Craig at isthebbcbiased.blogspot.co.uk has a great spot http://isthebbcbiased.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/managing-expectations.html about how the BBC try to minimise criticism of immigration.
The BBC as usual disgust me.
'... from April 2015 through last night, the Clinton/Uranium/Russia story has been granted only 3 minutes, 21 seconds of evening news coverage — less than one-half of one percent of the coverage doled out just this year to the conspiracy theories surrounding Trump and Russia.'
More pushing the Trump Russia narrative whist ignoring the Clinton Russia story all over the mainstream media including the BBC.
Mark Steyn and Tucker Carlson on the Russian links to US political parties. The sort of talk that you won't hear on the VOTE HILLARY CLINTON BBC
Bless the biased BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41520842 for trying to protect their Democratic Party allies with this line:
'The DNC said its new leadership had nothing to do with creation of the dossier.'
So that's OK then?
'The International Judo Federation is demanding that at the Abu Dhabi Grand Slam, "all delegations, including the Israeli delegation, shall be treated absolutely equally in all aspects, without any exception."
The International Judo Federation (IJF) sent a letter to the United Arab Emirates Judo Federation demanding that "all delegations, including the Israeli delegation, shall be treated absolutely equally in all aspects, without any exception."
The Federation's intervention came following a request by the World Jewish Congress (WJC) to intervene on behalf of the Israeli judo team competing in the Abu Dhabi Grand Slam this week.
Abu Dhabi is barring Israel's judo team from donning national symbols and playing the Jewish state's national anthem during a major tournament in the country.
Additionally, the 12 Israeli athletes participating in the Abu Dhabi Judo Grand Slam tournament from October 26-28 cannot include the letters "ISR" to identify their nationality on their uniforms.'
More here https://worldisraelnews.com/judo-federation-demands-end-arab-discrimination-israel/ but not on the BBC.
The BBC likes to portray itself as deeply anti discrimination but there's one discrimination that the institutionally anti Israel BBC will allow and that's discrimination against Israelis. So don't expect to read about this news on the BBC website, do expect to read about any criticism of Israel though.
The BBC make me sick but also very angry, their incessant anti Israel reporting has been responsible for increasing anti semitism in Britain, that allied with the huge increase in the Muslim population of Britain.
The current Labour Party leadership has a problem with Israel because of their identification with revolutionary socialist movements and an anti American/imperialism obsession. Those and the decision that pandering to the anti Jewish sentiments so prevalent in the Muslim community means more votes.
The BBC and the Labour Party will destroy this country if we don't stand up to them.
'Unidentified perpetrators hurled stones and shattered the window of a synagogue in Malmo, a city in southern Sweden.
The incident occurred earlier this month but was only first reported in the Swedish media Tuesday after police arrived at the building a day earlier because of a separate incident, which turned out to be a false alarm, the Aftonbladet daily reported.
Fredrik Sieradzki, a spokesman for the local Jewish community, told the TT news agency that the earlier incident happened on October 7 and that it is not yet clear whether it was a hate crime targeting the congregation. There are no suspects.'
More here https://www.timesofisrael.com/stone-throwers-shatter-window-of-synagogue-in-sweden/ but obviously not on the BBC for whom acknowledgement of the following facts would go completely against the fake narrative that they are trying to push.
'Dozens of anti-Semitic incidents are recorded annually in Malmo, a city where first- and second- generation immigrants from the Middle East make up one-third of a population of roughly 300,000. Several hundred Jews live there.'
She calls him a liar, he keeps saying "people like you". Who's in the right, you decide.
'The Israeli judo team, which was supposed to fly to the United Arab Emirates via Istanbul for the Grand Slam event, was stranded at Ben Gurion Airport after Turkish Airlines refused to allow them on its plane, Channel 1 reported.
The 12 Israeli jukokas were supposed to receive their visas to the United Arab Emirates in Istanbul and arrive for the competition tonight (Monday). The team will now have to travel to Amman to receive the visas instead.
Moshe Ponte, the president of the Israel Judo Association, said: "We will not give, even if we have to reach Abu Dhabi on foot. Now we have to fly to Amman to get visas there instead of flying to Istanbul as we planned. We are looking to change our tickets. We will arrive after 14 hours of waiting in Amman. We may arrive exhausted, but we will not give up."
The Israeli judo team has already experienced discrimination in the competition in Abu Dhabi. The team will not be allowed to compete under the Israeli flag during the event, and will be the only nation prevented from doing so. The team will also not be allowed hear their national anthem, "Hatikvah," should they win.'
If this was athletes from a Muslim majority country having problems getting onto a British or American plane then the BBC would be giving space to the news and voicing their disgust. But as it's Israel the institutionally anti Israel BBC will ignore the news.
I wonder how many journalists at the BBC agree with the discriminatory treatment that is meted out to Israel? Does Jeremy Corbyn agree with it?
More here http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/237080
Guido Fawkes reports https://order-order.com/2017/10/23/hamas-praises-corbyn-boycotting-balfour-dinner/
'Terror group Hamas has welcomed Jeremy Corbyn's decision to boycott a dinner commemorating the centenary of the Balfour Declaration. Jez was criticised by the Jewish Leadership Council on Saturday after declining an invitation to a dinner celebrating the British government's support for a Jewish state. A tweet backing Corbyn's decision was then sent from the official Hamas English account.'
Jeremy Corbyn is seemingly in step with a terrorist group, what a shock.
Mayor Sadiq Khan's £10 T-Charge, which mainly applies to diesel and petrol vehicles registered before 2006, has come into force.
It covers the same area as the existing congestion charge zone, bumping up the cost to £21.50 for those affected.
Opponents said the scheme would "disproportionately penalise London's poorest drivers".
London drivers to be milked again but hey that's what we're here for.
Some of Diane Abbott's greatest moments, from a very long list.
'German police have arrested a man in Munich after four people were lightly injured by a knife attacker.'
More here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-41705587
Hmm...
The insanity continues...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-41702662
'A goodwill ambassador may be a largely symbolic role, but the symbolism of giving it to a man whose leadership of Zimbabwe has, critics say, coincided with a collapse of its health service, and major human rights abuses, will be very unpopular.'
The election of tyrants, dictators and generally evil people and countries to positions within the United Nations and similar supranational bodies is disgusting.
Those countries who pay for this insanity should withdraw from these organisations immediately.
The BBC finally report on Clive Lewis's shameful remarks but only once they've got Clive Lewis's response.
'A Labour MP has apologised for using "offensive and unacceptable" language at an event last month.' we are told here
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-41697615 with the clear subtext that that's the end of the matter, nothing to worry about, let's draw a veil over the matter.
Now imagine that this had been a Conservative MP rather than a Labour MP, would an apology be enough to quell the outrage? I think not, the BBC would scent blood and would go for the Conservative MP's jugular.
Luckily for Clive Lewis, he's a Labour MP, a black Labour MP indeed and thus will be protected by the Labour Party's propaganda arm, the BBC.
It seems that Clive Lewis has form in this area, this from the BBC in April 2015:
'An election candidate has apologised for joking that he "could be caught with my pants down behind a goat with Ed Miliband at the other end".
Labour's Clive Lewis, who is standing in Norwich South, made the comment in an interview with the New Statesman.'
Now it's personal!
Imagine that a Conservative MP and possible future Conservative party leader was shown on video to say "Get on your knees bitch". How much outrage from the left-wing commentariat would there be? How much airspace would the BBC give to this outrage? How often would the calls for this Conservative politician to quit be repeated? How many times would the BBC give time to left-wing thinkers to explain how the Conservatives were still the nasty party and irredeemably sexist?
By way of contrast have the BBC even reported that 'a video has emerged of Clive Lewis on stage at a Momentum event telling an audience member "Get on your knees, b*tch".'
More, including the video, at Guido Fawkes https://order-order.com/2017/10/20/clive-lewis-get-knees-btch/ but still not a word on the Labour Party's propaganda arm, the BBC.
The Russians, there was collusion between Trump and the Russians, indict Trump! Based on next to no evidence it would seem, but still the mainstream media push the line.
But when there is evidence of collusion between Hillary Clinton and the Russians, not a word on the mainstream media. Odd that!
"The omission is the most powerful form of lie, and it is the duty of the historian to ensure that those lies do not creep into the history books." – George Orwell
A fascinating article at WUWT https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/10/19/in-australia-faulty-bom-temperature-sensors-contribute-to-hottest-year-ever/ do read the whole piece, here's the end of that article:
'While it may be the expectation of the Australian community that temperatures would be measured consistent with some standard, clearly this is not the case. The only real question now, is whether the Bureau is such a big and important Australian institution that, like Harvey Weinstein, it's transgressions are best ignored – at least for the moment, not under the current Minister's watch, what? I had my eyes closed.'
Thanks to Jennifer Marohasy who is a Senior Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs and blogs at jennifermarohasy.com.
'London's Metropolitan Police Force has said it will give up on investigating many instances of "low-level" crime such as shoplifting and vandalism, saying it is "not practical" to fight them in a time of cutbacks.
Deputy Assistant Commissioner Mark Simmons claimed that giving up on investigating many offences was necessary so police constables' efforts could be "focused on serious crime and cases where there is a realistic chance that we will be able to solve it."
The move has raised eyebrows among members of the public, considering recent reports that the Met detained 867 out of the 3,395 people known to have been arrested for "offensive" online comments under the Malicious Communications Act in 2016 — an increase of 53 per cent for the force area since 2014.'
More bizarre police priorities all over the UK.
The always excellent isthebbcbiased.blogspot.co.uk has a great spot http://isthebbcbiased.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/norman-smith-sadly.html relating to another impeccably unbiased BBC 'journalist', thus time the BBC's assistant political editor Norman Smith. Isthebbcbiased.blogspot.co.uk has the transcript of Norman Smith 'letting slip a word he ought not to have let slip'.
It's odd how whenever a BBC 'journalist' lets slip a word or phrase that indicates bias, it's always bias in one direction. Most odd, but rest assured that the BBC is completely unbiased.
'A new Shia Muslim mega mosque and Islamic center – measuring over 3,500 square meters and with room for 3,000 people -- has opened in Golders Green, one of only two largely Jewish areas in London. The Shia Muslim religious center, Hussainiyat Al-Rasool Al-Adham, owns the mosque.
... After the BBC left the building in 2005, a Jewish group wanted to convert the building into a place of worship but was rejected, because the planning applications stipulated that the building should be used for entertainment.
In March 2007, it was purchased by an evangelical Christian center. After the church center closed, the Hussainiyat Al-Rasool Al-Adham center acquired it.
Because the building is a so-called grade II building, special permission is needed to change the purpose of the building. The Hussainiyat Al-Rasool Al-Adham has applied to the local city council for permission to use the building as a 'place of worship'. The application is still pending-- and worship there is therefore, strictly speaking, illegal -- but the mosque is operating nevertheless. It apparently officially opened on September 8, and has been in frequent use since, as is evident from the many photos shared on the Hussainiyat Al-Rasool Al-Adham Facebook page.'
More here https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11183/london-new-mega-mosque but obviously not on the institutionally pro Islam BBC.
An Islamic centre and Mosque right in the heart of one of the three Jewish areas of London, what could possibly go wrong?
'Extricating Britain from Europe will be the greatest challenge this country has faced since the Second World War – or its greatest crisis.
But in Nick Clegg's view there is nothing remotely inevitable about Brexit – except that it will be deeply damaging if it happens. But can we stop it? How can it be done? Haven't the people spoken?
Nick Clegg argues that our democratic mandate is not trounced by the referendum. We are free to reconsider. Calmly and rationally, he will explain precisely how this historic mistake can be reversed – and what you can do to make sure that it is.'
All the above in conversation with the BBC's Emily Maitlis. I wonder if she'd also be willing to host a how to keep Brexit on track conversation with Nigel Farage?
More here http://www.howtoacademy.com/courses/stop-brexit-nick-clegg-conversation-emily-maitlis
More pro Remain propaganda all over the BBC.
It's fascinating how the BBC manage to report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-41643467 on the proposed Parliamentary seat boundary changes without mentoring that the current constituency boundaries give an unfair advantage to the Labour Party of around 30 seats.
I suppose that an organisation that too often acts as the propaganda arm of the Labour Party wouldn't mention such inconvenient facts.
This BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-41625544 includes this caption description and opening to the article:
'Sebastian Kurz has taken the conservatives further to the right
Austrians are voting in a general election in which the frontrunner, conservative People's Party (ÖVP) leader Sebastian Kurz, is just 31.'
Remind me have the BBC ever described Jeremy Corbyn as having 'taken the Labour Party further to the left'. I think not and I think we all know why. For the BBC the right is bad and the left is good. The BBC is not an independent unbiased news reporting organisation, too often it acts instead as the propaganda arm of the Labour Party.
I've just listened to the last twenty minutes or so of Maajid Nawaz's LBC programme http://www.lbc.co.uk/ this afternoon. Quite revealing the calls from Muslims whose reaction to the banning of sex segregation in schools was "what about the Jews".
I'd say I was shocked but I've heard this sort of talk before. When Islam is criticised then some Muslims have an automatic "what about the Jews" reaction. The hatred that some Muslims have for Jews is visceral and obsessive.
Is history repeating itself?
I've posted the full version of this video before but this information is worth repeating.
The BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-41608722 that 'Penguins die in 'catastrophic' Antarctic breeding season'
Global warming? Not cold enough? Not enough ice?
'All but two Adelie penguin chicks have starved to death in their east Antarctic colony, in a breeding season described as "catastrophic" by experts.'
Global warming? Not cold enough? Not enough ice?
'It was caused by unusually high amounts of ice late in the season, meaning adults had to travel further for food.'
Too much ice! How inconvenient for the BBC climate change brainwashing.
'The vast majority of the public believes "no deal is better than a bad deal" according to this new Sky Data poll. A decisive 74% agreed the country should walk away rather than accept a punishment deal. Just 26% think "any deal is better than no deal"…
The sentiment holds true across the age range. Among 18-34 year-olds support for"no deal is better than a bad deal" is at 75%. Among 35-54 year-olds it is 74% and 76% among those aged 55+. '
You can read more here https://order-order.com/2017/10/12/74-say-no-deal-is-better-than-a-bad-deal/ at Guido Fawkes but obviously not on the BBC where support for the EU and thus vehement opposition to Brexit is de rigeur.
'Egypt and Israel, Hamas' chief adversary, have maintained a blockade around Gaza since 2006. Hamas calls for Israel's destruction and has fought three wars with the Jewish state.
Israel resolutely opposes any involvement by Hamas in the Palestinian Authority. It considers Hamas a terrorist group and has said it will not deal with a Palestinian government that contains Hamas members.
Hamas as a whole, or in some cases its military wing, is designated a terrorist group by Israel, the US, EU, UK and other powers.'
So report the institutionally anti Israel BBC here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-41591450
Lets unpick that a little.
'Egypt and Israel, Hamas' chief adversary, have maintained a blockade around Gaza since 2006. Hamas calls for Israel's destruction and has fought three wars with the Jewish state.'
It's good that the BBC recognise that Egypt is blockading Gaza, they often try to minimise reporting of that fact.
Do Hamas just call for Israel's destruction or the death of all Jews? I get confused between the statements of Hamas and Hezbollah, maybe their friend Jeremy Corbyn could advise me on this matter.
If Hamas calls for Israel's destruction then how should Israel make peace with Hamas? What would be a fair compromise for Israel to agree to? Maybe the destruction of just half of Israel? Perhaps Jeremy Bowen could consider that matter.
'Israel resolutely opposes any involvement by Hamas in the Palestinian Authority. It considers Hamas a terrorist group and has said it will not deal with a Palestinian government that contains Hamas members.'
Does the BBC consider that Hamas is a terrorist group? Do the BBC agreed with the policies of Hamas?
'Hamas as a whole, or in some cases its military wing, is designated a terrorist group by Israel, the US, EU, UK and other powers.'
Which other powers? Do the BBC disagree with these countries, if so why?
'Hillary Clinton Gets More Big Bucks Support From Harvey Weinstein, JLo & Sarah Jessica Parker.
Something in the neighborhood of $1.8 million was raised at Harvey Weinstein's star-packed fundraiser for Hillary Clinton in New York City Monday night, sources tell Deadline.
The event for 50 or so Clinton supporters at Weinstein's Manhattan home drew some major Hollywood names, including Leonardo DiCaprio,Jennifer Lopez, Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick, Candice Bergen, Bethenny Frankel and designers Vera Wang and Tory Burch.'
More here http://deadline.com/2016/06/hillary-clinton-fundraiser-harvey-weinstein-leonardo-dicaprio-jennifer-lopez-1201776300/ but not on the pro Hillary Clinton BBC.
'Crucially, as his email to staff acknowledged, it (the BBC) also has to be impartial. That is an intellectual and moral challenge for all journalists - and also a vital one of course. My sense from speaking to him is that, as he says, you're told when you join the BBC that you have to leave your opinions at the door... '
That's from following the 'read more' link on the page relating to the James Harding leaving the BBC next year story.
More here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-41572764
Impartial? Seriously? How can any BBC employee say this with a straight face?
This would be funny were it not so unbelievable and demonstrably untrue. Beeb Bias Craig has some great old figures, and is now at isthebbcbiased.blogspot.co.uk doing the same.
The BBC has to be impartial, ha f***ing ha!
The BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-41572378 that 'James Harding to stand down as director of BBC News at the beginning of 2018'
So who will replace him?
A woman, obviously.
A woman of colour, almost as obviously.
A Labour politician or ex politician, or at least a Labour supporter.
So how about Diane Abbott?
If the BBC ignore the first two criteria above, then how about Alastair Campbell?
Let's be honest, neither of them could push the BBC's news coverage any further to the left. Why pretend to be a source of unbiased news, BBC, just come out as the propaganda arm of the Labour Party that you are.
I hope this isn't really the case but fear that in this political correctness outranks all UK it probably is.
Read the story here https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4648168/mulumebet-girma-217-tube-bombing-london-southwark-council/ but obviously not on the BBC where the safety of the British public is much less important than virtue signalling.
As I believe I have said before, this country is well and truly fucked.
'... peaceful demonstration in London yesterday, which had attracted a crowd in the tens of thousands - some have suggested as many as 70,000.
It was an anti-extremism march organised by a group calling itself the Football Lads Alliance. Shamefullly, there has not been a word about the march from the corporation (or indeed from any other part of the mainstream media). In fact, the Football Lads Alliance is not mentioned on the BBC website at all.
Yet the BBC is quite happy to report a protest by 150 people demanding changes to disability benefits and a protest by "hundreds" about the Grenfell Tower fire. '
That's from the Bishop Hill blog http://www.bishop-hill.net/blog/2017/10/8/media-blackout.html
The BBC is not an impartial news reporting organisation, it's a campaigning left wing site. Since that is the case why should one be criminalised if one refuses to pay to receive their their propaganda?
'If you just took everyone in the BNP and everyone who votes for them and shot them in the back of the head, there would be a brighter future for us all.'
Jeremy Hardy Speaks to the Nation, BBC Radio 4, 13 September 2004
'Officials at Michigan State University investigated and released strongly worded statements earlier this week because a female student claimed to find a noose on the handle of a stairwell door in a residence hall.
Turns out, the alleged "noose" was just a stray shoelace.
The first report of the packaged leather shoelace someone decided was a noose occurred on Wednesday morning, reports the Lansing State Journal.
Police — and, of course, the office of institutional equity — investigated the shoelace after a female student reported it as a noose.
The president of Michigan State University, Lou Anna Simon, rapidly released a statement denouncing nooses and describing the shoelace hanging on a dorm door in Holden Hall as "a racial incident."
"A student reported a noose was hung outside of her room," Simon's statement said. "I want to recognize the courage it took for the student to report this incident."
"This type of behavior is not tolerated on our campus," the taxpayer-funded school president also said. "No Spartan should ever feel targeted based on their race, or other ways in which they identify. A noose is a symbol of intimidation and threat that has a horrendous history in America."
By Wednesday afternoon, campus police managed to locate a shoelace which matched the "noose." The police found it outside the dormitory.'
More hysteria about 'racism' all over university campuses and the mainstream media.
This comment on biasedbbc.org https://biasedbbc.org/blog/2017/10/06/weekend-open-thread-165/#comments really struck a chord:
'Emmanuel Goldstein on October 6, 2017 at 4:10 pm
I looked up on google for the recipients of the eu money as opposed to those like us who pay in.
Poland gets about £15 billion a year.
Good for them.If Poland were to leave the eu does that mean they would receive £50-£100 billion (for future commitments of course) and that the eu would have to pay them maybe £10 billion a year to be able to trade with them.
Sounds ridiculous but it is perfect logic.
If Catalonia leaves Spain do they have to pay Spain tens of billions and then, depending on if they are receivers or payers to the eu, have to settle up with the eu as well.
How much would it cost Scotland to leave the UK if they vote to leave in their next referendum.
After centuries together…how many billions.
Or are we absolutely unique in that we are expected to give tens of billions to leave the eu and billions more to buy stuff from the eu.'
The sort of questions that will never be given space on the BBC where anti Brexit propaganda is spewed incessantly and without any shame. The BBC ceased to be impartial years ago but its support for the EU has lead it from partiality to campaigning and for that reason, amongst others, I detest it.
Guido Fawkes has more news of Jeremy Corbyn's links with vile anti Semites here https://order-order.com/2017/10/06/corbyn-gave-tour-parliament-anti-semitic-conspiracy-theorist/
'Today it emerges Tapash Abu Shaim received a tour of Parliament given by none other than Jeremy Corbyn. Jez tweeted to Shaim to say it was "a pleasure" showing him and other Palestine Solidarity Campaign members around. Shaim and Jez still follow each other on Twitter. Jez is a patron of PSC; sources tell Guido Shaim is a high-ranking member.'
Not a word about this will appear on the institutionally anti Israel BBC. The Labour Party is now lead by people who's anti Israel obsession leads them to consort with the sort of people who hold views that should disgust right-minded people.
Too many people in the Labour Party have decided that as there are many more Muslim voters than Jewish ones in the UK then it makes sense to pander to the anti Semitic elements of that religion.
That that decision dovetails so neatly with the let's obsessive anti Israel ideology is a plus for them and one that links neatly with the BBC who have been spewing anti Israel lies for years.
Emily Longworth is not happy, but she is sweary.
Included in this BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41520842 is this:
'... President Trump said: "The Iranian regime supports terrorism and exports violence and chaos across the Middle East."'
I note that the BBC don't dispute this claim. It would be hard so to do but acknowledging Iran's exporting of Islamic terrorism would be hard for an organisation with the pro Islam mindset of the BBC.
'Rotherham Council has been shortlisted for the Best Social Work Employer of the Year prize in the acclaimed Social Worker of the Year Awards 2017 as a result of their outstanding work with vulnerable children.'
Not a parody but reality http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/news/article/1326/rotherham_council_in_line_to_be_social_work_employer_of_the_year
Words fail me.
'A Labour member who shared anti-Semitic conspiracy theories blaming Israel for 9/11, ISIS and the Charlie Hebdo attack was allowed to host an exhibition stall inside the party's conference last month, Guido can reveal.
Tapash Abu Shaim was seen manning the Palestine Solidarity Campaign desk inside the conference centre secure zone. Shaim was given a pass despite his social media activities being reported to the party in August and concerns being raised last year over his attendance at Labour conference 2016.
Shaim's promotion of anti-Semitic conspiracies on social media has been well documented. In the wake of the January 2015 Paris terror attack he posted: "US politician Jack Lindblad claims Charlie Hebdo killings were 'by US and Mossad' to keep Israel's Netanyahu in power".
In another post he labelled terror group Daesh "ISIS = International Solidarity for Israeli Sentiment". He shared yet another which read: "confirmed ISIS is a Mossad united state of IsraHELL creation".'
There's more here at Guido Fawkes
https://order-order.com/2017/10/05/anti-semitic-conspiracy-theorist-ran-stall-labour-conference/ but obviously not on the institutionally anti Israel BBC who are also the propaganda arm of the Labour Party. There's more Muslim votes than Jewish votes so anti Semitisn has quite a hold amongst the left wing that now control the Labour Party.
' "Debauchery" and "inciting debauchery" are the accusations generally directed by officialdom towards Egyptians perceived as gay.
"In a matter of days the Egyptian security forces have rounded up dozens of people and carried out five anal examinations," Najia Bounaim, North Africa campaigns director at Amnesty International, said in a statement on Monday.
These developments signal "a sharp escalation in the authorities' efforts to persecute and intimidate members of the LGBTI community following the rainbow flag incident", said Bounaim.'
More here http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2017/10/04/egyptian-government-crackdown-homosexuals-spreads-anal-examinations/ but obviously not on the BBC or the LGBTQRPSDFGHJKL activist sites where demonising Israel is de rigeur but criticising an Islamic country is verboten.
The key word in this BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-41493682 being 'could'.
The word 'could' appears many times and that's the key point. Many things 'could' happen, especially if they rely on the same flawed data as other scientific research.
'An Islamist terrorist bomb plot was foiled in Paris on Saturday after an improvised explosive device was found near Paris Saint-Germain football club.
The device, consisting of four gas cylinders covered in petrol, were found in the upmarket 16th arrondissement near the Parc des Princes stadium, just hours before PSG were playing a league game.
Five men have been arrested, including a known Islamist extremist who was meant to be under surveillance.'
More here http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4943596/Bomb-Paris-St-Germain-football-ground.html but not on the BBC where anti President Donald Trump, Theresa May and Boris Johnson propaganda takes precedence.
'I told the hard left that I earned £140K a year. They attacked me as being one of the few.
I told them that I was privately educated. They attacked me as being one of the few.
I told them I spent my childhood in a seven bedroom house.They attacked me as being one of the few.
I told them that my pension pot was worth considerable more than £1M.They attacked me as being one of the few.
I told them that my name was Jeremy Corbyn and the hard left said that they would vote for me.'
Thanks to MarkyMark on October 2, 2017 at 2:52 pmMarcher Lord @MarcherLord1 – Sep 28 on https://biasedbbc.org/blog/2017/10/02/start-the-week-open-thread-144/#comments
The Mail reports http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4939586/Britain-s-second-blind-judge-no-idea-law.html
'The country's second blind person to reach a judicial post wholly failed 'to meet the standards that are demanded by the office of a judge', according to a panel's ruling.
The three-strong bench of senior judges ruled 'shambolic' 64-year-old immigrationjudge Amir Ali Majid had 'very little idea of either his own (limited) powers or the content of the law that is in issue'.
Their ruling was the result of appeals relating to 13 cases heard recently by Judge Majid.
Judges from the immigration and asylum chamber's upper tribunal allowed 12 appeals against the judge.'
You'll not find anything about this on the BBC. Presumably because at the BBC they are celebrating the diversity of having a blind Muslim judge, so much better than another stale white male judge. So he got a few decisions wrong (according to presumably white senior judges) that's a very small price to pay for diversity, isn't it?
Read this BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41459237 and you'll be shocked to learn:
'Canadian police have confirmed they are investigating possible acts of terrorism after multiple incidents in Edmonton, Alberta, on Saturday night.
...
Police said an Islamic State (IS) group flag was found in one of the vehicles.'
The BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-41461107 on yet another knife attack, this time in Marseille. I'm sure that you won't be surprised by the last line of the BBC report...
'Two people have died in a knife attack at Marseille's St Charles train station, according to media reports.
...
An unnamed official told France's Le Monde newspaper that the assailant had cried "Allahu akbar".'
Quelle surprise...
I'm not a fan of Katie Hopkins but regarding the Labour Party, the magic money tree and the way the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn excluded Brexit from being debated at the party conference, she's on the money.
John Podesta to the COO of Facebook pre the 2016 US Presidential Election;
'Wishing you a happy New Year. 2015 was challenging, but we ended in a good place thanks to your help and support. Look forward to working with you to elect the first woman President of the United States.'
Unbiased media? Not according to WikiLeaks as reported by RT here
https://youtu.be/CUzfdEBqwsA
Do you still trust Facebook to give you unbiased information and not to highlight certain posts over others?
Facebook is as much fake news as CNN, the BBC and most of the mainstream media.
'The referendum on Thursday, 23 June is your chance to decide if we should remain in or leave the European Union.
The government believes it is in the best interests of the UK to remain in the EU.
This is the way to protect jobs, provide security, and strengthen the UK's economy for every family in this country – a clear path into the future, in contrast to the uncertainty of leaving.
This is your decision. The government will implement what you decide.'
Clear enough Remoaners? Obviously not for the BBC and the other EU fanatics. The government promised to implement what the British public decided, a majority voted for Brexit, 'end of'... If a majority had voted Remain would the BBC be giving pro Brexit supporters airtime?
Quote directly taken from the UK government's Brexit publication sent to every UK household, as still available here - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/why-the-government-believes-that-voting-to-remain-in-the-european-union-is-the-best-decision-for-the-uk/why-the-government-believes-that-voting-to-remain-in-the-european-union-is-the-best-decision-for-the-uk
This BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41449299 is rather protective of the BBC record re Jimmy Savile's crimes. The report starts thus:
'The Archbishop of Canterbury has criticised the way the BBC handled sexual abuse by Jimmy Savile.
The Most Rev Justin Welby said the BBC had not shown the same integrity over accusations of child abuse that the Catholic and Anglican churches had.
He was reflecting on changes to society over the past 60 years, in an interview for BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
The BBC said it did not recognise the accusation, and had acted transparently over Savile.'
Transparently? This Guardian report https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jul/29/bbc-savile-expose-newsnight-meirion-jones suggests otherwise:
' BBC journalists will be afraid of speaking out about the next big BBC scandal after seeing how those who tried to expose Jimmy Savile were forced out, according to the former head of investigations at Newsnight.
Merion Jones said the way he and other journalists who complained about the way the BBC handled the scandal were pressured to leave.
He said: "We were told at the time that you won't be sacked, but over a year or two years you'll realise you are being treated as an outsider, that you will never be trusted because you blew the whistle, and you will find yourself leaving," he said.
"I didn't believe that, but I started watching what was going around me."
I think journalists will be afraid of speaking out. This isn't ancient history, I left in February. It looks like no lessons have been learnt."
Jones earlier told Press Gazette that those who tried to expose the handling of the case were seen as "traitors" while executives who tried to suppress the scandal had continued their careers unhindered.
"Everyone involved on the right side of the Savile argument has been forced out of the BBC," he said."There is still sadly a small group of people at the BBC who think that the only problem with Savile was that it was exposed and if it had stayed hushed up, everything would be fine."
Jones's investigation into Savile was pulled by the then Newsnight editor Peter Rippon in December 2011, just weeks before a tribute to the presenter – who is thought to have abused hundreds of children over decades – was broadcast.
Jones said he was told by an employment lawyer that if he sued the BBC, he would win and there would be "no cap on it because it will be a whistleblower case", but the corporation would fight the case for at least a year before settling.
Instead, Jones said he decided to take voluntary redundancy.
Among those who Jones says were also targeted by bosses over Savile included his colleague on the the investigation, Liz Mackean, who left after 23 years with the corporation in April 2014 and now works on Channel 4's Dispatches.
Mackean told Press Gazette: "I didn't feel encouraged to stay. I felt I would do better to work outside the BBC."
Jones and Mackean gave evidence to the Pollard inquiry, which found that "rigid management chains" meant the BBC proved "completely incapable"of handling the Savile case. However, it decided Rippon's decision to pull the Newsnight investigation was "done in good faith" without undue pressure from senior management.
Jones says he and Mackean were told they "would never work for the BBC again" if they co-operated with a Panorama investigation into the scandal called What the BBC Knew. "Lots of efforts were made to block that Panorama," he added.
He says the editor behind the programme, Tom Giles, and the executive put in charge of Savile coverage, Peter Horrocks, who forced it through, were also subsequently squeezed out.
Giles was shifted to a strategy role in May last year and left to become head of ITV current affairs a year later. Horrocks left the BBC earlier this year to become vice-chancellor of the Open University.
Jones also said the way the BBC treated one of Savile's original accusers, Karin Ward, when she was sued by Freddie Starr over comments she made on BBC and ITV, showed how the corporation was prepared to leave whistleblowers out to dry. Ward did not receive any legal support from the BBC until the eve of her trial, which she eventually won."It's an extraordinary thing for the BBC not to support a whistleblower who had appeared on a BBC programme," said Jones. "That's unprecedented as far as I know.""If I was a whistleblower, I would not go to the BBC now unless they announce a big change in their policy."
A BBC spokesman said: "Meirion Jones has made his views known before and we have always been clear that nobody was forced out of the BBC for exposing the Savile scandal."
The Pollard report concluded, following a detailed investigation, that the decision to drop the initial investigation into Jimmy Savile was taken in good faith and not for any improper reason."The publication of the independent investigation into sexual abuse at the BBC overseen by Dame Janet Smith was indefinitely delayed in May after police said it could prejudice ongoing investigations.'
Does that sound transparent to you? Do you believe the BBC?
The BBC are only partly at fault for the political aspect of the reporting of Julia Louis-Dreyfus's announcement that she has breast cancer. This BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41237592 faithfully reports Julia Louis-Dreyfus's words including that she had "fantastic" health insurance through her union.
The BBC doesn't report, for context, that Julia Louis-Dreyfus reportedly earns around $150,000 per episode of VEEP so has no real desperate need for health insurance. Nor do the BBC report, for context, that Julia Louis-Dreyfus is apparently worth upwards of $200 million, maybe more since her multi billionaire father died last year.
Nor do the BBC report, for context, that Julia Louis-Dreyfus is a long time Democrat supporter, per Wikipedia:
'Louis-Dreyfus supported Al Gore's 2000 U.S. presidential bid, and also endorsed Barack Obama's bid for the presidency in 2008[70] and 2012.[71] She appeared in a video that urged President Obama to reject the proposal of the Keystone XL pipeline, arguing that if the pipeline ever were to leak, it would cause mass pollution across the U.S.[72]
...
During the 2016 Democratic National Convention, Louis-Dreyfus announced her endorsement of Hillary Clinton for the United States presidential election of that year.[75]
In her acceptance speech at the 2017 Screen Actors Guild Awards, she denounced President Donald Trump's executive order of travel ban as "un-American," and said, "My father fled religious persecution in Nazi-occupied France."[76]'
For the record, I loved Julia Louis-Dreyfus's creation Elaine Benes in Seinfeld and love her portrayal of the seemingly inept and amoral Selina Meyer in VEEP. Her politics I'm less a fan of and the BBC's complicity in reporting her words irritate me even more.
Get well soon Julia Louis-Dreyfus.
'According to research done by a co-conspirator*, Remain panelists have outnumbered Leavers by 137-72, nearly twice as many. 86% of the time the panel was dominated by Remainers…
Leavers have only outnumbered Remainers in 3 episodes.
Remainers dominated in 36.
In 16 editions there was only a single Leaver.
Prominent anti-Brexiteers dominate the repeat appearances with Emily Thornberry and Richard Burgon on 5 times, Alex Salmond and Leanne Wood on 3 times.Jacob Rees-Mogg was the only Brexiteer to appear 3 times.'
More analysis here https://order-order.com/2017/09/28/bbc-question-time-panels-dominated-by-remainers/ and more pro Remainer propaganda all over the institutionally pro EU BBC.
Guido Fawkes reports https://order-order.com/2017/09/26/corbyn-refuses-say-hed-defend-nato-ally-attacked-russia/ that:
'In an interview with CNN Corbyn has refused to say if he would defend a Nato ally attacked by Russia. '
Oddly there's not a word about this news on the Labour Party supporting BBC.
An impartial news reporting organisation would report this but the BBC has long ceased to be that and acts instead as the propaganda arm of the Labour Party.
This BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-41393021 includes this line:
'The Labour Party is making detailed plans for government, including "war-game-type scenario-planning" for events such as "a run on the pound".'
It's odd how the BBC make the Labour Party's preparations for a run on the Pound sound like sensible policy. However when the Conservative Party do reduce the value of the Pound the BBC are all doom and gloom, but with the Labour Party it's all about emphasising the positives.
Everytime I need reminding why the global warming concensus is no such thing, I watch this video.
Guido Fawkes https://order-order.com/2017/09/25/84-of-pfi-projects-started-under-labour/ has some Sky sourced figures that backup what I posted recently about the BBC trying to hide which UK government pushed PFI.
'Sky's Ed Conway has this helpful graph showing 604 PFI projects started under Labour, compared to 112 under the Tories.'
That's 84% Labour and 16% Conservative: you might wonder why, other than promoting the Labour Party, the BBC would seek to obscure the facts
I thought that the BBC were not placing as much attention as usual on the latest Tennessee shooting. Why, I wondered?
Then one line in this BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41382492 gave the game away:
'Nashville Police said the suspected attacker at the Burnette Chapel Church of Christ was Emanuel Kidega Samson, 25, who was originally from Sudan.'
The attacker was a Sudanese, it all starts to make sense.
This BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-41379849 manages to avoid laying the blame for PFI on the Labour Party.
'The PFI model of funding public services such as new schools and hospitals was pioneered by the Conservatives in the 1990s and has continued under successive governments.'
The BBC proud to whitewash history in order to protect their friends in the Labour Party. I'd be disgusted were it not so predictable.
Dinesh D'Souza is also unlikely to be given a soft interview on any BBC programmes.
This story should be headline news but the Hillary Clinton supporting MSM won't touch this story with a bargepole.
The Times reports that:
'The AfD's call for an official inquiry into whether the 63-year-old chancellor broke German law received a boost yesterday from a report in the conservative daily newspaper Die Welt that a non-partisan Bundestag committee had concluded that the decision to open the country's borders should have been put to MPs.'
Good luck finding any reporting of that Bundestag committee on the BBC where support for unfettered Muslim immigration is a higher priority than reporting inconvenient facts.
Hidden away on the BBC website is this report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-41330813 that will not be headline news as it runs counter to the Brexit doom and gloom narrative.
The report ends thus:
' Ben Brettell, senior economist, at stockbrokers Hargreaves Lansdown, said the willingness of consumers to spend was surprising: "The UK consumer continues to show remarkable resilience, with retail sales in August blowing economists' forecasts out of the water."
Spending has defied expectations of a slowdown since the Brexit referendum, and currently seems to be holding up despite weak wage growth and above-target inflation.
"This could bode well for economic growth - the UK economy is heavily reliant on the consumer, and economists had expected falling real incomes to eventually translate into weak retail sales. If this fails to materialise, the economy could see a stronger second half to the year."'
That sort of news must be kept away from the general public at all costs. It's really not the sort of fact that the institutionally pro EU BBC wants to report at all.
The media, especially the BBC, are obsessed with 'improving diversity'. That's diversity of sex, sexual preference, colour and class. However diversity of thought is not wanted.
The Mail http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4889892/No-TV-executive-said-felt-optimistic-Brexit.html reports:
'Alastair Campbell encouraged hundreds of TV executives to help block Brexit after they all refused to say they were optimistic about leaving the EU.
The former Labour spin doctor was addressing the cream of Britain's broadcasting industry at the Royal Television Society conference.
He asked the audience of nearly 280 to raise their hands if they were 'optimistic' about Brexit. But – highlighting concerns of Left-wing bias in an industry that wields enormous power and influence – not a single person did so.
Mr Campbell then urged them to do anything they can to stop Brexit. 'It has got to be stopped,' he said. 'Anything you can do to help stop it, as citizens, as business directors, well frankly do it.''
Unbiased media? Don't make me laugh.
It's odd how many of these technical faults occur when someone says something inconvenient.
The BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41313312 with a straight face that:
'Online jihadist propaganda attracts more clicks in the UK than any other country in Europe, a report has found.
Britain is the fifth-biggest audience in the world for extremist content after Turkey, the US, Saudi Arabia and Iraq, Policy Exchanges study said.
The think tank suggested the UK public would support new laws criminalising reading content that glorifies terror.
The government has told internet companies like Facebook and Google to do more to to remove jihadist material.
Former US military chief General David Petraeus, who wrote a foreword to the report, said efforts to combat online extremism were "inadequate".
He said the bombing of a London Tube train last week "merely underscored once again the ever-present nature of this threat."
"There is no doubting the urgency of this matter," he said."The status quo clearly is unacceptable."'
Why does the UK feature so high in that list? I suppose that the BBC blame a combination of the legacy of empire, Brexit and President Donald Trump, but certainly not Islam.
Are you worried about AI?
Now are you worried about AI?
How about the media giants that may be monitoring everything that you do?
'The pound has hit its highest level against the dollar since the Brexit vote after a senior Bank of England official fuelled speculation it could raise rates in the coming months.
Gertjan Vlieghe, who has previously argued against a rate rise, said the "moment is approaching" when interest rates might need to go up.
The Bank kept rates at 0.25% this week, buthinted at a rise in the future.
Sterling rose more than 1% against the dollar to hit $1.3610.
That was its highest level since 24 June, the day after the Brexit vote.
The pound also gained more than 1% against the euro to rise above 1.13 euros.'
More clenched teeth reporting here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-41278741
Poor BBC: FTSE at record levels, unemployment down, now Sterling above Brexit day fall, it really doesn't help their Brexit means economic doom and gloom agenda.
'The Svakom Gaga Selfie Camera Vibrator costs a meagre £120 and hopes to let you get a good glimpse of your lady parts to see what actually goes on down there during an orgasm.
Everything down to the last muscle-twitch. Sexy.
Footage from one's undercarriage can also be uploaded to all kinds of devices including your computer or smartphone, so you can watch it back later.
The photography device, which doubles up as a vibrator, even lets you Face VagTime.'
Words all but fail me, would anyone really want to FaceTime their or anyone else's vagina?
More here http://www.huffpost.com/uk/entry/6790434?
Interestingly Sky News are reporting here http://news.sky.com/story/police-investigate-explosion-on-london-tube-11036235 that 'Scotland Yard said it was aware of the incident at Parsons Green station on the District Line, near Fulham, in south west London, and officers were in attendance, including counter-terror forces.'
The BBC will do their utmost to avoid using the word terror or terrorist, unless of course the perpetrator is a white 'right winger', in which it will be thrown about liberally.
'London Underground passengers have been hurt after an explosion on a District Line train in south-west London.
Police and paramedics were called at 08:20 BST (07:20 GMT) on Friday to Parsons Green station in Fulham.
Pictures show a white bucket on fire inside a supermarket bag, but do not appear to show extensive damage to the inside of the Tube train carriage.
Witnesses described seeing at least one passenger with facial injuries.'
Here we go again?
Obviously no speculation at the BBC here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41278545
Post the EU Referendum, some on the Remain side have argued that the Leave campaign garnered votes from people who were mislead by the NHS money promise and other factors. I wonder how many more people might have voted Leave if they had realised that the Remainers promises that further EU integration wasn't going to happen were not true. For instance re an EU army Nick Clegg said "It's not going to happen, it doesn't matter whether Nigel Farage says it's going to happen or Jean Claude Juncker… he [Juncker] can't create a European army,"
Yesterday we discovered that the truth was with Nigel Farage not Nick Clegg.
You can read more here http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/09/13/juncker-we-need-fully-fledged-eu-army-2025/ but doubtless not on the institutionally pro EU BBC.
Hillary Clinton has a new book out, purporting to tell us what happened in the 2016 US Presidential Election.
Liz Wheeler thinks she has a better understanding of the reasons.
What do you think? Who's right, Hillary Clinton or Liz Wheeler?
Is the BBC's Nick Robinson neutral on Brexit? Of course not, Guido Fawkes has the figures:
'Robbo has sent 157 tweets about Brexit since 24 June 2016.
3 tweets had a positive sentiment, that's just 2% of his total tweets.
65 tweets were neutral, that's 41%.
89 tweets were negative, that is 57% of his total Brexit tweets having a negative sentiment.'
More here https://order-order.com/2017/09/13/brexit-twitter-sentiment-analysis-robbo-not-neutral/
More BBC bias all over the BBC.
Th BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41241353 on the high incidence of anti Semitic sentiment in the UK in a report that is a trifle odd.
It starts by reporting the incidence in the British public as a whole:
'More than a quarter of British people hold at least one anti-Semitic view, according to a study of attitudes to Jewish people.'
It then linked anti Semitic attitudes to anti Israel attitudes and also Islam.
'Researchers also found a correlation in anti-Jewish and anti-Israel attitudes... when questioned about whether they agreed with a number of statements, including "Jews think they are better than other people", and "Jews exploit holocaust victimhood for their own purposes", 30% agreed with at least one statement.'
."The report said about 70% of the population of Britain had a favourable opinion of Jews and did not hold any anti-Semitic ideas or views.'
That 30:70 split is reported factually, without BBC opinion. Just imagine how the BBC would report similar figures re 'Islamophobic' attitudes, the BBC would be affronted and incensed.
Back to anti Semitism, t he BBC report does have a section headed 'Muslim views' that runs thus, and I comment on each pertinent part:
'The IJPR's researchers questioned 5,466 people face-to-face and online in the winter of 2016/17 - 995 of these were Muslims, although a smaller number of Muslims were included in the statisticians' nationally representative sample.'
So a large sample, we should be able to rely on a sample of that size.
'They found more than half of Muslims (55%) held at least one anti-Semitic attitude.'
More than half, a clear majority, of Muslims hold at least one anti-Semitic attitude. Interestingly the BBC don't report how many Muslims hold many anti-Semitic attitudes, I wonder why.
'Dr Jonathan Boyd, director of the IJPR, said: "Our intention here was not to make any broad generalisations about the Muslim population and their attitudes towards Jews.'
Although the generalisation that Muslims hold anti-Semitic views could be made?
"There does seem to be some relationship between levels of religiosity in the Muslim population and anti-Semitism."
Now that's interesting but the BBC are not interested in investigating why seemingly the more one follows 'the religion of peace' the more one holds anti-Semitic views. Surely any correlation between Islam and anti-Semitism is worthy of asking the question 'why'. An independent unbiased news investigative organisation would ask that question but the BBC is not unbiased in this area.
'The institute said it wanted to promote an "elastic view", making a distinction between people who are clearly anti-Semites, and ideas that are perceived by Jews as anti-Semitic.'
Oddly I don't recall the BBC pushing the idea that there was a difference between people who are 'Islamaphobic' and those who Muslims think are 'Islamaphobic'.
'In December 2016 the government adopted an internationally recognised definition of anti-Semitism: "a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews".'
No comment from the BBC on this?
Then the BBC have a section headed 'Questions on Israel'
'The researchers also questioned people about their views on statements about Israel and the conflict with the Palestinians.
Their report said fewer than one in five people questioned (17%) had a favourable opinion of Israel, whereas about one in three (33%) held an unfavourable view.
The report said: "The position of the British population towards Israel can be characterised as one of uncertainty or indifference, but among those who hold a view, people with sympathies towards the Palestinians are numerically dominant."'
Of course the BBC don't take any credit for this anti Israel sentiment but they have done more than almost any other organisation to raise the level of anti Israel feeling amongst the consumers of its output.
'Dr Boyd said: "Anti-Israel and anti-Jewish views exist both together and in isolation."The higher the level of anti-Israel attitudes measured, the more likely they are to hold anti-Semitic views as well."'
That's a point that I've been making for years, increasing anti Israel feelings inevitable increases anti-Semitism. And that is something that the institutionally anti Israel BBC has been guilty of for years.
There's much more that I could say about this BBC report but I'll end with this line from the report:
'Despite this, the researchers said they found that levels of anti-Semitism in Great Britain were among the lowest in the world.'
The BBC would say, so that's OK then. I'd say it shows just how hated Jews are around the world and that maybe the BBC concentrate on that a little more than incidents of supposed 'Islamophbia'.
I have as going to analyse the various Labour positions on the EU, something that the Labour Party's propaganda arm, the BBC will not do. However why bother when Guido Fawkes has already done just that here https://order-order.com/2017/09/11/labours-brexit-policy-clearly-explained/
'Corbyn is whipping his MPs to vote against Brexit even though he privately supports it. Caroline Flint says MPs should rebel against the Labour whip. Thanks to Keir Starmer Labour officially want to stay in the single market during the transition, even though Corbynistas think the single market is a neoliberal tool of the bosses and want to leave it. Tom Watson says Labour could stay in the single market forever, yet John McDonnell says we have to leave it to respect the referendum result. Frontbenchers Jon Ashworth and Jenny Chapman say Watson is wrong, Heidi Alexander and Alison McGovern say he is right. Diane Abbott and Clive Lewis say Labour must support free movement, Corbyn and Starmer say free movement will end after Brexit. Barry Gardiner says staying in the customs union would be a "disaster", yet Starmer says we should remain in "a" customs union during the transition. Watson says we could stay in indefinitely. Tony Blair says we should just stay in the EU.
Got that?'
The BBC are always very excited by Conservative Party splits over the EU but completely unconcerned by Labour Party ones. The reasons are obvious.
Labour MP Graham Stringer:
"I will vote for the second reading of the bill. The bill is necessary for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union, that was the commitment the Labour party gave in the General Election which was only three months ago."
Not the kind of principles that the institutionally pro EU BBC will support.
News that you won't find reported on the institutionally pro immigration BBC. Although they will bemoan housing shortages as a way of attacking a Conservative government.
'A report by think tank Civitas says that the population of the United Kingdom is growing at a rate of more than 500,000 a year – the equivalent of a new town of about 10,000 people being created every week.
The report, 'Britain's Demographic Challenge: The Implications of the UK's Rapidly Increasing Population', also said that based on current projections, by 2039 there will be nearly 10 million more people in the UK – enough to populate Greater Manchester three times over.
"In the year ending 30 June 2016 the population of the United Kingdom increased by 538,500, equivalent to 1,475 people per day", the report states.
The authors note that this growth in population would require the construction of 641 homes per day – "27 per hour or one every two minutes, night and day".'
I'll repeat that last part "this growth in population would require the construction of 641 homes per day – "27 per hour or one every two minutes, night and day".'
More here http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/09/10/report-uk-population-gains-equivalent-new-town-every-week/ but not on the BBC.
The BBC report http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-41209610 seemingly with a straight face that:
'Saudi Arabia says it has suspended dialogue with Qatar... The four countries (Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt and the UAE) say Qatar supports terrorism - something Doha denies."
How can anyone report that Saudi Arabia has accused another Muslim Arab country of supporting terrorism without at least acknowledging the hypocrisy?
The BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41216679
'Tony Blair has called on the government to introduce a new immigration policy which "reasserts control".
When he was prime minister, Mr Blair's government - unlike most EU countries - did not apply transitional controls on migrants from eastern Europe.'
Quite unbelievable I'd say were it not that there's nothing that vile man could do that would surprise me. He opened the floodgates to massive EU and non EU immigration so as to, at least partly, rub the right's noses in diversity. This policy exacerbated inter community tensions and increased the incidence of terrorism in this country and now he wants controls!
I do have a message for Tony Blair but it really isn't printable.
The BBC report begins:
'Thousands of protesters in favour of the UK staying in the European Union have marched in Westminster.
The People's March for Europe took a route through central London before a rally in Parliament Square.
Liberal Democrat leader Sir Vince Cable said there were a growing number of people worried about Brexit's impact.
The march comes ahead of MPs voting on Monday on a bill to overturn the act that took the UK into the EU and end the supremacy of EU law in the UK.'
It's that last line that was one of the reasons I voted for Brexit, I want British law NOT EU law supreme in this country.
More Remainiac propaganda all over the institutionally pro EU BBC.
More of this particular report here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-41212505
File under Labour Hypocrisy and BBC protecting The Labour Party from any criticism.
'Given Jeremy Corbyn's proclamations on workers' rights at PMQs, Guido is intrigued by this new job advert from his Unite paymasters. The union are hiring branch organisers to work out of their offices in North London. Though rather than giving their employees contracts, Unite are offering the jobs only on "self-employed"terms. That means no national insurance contributions, pension, sick pay or holiday pay. Isn't this the sort of "bogus self-employment" Corbyn and Unite campaign against?'
More here at Guido Fawkes https://order-order.com/2017/09/06/unite-advertising-self-employed-branch-manager-job/ but not on The Labour Party's propaganda arm, the BBC.
'Last month the BBC reported that in 1947 India became independent and all the violence was our fault because we partitioned it between the Muslim and non-Muslim populations. This month the BBC is reporting that in 1948 Burma became independent and all the violence is our fault because we didn't partition it between the Muslim and non-Muslim populations. To the BBC the only common factor seems to be the British involvement – unless you include the fact that where ever you go the Muslim are always the victims of all this inexplicable violence. '
Copied from a comment at biased BBC
here https://biasedbbc.org/blog/2017/09/04/start-the-week-open-thread-140/#comment-864416
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-41125459
Guess what sort of people in what countries are doing this? Not too tricky was it?
One line from this report http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/08/31/albanian-gangs-sneakingbritain-ferries-spain/ struck me as something that you wouldn't hear on the BBC.
'... one of the migrants interviewed by the newspaper boasted: "I will try until I get through. Nothing will stop me. It is good money in Britain."'
Straight from the horse's mouth but not of any interest to the BBC.
Because men aren't treated equally by society, here are 50 Female Privileges.
Guido Fawkes reports https://order-order.com/2017/09/01/islamist-preacher-who-called-for-destruction-of-britain-coming-to-parliament/ on someone who is coming to Parliament to meet MPs:
'... a notorious Islamist hate preacher who called for Britain to be "destroyed" is due to meet MPs in parliament this month.
Sheikh Ekrima Sabri, a former Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and current Imam of the city's Al-Aqsa Mosque, will visit Britain as part of a delegation organised by pro-Palestinian group EuroPal. Provided he isn't stopped at Heathrow…
Sabri stated in a 2001 radio sermon: "Allah, destroy the U.S., its helpers and its agents. Allah, destroy Britain, its helpers and its agents. Allah, prepare those who will unite the Muslims and march in the steps of Saladin.'
London Mayor Sadiq Khan opposed President Donald Trump visiting Britain, I wonder if he'll oppose Sheikh Sabri's visit too.
I've yet to find any mention on the BBC of this visit but then they may well welcome the visit of such a stout defender of the Palestinian people and aggressor towards Israel. That's just the kind of person that the institutionally anti Israel BBC like.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-41130937
Well a shipwreck 'could' be to blame but so 'could' foul play but don't expect the BBC to consider that option unless they can blame it on Brexit, President Donald Trump or Israel.
Mark Steyn on fine form, but then Hillary Clinton is an easy target.
The Cold Swedish Winter http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04f241s was one of those BBC Radio 4 comedies that I listened to if I caught it but didn't worry if I missed it.
I turned on the radio earlier today and caught part of President Donald Trump's speech about the problems Sweden was having with Muslim immigration, that's odd I thought. It was the start of a new episode in the third series of The Cold Swedish Winter. What was once a vaguely amusing series about an Englishman trying to fit in in Sweden, a series with some gentle humour at the expense of the English and the Swedish seems to have become a pro immigration programme. There's an Afghan refugee, portrayed by an Afghan refugee, who's insulted by an old Swedish man which leads to the English protagonist saying "How could any human being agree with Trump". That seemed as good a moment as any to turn the radio off.
The BBC's obsession with brainwashing the British public would be amusing were it not so bloody dangerous and inimical to the interests of the country.
