US College Students Hate Trump's SOTU Address... But Don't Realize It Hasn't Happened Yet

https://youtu.be/p0ByWdt5iFQ

Words fail me

The Fisa Memo Scandal Summed Up In 2 Minutes

https://youtu.be/PH5ZLmdb5p0

The biggest scandal...

Hamas founder dies after 'accidentally' shooting himself

Not the sharpest tool in the box... Read here http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/241335

Ruthless Truth: The BBC is Racist - A point of view

This article https://john-moloney.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/the-bbc-is-racist.html has been sitting uncommented upon in my browser for a while now. Take a read of the whole article, it's an interesting point of view. Here's an extract:

'So what's going on? Why would it be irredeemably racist to cast a white actor to play Nelson Mandela, but uber anti-racist to have a black man play Admiral Nelson?

It all comes down to the BBC's view of racism.

Most of us tend to assume that not being racist means treating  everybody the same regardless of their race, but to the cultural Marxists at the BBC that sort of thinking is naive at best and a right-wing tactic to keep blacks down at worst.

These days progressive anti-racism actually involves being racist against certain groups. The theory goes that because the white race has institutional power and privilege it's necessary to balance that by favouring 'disadvantaged' races so that the outcomes for each racial indentity can be equalised. Hence being racist against whites counts as anti-racist in BBC circles! '

What think you?

A serious admission re BBC bias that the biased BBC have ignored

Biased BBC alert me to a report in The Sun, you can find the biasedbbc.org report here https://biasedbbc.org/blog/2018/01/28/the-almost-complete-history-of-fake-news/

Here's part of that report:

'Labour frontbencher Clive Lewis admits broadcasting biased news reports while working as BBC journalist

A LABOUR frontbencher has admitted broadcasting biased news reports while working as a BBC journalist.And last night the revelation by shadow treasury minister Clive Lewis plunged the corporation into a damaging storm.Mr Lewis told left-wing Momentum members: "I was able to use bias in my reports by giving less time to one than the other."I reported on both but the angle and words and the language I used — I know the pictures I used — I was able to project my own particular political positions on things in a very subtle way."

Mr Lewis made his damning comments last September at a Momentum rally in Brighton.They were discovered in a secret recording and will be a huge embarrassment to BBC bosses.Tory MP Damian Collins said: "He's boasting about undermining one of our great institutions."

A spokesman for Mr Lewis declined to comment. A BBC spokesperson said: "Our editorial guidelines ensure impartiality."

Remarkably, or not, you won't find the story on the BBC website.

A Labour MP admits that when he was a BBC journalist he used the platform to spread his own propaganda and the BBC doesn't immediately investigate and put it up as frontpage news?  If it had been a Tory MP who had worked for the Mail, a Murdoch paper or Sky I can't imagine the BBC being so coy.'

The BBC should be held to account for their bias and constant bias. However they are incredibly powerful and have the ability to destroy anyone they should choose to so destroy. It would take a very brave politician to take on the BBC and I don't see anyone at or near the top of the Conservative party who meets that description. So how can the BBC's power be curtailed? Anyone have any ideas?

Corbyn Lies About His Support For Iran per Guido Fawkes

Guido Fawkes reports https://order-order.com/2018/01/28/corbyn-lies-about-his-support-for-iran/

'Corbyn told Marr he had accepted money from the Iranian regime "a very long time ago" – it was 2012 – and that he stopped because of the way they treated the Green movement – that was in 2009, he carried on taking their cash and praising their government for years after. 

Marr really should have pinned him down on this, Jezza is straight up telling porkies…'

Now why might a BBC high earner not want to pin the Labour Party leader down? It's a mystery...

Israel criticises Poland over proposed Holocaust law leaving BBC News conflicted

This BBC report http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-42848842 has to walk a tightrope: the BBC is anti the Holocaust, mainly because that's the stick it can use to beat anyone vaguely right of the soggy political centre, the BBC opposes the current Polish government for being against unlimited Muslim immigration into Europe and for opposing Angela Merkel on this matter, but the BBC is also institutionally deeply anti Israel.

Thus this report has to tread very carefully indeed. Read it and you'll see how.

One other aspect intrigued me, the BBC say that they are against Holocaust denial and quote their hated 'Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu'  as having  'criticised a proposed bill that would make it illegal to describe Nazi death camps as Polish."I strongly oppose it. One cannot change history and the Holocaust cannot be denied," he said in a statement.'

Oddly the BBC have never (so far as I recall) described the Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas as a Holocaust denier despite that being his educational background and present.

It must be hard working for the BBC and keeping all of those narratives running when the facts move these narratives into opposition to each other. I'd feel sorry for the BBC were they not such biased scum.

Czech election: Zeman beats Drahos to win second term and BBC News show their prejudices

This BBC report http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42832720 on the recent Czech Presidential Election is notable for letting you know exactly where the BBC stand. The last three paragraphs of analysis are especially transparent, here's one of those:

'The presidential election has reflected divisions between low-income voters with lower education and those living in rural areas, who tend to vote for Mr Zeman, and wealthier and well-educated residents of bigger cities, who are likely to prefer Mr Drahos, correspondents say.'

In other words, just as in the Brexit vote (also won with 52% of the vote) and the US Presidential Election, those with lower levels of education voted the wrong way (for the BBC, establishment and our betters).

John McDonnell when he worked with Ken Livingstone until a bitter fall-out over the now shadow chancellor's spending policies

John 'kneecaping' McDonnell did once hold economic and politics power. It was back in the 1980s at the GLC.

'Livingstone only averted financial catastrophe by sacking McDonnell in 1985. The former London Mayor revealed in his 1988 autobiography that McDonnell had 'exaggerated' spending figures to support his case that the GLC had to ignore the rates cap.'

Sounds perfect for the role of Labour Chancellor of the Exchequer. Certainly the BBC won't let the British public anywhere near learning about the past of John 'kneecaping' McDonnell.

That paragraph from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3234679/So-far-Left-Red-Ken-sacked-ANDREW-PIERCE-explains-John-McDonnell-Livingstone-political-soulmates-bitter-fall-new-shadow-chancellor-s-spending-policies.html

How BBC kept Brexiteers off the air for a decade per Daily Mail

The Mail reports http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5314581/How-BBC-kept-Brexiteers-air-decade.html on a Civitas study that is absolutely unsurprising:

'Pro-Brexit voices are being drowned out on the BBC's news programming, an analysis has claimed.

Only a very small proportion of speakers on Radio 4's Today programme are long-term supporters of leaving the EU, the Civitas think-tank said in a report.

The authors claimed the BBC has been unable to supply an example of a single programme since the June 2016 referendum which has examined the opportunities of Brexit.

Last night the BBC described the analysis as flawed and insisted it was 'covering the process towards Brexit in a responsible and impartial way'.

The Civitas report, entitled The Brussels Broadcasting Corporation?, said that for the past 20 years the BBC has consistently viewed the issue of withdrawing from the EU through the prism of splits in the Conservative Party.'

That the BBC is institutionally pro the EU is obvious, that the BBC push views that are in accordance with theirs is clear. That the BBC is a clear and present danger to the interests of the UK is also clear and obvious.

The question is what can be done to stop the BBC propaganda machine before the UK is beyond help.

Controversy over Jeremy Corbyn´s Holocaust memorial message that doesn't mention the Jews

Campaigners against anti-Semitism have called on Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn to apologise after he wrote a message for Holocaust Memorial Day which did not mention the Jews.

Mr Corbyn said that "the millions who died" should never be forgotten.The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism said his failure to specifically mention the Jewish people was "appalling", while the Jewish Leadership Council said it displayed "a complete lack of sensitivity".

Maybe Jeremy Corbyn just didn't want to upset his genocidal, Jew hating "friends" in Hamas and Hezbollah?

More on the Press Association, MSN and the Mail here http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-5316547/Controversy-Corbyn-s-Holocaust-memorial-message.html but obviously not on the institutionally anti Israel BBC.

UK economic growth exceeds forecasts, ONS says per BBC News through gritted teeth

The expanded BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42831655 on the latest GDP figures is not one filled with joy. The gritted teeth are evident especially in the very last sentence:

'Annual growth of 1.8% may be less than we would like, but so far there is little sign of the Brexit-induced disaster that some predicted.'

Some people like the BBC? Keep gritting those teeth.

The BBC try to minimise reporting of good business news

The BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business on the latest GDP figures thus:

'UK posts solid quarterly growth

Economic growth is a better than expected 0.5% for the last three months of 2017, official figures say.'

Solid is an interesting word to use. Are the BBC trying to get the attack line from their friends in the Labour Party and the EU?

Trump, the FBI and the 'secret memo' intriguing Washington - BBC News finally get around to reporting - #ReleaseTheMemo

Today the BBC finally get around to reporting on THE MEMO http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42783147

It's an odd piece as they can't explain why they've ignored it for so long or dismiss it out of hand.

'It's the memo that everyone is talking about, but no-one can (really) talk about.

Depending on whom you ask, it will either explode the entire basis for the Trump-Russia investigation or is an inflammatory collection of rumours and conjecture.

Donald Trump Jr has tweeted about it. More than 200 members of Congress have seen it. A social media hashtag - #releasethememo - has been pushed by interested parties including, it appears, a sizable number of pro-Russian Twitter bots.'

So everyone's talking about it but we've waited several weeks before mentioning it. Regardless, look the Russians, the Russians.

The BBC really are a very odd news organisation.

When is a loan not a loan?

When is a loan not a loan?

The answer, when it's a loan made to Jeremy Corbyn.

Name of donor: Momentum Campaign (Services) Ltd
Address of donor: Walkden House, 10 Melton Street, London NW1 2EJ
Amount of donation or nature and value if donation in kind: interest free, unsecured loan of £50,000 towards my campaign for leadership of the Labour Party. This loan is for an indefinite period.

My definition of a loan would be an amount of money borrowed from a bank (or elsewhere), that has to be repaid, usually with an extra amount or money paid as a charge (interest) for borrowing.

This 'loan' to Jeremy Corbyn however is interest free and for an indefinite period, isn't that a donation?

I wonder if the BBC would be interested in pursuing this matter.  I'd say that they would be about as likely to investigate this as they were about the Labour Party's Co-op bank overdraft facility. Remember that for the BBC nothing must be allowed to get in the way of a Labour Party win at the next general election.


Donor record from UK Parliament publications

The New Owners of the Golders Green Hippodrome according to the Campaign4Truth

This article https://campaign4truthblog.wordpress.com/2018/01/02/golders-green-hippodrome/ is a must read, here's an extract:

'The Shirazis are extremists by any standard and collaborators with designated groups such as Hezbollah as well as with the Khomeini regime.

Antisemitism and radicalisation

There is evidence that the Shirazis are radicalising the Shia in Britain entrenching both traditional and modern hatred of Jews promoting conspiracy theories and antisemitic tropes nurturing the perception of non-Muslims as 'impure' advocating extreme self-flagellation rituals including bloodletting
stoking distrust and hatred of Britain'

These are, allegedly, the sort of people who will be occupying the old Hippodrome on the outskirts of the largest Jewish area in London. Does anyone else see the potential problem?

'World's richest 1% get 82% of the wealth', says Oxfam per BBC News

The BBC report http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42745853 on this terrible poverty gap. The Labour Party / BBC alliance will push this discrepancy as am example of how capitalism has failed and why Jeremy Corbyn should become Prime Minister and lead the UK to a socialist nirvana. Leaving aside that Socialist nirvanas tend to become killing zones for those who the socialists decide are undesirable, you might be interested to know that:

'According to the Global Rich List, a website that brings awareness to worldwide income disparities, an income of $32,400 a year will allow you to make the cut.'

Jeremy Corbyn and any BBC journalist virtue signalling about this matter earns a lot more than the equivalent of $32,400 per year. But they'll spin the story as being anti the rich.

"Worse than Watergate" - but nothing on the BBC

https://youtu.be/Q_NvcqivfSg

Why might the BBC be ignoring this massive story? I think we all know why.

Is it time to reign in the BBC? Per David Sedgwick

This is a must read article http://www.davidsedgwick.co.uk/blog/is-it-time-to-reign-in-the-bbc with much insight into the BBC's anti President Donald Trump and anti Brexit stances.

Here's a brief extract, but do read the whole piece:

'Meanwhile under the Trump stewardship the US economy continues its remarkable ascent – a US stock market breaking all records; according to the Wall Street Journal the economy operating at near full capacity for the first time in generations; record levels of job creation; lowest levels of unemployment in the African-American community - stories virtually ignored by the BBC or at best relegated to the obscurity of its business pages where it knows few, if any, of the general populace will encounter this economic miracle.

For make no mistake, the BBC is determined to do all it can to undermine the Trump presidency in just the same way it is attempting to sabotage the Brexit vote. While a toothless political class looks limply on, the national broadcaster grows ever more audacious, emboldened by lack of regulation and timorous politicians the BBC is an organisation now out of control.'

The BBC is a clear and present danger to the British people but who can solve the problem that is the BBC?

Why Socialism Doesn't Work in 55 Secondw

https://youtu.be/zaqGnIH5z4g

You can laugh along with President Ronald Reagan but also see your future under Prime Minister/President for Life Jeremy Corbyn.