tell us what they know will happen, except they were wrong. Britain and elsewhere have had three snowy winters on the trot. Have we had an apology from Dr David Viner or David Parker? Somehow I doubt it.

Why should we believe experts in 2012 who tell us one thing when we were told almost the opposite with just as much certainty in 2000. The only constants are that we should be afraid, do as the 'experts' tell us and above all pay more taxes.

Wednesday, 4 January 2012

Wednesday morning catch-up

The usual story; too many open tabs and not enough time.

1. Christopher Booker explains why the BBC steadfastly avoided the facts about the wind farm scam in David Shukman's reports on energy policy for the BBC. Christopher Booker unveils the true lunacy of the Government's plans, plans idiotically pushed by Chris Huhne.


2. The Register report that coal power stations may be responsible for global cooling. When will scientists admit that even the most complex climate models can only approximate the Earth's true climate?


3. The Globe & Mail explain why gold coins are not an investment bubble.


4. The Standard reports the on the FSA report into the collapse of RBS and unlike the BBC actually reports what was said about the partial blame that was layable at the feet of Gordon Brown and Ed Balls.


Monday, 20 June 2011

Monday morning catchup

The usual story, too many tabs and too little time:

1) Edmund Conway in The Telegraph argues that it would be best if Germany left the Euro rather than Greece. It's a point of view. What I wish is that the EU-fanatics who connived to let Greece enter the Euro, despite knowing that it's economic figures were fiddled to meet the convergence criteria, are  made to apologise for their stupidity.


2) Wake Up America has a story of education in the USA.


3) The Algemeiner has news of Yale, anti-Semitism and Jewish donors.


4) The New York Sun compares
'Two pulchritudinous ones... Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin.


5) HotAir discusses the coming ice-age, for more look here.


6) Guido Fawkes in The Guardian explains what he thinks happened at PMQs last week. For my take, read this.


7) Andrew Lilico at Conservative Home explains the 'Twenty things Westminster needs to know about Greece and its debts'; it's not a cheerful read.


8) Elder of Zion has some pictures that show the true state of Gaza; warning not for the faint-hearted.


9) Andrew Grice in The Independent thinks that Ed Miliband and Ed 'second choice' Balls are divided over apologising for over-spending. You will not be surprised to learn that Ed Balls does not want to apologise for anything.


10) Finally World Net Daily has a story of an odd twist on the Obama birth-certificate story.

Tuesday, 14 June 2011

Global warming or mini ice-age - which one is our near future?

I read some fascinating news at The Register :
'What may be the science story of the century is breaking this evening, as heavyweight US solar physicists announce that the Sun appears to be headed into a lengthy spell of low activity, which could mean that the Earth – far from facing a global warming problem – is actually headed into a mini Ice Age.
Average magnetic field strength in sunspot umbras has been steadily declining for over a decade. The trend includes sunspots from Cycles 22, 23, and (the current cycle) 24. Credit: NSO/AASIce skating on the Thames by 2025?

The announcement made on 14 June (18:00 UK time) comes from scientists at the US National Solar Observatory (NSO) and US Air Force Research Laboratory. Three different analyses of the Sun's recent behaviour all indicate that a period of unusually low solar activity may be about to begin.

The Sun normally follows an 11-year cycle of activity. The current cycle, Cycle 24, is now supposed to be ramping up towards maximum strength. Increased numbers of sunspots and other indications ought to be happening: but in fact results so far are most disappointing. Scientists at the NSO now suspect, based on data showing decades-long trends leading to this point, that Cycle 25 may not happen at all.'
Do read the whole story because if this is true then the earth is facing a more serious problem than global warming. Global cooling could kill millions of people and food shortages could kill even more. Since warmists believe (sorry, know) that CO2 emissions 'definitely' cause warming, I presume that they will be calling for increases in CO2 emissions to counter this cooling effect. Should large CO2 emitting engines be encouraged? Maybe tax breaks for cars with engines larger than 3 litres capacity? How about banning all electric cars as they will help the earth to cool? Should 4x4 drivers be rewarded for their choice of car?

Somehow I doubt that my ideas will be followed; increased taxation and a diminishing of personal freedom is more likely.

Friday, 11 March 2011

Is the Eath's temperature and weather more affected by CO2 or El Nino and La Nina?

Climate Realists think they have the proof that it is the latter not the 'warmist' believers' theory that it is the former:
'It is likely that 2011 will be the coolest year since 1956, or even earlier, says the lead author of a peer-reviewed paper published in 2009:

Our ENSO - temperature paper of 2009 and the aftermath by John McLean

The paper, by John McLean, Professor Chris de Freitas and Professor Bob Carter, showed that the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), a measure of El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) conditions, is a very good indicator of average global atmospheric temperatures approximately seven months ahead, except when volcanic eruptions cause short-term cooling.

The lead author, McLean, points to a fall in temperatures that began in October last year, seven months after the abrupt shift to La Nina conditions, and according to last month's data is still continuing.

"The delayed response is important for two reasons." McLean says, "Firstly the high annual average temperature in 2010 was due to the El Nino that ended around March but whose delayed effect on temperature continued until late in the year. Secondly it means that the ENSO conditions can be used to predict with reasonable confidence the average global temperatures up to seven months ahead." '
I know what I believe and oddly I recently discovered that so do more people that I know, they just feel they have to keep it quiet. That is something that I increasingly notice, people feel free to espouse radical leftist views without fear of censure but those of us on the right feel that we have to take care before expressing views that are at variance with the liberal 'consensus'.

Monday, 15 November 2010

But all the scientists knew the world was cooling in the 1970s and 1980s

Omniclimate it would seem can speak Italian and has used this to do some intersting research, let's let him explain:
'Italian newspaper “La Stampa” has just put online its 1867-today archive (yes, it IS in Italian). What better chance (well, for me at least…) to explore the evolution of “global cooling” thinking in the 1970s beyond the usual English-speaking newsmedia? With the added bonus of plenty of names and other key words to use as…keywords for further research.

Very briefly: in the 15 articles I have found so far:

* the popularity of scientists predicting an ice age is very clear up to the Feb 1979 meeting of the World Meteorological Organization
* “upcoming ice age” is the meme du jour up to 1985 at least
* there is a warmist slant in 1990 but strangely, the arguments of discussion are more or less the same still central to the debate in 2010

This collection strongly indicates that in Italy, like elsewhere, the average reader of newspapers would have had all the reasons to believe in a “global cooling consensus” for much of the 1970′s and even later.'
Read the whole article, fascinating...