StatCounter

Showing posts with label Stupidity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stupidity. Show all posts

Friday, 9 September 2016

These are college students!



I'm not sure which people in this video irritate me more: the ones who know nothing "Honestly I don't even know anything" or the women who think it "will be fun to like have a female President"

Sunday, 10 April 2016

Police hunt on-the-run child rapist from Rochdale paedophile gang

This news story beggars belief, what was the trial judge thinking? 

'A child rapist jailed for 19 years for his role in a Rochdale paedophile gang has been on the run for more than four months and is feared to have fled to Pakistan.

Choudry Ikhalaq Hussain, 38, was sentenced to imprisonment in his absence on Friday for rape, sexual activity with a child and conspiracy to rape.

But Hussain, who was part of a 10-strong child abuse ring all of whom were of Pakistani and Bangladeshi heritage, absconded during his trial last November and police believe he is now in hiding abroad.

During the trial at Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court Hussain claimed a family member had died.He was given permission by the judge to attend the funeral - which he had said was due to be held in Britain.

However, Hussain never returned to court.'

Unbelievable? Actually, and worryingly, it's not. 

Wednesday, 23 December 2015

I'm all but lost for words

'Asylum seekers and refugees applying to be minicab drivers are exempt from criminal records checks, potentially allowing murderers and rapists to get behind the wheel.

Rules laid down by Transport for London (TfL) mean refugees and those applying for asylum do not have to reveal whether they have a criminal history when trying to become a cab driver.

The legal loophole in an official application document on 'private hire driver licensing' says people coming to Britain will not be required to have their criminal convictions checked.

Asylum seekers and refugees applying to be minicab drivers are exempt from criminal records checks. '
If true this is so mind-blowing a policy that I am lost for words.

Wednesday, 20 May 2015

The 'oh come off it' story of the month

CBC report that:
'Quebec girl told to stop reading book by school bus driver
 
Sarah Auger, 8, enjoyed reading to and from school, until the bus driver said it was dangerous
 
Kate McKenna, CBC News 
 
An eight-year-old girl in St-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Que. was told she's no longer allowed to read books on the school bus because it poses a risk to the safety of other students.
​
Sarah Auger loves reading and used to enjoy using her 20-minute ride to and from school to read for pleasure.

But recently, her bus driver told her she had to stop.

She says she was told reading posed a risk to other students on the bus.

He suggested they might stand up to see what she was reading, or she might poke herself in the eye with the corners of the book. '
Seriously? Oh come off it.

Monday, 17 March 2014

Ukraine Region Votes to Join Russia - WSJ.com

'American officials realize that they misjudged Mr. Putin and are working to predict his next move, the senior official said. "We have misread Putin. He is not going to give up," the official said.'

How come they couldn't see what I could? Or could they but now Barack Obama has more flexibility in his second term...

Friday, 24 January 2014

If they are that ignorant then they shouldn't be allowed a vote

From the BBC report on the Lords blocking the possibility of a EU Referendum following the next general Election comes this passage:
'As it stands, the bill states that voters should be asked: "Do you think that the UK should be a member of the EU?"
...
The Electoral Commission has already said the existing question needs further thought, suggesting that some people are not aware that the UK is already a member and might not understand the premise as a result.'
If people aren't aware that the UK is already a member of the EU then they shouldn't have a vote on anything.

Friday, 14 June 2013

Everyone should be monitored apart from radical mosques!

We've learnt recently that the Obama administration is monitoring the US and foreign general public's voice and electronic communications in an effort to identify terrorists or maybe just opponents of Barack Obama who need to be investigated. What is less well known is that:
'Since October 2011, mosques have been off-limits to FBI agents. No more surveillance or undercover string operations without high-level approval from a special oversight body at the Justice Department dubbed the Sensitive Operations Review Committee.

Who makes up this body, and how do they decide requests? Nobody knows; the names of the chairman, members and staff are kept secret.

We do know the panel was set up under pressure from Islamist groups who complained about FBI stings at mosques. Just months before the panel's formation, the Council on American-Islamic Relations teamed up with the ACLU to sue the FBI for allegedly violating the civil rights of Muslims in Los Angeles by hiring an undercover agent to infiltrate and monitor mosques there.

Before mosques were excluded from the otherwise wide domestic spy net the administration has cast, the FBI launched dozens of successful sting operations against homegrown jihadists — inside mosques — and disrupted dozens of plots against the homeland.

If only they were allowed to continue, perhaps the many victims of the Boston Marathon bombings would not have lost their lives and limbs. The FBI never canvassed Boston mosques until four days after the April 15 attacks, and it did not check out the radical Boston mosque where the Muslim bombers worshipped
Thanks to Investors.com for that spot.

So why has the Obama administration made this policy decision and why is it receiving so little MSM attention? 

Wednesday, 13 March 2013

BBC News - MP David Lammy apologises for BBC Pope race 'innuendo' claim

'A Labour MP has apologised for claiming the BBC made a "silly innuendo about the race" of the next Pontiff.

David Lammy was commenting on a BBC Twitter message, which asked "will smoke be black or white?".

Mr Lammy, tweeting from the Commons chamber, said the BBC message was "crass and unnecessary".
He later apologised after Twitter users pointed out the role played by black and white smoke in announcing the election of a new Pope.'
More here at the BBC

Is David Lammy really that ignorant?

Well you could take this into account, David Lammy on Celebrity Mastermind...



 More here.

Remember this dolt was the last Labour government's Minister for Higher Education. Just about sums up the last Labour government...

Friday, 2 November 2012

Obama Supporters Actually Hate Obama's Policies


'Luke Rudkowski hits the streets of NYC to find out where Obama supporters really stand on his policies. Now he did this in an underhanded way where the policies where presented to be Romney's, but this was only done to get an honest opinion. The reactions when the truth was uncovered varied but they were very telling to say the least. Here are some of the sources that were mentioned throughout the interviews 1st question, part 1 - Obama, in Europe, signs Patriot Act extension http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43180202/ns/us_news-security/t/obama-europe-signs... 1st question, part 2 - Warrantless Spying Skyrockets Under Obama http://reason.com/archives/2012/10/03/warrantless-spying-skyrockets-under-obam 2nd question - President Obama Signed the National Defense Authorization Act - Now What? http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2012/01/02/president-obama-signed-the-na... 3rd question - Secret 'Kill List' Proves a Test of Obama's Principles and Will http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.... 4th question - Drone wars and state secrecy -- how Barack Obama became a hardliner http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/02/drone-wars-secrecy-barack-obama '
So why are these people still supporting Barack Obama? Of course the reason these people don't know these facts is that the US media like the BBC in the UK is all but actively campaigning for Barack Obama's re-election.

Thursday, 26 July 2012

Why did Gordon Brown sell a large proportion of Britain's gold at a historically low price?

I have commented on the so called 'Brown bottom' before but Thomas Pascoe in The Telegraph  has an interesting theory, but first some background (my emphasis):
'A great deal of Gordon Brown’s economic strategy would strike a sane man as troubling. Not a great deal was mysterious. The orgy of consumption spending, frequent extensions of the cycle over which he would “borrow to invest”, proclamations of the “end of boom and bust”: these are part of the armoury of modern politicians, of all political hues.

One decision stands out as downright bizarre, however: the sale of the majority of Britain’s gold reserves for prices between $256 and $296 an ounce, only to watch it soar so far as $1,615 per ounce today.

When Brown decided to dispose of almost 400 tonnes of gold between 1999 and 2002, he did two distinctly odd things.

First, he broke with convention and announced the sale well in advance, giving the market notice that it was shortly to be flooded and forcing down the spot price. This was apparently done in the interests of “open government”, but had the effect of sending the spot price of gold to a 20-year low, as implied by basic supply and demand theory.

Second, the Treasury elected to sell its gold via auction. Again, this broke with the standard model. The price of gold was usually determined at a morning and afternoon "fix" between representatives of big banks whose network of smaller bank clients and private orders allowed them to determine the exact price at which demand met with supply.

The auction system again frequently achieved a lower price than the equivalent fix price. The first auction saw an auction price of $10c less per ounce than was achieved at the morning fix. It also acted to depress the price of the afternoon fix which fell by nearly $4.

It seemed almost as if the Treasury was trying to achieve the lowest price possible for the public’s gold. It was.'
Read the article for the explanation, which revolves around the 'carry trade'. Is this true? I cannot say. It might be but then it might also just be true that Gordon Brown saw gold as an unproductive asset and thought that he could do so much more by selling the gold and 'investing'  the proceeds. The trouble is that when Gordon Brown said 'investing', he too often meant wasting.

Saturday, 23 June 2012

No it won't

The BBC love to hate anything Western, especially English and long for the day when the West has been eclipsed by the East and Christianity by Islam. I found this comment on the BBC news website that I thought worth examining.

'There has certainly been language shift in Los Angeles, most notably a doubling of the number of Spanish speakers (those who speak the language at home) in the past 30 years from 1.5 million in 1980 to 3.6 million in 2010 (including Spanish Creole).
Internationally, Spanish is also significant and futuregazers have gone as far as predicting that one day Mandarin Chinese could become the default language of business worldwide.

Speaking to the New York Times in 2009, French linguist Claude Hagege, author of On the Death and Life of Languages, said that Hindi and Mandarin could replace English some day.'
The bloody obvious point being missed is that there are more speakers of Mandarin Chinese and Hindi than there are of English BUT (and it's a bloody big but) Hindi is not even spoken by all Indians, nor Mandarin by all Chinese. Indeed the common language of India is English, as it is the second language of so many people. But how many Chinese speak Hindi? How many Indians speak Mandarin? The reason English is the international language is not that it is the first language of the majority of people but that it is the first or second language of more people than any other language and the only chance of a common language.

Saturday, 10 December 2011

A fine example of refusing to call a spade, a spade...

"Anti-Islamic Hyperventilation" Time Magazine   Dec 8:
 
Exchange from hearing, Wed. between Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Calif., and Paul Stockton, Assistant Defense Secretary for Homeland Defense: The terrorist threat/Hasan/Ft Hood massacre
 
 
"REPRESENTATIVE DANIEL LUNGREN (R-CA): Secretary Stockton, are we at war with violent Islamist extremism?
MR. STOCKTON: No, sir. We are at war with al-Qaida, its affiliates –
REP. LUNGREN: OK, I understand that. My question is, is violent Islamist extremism at war with us?
MR. STOCKTON: No, sir. We are being attacked by al-Qaida and its allies.
REP. LUNGREN: Is al-Qaida — can it be described as being an exponent of violent Islamist extremism?
MR. STOCKTON: They — al-Qaida are murderers with an ideological agenda –
REP. LUNGREN: No, I — that’s not my question. That wasn’t my question. My question was, is al-Qaida acting out violent Islamist extremism?
MR. STOCKTON: Al-Qaida is a violent organization dedicated to overthrowing the values that we intend to advance –
REP. LUNGREN: So is it yes or no?
MR. STOCKTON: Can I hear the question again? I’ll make it as clear as I can. We are not at war with Islam. And it is not –
REP. LUNGREN: I didn’t ask that — I did not ask that, sir. I asked whether we’re at war with violent Islamist extremism. That’s my question.
MR. STOCKTON: No, we’re at war with al-Qaida and its affiliates.
REP. LUNGREN: Well, al-Qaida — how does al-Qaida define itself? Are they dedicated to violent Islamist extremism?
MR. STOCKTON: Al-Qaida would love to convince Muslims around the world that the United States is at war with Islam.
REP. LUNGREN: I didn’t say that.
MR. STOCKTON: That’s a prime propaganda tool.
REP. LUNGREN: Sir –
MR. STOCKTON: And I’m not going to aid and abet that effort to advance their propaganda goal.
REP. LUNGREN: No, no, my question is, is there a difference between Islam and violent Islamist extremism?
MR. STOCKTON: Sir, with great respect, I don’t believe it’s helpful to frame our adversary as Islamic with any set of qualifiers that we might add, because we are not at war with Islam. 


Thanks to 'noggin' at Biased-BBC for the spot that illustrates the linguistic and mental tangles that too many Western governments get into when discussing Islamists.

Monday, 17 October 2011

I am sorry to ruin your Monday morning but economically we are well and truly f***ed

Ludwig von Mises wrote that 'there is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.'
 
The Central Banks and their associates in government are trying to put off the evil day but that day will come. The problem is that Capitalism has been replaced by Corporatism is recent years and thus whilst Capitalism works through trial and error in free markets to find an optimal allocation of resources, Corporatism works by fixing the markets. We have had over a decade of central banks deliberately providing cheap & easy credit thus negating the existence of Capitalism. Under Capitalism losses are penalised, under corporatism loss making banks are instead bailed out or otherwise protected - thus we reach the position where a €2 trillion bailout fund is required. That's not €2 billion but €2 trillion; I have explained before how big a trillion is.

Central banks egged on by unscrupulous governments kept interest rates far too low for far too long. This engineered a boom, a fake one but a boom nonetheless, this boom enabled Gordon Brown and others to claim that they had 'ended boom and bust' and to increase taxation just less than the increase in (albeit fake ) wealth that the middle classes experienced as house prices rose. The US housing bubble also resulted from easy credit and liberal guilt over the comparative difficulty some blacks had in getting mortgage credit.

The trouble is that we are now in a situation where it is not the banks that might fail, but countries. If the banks are "too big to fail" what about Greece, Italy, Spain, the UK the USA?

We are well and truly f***ed, there's bugger all most people can do about it and as savings become worthless through the vicissitudes of inflation we may as well spend the lot - the decision is should it be a new car, new kitchens and holidays... or gold, generators and guns?

Sunday, 22 May 2011

Though for the Day

"It is incredible what political simpletons Jews are. They shut their eyes to one of the most elementary rules of life, that you must not "meet halfway" those who do not want to meet you."
Vladimir Jabotinsky, The Ethics of The Iron Wall

Wednesday, 20 April 2011

The cost of Gordon Brown's stupidity

Gordon Brown and his advisers ignored experts' advice and sold 400 tonnes of British gold reserves in a pre-announced sale that helped drive the price received paid for the gold down to a 20 year low. Gordon Brown managed to achieve a price of under $300 an ounce for the gold, the price of gold has just breached the $1,500 per ounce level. I calculate that as 1 tonne equates to 35,273.9619 ounces, Gordon Brown and his advisers including Ed Balls and Ed Miliband have lost the country around $16.9 billion which is around £10.3 billion - that's £10,300,000,000 - so far on this deal.

Gordon Brown - economic genius fit to lead the IMF or dangerous idiot who preferably should stand trial for his reckless stupidity or at least face the deserved ridicule of this country?

I have posted before on this matter and will do so again. The BBC however will not remind us of the stupidity of Gordon Brown in selling gold to 'achieve a better balance in the portfolio by increasing the proportion held in currency' as protecting Labour from attack is one of their top priorities.

Friday, 11 February 2011

The con that is Wind Power

'We expect that over time we will be able to reduce support for wind power and other renewable energy technologies as they become more economic, but it is not possible to put a specific timescale on this.'
'Coalition' Energy Minister Charles Hendry has told MPs that UK governments had spent £2.2 billion supporting wind power over the last eight years and that it was impossible to predict when Wind Power would prove profitable without grants. If this is the case, why are we wasting the money; it's not as though Man Made Climate Change is real.

Sunday, 23 January 2011

'Officials at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport carrying out a so-called ‘equality impact assessment’ to ensure minority groups are able to take a full part in the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee celebrations next summer.'

'Officials at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport carrying out a so-called ‘equality impact assessment’ to ensure minority groups are able to take a full part in the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee celebrations next summer.'

There's more, but I just don't have the energy.... read The mail instead.

Sunday, 26 December 2010

The good - United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Canada, Netherlands, Australia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Israel, Latvia, Lithuania, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Palau, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

The good - Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Netherlands, Palau, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Sweden, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, United Kingdom, United States.

The cowardly - Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Cyprus, Finland, France, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Samoa, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Tonga, Ukraine.

The mad, bad, evil, misinformed or maybe or bullied - Afghanistan, Algeria, Argentina, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Chile, China, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, Gabon, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Qatar, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Singapore, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Swaziland, Syria, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

UN Watch have the details relating to the United Nations' Durban Declaration and Programme of Action aka Durban 3 vote.