StatCounter

Showing posts with label Harriet Harman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Harriet Harman. Show all posts

Monday, 23 May 2016

Harriet Harman showing her ignorance

Sunday Politics London, 22/05/2016: www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b07bghpv via @bbciplayer
Watch from the hour mark and see Harriet Harman show her ignorance of how tariffs work, the EU exporters could put tariffs on their exports to us if we leave the EU? Then near the end admit that she doesn't recognise any of the seven leading EU figures, she's a senior British politician, even I recognise two of them...

Sunday, 13 September 2015

Harriet Harman exhibits the usual Labour hypocrisy

'Harriet Harman has slammed the Government's plan to use the international aid budget to help pay for the 20,000 Syrian refugees Britain is to accept over the next five years.Yet who was it that first started using the aid budget to support refugees?The policy was introduced in 2009 – by the last Labour government.'

Monday, 18 May 2015

£3 and you can vote for the next Labour leader...

Sky News (@SkyNews) tweeted at 10:09 AM on Mon, May 18, 2015:
Harriet Harman says "anyone" can vote for the new Labour leader (so long as they pay £3) http://t.co/CBNoI7Afaq  http://t.co/nxCCkONme6
(https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/600226721401475074)

Fun times ahead.

Wednesday, 11 February 2015

Feminism and politics

Dan Hodges nails the difference between the Conservative and Labour parties on feminism:
' The idea the Labour Party is blazing a trail for women is one of the biggest jokes in British politics

On this day in 1975 Margaret Thatcher became the first female leader of the Conservative Party.
Yesterday the Labour Party unveiled its response. According to the Guardian "a bright pink minibus of female Labour MPs will tour constituencies to talk to female voters around the kitchen table".

A pink bus. To talk to women. Around the kitchen table. In the year 2015. Courtesy of the Labour Party.'

Tuesday, 25 March 2014

Harriet Harman expressing solidarity with her former economics advisor Duncan Weldon, now BBC Newsnight's new economics editor


When I saw this tweet, and thanks to Guido Fawkes for the spot, I remembered that I had some video of Harriet Harman giving assistance to another BBC presenter...



The BBC and the Labour party - two cheeks of the same arse.

Friday, 14 March 2014

The BBC are utterly shameless

I hear that the BBC have replaced Stephanie Flanders, former girlfriend of both Labour leader Ed Miliband and Labour's Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls, with the TUC’s senior economist Duncan Weldon. He previously worked for the labour party, was a Labour candidate in 2010, has written for several Labour blogs (including LabourList and Owen Jones and UNITE's CLASS think tank.

How can anyone think it right that such a person be appointed as the economics expert on the BBC's flagship news and current affairs programme at any time, let alone just over a year before a general election?

Have the BBC heard of unbiased reporting or do they not feel they even need to pretend to be unbiased anymore?

Will the Conservatives do anything other than quietly express disquiet? I doubt it, they are too scared of the BBC's reach and power.The BBC is out of control, for some time it has not been an unbiased news reporting organisation but an organisation campaigning for left-wing causes. Increasingly it now functions as the propaganda arm of the Labour Party in the UK, the Democrats in the USA and radical Islam around the globe.


Update: I learn that Duncan Weldon was also the economic adviser to Harriet Harman when she was acting leader of the Labour Party.


Oh come off it, seriously BBC?

Monday, 10 March 2014

How many times can you spend one lot of money?

How many times can you spend one lot of money?

If you're an ordinary taxpayer the answer is once. If you're the Labour leader or one of his team, then the answer is 10 or maybe 11 times, so far.

Guido Fawkes makes it 10 times and has the video clips to prove it...


My favourite clip is the hopeless Harriet Harman showing her mastery/mistressy of the subject. You just know if that had been a Conservative spokesman that clip would have been played over and over again, but as it's a Labour bigwig, I don't think I've ever seen it on-air as opposed to to on the web.


But BuzzFeed think it's 11....


Can we just agree that it's more than possible? Except in the world of Labour Party / BBC economics.

Tuesday, 4 March 2014

The BBC must be so frustrated this morning

Ordinarily the news that a David Cameron aide had been arrested for anything, let alone an offence "relating to child abuse imagery", would be headline news at the BBC.

However the PIE affair is still hanging over Labour's Deputy Leader Harriet Harman and her husband Jack "winner of an all women's shortlist" Dromey. Also we all remember very clearly that the BBC ignored the PIE story until it was impossible to continue to do so.

So the BBC just can't go big on this story, they must be so frustrated this morning.

Tuesday, 25 February 2014

Harriet Harman: the unanswered question

In the BBC coverage of this story and Harriet Harman's online statement I can see no mention of this point: In a letter to the Home Office in April 1978, the NCCL argued that child pornography should not be banned as “indecent” unless it could be shown that the child depicted had been harmed. The NCCL official who wrote this letter was its legal officer, Harriet Harman.

Am I correct, did she sign that letter? Why?

Friday, 14 June 2013

Harriet Harman has got it right, I suppose it had to happen eventually!

Yesterday The Guardian reported that:
'Harriet Harman: time to consider media ownership cap as low as 15% 
Shadow culture secretary to say that plurality ensures no private interest can set itself above public interest'
Apparently:
'A media ownership cap as low as 15% across newspapers, broadcasting companies and online sites must be considered to stop companies feeling they are "above the rule of law", according to Harriet Harman.

...

The Labour frontbencher will call on her Tory counterpart Maria Miller to set up crossparty talks to help push reforms through.

Labour last year proposed a possible 30% limit on ownership within the newspaper industry but suggests that could sit alongside a 15% cap across the media as whole, including "any medium of communication that stands between a creator of content and an audience".'
The most fascinating sentence in the whole report was this one:
'News International held 37% of the newspaper market until the closure of the News of the World.'
Now can you think of a media organisation that holds an even larger market share in the area of reporting the news?

Guido Fawkes  has today this useful graphic to illustrate the BBC's dominance in news dissemination:


But two years ago Conservative Home produced a more in depth report that included these eye-opening graphs based on OfCom figures:

First one that shows where people get their news from

This shows that television accounts for 73% of peoples' news. The internet, TV and radio are nearly equal in importance but all a poor second place and with the internet eating into newspapers at an accelerating rate...

Now a graph that shows how the BBC dominates the TV news sector. Its share of TV news is more than ten times as big as Sky News.


And finally the share of internet news:

This chart shows that BBC websites have ten times as much market share as Sky. When it comes to the overt opinion-based news websites News Corporation has less market share than The Guardian or the Daily Mail.

Taken together these graphs show that there is indeed a dominant player in the UK news market but that it's not News International, it's the BBC.
More importantly the fact that the BBC is clearly not an unbiased voice on so many subjects, including  immigration, Israel, Islamic terrorism, the EU, US politics, British politics and climate change, means that the BBC is not some benign impartial force sitting above a partisan sector. 
The BBC dominates the news agenda like no other organisation and on many of these subjects its views are at variance with the rest of the British people who have little choice but to pay the licence fee. Nobody forces people to buy The Daily Mail or subscribe to Sky but if you have a TV and the ability to receive TV broadcasts in the UK you must have a TV licence.

So did Harriet Harman men to include the BBC in her 15%  media ownership cap and if not, why not? Maybe because the BBC is in tune with Harriet Harman and Labour on so many issues and thus plays a large role in increasing the Labour vote.


UPDATE:
As of Friday evening I can find no mention on the BBC website of Harriet Harman's proposals. This is odd as the BBC are normally totally obsessed by media matters. Why on earth would they be ignoring this story? It's a total mystery!

Saturday, 20 April 2013

Harman praises 'hero' immigrants who send welfare handouts home | Mail Online

'Harriet Harman has praised 'heroic' immigrants who claim welfare payments in Britain and use the cash to support families living abroad.

She said the Government should make it easier for them to send the money home and called for tax refunds to encourage more immigrants to follow suit, in particular those who paid for their children to be educated in the Third World.

The Labour Deputy Leader, who is also the party's spokesman on International Development, derided 'those who say we should look after our own first' in the recession and vowed to fight any attempt to cut the £9.4 billion overseas aid budget.'

More here http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1337876/Harman-praises-hero-immigrants-send-welfare-handouts-home.html


For too many on the left of British politics, immigration was a way of rubbing the right's noses in diversity, in increasing the Labour vote and redistributing income worldwide. These people have little loyalty to the British people.

Friday, 16 March 2012

Harriet Harman floundering badly on the bankers bonus tax and the cost of Labour's job scheme


Impressive performance isn't it?

How has this woman managed to stay near the top of British politics for so long? Is there really nobody better qualified in the labour party?

Friday, 2 September 2011

A reminder of typical Labour hypocrisy


Harriet Harman showing the sort of hypocrisy that meant she was the perfect person to be deputy leader of the Labour party.

Monday, 6 June 2011

Labour paying off its historic debts "bit by bit", unfortunately not the country's

This morning I hear that Harriet Harman has said that the Labour party is paying off its historic debts "bit by bit".That's good to know but it is a shame that they cannot also be called upon to pay off the debts they built up for the country "bit by bit". The last 11 years of the last Labour government saw an increase in public spending that was beyond anything the UK has seen before. This expansion of the state was supported by a bubble of debt and the policies of above all Gordon Brown and his right-hand men Ed Balls and Ed Miliband. This triumvirate of wasters should never, ever be allowed to forget or be forgiven for their role in screwing up the UK economy. However their friends and allies in the BBC will do their best to ensure that the Labour mantra that it was all the fault of bankers and the US economy becomes the accepted truth.

Saturday, 22 January 2011

Left-wing bias? It's written through the BBC's very DNA, says Peter Sissons

The Daily Mail has an article by Peter Sissons about the pro-left and anti-right bias endemic within the BBC. The piece confirms so many of the things that I have written over the past few years that some may wonder if I am in fact Peter Sissons... I am not!

Here's a few extracts to give you a flavour:
'For 20 years I was a front man at the BBC, anchoring news and current ­affairs programmes, so I reckon nobody is better placed than me to ­answer the question that nags at many of its viewers — is the BBC biased?

In my view, ‘bias’ is too blunt a word to describe the subtleties of the ­pervading culture. The better word is a ‘mindset’. At the core of the BBC, in its very DNA, is a way of thinking that is firmly of the Left.

By far the most popular and widely read newspapers at the BBC are The Guardian and The Independent. ­Producers refer to them routinely for the line to take on ­running stories, and for inspiration on which items to cover. In the later stages of my career, I lost count of the number of times I asked a producer for a brief on a story, only to be handed a copy of The Guardian and told ‘it’s all in there’.

...

At any given time there is a BBC line on everything of importance, a line usually adopted in the light of which way its senior echelons believe the political wind is ­blowing. This line is rarely spelled out explicitly, but percolates subtly throughout the organisation.

Whatever the United Nations is associated with is good — it is heresy to question any of its activities. The EU is also a good thing, but not quite as good as the UN. Soaking the rich is good, despite well-founded economic arguments that the more you tax, the less you get. And Government spending is a good thing, although most BBC ­people prefer to call it investment, in line with New Labour’s terminology.

All green and environmental groups are very good things. Al Gore is a saint. George Bush was a bad thing, and thick into the bargain. Obama was not just the Democratic Party’s candidate for the White House, he was the BBC’s. Blair was good, Brown bad, but the BBC has now lost interest in both.

Trade unions are mostly good things, especially when they are fighting BBC managers. Quangos are also mostly good, and the reports they produce are usually handled uncritically. The Royal Family is a bore. Islam must not be offended at any price, although ­Christians are fair game because they do nothing about it if they are offended.

...

But whatever your talent, sex or ethnicity, there’s one sure-fire way at a BBC promotions board to ensure you don’t get the job, indeed to bring your career to a grinding halt. And that’s if, when asked which post-war politician you most admire, you reply: ‘Margaret Thatcher’.

...

Complaints from viewers may invariably be met with the BBC’s stock response, ‘We don’t accept that, so get lost’.

...

...just before the 2009 local and European elections, when time was starting to run out for the Brown Government.
I was at Television Centre preparing to anchor the 5pm-6pm news, the centre-piece of which was to be an extended interview that I would conduct with Labour’s deputy leader Harriet Harman.

I did what I have always done before thousands of interviews in my 45 years as a broadcast journalist. I drew up a list of the most important current issues that I felt she needed to be asked about, drafted a few core questions, and scoured the newswires and morning papers for anything I’d missed.

Then it started — a steady stream of email messages from producers telling me what to ask. Three or four of them all wanted to have their say, and they seemed particularly twitchy about Harman being interviewed by me, unsupervised. Most seemed to be fully paid-up members of her fan club.

BBC news producers have a perfect right to try to ensure that a news presenter sticks to their agenda — it is the BBC way. But too many of them are concerned not about what will be the best thing to do journalistically, but about what will best please the news executives on the floors above. The two are not necessarily the same thing.

I managed to bat away most of the stuff suggested to me, and the way the interview might go took shape in my mind. Then, half an hour before transmission, a ­producer arrived with a list of questions for Harriet Harman emailed in by viewers.

This was news to me, but I had no choice in the matter because they had already been set up with ­captions, and it was my job simply to put them to her. After that, if there was time — and the interview was to run to no more than eight minutes — I could put some questions of my own.

I was asked what I had in mind, and I said that I was going to ask her about a row brewing in the morning papers about Gordon Brown not inviting the Queen to the 65th anniversary commemoration of D-Day. The response shocked me. I was told this was not a topic worth raising because it was ‘only a ­campaign being run by the Daily Mail’.

I have no doubt that if it had been the lead in The Guardian or The Independent, I would have been instructed to nail Ms Harman to the wall. I did ask the question, and she, clearly uncomfortable, promised a statement when she had found out all the facts.'
Sissons when it is published on February 2 by Biteback Publishing at £17.99.

Monday, 17 January 2011

Parental leave

When Labour launched this idea I remember the BBC's airwaves being full of people saying what a progressive move this was and how pleased they were. Any businessmen who raised objections were dismissed as old-fashioned and it was explained how business would just have to come into the 21st century. Now that the Conservative/LibDem coalition government are going ahead with these plans, suddenly the BBC are very interested in the adverse views of business and in promoting them. It is almost as though the BBC's first reaction is to support Labour proposals and oppose Conservative/LibDem ones...

For the avoidance of doubt, I was opposed to this policy when proposed by Harriet Harman and am just as opposed now.

Thursday, 23 December 2010

30 new facts about Gordon Brown

The Guardian has gleaned 30 new facts about Gordon Brown from Anthony Seldon's biography. Do take a read of them all, here's a few to whet your appetite (my comments in italics):
'4. Brown often swore about having to meet foreign dignitaries. "'Why the fuck are you making me do this?' he would complain to [Tom Fletcher, his foreign policy adviser] before almost every such meeting," Seldon and Lodge write
Polite chap wasn't he, must be the influence of his upbringing as a son of the manse...

6. Ed Balls is reported to have said: "Every appointment that Gordon has ever made on his own has been a disaster." Seldon and Lodge quote this in relation to the appointment of Stephen Carter to Downing Street.
Was Ed Balls appointed by Gordon Brown?

7. Brown is not able to read newsprint easily. According to Seldon and Lodge, he has to rely on others to keep him informed about what's in the papers.
So at one point we had a blind Home Secretary and a one-eyed poor sighted Chancellor...

8. Brown tried to get parliament to vote for 42-day pre-charge detention to please the Murdoch press, his colleagues believe. "Blair made it very clear to Gordon that he had to come across as tough; the News International people would worry if he was not. That is why he did 42 days," Balls told the authors.
This is the man of principles is it?

9. When Brown met Obama in Downing Street before Obama was elected president, Brown's sons were brought in to extend the length of the meeting because Brown wanted to keep Obama in No 10 for as long as possible.
How pathetic...

10. When Harriet Harman stood in for Brown during the summer holidays in 2008, she was overheard telling a cabinet colleague: "I don't know how Gordon manages to make this job seem so difficult."
Harriet Harman the perfect advertisement for sexual discrimination against women

26. Brown stopped speaking to Mervyn King, the governor of the Bank of England, towards the end of his premiership because he thought King was taking a political stance in the argument about deficit reduction.
Another example of Gordon Brown's famed maturity...

27. Nick Macpherson, the permanent secretary to the Treasury, despaired of Brown's refusal to accept the need for a tougher stance on reducing the deficit. "He just doesn't get it," Macpherson often told colleagues.'
Why should Gordon Brown have got it, he never seemed to get it

Friday, 26 November 2010

Labour springs its well laid trap

Harriet Harman's equality legislation passed this year was passed for a reason, and that reason was not 'love'. Thus The Guardian's report that:
'George Osborne is facing a formal investigation by the equalities watchdog to establish whether the Treasury fulfilled its statutory duty to assess the impact of the spending review on women, disabled and ethnic minority people.'
did not surprise me. Labour knew they would be out of office soon and so left behind all sorts of traps for the incoming government. The fact that the Conservatives have to govern in a coalition with the LibDems means that they cannot repeal these pieces of legislation as easily as they otherwise might thus the impeccably left-of-centre, but statutorily reinforced Equality and Human Rights Commission announced today that it would launch a formal assessment into the Treasury's conduct prior to the spending review last month:
"Under the public sector equality duties, covering race, gender and disability, the Treasury, like all public bodies, has a legal duty to pay 'due regard' to equality and consider any disproportionate impact on protected groups when making decisions, including decisions about the budget. Where decisions are found to have a disproportionate impact on a particular group protected by the legislation, public bodies must consider what actions can be taken to avoid, mitigate or justify that impact."

This week we've seen this 'equalities' legislation and Alistair Darling's EU crisis sign up emerge as well laid traps, what others will follow?

Saturday, 30 October 2010

So which is the 'nasty party'?

The Labour deputy leader of Sunderland City Council says on Twitter that she hopes Margaret Thatcher “burns in hell” and the Labour council insists yesterday that there would be no repercussions for the insult:
'A spokesman said: “There are still strong feelings in many parts of the country about events during Margaret Thatcher’s time as Prime Minister and Cllr Anderson has expressed her feelings.”

Council leader Paul Watson, leader of the Labour group, said: "It was an entirely personal comment that was attributed to her." '

Meanwhile Harriet Harman has called Danny Alexander a 'ginger rodent' in a speech to the Labour party's Scottish congress:
'In her speech, Ms Harman said many people who voted Lib Dem in May "believed that they were a progressive anti-Tory party".

She said they "woke up" after the coalition deal to see Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg with Tory prime minister David Cameron in the rose garden of Number 10 Downing Street.

The deputy Labour leader said there was "incredulity" at seeing Mr Alexander, a Scottish MP, becoming "the front-man for the Tory cuts".

"Now, many of us in the Labour Party are conservationists - and we all love the red squirrel," Ms Harman said.

"But there is one ginger rodent which we never want to see again - Danny Alexander."'

What lovely people and how appropriate that they reprsent such a poliical party that has been nasty to the country for so many years.

Sunday, 17 October 2010

Defending the indefensible

Yesterday I received a comment on my old post entitled '
The BBC/Labour relationship in one video clip'.

Here's the comment from 'Anonymous'

'What was it that we're supposed to be annoyed about? She said something to him, and he then interrupted IDS, but you can't say that one led to the other. All David Dimbleby does on that show is interupt and challenge the speakers - that's what he's there for. He does it to everyone - well, to all the politicians anyway, he usually gives journos and business types an easier ride.

By the way, Dimbleby is not employed by the BBC, he's always been a freelancer.'

And here's the video


So let's see: can you really watch that piece of video and not see Harriet Harman tell David Dimbleby what to do and him acquiesce? Check Beeb Bias Craig for figures detailing David Dimbleby's lack of bias. And as for David dimbleby not being employed by the BBC, so what? They pay him and they broadcast the programme.